November "W" Cover Pits Aniston Against Jolie

FishbowlLA:

The November issue of W is out now, giving readers interested in other people's messy divorces the opportunity to put in their two cents. Or their $4.50, as it were.

The magazine is publishing two separate covers -- one with Jennifer Aniston and one featuring Angelina Jolie. It's about as tacky as a fashion mag can get. And for those of you wondering which will sell the most (as the news puppies at E! apparently are doing), here's a hint: Jennifer Aniston. By a lot.

Read the whole story: FishbowlLA

Comments

[ms.understood]

03:11 AM on 10/25/2007

Angelina is much more attractive than Jennifer, and by a long shot! Certainly, the "readers" of this mag will see that.

[RFuqua]

10:06 AM on 10/25/2007

Sorry ms.understood. Jenn is much hotter!

[Gayrove]

11:59 PM on 10/24/2007

Which cover the public buys won't mean anything unless the mag are in a separate stand side by side and there's a prominent sign saying the person on the cover of the one you buy will get a vote as being better-looking than the other. That's one. Two is that some people hate one or the other and believe that their hate makes that one ugly and the other pretty. Three, when one thinks how many people think that Sarah J. Parker who is horse-faced, short-legged, and super long-waisted (if she sprained an ankle, she wouldn't need crutches because she still could run along on her knuckles!) and fits the standarda of ugliness of almost any people on earth, but that through camera angles, positioning, dress, and ACTING LIKE a beauty, one must realize that there's a huge bunch of people in America who have no more sensitivity to beauty than the sightless. Jennifer Anniston is no beauty at all: let her pull her hair back in a pigtail and let us all get a good look at those wide jaws and those ursine little eyes...at least her nose doesn't quiver with expression as she talks as does that of Buffy the Vampire Frightener!
Angelina Jolie IS a beauty--with flaws, to be sure, but a beauty, nevertheless. In any normal time, her lips would be a handicap: she definitely inherited them from her father, Jon Voight. But in our time women PAY to get their lips stuffed like that because full lips are considered to be an asset of youth that starts to vanish at the age of about 35; moreover, Adele Davis used to say that thin lips were associated with the aged because they signify a vitamin deficiency in the old OR the young.
Have Angelina tie HER hair back in a pigtail or shave it off, erase the make-up and she'll still be beautiful. Do the same with Sarah Jessica or Jennifer A. and you'll feel, 'Who hit HER in the face with the ugly stick?'

[smartstuart]

08:43 PM on 10/24/2007

Any news about the love lives of the Three Stooges???

[bethinCary]

07:54 PM on 10/24/2007

very tacky.

[FlaExRepub]

01:05 PM on 10/24/2007

The covers are nice if only the pages are empty. If that were the case, I'm betting on Angel.

[maxfusion]

12:24 PM on 10/24/2007

HUH

[kellygrrrl]

10:50 AM on 10/24/2007

how desparate must you be to sell a damn magazine?!

this inflammatory display of business practice should further drive away whatever miniscule audience remains.

[CammyV]

08:49 AM on 10/24/2007

That's pretty darn tasteless of them. My money's on AJ however.

[h20bird]

07:36 AM on 10/24/2007

They're publishing a whole series (at least 6), not just 2. Seriously, check your facts, too. W magazine blows, but that doesn't excuse poor "journalism" from Huffpo.

[Jain]

09:20 PM on 10/23/2007

I think Angelina - check your sources...