Rihanna Is 'Unapologetic' in 'Nobody's Business'

This is a far cry from the S&M posturing of Madonna in her heyday. Everybody knew The Big M was just looking for new ways to shock. Rihanna has also shocked. But there is a disturbing feeling she's not posing or kidding.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

"WELL, I'D rather my man would hit me/Than for him to jump up and quit me, ain't nobody's business if I do."

So sang Billie Holiday, back when it was considered "okay" to knock a woman around, and for the woman to accept it. (Why, just the other evening, I found myself a bit shocked hearing Clark Gable describe Claudette Colbert in 1934's It Happened One Night as a woman who deserved to be "socked daily whether she needed it or not.")

But that was then. Romantic comedies don't treat beating women as funny anymore. And women don't sing about how they'd rather be hit than abandoned.

That is, unless you are Rihanna. The singer's new album is titled Unapologetic. The most controversial song on it is a duet with her ex, Chris Brown, titled "Nobody's Business." (Brown plead guilty to battering Rihanna three years ago. Who could forget the photos of her bruised and swollen face?)

But almost immediately, it seemed that Rihanna wasn't as upset about the incident as was the media. It appeared she took to heart the cries from women's groups that if she "forgave" Chris Brown it would send a bad message to her young fans. She was only 21 at the time. Or was it that she took to heart advice from her PR people?

In any case, Brown has never really been out of her life. She was always running into him. She has wept over the beating (with Oprah, naturally) but the suggestion lingered that as traumatized as she had been, she wasn't ready to cast him off. Indeed, that she might even have encouraged or enjoyed or felt she deserved this kind of "attention." She has given out signals that she doesn't mind "danger" in relationships.

This is a far cry from the S&M posturing of Madonna in her heyday. Everybody knew The Big M was just looking for new ways to shock. Rihanna has also shocked. But there is a disturbing feeling she's not posing or kidding.

Rihanna is the token hot woman on one of the current GQ "Men of the Year" covers. (Channing Tatum is another cover, named as "Movie Star of the Year.") She is half-naked, of course.

Whatever. As Billie Holiday exuberantly sang, and now Rihanna boldly declares -- it's "nobody's business." I suppose that's true. But we can't help worrying.

And this CD "reconciliation" whether personal or merely professional, doesn't send a good message to young women or young men. Don't ever go back to men who hit you. And don't ever hit a woman. Period.

  • EVEN ROGER Moore says that Daniel Craig is the "best Bond ever!" Roger had the role of 007 from 1973-85. He was the most laid-back of all the Bonds, probably the least like Ian Fleming's character. But he was charm personified, much more convincing sexing up various Bond girls than in the killing or fighting. Roger always seemed quite amused that he was James Bond.
Daniel Craig's
Skyfall
is still doing great at the box office, though it had to take second place to the latest
Twilight
tale. I don't get the
Twilight
movies or the "charm" of the two famous stars -- Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart -- but maybe I should ask Ann and Mitt Romney? Supposedly the couple caught the movie a few days ago. Well, the
Twilight
films are supposed to be chock full of Mormon agenda, dressed up as twinkly vampires. So the Romneys are keeping the faith -- with fangs.
  • NEVER LET it be said that director Oliver Stone is ever apologetic. He is like Rihanna, without the tattoos. Stone is a confirmed conspiracy theorist and revisionist historian. Stone's latest endeavors are a book, Untold History of the United States and a concurrent TV series on Showtime. Both the book and the series are fascinating, but don't expect Stone to be slotted on FOX to promote it. The JFK director doesn't wallow in jingoistic chat. I did catch him with Piers Morgan on CNN. Oliver did most of the talking.

Stone's history lessons might make some people uncomfortable. His take on World War II is a three-sided perspective -- America, Britain and what was once Soviet Russia; how each great power approached or did not approach world conflict...who was pushed into war... who really "won" it... who helped the Jews. (I won't give you all the answers, but as to the Jews -- very few really helped them. And that explains a lot, including current mid-east matters.)

Stone warns of the "empire-building" of the U.S. and our massive military spending, citing the example of ancient Rome and the eventual power of the praetorian guards, who were the true leaders, as Rome declined. They chose and disposed of Emperors at will -- military power and extremism at its most destructive. I don't agree with Oliver that we shouldn't have dropped the atom bomb. But disagreement makes the world go around. (Dropping it created mutual deterrence for years.)

And when Piers asked about the David Patreaus scandal (Morgan seems simply obsessed with it), Oliver Stone said, "The American media has come up with this narrative that he's the American hero who [was] betrayed by the woman. But it's not true. I see no evidence of his heroism."

Stone believes the media "needs" heroes and Patreus was mythologized beyond all reality, more so now, in his disgrace.

Oh, and before I start getting hate mail. These are Oliver Stone's opinions. Just as Rihanna writes her own songs and lives her own life. I'm just here to report.

I don't know Rihanna. But I do know Oliver. And I like him. If you want to hate me for that, go right ahead.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot