Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Hillary Only Top-Tier Dem To Receive Wal-Mart Money

October 16, 2007 05:24 PM


stumbleupon :Hillary Only Top-Tier Dem To Receive Wal-Mart Money   digg: Hillary Only Top-Tier Dem To Receive Wal-Mart Money   reddit: Hillary Only Top-Tier Dem To Receive Wal-Mart Money   del.icio.us: Hillary Only Top-Tier Dem To Receive Wal-Mart Money

2007-10-16-walmart.jpgSenator Hillary Clinton, D-NY, received nearly $13,000 in campaign donations during the third quarter from Wal-Mart, the largest retailer in the world and a frequent target of Democratic ire.

Among the party's presidential frontrunners, Clinton was the sole recipient of donations from Wal-Mart executives. The $12,900 she received came from senior offices, such as Thomas Hyde, public relations officials, like George Shelton, as well as other directors for the retail giant.

The Senator's office did not return a call for comment.

Democrats on the campaign trail have repeatedly criticized Wal-Mart for providing its workers with substandard wages and health care benefits. Clinton too has been a critic. During her 2006 Senate reelection campaign she returned $5,000 to the Wal-Mart's political action committee, citing "serious differences with current company practices." More recently, in an April 2007 debate hosted by NBC's Brian Williams, Clinton called the company a mixed blessing.

"They have raised serious questions about the responsibility of corporations and how they need to be a leader when it comes to providing health care and having safe working conditions and not discriminating on the basis of sex or race or any other category," the New York Senator said.

Clinton does have long political ties to the retail giant. She served on Wal-Mart's board from 1986 to 1992, and was close with the company's founding family, the Waltons. Prior to the third quarter, Clinton's presidential campaign had received only a $500 donation from George Shelton a Wal-Mart Executive, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
Comments
82
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

I Will Not Vote For Hillary Clinton. (by Miz Molly Ivins) http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/1/2006/1304

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 10/16/2007
- truthyguy I'm a Fan of truthyguy 42 fans permalink

Nor will I and 60% of all registered voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 10/16/2007

Unfortunately, her negatives poll at only 41% according to a recent poll I saw, with Giulani's and McCain's a little worse - around 43 and 44%, with Thompson's at 46% and Romney scoring a tremendous 56% who say they wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 10/17/2007

Oh these evil corporations! Oh help! Ralph! Yoohoo?! Come out from your political coma Ralph! Help! The corporations are taking over ...

Vote Obama! Vote for Cheney, er change! Dick and Barack Hussein are 8th cousins!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 10/17/2007

Sorry that should be WWW.NEWSME­AT.COM

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 10/16/2007

To read all contributions go to www.dogmeat.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 10/16/2007

Hardly surprising but saddening nonetheless. Wal-mart is a race to the bottom and bottom-dwellers feast on detrius.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 10/16/2007
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

Walmart donates to Hillary, of course, she is a Republican.
I'm shocked, I tell you , I'm shocked, there is gambling in the place, I'm shocked!
She loves those trade deals her husband did, that sent good paying jobs to Mexico and Communist China, putting millions of middle class into lower paying jobs.
Wake up America!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 10/16/2007
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

It's not to late, Ralph Nader, run on the Democrat ticket, now . not as an independent!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 10/16/2007

Is anyone really surprised by this? I'm with Obama, the polls may suggest otherwise, but 350,000 people donating to one newcomer on the scene can't be wrong. He is the most credible, intelligent, diplomatic leader we have seen in decades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 10/16/2007
photo

yes it can!! look at our white house for goodness sakes!!!!!

the only way i could agree with a single thing you posted is if you replace all references to obama with dennis kucinich. (and/or al gore)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 10/16/2007

Hey Arianna...­she was on the Wal-Mart Board of Directors when Bill was governor of Arkansas! What's the shock here??? Oh, i forgot....­the lefty loons need a helping or two of anti-Hillary "red meat" daily, and this is the best you could come up with this evening!!!! You stink,Huff­po...you too Sammy Stein....a­nd , of course, you ALWAYS stink it up, Arianna Rove!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 10/16/2007
photo

Walmart is one of the worst companies for paying off public officials to claim eminent domain on people's property. Watch "Walmart the High Cost of Low Prices" You can rent it on Netflix.

I'm not really into religion, but look at this http://www.nysun.com/comments/34458

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 10/16/2007
- ClintonFun I'm a Fan of ClintonFun 5 fans permalink

Ooopsss..s­orry for the dups...but then some blog readers might need to be reminded multiple times...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 10/16/2007
- ClintonFun I'm a Fan of ClintonFun 5 fans permalink

HILLARY'S NO EXPERIENCE?

COMRADE HILLARY...

She's never run a city,

she's never run a state.

She's never run a business.

She has never met a payroll.

She has never been responsible for the safety and security of millions of people, much less even hundreds of people.

