06/05/2012 05:23 pm ET Updated Aug 05, 2012

Sister Act

Growing up Jewish in the 1960s, my understanding of nuns was shaped by Sally Field on television and Audrey Hepburn at the movies. Sister Betrille and Sister Luke were passionate, courageous and authority defying, as well as loving, caring and dedicated to the poor.

I didn't actually know any Sisters personally until I began my seminary studies, when I had the privilege of taking a class with Sister Mary Boys, spending time at the Peace Council with Sister Joan Chittister, and being guided in an independent study by Sister Margaret Farley. These Catholic theologians inspired me with their brilliance, their deep understanding of ethics, and their unending compassion for their students and the world.

This weekend, Margaret Farley was publicly condemned by the Vatican for her 2006 book, "Just Love: A Framework for Christian Ethics." They said it could cause "grave harm" to the faithful, in presenting a sexual ethic based in justice. My denomination, the Unitarian Universalist Association, actually requires our candidates for ministry to read this book for grounding in sexual ethics. Ironically, the Vatican's action means that Farley's book now has an audience much larger than ever before: it's gone from being a somewhat obscure read for seminary students to being ranked No. 19 on Amazon in a few days.

The statement against Farley follows the Vatican's public crack down on the Leadership Conference on Women Religious, an organization that, according to their website, includes 80 percent of American nuns and whose mission is to "further the mission of the Gospel in today's world." The Vatican has called for a full scale overhaul of the LCRW, because they have not done enough to speak out against abortion and same sex marriage, an accusation that could be leveled at the Gospels as well since neither issue is ever mentioned in them. The Board of the LCRW met late last week and announced that they will go to Rome on June 12 to speak directly to the Vatican officials, calling the charges "unsubstantiated accusations and the result of a flawed practice that lacked transparency."

This attack on American nuns is nothing short of incongruous by the all-male, celibate Catholic hierarchy. On the one hand, they are censuring Farley because of her public stance on sexuality; on the other hand, they are trying to take over the LCRW because of their lack of a public stance on sexuality. This should come as no surprise after the U.S. Catholic Bishops declared earlier this spring that removing contraception from health care reform would be their number one public policy priority. There seems to be no end to the Catholic hierarchy wanting to address sexuality issues.

Except perhaps among their own ranks. Ironically, just as the news of Farley's censure was being reported, so was a news story that the Milwaukee Archbishop had paid sex abusing priests to leave the priesthood, rather than holding them accountable for their actions. The U.S. Catholic Church has spent millions of dollars settling cases of priest sexual misconduct with children and adolescents. No other religious denomination has been tainted by such widespread abuse or cover up of cases.

I am hopeful that the Sisters going to Rome will let the Vatican know that it is way past time for the male hierarchy to cease seeking to control Roman Catholic women, either lay or religious. They are speaking truth to power and standing for the full inclusion of women in religious life.

The LCRW posted a prayer on their website that ends with these words:

May we continue to faithfully live the

questions of our time and witness to

the people of God that we are women

at home with mystery and filled with

fierce hope for our shared future.

Sisters, our prayers are with you.