Think Progress:
Supreme Court justices reportedly are aren't thrilled with Clarence Thomas's new biography. The NY Posts's Cindy Adams writes, "Phrases swatted about are 'unseemly' and 'breach of decorum.' Besides unraveling his life story, he has also delved into the ways and hows of the Court. They feel it 'irresponsible' for a sitting Supreme Court Justice to write about The Process."
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Funny isn't it how a pack of corrupt,sleaze balls like the US Supreme Court (who gave the 2004 presidency to fellow slime-ball Bush but still refuse to hear any 911 cases!) are so quick to take umbrage from some implied insult!
The thing is you have to possess some real kind of integrity,conscience and morality before anyone can insult you for your consumate "lack" of those qualities - otherwise its just more puffed up hypocrisy as usual!
"Unseemly" ???
Try tacky, pathetic, embarrassing.
What a shame that the first black person on the Supreme Court is so supremely unworthy.
It doesn't take a Psych Degree to figure out from what he writes that he needs his head examined.
Thurgood Marshall was the first black person on the Supreme Court
Loading comments…
First Posted: 10-15-07 04:19 PM | Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM