Is the Cost of Making a Bowl Game Worth It?

There has been an exponential explosion in college football bowl games -- 35 in all will be played, leading up to Monday's BCS Championship at the Orange Bowl. But is more, less?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
MIAMI GARDENS, FL - JANUARY 05: The National Championship trophy sits on display during Media Day ahead of the Discover BCS National Championship at Sun Life Stadium on January 5, 2013 in Miami Gardens, Florida. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)
MIAMI GARDENS, FL - JANUARY 05: The National Championship trophy sits on display during Media Day ahead of the Discover BCS National Championship at Sun Life Stadium on January 5, 2013 in Miami Gardens, Florida. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

In the beginning, every college football team, its alums and its fans had no greater aspirations than to end their season in the glory of participating in and winning a legendary post-season bowl game. Pacific Coast and Midwest players and their fans grew up yearning for the ultimate ratification of winning "The granddaddy of them all" -- The Rose Bowl. For players in the South, the Sugar Bowl or the Orange Bowl was the goal. In the Southwest, the Cotton Bowl conferred legitimacy. The country sat transfixed on New Year's Day following this cornucopia of football excellence. There has been an exponential explosion in college football bowl games -- 35 in all will be played, leading up to Monday's BCS Championship at the Orange Bowl. But is more, less? Questions have been raised as to whether this plethora of games is diluting quality matchups, attracting sufficient attendance, and financially benefiting the schools involved.

Participation in a Bowl Game has always been seen as a reward for outstanding performance by a team during the regular season. Ten of the teams competing this year had 6-6 .500 regular seasons. Georgia Tech had a losing season at 6-7 (though they did beat SC in the Bowl game). Being .500 has always been regarded as a disappointing, mediocre season -- yet six games qualify a team for a postseason bowl game. This leads to matchups with teams that were often regarded as having failing seasons. At many institutions, a 6-6 season would be a firing offense. So what is being rewarded except the desire of Bowls and television networks to make money?

The first way that schools experience financial difficulties with Bowls is in having to live up to ticket guarantees. The Sugar Bowl charged LSU a full $350 a ticket for supposedly
"complimentary tickets" in last year's BCS Bowl games. LSU had to pay for players to get tickets as well as band members and as a result owed the Sugar Bowl $562,000. This year's Orange Bowl required Northern Illinois and Florida State to purchase 17,500 tickets apiece at prices ranging from $75 to $225. That is 2,000 more than Northern Illinois averaged for home games last year. They distributed 15,000 seats, but only sold 3,000 and had to donate the remainder. Connecticut lost $1.8 million in tickets at the 2011 Fiesta Bowl.

Travel and lodging expenses are also exorbitant. At the Fiesta Bowl in Arizona in 2011, Oregon and the Pac 12 had to reserve 580 hotel rooms, some for six nights, many of which cost $319 a night. LSU spent $754,118 on meals and lodging at the Sugar Bowl last year. The Bowl's benefit mightily from the television rights and other various revenue. The Sugar Bowl Inc. filed federal tax returns that show it ended its' fiscal year 2011 with $34.2 million dollars in assets. The last year in which it hosted both the traditional Sugar Bowl and the BCS title game it did $34.1 in revenue and turned an $11.6 million dollar profit. And that games enjoys a 501 (c)(3) non-profit status, that was all tax-free.

How the participating schools fare is largely a function of the way their conferences split the proceeds and expenses. Curtis Eichelberger wrote in Bloomberg in 2010 that 13 public schools lost money on their participation. Northern Illinois was saved this year by the MAC Conference agreement to pay $4 million in travel expenses.

There are many other tangible benefits of school bowl participation. Every school that participates reports that the national showcase and buildup is very helpful with recruiting efforts for their program. High school players can attend the game itself if the expenses are low enough. There is a NBER paper by Michael Anderson that found that a winning football program enhances the number of overall applications a university receives, in-state enrollment, SAT scores and raises a school's overall academic performance. Schools participating in Bowl Games report greatly increased alumni giving to the football program and the athletic department. In most schools football revenue supports the less generating revenue sports, providing opportunities for many athletes. This paper also illustrates that alumni giving to non-athletic aspects of the universities increases. The experience can greatly enhance the prestige of the university. College football consistently polls as the nation's second most popular team sport.

This year we were treated to legendary institutions such as the "Famous Idaho Potato Bowl," "Little Caesar's Pizza Bowl," "TaxSlayer.com Bowl," "GoDaddy.com Bowl," and the "Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl." The cow left the barn on the creation of this new college football tableau some years ago and shows no sign of abating.

But let the colleges' beware that the Golden Goose may have hidden wings of financial lead.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot