If Hillary is in such a tail spin why hasn't it show in the polls. There's been a little tightening in Iowa, and one or two in NH show she's only winning now by just 10-15 points there. But her national numbers are still way ahead of the others. In SC she still has a comfortable lead, and in NV where the debate is being held she's so far ahead her opponents can't see her.

So I guess a supposed poor debate performance and fake scandals like tipgate didn't do much after all. This is all the media trying to make the race more competitive, being a player trying to make this into a horserace.

these things are pretty friggin far from being a debate.

VOTE KUCINICH!

If you don't, you might as well be a republican.

At least last time their was some real noise about the different mind sets... but we all must have seen how the questions were "directed" to cause the fighting as it was. I think Russert blew it last time with his direction of questions but it all comes down to selective questions to selective people to get selective responses. Debate? I thought debate meant you get epople up in front and they yelled at each other their opinions until someone slapped the other one. Nope? Is it when rational people get up front and present their side on what/how they would do whatever. No debate seen yet was one I would call informative. Just news/noise makers for everyone to spin their way.

"Of course Hillary was not going to slam the Dem. Governor of her state."

That is just another example of Hillary playing politics rather than saying what she believed about the issue. She was either against the plan and refused to voice it, or she was for Spitzer's plan, but once support for it started to fall apart, backed away. Either way she wasn't giving a straight answer.

The headline here is misleading. It's NOT a debate. It's a corporate media extravaganza brought to you by (fill in the blank). No other country in the world does this. And we expect them to take us seriously?

.
In this "debate", like the last one, all the men will be attacking our beloved Hilary just because she is a woman - God's preferred sex.

Stop it you meanies.

So what if she is double-talking and two-faced and has a platform that consists of: Show-Me-The-Money, Say-Whatever-They-Want-To-Hear, Continue-The-Neocon-Wars, Sell-The-Lincoln-Bedroom, and I-Want-A-New-Pair-Of-Hsu's. So what if there are no depths of depravity to which this moneywhor'e won't go, including staging questions at public events. So what if she is Bush-Lite on the neocon wars and many other critical issues. So what is she is an advocate for the most un-American piece of legislation ever enacted, the so-called "Patriot" Act, which shows clearly that she will be as lawless, secretive and anti Bill of Rights as DickNBush.

She is woman - let her roar!
.

Tip:

Tonight CNN will use Brown to go after Senator

Clinton.

The boys of msm love a cat-fight between two women.

Of course Hillary was not going to slam the Dem. Governor of her state. Certain questions are not black and white yes - no answers. The exception to this would be the way that Bush thinks. I prefer a bright person who understands a multifaceted approach.

Let's hope Brown goes into labor today. Then CNN can replace her with Judi (oops Judith) Guiliani. It will make everything much more fair.
Have to disagree with Yepsin's comment that Clinton gave a "poor performance" during the last debate. I think she handled herself extremely well under the bombardment she faced. I think some of the others would have cried halfway through. Yepsin has not been what anyone could consider an impartial reporter for quite a while when covering the Democratic race. He's certainly entitled to his opinion, but I don't find him unbiased.

unless leslie blitzer channels tim russert, obama will be his usual self. And will campfollower brown announce her conflict or does she just think it will be obvious