Ringside At The Reality Show: New Kurtz Book Goes Behind The Scenes In The Anchor Wars

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar   |   October 8, 2007 08:42 AM


stumbleupon :Ringside At The <em>Reality Show</em>: New Kurtz Book Goes Behind The Scenes In The Anchor Wars   digg: Ringside At The <em>Reality Show</em>: New Kurtz Book Goes Behind The Scenes In The Anchor Wars   reddit: Ringside At The <em>Reality Show</em>: New Kurtz Book Goes Behind The Scenes In The Anchor Wars   del.icio.us: Ringside At The <em>Reality Show</em>: New Kurtz Book Goes Behind The Scenes In The Anchor Wars

2007-10-05-RealityShow.JPGThere's been barely a whisper leading up to Howard Kurtz's new book, released tomorrow — it's been embargoed, hushed, and kept under wraps for months, it's title and cover even kept off Amazon. The book is called Reality Show: Inside The Last Great Television News War, and it chronicles the saga of the latest — and possibly last — generation of Big Three Anchors: Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson, and Katie Couric. Amazingly, Kurtz and his publishers were able to keep the details of the 480-page book from leaking — impressive considering the number of people he obviously spoke with across all three networks — and today is the first day that details from the book have been made available. (Well, except for the Barnes & Noble in Deerfield, IL, where a certain shopper tells us it was proudly displayed on the new Non-Fiction table. Oops.) Kurtz's own Washington Post today runs a lengthy excerpt, the Drudge Report has a few scoops...and, rounding out this particular Big Three, ETP is pleased to offer our own ¡EXCLUSIVE! intel and excerpts from the book.

Despite the careful seeding of info, the book itself still remains under wraps, but from the amount we've surveyed (about 7,500 words) it looks to be a thoroughly engrossing, engaging and more than occasionally juicy read. Kurtz declined to name who spoke with him, but did say that no interview he sought was declined. All signs point to a cast of characters straight out of TVNewser's wildest fantasy, in addition to the Big Three: Diane Sawyer, Elizabeth Vargas, David Westin, Bob Schieffer, Lara Logan, Steve Capus, Jeff Zucker, Andrea Mitchell, David Gregory, Ann Curry, Bob Woodruff, Les Moonves, Rick Kaplan, Sean McManus, Dan Rather, Mary Mapes, Tom Brokaw, Tim Russert, Campbell Brown, John Reiss, Alexandra Wallace, Meredith Vieira and Matt Lauer. This is a non-exhaustive list.

Before getting into some excerpts, some revelations:

  • Before the ABC anchor chair was assigned, Diane Sawyer and Charlie Gibson were in constant contact about it, offering each other the position and volunteering to back off. It was decided that Charlie would take it — and then Sawyer had the idea to do the newscast together, like the partners they'd been for eight years. Sawyer was filled with enthusiasm. Gibson wasn't into it.
  • However effective Couric was in the morning, her partner Matt Lauer privately had doubts about how she would do in the 6:30 timeslot — and said so, telling a friend that he didn't think the evening newscast played to Couric's strengths. Oops. Now that's in a book.
  • NBC News scooped CBS on their own exclusive interview with Bob Woodward for the release of State of Denial. The book was embargoed, but CBS had issued a press release crowing about its revelations about White House obfuscations on Iraq. Williams was annoyed that NBC was empty-handed, and wanted the story. The Nightly team scratched their heads about how to do it...and then CBS posted clips from the interview on its website. Using that footage, available quotes and some confirmatory reporting, NBC led with the story, scooping CBS, which didn't even mention it — and thereby got the exclusive on the exclusive.
  • Remember that mystery exec at NBC that Katie Couric claimed she felt "pressure" from to back off of the administration on Iraq? It was Bob Wright.
  • My, what a lovely handbasket: BriWi on how the White House played the press after 9/11: "He had to admire, in a clinical sort of way, the political management of the press during what came to be known as the war on terror. It was truly remarkable."
  • My, what a lovely handbasket, Part II: Charlie Gibson essentially had his job because Bob Woodruff had been blown up in Iraq, but still, he wanted to go. He hadn't been in three years; Brian Williams had just come back from his third trip. He mentioned it to ABC News boss David Westin. "Not on my life are you going," Westin said. "Not with my track record." (We're sure that one gave great comfort to Martha Raddatz.)
  • Guess he wasn't that distracted by hurricanes: In a shocking contradiction to the other tome published on the subject — his lawsuit pleading — Kurtz reports that Dan Rather apparently pushed for the Memogate story to air, threatening to leak proprietary docs to the New York Times if the piece was spiked. If we were Josh Howard we would be completely out of patience.
  • Remember when NBC shocked the news establishment by actually calling the Iraq civil war a civil war? The same guy from whom Couric said she felt "pressure" started the dominoes falling with an email asking if it was time to use the term — in spite of the White House. Then the guy who greenlit "Joey" chimed in, and the rest is history.

The Real Reason Diane Sawyer Turned Down The Anchor Chair: Katie

It had been clear for some time that Couric was headed to CBS to take over Dan Rather's old job. If Sawyer were to take the plunge as the second woman to be the solo anchor of a nightly newscast, she realized, all the press coverage would be about dueling divas. Never mind that they knew each other only slightly. It would be like that New York magazine cover every day, a relentless focus on what they were wearing and similar trivia. It would be like every movie that featured two women battling it out. Women made great copy, that was the way the popular culture worked... She did not want her evening news tenure to be viewed through that prism. If she went to Darfur, the stories would be all about how she was trying to demonstrate that she was more interested in the plight of refugees than Couric was. She would be cast in a catfight. Couric would be the featured player and her role would be to juice up the story. No matter what she did journalistically, everyone would suspect her motives. No, it just wouldn't work. This was Katie's moment. Sawyer would not thrust herself into that particular spotlight....

"Good Night And Bite Me": Katie Couric's Big Mouth, Fracturing Team

Everyone at CBS, it seemed, was buzzing about Couric's exceedingly candid interview with Esquire. She said she hated the word panties. She said that sometimes she barely remembered to put on deodorant. She said she had a perfect life until she turned 40, when Jay died. She said she was open to love but that it was difficult at 49 with two kids and a very public life. She said there were a lot of "circling vultures" out there ready to eat her alive. She said she played the piano and cried when she was depressed.

Couric also complained about Esquire's editors having said in a cheeky column called "Obscure Women We Love" that they no longer felt they knew the anchor. Her response: "You don't know me any more? Bite me."

For days, CBS reporters and producers, at the slightest provocation, walked around inviting a biting from each other. One jokingly wondered whether the official motto of CBS News had gone from "Good night and good luck," to "That's the way it is," to "Bite me." .....

Sean McManus had a message for the troops. It was fine for CBS staffers to fight among themselves in the office, he said on a conference call. That was what journalists did. But these were family fights, and no one should talk about them to outsiders.

A woman in the London bureau had a question: Was McManus saying that there was a lack of loyalty at CBS? No, McManus said. He just wanted to make sure that they kept their discussions in-house.

Brian Williams Slides To Second


[A]lthough
Nightly had lost half a million viewers from the previous year--even more than Couric had shed, as CBS executives kept reminding reporters--Williams was convinced that none of it, not a tenth of a percentage point, was his fault... [W]hat was killing the newscast, he thought, were the budget cuts at the network's ten O-and-Os, or owned-and-operated stations. At every station he visited, he could still smell the gunpowder from people being shot... All these cutbacks, Williams believed, were slicing into his lead-in audience in the major markets in a way that coincided with his ratings slide, as if someone had flipped a switch. Local executives at these stations kept asking him to fix his newscast, but Nightly, in his view, was not the problem.

Williams took his case to Jeff Zucker. "These cuts are killing me," he said. He also appealed to Jeff Immelt at GE.

"You're the most important single asset to the company," Immelt assured him. It was nice to know that he was even more vital than lightbulbs, Williams thought, but that didn't make the problem go away. Immelt and Zucker both said they would look into the matter, but Williams was not optimistic.

Williams thought Nightly was as good as ever, but this was really starting to sting. The horse-race coverage was maddening, especially since most television writers never bothered weighing the merits of the newscasts. It was always numbers, just numbers.

And for Williams, the numbers were personal. The ratings slide was being hung like an albatross around his neck. Every news story on the subject began, "Williams has lost X hundreds of thousands of viewers..." Did people actually believe that he had been on top for two years and suddenly became an awful, unwatchable presence?

There's more — and apparently it's already available at your bookstore! So go buy it, or don't and wait for the juicy bits to leak out on your favorite blog. Or, you could always catch the Reality Show live at 6:30 pm on your favorite network. But God, who watches the news anymore?