WHAT IF?
It would seem that in a TIME OF DIFFICULT PROBLEMS AND WAR WE DON'T WANT ON THE JOB TRAINING FOR (PRESIDENT). And you WANT HER TO TELL YOU WHEN YOU GO TO THE DOCTOR / RUN YOUR HEALTH CARE?

WILL PRINCESS HILLARY STAND UP?
How will Hillary/Democrats stand up to terrorists, when they can't stand up to Fox News?

STUPID QUESTION?
If Queen Hillary is the answer, it must have been a stupid question.

TooExperie­ncedInform­edEducated­ToVoteDemo­crat

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 10/16/2007
- SiskoKid I'm a Fan of SiskoKid 6 fans permalink

She's helped run a state

When you help run a state, you, by default, help run the cities within that state.

She's helped run a business (I don't think you read the article you respond to since you copy and paste this same thing)

She has had immense experience in and outside of the White House

When someone's in office, they're automatically responsible for the safety and security of millions.

WHAT IF
You stop coloring the situation a color it's NOT.

DEMOCRATS
Including Hillary, will stand up just fine to terrorists. We were attacked under COMPLETE Republican rule.

STUPID IDIOT
Answer? ClintonFun

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 10/16/2007
- ClintonFun I'm a Fan of ClintonFun 5 fans permalink

Weak arguments. "Helping" is not even nearly the same as managing, executing, directing, deciding, judging.

Oh yes, and what week will she stand up to terrorists­...she has flip flopped 6 times in the past few weeks.

She is a mean, unforgiving little dictator who runs Bill and has to have her smear machine thugs (Podesta, Ickes, MoveOn, American Progress, etc..), orgs she admits to starting up, to do her dirty attacks for her so she can try to appear clean.

Queen Hillary is not hiding her real self very well every time she opens her mouth and has fooled and hoodwinked many serfs like yourself.

Top Ten Reasons Queen Hillary Clinton Should Not Be President:
10. Queen Hillary Healthcare.
9. The first first lady to be subpoenaed.
8. Travelgate
7. Never lived in NY until 1999.
6. She will tax ‘em to the max’um.
5. Open border and amnesty for all.
4. She’ll sacrifice our National Security for so-called “civil liberties”.
3. She’ll wave a white flag in Iraq.
2. She has a 96% “Liberal Quotient” voting record.
1. Bill Clinton

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 10/16/2007

It's okay to disagree with Hillary and it's okay to to root for Obama, Edwards, etc, but these sophomoric venomous attacks by the left-wingnuts on Hillary's character only expose their immaturity and ignorance. In November 2008 they will end up either voting for Hillary, siting on their hands (or brains), or throwing their vote away on someone like Ralph Nader. And, if they should help elect another Republican they will blame that, too, on Hillary. Nincompoops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 10/16/2007

E-X-A-C-T-L-Y!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 10/16/2007

I agree, rocketoo. Name calling frankly doesn't help. It accomplishes nothing and won't change anyone's mind. Now, I'd sooner vote for an inanimate object than Hillary, but not because I dislike her personally. I just think she's a borderline conservative and a sellout. But it's about her policies and sources of funds, not about her as an individual. I desperately hope she loses. She's obviously not as bad as any GOP candidate but voting for her would be a betrayal to my sense of honesty and my belief that we need to change the entire system of government. It's got to start somewhere.

And that doesn't mean I'll be "sitting on my brains", by the way. It means I'll be voting my conscience. And calling me a "wingnut" because I disagree with Hillary is also name calling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 10/16/2007

So...whenH­RC IS the DEM's nominee, and you won't vote for her out of "honesty".­..and won't sit on your hands....t­hen I guess you'll vote for the Repuke!!! Can you "honestly" defend THAT????You're NOT a wingnut, just confused!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 10/16/2007

I did not call you a wingnut for disagreeing with Hillary. If you remember I said it is okay to disagree. The wingnuts are those who launch sophomoric venomous attacks on her character. I am sorry that you choose to identify identify with them. As you say, though, let your conscience be your guide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 10/16/2007

You're totally correct, rocketoo.
This story's a joke, like $16,000 is going to buy any president's vote. Or the fact that Walmart execs didn't donate to other dem candidates somehow means they're more pure.

I can't for the life of me understand 'progressives' desire to try and nominate candidates that a broad swath of the electorate won't vote for. It's like the Naderites 'voting their conscience­.' Great work that.

If Hillary ends up president, I think we'd see our system of government changed quite radically, and for the better. Everybody forgets it's not just about the President, it's about who ends up in the cabinet too, and how well that team is run. Obama, Edwards, Bill, even Gore, might well end up filling important posts, because while the uber-left rags about Bill Clinton, the guy knew how to assemble an expert team, and so does HRC. With democratic majorities in the House and Senate, a lot of the GOP obstructionism like cloture votes (which netroots cluelessly call 'spineless dems') will evaporate, thus opening the gate to a progressive agenda.

But that seems too complex for some.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 10/16/2007
- 2224612 I'm a Fan of 2224612 3 fans permalink

There is no DNC democrap worth a progressive vote. This "news" is but one example why. If you want a choice, you are going to have to look deeper. As in Kucinich.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 10/16/2007
- hugs4u I'm a Fan of hugs4u 11 fans permalink

It is her reward for when she was on the Board Of Directors for Walmart, she did nothing to help the workers unionize.
I cant figure out why unions help the bitch, when she never helped them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 10/16/2007
- SiskoKid I'm a Fan of SiskoKid 6 fans permalink

I don't know if $13,000 from a few sets of people buys you control of a president. Maybe a nice dinner. I think Hollywood types have given her more on an INDIVIDUAL basis.

Who knows, if $13,000 gets you presidential control, I think we can all save that up and control Hillary how we'd like when she's in office. I'd definitely put $13,000 towards Hillary than a new car if that's the case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 10/16/2007
- ClintonFun I'm a Fan of ClintonFun 5 fans permalink

HILLARY'S NO EXPERIENCE?

COMRADE HILLARY...

She's never run a city,

she's never run a state.

She's never run a business.

She has never met a payroll.

She has never been responsible for the safety and security of millions of people, much less even hundreds of people.

WHAT IF?
It would seem that in a TIME OF DIFFICULT PROBLEMS AND WAR WE DON'T WANT ON THE JOB TRAINING FOR (PRESIDENT). And you WANT HER TO TELL YOU WHEN YOU GO TO THE DOCTOR / RUN YOUR HEALTH CARE?

WILL PRINCESS HILLARY STAND UP?
How will Hillary/Democrats stand up to terrorists, when they can't stand up to Fox News?

STUPID QUESTION?
If Queen Hillary is the answer, it must have been a stupid question.

TooExperie­ncedInform­edEducated­ToVoteDemo­crat

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 10/16/2007
- SiskoKid I'm a Fan of SiskoKid 6 fans permalink

She's helped run a state

When you help run a state, you, by default, help run the cities within that state.

She's helped run a business (I don't think you read the article you respond to since you copy and paste this same thing)

She has had immense experience in and outside of the White House

When someone's in office, they're automatically responsible for the safety and security of millions.

WHAT IF
You stop coloring the situation a color it's NOT.

DEMOCRATS
Including Hillary, will stand up just fine to terrorists. We were attacked under COMPLETE Republican rule.

STUPID IDIOT
Answer? ClintonFun

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 10/16/2007
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 71 fans permalink
photo

Try again Huffpo.. You're not going to discredit Hillary as you would like.

Hillary is a powerful woman. She's not perfect but she is a "Democrat" which means we can work with her and push her in a direction that is in the party's interest an in the interest of the America people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 10/16/2007
- hugs4u I'm a Fan of hugs4u 11 fans permalink

we can work with her and push her in a direction that is in the party's interest an in the interest of the America people.

Hillary only does things to help Hillary.
Look at her cattle futures and Vince Foster. Illegal trading on the one and killed the other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 10/16/2007

"HUGS ON DRUGS"....­and your responsible source that HRC Killed Vince Foster is .....???? Is it Jerry Falwell's "Clinton Chronicles"??? I knew you were dumb as wet turd....bu­t THAT would make you smarter than you really are!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 10/16/2007
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

No, you are an idiot if you really believe Hillary is a Democrat!
Her husband is also a Republican.
Just because they run on a Democratic ticket does not mean they are Democrats!
look at what they do, not at what they say.
When asked if she would get rid of those trade treaties her husband imposed on the middle class, she said no.
Seems the middle class votes for their own demise.
They voted for Bill Clinton and The monkey, twice!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 10/16/2007
- kentj I'm a Fan of kentj 6 fans permalink

The more evidence that exposes Hillary for the republican she is,the higher her poll numbers with democrats.

There are more neo-con democrats than neo-con republicans. They love wars, they love Hillary, and they are loyal to racist jews. But than those same voters wonder why they are without health care, secured jobs, and a retirement plan. Because Hillary and Bill use their useful idiot democratic voters for power.

The Clintons were president(s) for eight years and did more harm to middle America than any president. Hillary keeps talking about health care but did not do anything for eight years. At least with Bush he did provide the PRESCRIPTION DRUGS health care for low income, disabled and seniors. It may not be perfect but at least he tried and has helped many Americans.

The democratic party is a bunch of warmongering neo-cons. Poor, jobless, mindless, idiots for the Clintons. All the Clintons have to do is talk a good game and it makes their useful idiots happy. The Clintons can institute segregation and lynching and democrats would call it brilliant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 10/16/2007

Oh these evil corporations! Oh help! Ralph! Yoohoo?! Come out from your political coma Ralph! Help! The corporations are taking over ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 10/16/2007

"The Clintons were president(s) for eight years and did more harm to middle America than any president. Hillary keeps talking about health care but did not do anything for eight years."

Clearly, you forget how hard HRC pushed for health care in 1994, and how she got so trashed for it.

"There are more neo-con democrats than neo-con republicans. They love wars..."

Amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 10/16/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect