03/21/2011 05:05 pm ET Updated May 25, 2011

Obama Policies Not Matching Reality. Time to Pull His Nobel Prize and Elect a Non-Interventionist

Obama's attack in Libya is as ill advised and mismanaged as his Afghanistan surge or his domestic stimulus-spending circus. Without the approval of the US Congress, President Obama sent 110 Tomahawk Missiles into Libya. President Obama's claimed political goals were to force Gaddafi out of power. His words mean little, because almost everyone in the military world knows we cannot overthrow a government without troops on the ground.

In response to Obama, this Sunday on Meet the Press, Admiral Mike Mullen said, "We're protecting civilians, and letting Libyans handle their own politics. This is a short mission." In other words, the hawkish Democrats in Washington are at odds with the military commanders.

Hawkish leftovers from the Bush era, like George Will and Rep. Jane Harmon, claimed in summation, "Bombing Libya is a dumb decision." Yet, Obama continues to march on with one decision after another that is destroying the American republic.

What does Libya mean in the endgame? Stephen Walt asks "If we do go into Libya, and it ends up being harder than we think, and then something serious happens somewhere else (North Korea, the South China Sea, Sudan, the Horn of Africa, Mexico, etc.), what do we do then?"

No one has the answer for this very relevant question.

The only solution rests in our Constitution. It is time to impeach Obama. The US legislature and judiciary branch should conduct hearings on the strikes in Libya, and his secret renditions in Yemen and Pakistan and bring back a constitutional convention.

The end game occurs when Americans can stop our madness and listen to James Madison's powerful words, "No nation can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare".