Paid Newspaper Sites To Become Obsolete

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Paid Newspaper Sites To Become Obsolete stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09-19-07 10:33 AM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
2007-09-19-online_news.jpg

Editor & Publisher:

Now that The New York Times has thrown in the towel on TimesSelect, its two-year-old premium service limiting online columns to paid subscribers, is paid online newspapering dead?

Perhaps, but not everywhere. The Wall Street Journal, the only major daily requiring an online subscription, says things are doing quite well, thank you, in the paid Web world. However, new owner Rupert Murdoch has been making noises about ending the pay plan.

"So far, we are very successful," Daniel Bernard, the Journal's online general manager, told E&P. "We have a lot of great content that is open to the public, but we maintain our core content that is premium."

Read the whole story: Editor & Publisher

Filed by Michelle Kung  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
12
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- eaglecapri I'm a Fan of eaglecapri 5 fans permalink

I love the New York Times, but I absolutely hate Times Select. There is nothing worse than clicking on a story and you're re-directed to a page asking for money to read the damn thing! Good riddance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 09/20/2007

I hope that the Globe and Mail in Toronto gets the message and follows suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 09/19/2007
- Ginzaman I'm a Fan of Ginzaman 12 fans permalink

No way I'd pay for online stuff. If you know where to look you shouldn't have to do it. I tried subscribing for the printed NYT. NEVER AGAIN.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 09/19/2007
photo

Web news is a good extension of, but will never entirely replace the 'dead tree' edition, and I have no qualms with paying to support publication costs. What interests me is WHO owns the newspapers etc. Remember Randolph Hearst? It's all about the editorial control, bay-bee...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 09/19/2007
- nunzia I'm a Fan of nunzia 31 fans permalink

Why would anyone pay to read the NYT (Judith Miller, for instance) or the WP (drumbeats for the war) online?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 09/19/2007
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 68 fans permalink
photo

Why? Dowd, Rich, Herbert, Krugman...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 09/19/2007
- Bulbul I'm a Fan of Bulbul 45 fans permalink
photo

I subscribed it for one year just to read Dowd and Rich. Then found out Dowd disappears from op. ed. for long period of time. Not worth 50 bucks and definitely was not going to renew this year. Days of the bloggers Huffo gets you the instant news lot faster than NY times. Not giving a cent to WCJ, if it comes free, we shall see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 AM on 09/20/2007

I signed up for Times Select from day one, and liked it's content. However I had a terrible time with system crashes that would require reboots. Localnet.com was my provider and they tried different schemes that never really worked. I just wondered if anyone else had these problems. Oh yes NYT never ever got back to me with any kind of assistance. Anyone else?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 09/19/2007
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 96 fans permalink

If Rupert Murdoch makes the Wall Street Journal online free, I will still not read it.

We know what Murdoch does to journalism. No point in witnessing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 09/19/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect