Midway through listening to Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers' Republican response to the State of the Union address last week, a colleague of mine e-mailed, "they got & used the economic narrative talking points to write this." My friend was referring to the progressive economic narrative (PEN), developed to provide progressives with a powerful, clear story about the economy and the role of people, government, and business.
In fact, there are powerful similarities in the story of the American Dream that both Obama and Republicans express, particularly as Republicans increasingly see that they must speak to Americans who are being pushed out of the middle class and struggling to stay out of poverty. That convergence is not by itself bad. It is an opportunity to draw attention to the huge chasm that exists between the two narratives, a Republican story based solely on the individual and a Democratic one that sees the individual in relation to collective action.
Perhaps this is the line by McMorris Rodgers that triggered my colleague's ire: "Last month, more Americans stopped looking for a job than found one. Too many people are falling further and further behind." After all, one line from PEN is "Too many Americans can't find a job and too many jobs pay wages that don't support a family."
It is not a surprise that Republicans have been embracing part of the progressive story -- that the middle class is getting crushed -- because that is how most Americans are feeling, and pollsters for both parties are emphasizing that politicians must speak to where people are now to have any credibility.
The similarities go beyond just relating to economic insecurity. Both Obama and McMorris Rodgers have the same vision of the American Dream, an opportunity society in which people are, as McMorris Rodgers said, "not defined by our limits, but by our potential." Or, as the president put it, "our success should depend on... the strength of our work ethic and the scope of our dreams."
The heroes in both stories are hardworking Americans. Obama: "the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility you get ahead." McMorris Rodgers: "They taught me to work hard, help others, and always, always, dream for more."
A job is how our hero achieves his or her dream. McMorris Rodgers says, "a job is so much more than a paycheck -- it gives us purpose, dignity..." The president asks that "we do more to make sure our economy honors the dignity of work..."
The underlying value in both stories is opportunity. McMorris Rodgers anticipates that Obama will focus his speech on inequality and tries to cut him off at the rhetorical pass: "The president talks a lot about income inequality. But the real gap we face today is one of opportunity inequality."
But Obama was not, in fact, giving a speech about inequality. He too was focused on opportunity, as Benjamin Landy bemoaned. "Instead of inequality, the president talked about 'opportunity,' a poll-tested alternative Obama deployed 14 times during the 65 minute speech. 'Inequality' was mentioned three times."
Saying that "opportunity for all" is "what unites the people of this nation," Obama declared, "Opportunity is who we are. And the defining project of our generation is to restore that promise."
It is on the question of how we achieve the quest for opportunity for all that the president and McMorris Rodgers profoundly differ, where opposite visions of how we achieve the American Dream are projected. And remember that McMorris Rodgers' speech is entirely a representation of Republican messaging
According to McMorris Rodgers, you get there by yourself, with the help of your family. Her talk, as those of you who had the patience to listen through it will remember, was all about herself and her family: the work and savings ethics taught by her parents in a rural small town in Eastern Washington, her raising of her son born with Down syndrome.
And that, in her political narrative, is how we address the challenge facing the country, "one manufacturing job, nursing degree, and small business at a time." Her talk barely bothers with policy directives, but those few that appear are based on the individual.
The most robust policy paragraph in her talk is, "We have plans to improve our education and training systems so you have the choice to determine where your kids go to school...so college is affordable...and skills training is modernized." When it comes to health care, "Republicans believe health care choices should be yours, not government. [emphasis added]"
As far as how to get Americans those jobs, Republicans have "plans that focus on jobs first, without more spending, government bailouts, and red tape.... We have solutions to help you take home more of your pay -- through lower taxes, cheaper energy costs, and affordable health care."
The villain is unmistakable in her story: "Government that decides for you."
But while the president's heroes are individual hard-working Americans, he makes it clear that we build the pathway to opportunity for all through collective action. The word "community" appears 13 times in Obama's speech; not once in McMorris Rodgers. The president uses "us" referring to the nation, 17 times; McMorris Rodgers, four times.
The substance of Obama's policy solutions are replete with concerted actions, and the entire premise that we do something together, through our government, is the exact opposite of the Republican story of getting the government out of the way.
The stories he tells unite the individual and the community. For example, a student who, "thanks to the support of great teachers and an innovative tutoring program, he led a march of his classmates -- through a crowd of cheering parents and neighbors -- from their high school to the post office, where they mailed off their college applications."
Summing it all up -- the heroes, the quest, the role of individual and the community, Obama says, "It's the spirit of citizenship, the recognition that through hard work and responsibility, we can pursue our individual dreams, but still come together as one American family to make sure the next generation can pursue its dreams as well."
The narratives in President Obama and McMorris Rodgers' responses are more than just a minor part of the evening's political theater. They speak to the fundamental ideological divide in the nation and frame the political choices before the country now and over the coming decade. In the starkest terms, it is a contrast between "you are on your own" and "we are all in this together." We want to tell our story in those terms, for when we do, progressives absolutely win that debate.
Cross-posted from Next New Deal