Comments for this post are now closed

 
Comments
46
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

The movies "Broadcast News" and "Network" ring with louder truth today and more than ever. It's sad that these prophetic movies weren't taken seriously by the MSM and viewers alike.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 10/20/2007

Scott Horton senses some shenanigans.

http://harpers.org/archive/2007/10/hbc-90001413

Ms. Sklar, exactly what is going on here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 10/13/2007

Everyone new that Couric as a news anchor was a moronic idea except those idiot executives at CBS who are making millions of dollars to be stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 10/10/2007
- Dominick06 I'm a Fan of Dominick06 6 fans permalink

Wow, what a bunch of trite stuff about a bunch of trite people. I wonder if the book will really sell many copies outside of media and pundit circles? My eyes hurt after reading this stuff. Is it the media who feels the need to write about each other in such a way--as if these anchors hold any positions of importance relative to society? It's funny, more and more of us get our news and information online rather than from TV--yet so many online folks feel the need to write about TV anchors. It's like canabalism really. Or is it merely incest? Either way I doubt most people care. I bet the book has mediocre sales. The American people deserve better. No wonder network news is a loser. Why would most of us care about Katie, Dan and the rest. These folks make way to much money for what they do. Of course, more power to them since the market allows these salaries. But, I wonder if a network exec will figure out that he or she can put on journalists and pay them less than half what these folks make and still get as good of ratings as katie does? CNN did this for years before it let the star system consume it as well. Remember headline news and early CNN. Much to be said about Ted Turner's hungry, broke days. What next--poor Dan Rather...After all who said you should retire at 75 and make room for some tounger folks like normal working people do. Geez!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 10/09/2007

My druthers are that TV news readers and presenters are obscure, faceless and paid a modest salary so they aren't part of the news and celebrities in their own right. Unfortunately that's not the case.

I don't care much for the MSM, especially the TV networks (with the exception of PBS and BBC) but there aren't many like Kurtz who speak against others. The MSM needs among other things, more internal watchdogs. For years the MSM guarded its members from public scrutiny. If the networks want us to "trust" their anchors, hosts, cohosts, etc., let's see who they really are as persons, let's see what happens behind the scenes.

The blogosphere is great, I obtain news from there but its biggest handicap is an insufficient number of news gatherers. Some in the blogosphere gather news but not enough. That's still primarily within the domains of newspapers, news magazines and TV networks.

So far, the blogosphere has proven itself to be a great editorial group by disseminating, critiquing, enhancing, correcting, and updating news. The icing on the cake is the blogosphere letting many offer their opinions for others to read. The blogosphere is a major step closer to true democracy, an ideal that won't be reached but the closer we are to it, the better.

Like it or not, the MSM will be around for sometime.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 10/20/2007
- Oldtimer I'm a Fan of Oldtimer 20 fans permalink
photo

Rachel,
I like the fact that your interested in all the tidbits of the "anchor wars" but wonder how
you feel about the anchors bullhorning America
with "news" about the coming confrontation with Iran. When will the anchors have House Speaker
Pelosi on to ask about a declaration of war on
Iran? Instead we are being fed a steady diet
of trivial insider gossip. I belive the networks want a war with Iran. The ratings for
their Iraq War (it should be called the Bush
Iraq Occupation) are down and so its time for
a new crisis to pump up viewership. Of course,
the military industrial complex wants these ratings back up as well. Certainly Republicans
want these ratings up for the 2008 election
cycle. We all know whats coming. Be afraid
AMerica. Be very afraid...and watch our
coverage of the Iranian crisis...oh and vote
Republican while you're at it because as Dick
Cheney says "If the Democrats win there is more
of a chance the terrorists will strike again".
Keep up the good work Rachel. Shining the
spotlight on anchor war trivia is just what
AMerica needs. Right Arianna?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 10/09/2007
photo

I have to agree with a lot of the comments on this posting. Who cares what Howard Kurtz has to say? He doesn't strike me as that great of a newsperson himself. The rest of them are right in line with Howard that is except for my favorite Keith Olbermann who has the balls to tell it like it is. Thanks Keith!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 10/09/2007
- THISTLE I'm a Fan of THISTLE 61 fans permalink

Who the hell cares about this - these highly
highly over-paid "news readers" who think
they are so important. They READ the news,
for obscene amounts of money. They desperately
want to be "celebrities," - they have agents,
hair stylists, makeup stylists, - there is
NO journalism here. Bryan Williams is
"Ted Baxter" complete with his effected speech,
and Couric is a joke - who wore a "Peter Pan"
costume and flew over "30 Rock."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 10/09/2007
photo

Ditto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 10/09/2007

No one cares about what Kurtz thinks after seeing him defend CNN's hit piece on Michael Moore... oh that's right, you defend that hit piece on MM too... are there any other media journalist on this website?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 10/08/2007
- project I'm a Fan of project 6 fans permalink

As far as I am concerned none of these people do a good job; no one in the msm has done a good job since the supreme court appointed the bush cabal.
They have all shown what cowards they are.
More than anything they have shown just how far they will go in order to keep their high paying jobs!
I think the whole of the MSM has been bought and paid for just like our government.
If you think about it 10% of the people are probably crooks. If you look at the percentage of people in the MSM and the government you will most likely find the 10% of crroks@!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 10/09/2007
- Norm I'm a Fan of Norm 10 fans permalink

I was a faithful Brian Williams NBC watcher until the news stopped providing any (news, that is). I especially appreciated that Williams hung on to the Katrina story long after most MSM had dropped it as old and, thus, of no interest. But recently, NBC has more fluffy "special segments" sucking up valuable news time. Then I was recently annoyed at Brian Willims' 30 second blurb on Kyle-Lieberman, where he said the Democratic candidates did not vote on the measure, which, of course, was news, but untrue. Though usually dumb as a post when it comes to the political leanings of various media outlets, I too have noticed a skew to the right in recent broadcasts. If NBC can't give a hard news piece enough time to present it accurately, the network would do well not to present it at all. Until NBC manages that, along with serious fluff reduction, it's Charlie, YouTube, various papers and blogs for me.

Dan Rather, I miss you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 10/08/2007
- Kundera I'm a Fan of Kundera 24 fans permalink

All of us who truly appreciate fabricated biased news miss Dan Rather.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 10/08/2007
photo

Why?

Rather didn't work for Fox News.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 10/08/2007

Yeah Kurtz also repoted that Brian Willimas said he was glad Cheney was in office during 911 so much for the liberal bias... also, Brian Willimas reported on cspan that he was a huge fan of Rush Limbaugh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 AM on 10/10/2007

Great news reporting!Gee what a great story!!And American's are happy with the News!!Maybe the news should do a POLL on the news like they do on hack canidate that they are trying to shove down the voter's throat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 10/08/2007
- carex I'm a Fan of carex 7 fans permalink

If Brian Williams is shocked that his numbers are going down perhaps he should reflect on the
unbelievable and skewed content. I watched NBC
for a couple of decades. It became apparent that they decided to sign on to the Administration pro war stance. So very distrubing how things were spun to fit the White House talking points. Even more disturbing and telling were/are the things that are never mentioned in the "news".
It was very interesting to me to hear Couric
discuss not being regarded as a journalist once she took her current position. She has never been a journalist. This group of talkers are just that. They don't get stories through their own contacts, instead rely on a network of producers to create questions and take a pre-interview brief.
These are the talking heads who may infleunce an interview, but don't originate it.
If they really wanted viewers why not blaze trails by actually reporting the news, like Woodward & Bernstein of long ago? Instead of telling about reductions of deaths, detail how deaths are counted. Instead of running with the Jessica Lynch propaganda, expose what and how this drivel is being sold to the American public. Instead of getting warm and fuzzy over
Katrina, Ground Zero, Blackwater, actually
present the unvarnsihed truth. People would likely tune in for that novel approach. Oh and no more Anna Nicole, Linsey, Paris, etc., It is offensive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 10/08/2007
- lentinelia I'm a Fan of lentinelia 53 fans permalink
photo

It was the same during the Vietnam war.
NBC's nightly news, the Huntley-Brinkley Report, was sponsored by an OIL COMPANY. Needless to say their reporting was distorted to suit their sponsor's agenda.

Nothing has changed because the newsmedia were never confronted. So they will keep on doing it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/08/2007

It's Howard Kurtz. Who cares? He's obsessing about network shifts in teleprompt-readers.


And it's probably too complex for LibsRHilarious to realize that Bush was indeed AWOL from the National Guard, and the Rather letter was NOT disproven, and that he's goose-stepping behind a drunken, cowardly draft dodging silver-spoon Massachussetts oil baby whose family makes gigantic windfalls off of war.

I predict the Kurtz book will be a snoozer sales-wise. Network TV addicts don't read.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 10/08/2007
- Kundera I'm a Fan of Kundera 24 fans permalink

yes, it wasn't disproven, just like Bush did blow up WTC himself.

(close your eyes and imagine Hillary cackling)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 10/08/2007

Kundera,
I'm just wondering. Do you wipe the blood of the dead soldiers from your hands before you type this nonsense?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 10/08/2007

Harry Shearer must be salivating to get his hands on this book-can't wait to see his future posts on it's revelations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 10/08/2007
- Ginzaman I'm a Fan of Ginzaman 12 fans permalink

Kurtz is a opportunist and hack that will say and do anything to keep that "exclusive" access to the media power elite. Also, why should we pay attention to someone who actually likes and agrees with Glenn Beck? No thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 10/08/2007
- typicalpol I'm a Fan of typicalpol 2 fans permalink

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 10/08/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect