Senator Schumer's Silly Idea About Airline Seat Sizes

The senator is apparently willing to trade the low fares that have made flying more accessible for higher fares and more comfort for people who can afford to pay for it.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks during a news conference on opioid and heroin abuse, Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016 , on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks during a news conference on opioid and heroin abuse, Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016 , on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

New York Senator Charles Schumer thinks it's the government's job to regulate airline seat size, because somehow passenger comfort is now a pressing issue for Congress. Mr. Schumer is attaching an amendment to the FAA Reauthorization Bill to compel the FAA to set minimum seat size standards. It's easy press to beat up the airlines -- and I'm hardly an advocate for them -- but the Senator's idea is just plain silly. It's also an idea that will lead to higher fares. I'm sure his constituents will appreciate that.

The senator is apparently willing to trade the low fares that have made flying more accessible for higher fares and more comfort for people who can afford to pay for it. In other words, throw Grandma under the bus (or on the bus) since she may not be able to afford to visit the grandkids this year.

Further, in asking that the FAA regulate seat size, Mr. Schumer mis-understands the role of the regulator. It's the FAA's job to ensure safety, not comfort.

There's no question that the budget airlines have shrunk seats so they can squeeze in more people. Seat pitch -- the distance between a spot on an airline seat and the same spot on the seat in front of it -- has shrunk 4 inches in forty years. But airline fares have also shrunk -- by about half.

These same airlines offer larger seats (or more legroom) for passengers willing to pay for it, which the Senator also doesn't like. It's just plain unfair that a person gets charged for extra inches that were once standard.", he says. But why is that unfair? In every industry, better service and better products cost more. Even Bernie Sanders (I don't think) talks about "airline equality" as a constitutional right.

The airline industry group, Airlines for America, rightly opposes the idea. The group notes that the FAA should regulate seat size for safety, but should not substitute its judgments for market forces on what people are willing to pay.

Mr. Schumer is known for his anti-aviation rhetoric (he has fought the small businesses operating helicopters and seaplanes serving Manhattan, called for restricting aviation over the Hudson River, gone after airline websites, ramped up regulations on drones, and on and on). And he's perfected the Sunday morning news conference, where he denounces this or that in order to get a quick soundbite on the evening news.

If the seat size is a safety issue, by all means the FAA needs to fix it. But if not, then it's your job (consumers) to make the airlines pay -- by flying on better, more comfortable carriers. They're all out there. So before you put your butt in a specific airline seat, let your fingers do the walking and find a better one.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot