I can't wait to go hiking and biking on Christmas day in Indiana! How's that for a benefit? Who needs snow in the winter? Just because we haven't had any snow now for several years doesn't mean that it has anything to do with our reservoirs being empty and the crops wilting.....does it?
And who doesn't want those Floridian Palmetto bugs in every state? And year-round mosquitoes! YAY global warming!

idiot at work-she will be driven out--totally incompetent bush bottem feeder!!

France gets 80 percent of its electricity from nuclear energy. Why can't the US adopt the same level of this CO2 free and air pollution free means of generating electricity.
It is our planet's only hope.

Geez, what an embarrassment! That woman is like the Scarecrow in Wizard of Oz..."...if I only had a brain".

I have read all of these comments and for people that pretend to be open minded on issues, you could give lessons to Joseph Goebbels!

What a bunch of whiners! If any one had a real thought, you would be dangerous!

How Gross! I guess even pretty faces are capable of crass representation of reality. So, now that Dana Perino has elucidated the benefits of Global Warming I suppose her boss Dumbya will ask her to uncover the benefits of war. Let's see ... 1)for every human being we kill in Iraq, we save the oxygen and other resources the unfortunate individual would have consumed otherwise 2) It is better to have Blackwater individuals engaged in Iraq than in America ... safer for the US anyways 3)As for our tax payer money that keeps disappering by the suitcase everyday in Iraq, .. that's also better than misspending here in the US in "socialist" programs like insuring American children, even worse insuring children of illegal aliens ...Heckuva job Dana!

This woman should just take the advice of one Kitty Foreman...."honey, you should just shut up!"

Regarding the comments from Tator, who said, in part...

"Poor ole Liberals had been snookered by the Religion of Man made Global warming...Might want to read this, but I doubt you will since The Religion does not allow REAL scientist to be hear, because it is blasphemy.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/318/5850/629

Interesting that Tator chastises followers of "The Religion" for not reading the article that he links to, since it's obvious that he hasn't read it himself. If he had, he would see that what Roe and Baker are really saying is that while there is a relatively high probability that the predictions of current models are accurate, there is also a chance that the models are not sufficiently extreme. That is, things may actually get much WORSE than the models predict. Their point is that we may never be able to refine the models enough to get beyond this uncertainty.

Let me boil this down for you, Tator: The authors are saying that the models may be UNDERESTIMATING how much warming will occur due to increases in CO2. From the article:

"Our results imply that dramatic changes in physical processes are not necessary for dramatic changes in climate sensitivity, provided that those changes in processes can all align in the same direction toward increased sensitivity."

Nature online does a nice job of summarizing the analysis here:

http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071025/full/news.2007.198.html

From that that summary:

"The graph of potential temperature responses to rising greenhouse-gas levels shows a cluster of probable outcomes at the bottom of the scale, but a 'long tail' of possible extreme outcomes...Roe and Baker's analysis...shows mathematically that this tail is unlikely to get any smaller, regardless of how much research is done."

"We have to accept that that's the fundamental nature of the beast," says Roe. As a result, he adds, "it's very hard to distinguish between [the probability of] 6 °C warming and 10 °C warming."

Sorry, Tator, but you're the one who's been suckered.

Just remember Huffingtonpost readers, every time Bush and his syncophants open their mouths, a lie comes out. I would not believe one word these idiots say, and of course MSM does not hold their lies up to the light of day, they want to keep their job writing idiotic columns then go home to their families. (Guess the ones in Southern California may not have a home to go to, but what the heck, they still get a paycheck).

No one claimed she was the brightest bulb in the pack! This just proves it. It's like that old saying, "How do you know she is lying?" her mouth is moving. Either she is as dumb as a post or she thinks everyone else is.

She is "Baghdad Bob"!! I wondered where he went. Now we see he's moved to the White House!

This is the 'Al Gore invented the Internet' moment of the ThugliCon whack-job machine. Libruls, do not let this opportunity escape.

Don't forget to take your Global Warming vitamins for breakfast- they're grrreat!

Can we turn up the heat in hear a little bit? If we work hard at it, maybe we can achieve swealtering wasteland status like Venus. But be wary, it will be 'hard work'.

George Bush, turning up the heat the planet, just like he did on Saddam Hussein.

Fukc. These. Slogs.

Yes indeed, the health benefits will far outstrip the detriments to global climate change.

For instance. When sea level rises more people will have an opportunity to learn how to swim, thus avoiding obesity.

People who live in the West will have to move because of the rise in the number of wildfires and the lack of snowmelt. Lack of snowmelt means less allocation of water from rivers. This will be good for the housing market in the East and Midwest, which in turn will allow more wealthy people to provide for their families. Instant health benefit returns there!

Longer 'summer' months will allow people who live in northernly climes to stay outside longer than the season traditionally allowed. That means more exercise for them, too!

I have more....

She actually believes the stuff she feeds to the MSM.

the photo, alone, makes me ill. This is a guy dealing with an employee?