Looks like baby fat in the before photo. And if the nose has been altered it was a very subtle job. Something other actresses might consider rather than look like they are auditioning for the Joker in the next Batman movie.

you people are blind. her nose is thinner now that it was before. Actually look at the bridge of the nose. Tell me that it's not thinner. Ever so slightly but thinner, justthesame.

One pic she is smiling, one she isn't, your nose MOVES when you smile. They deserve to be sued, using her to sell their shit magazine is a joke.

She just has her head tilted downward a tad in the second photo. I can't figure out what any of the "before and after" pictures are showing on that cover. It just looks like "younger and older" photos to me. I do commend any Hollywood actress who doesn't have plastic surgery done, though (if such a one exists).

When I look at Scarlett Johansson it's never at her nose ..

I don't know about you guys, but those photos look like the same nose to me. She just has more makeup on in the pic on the right.

And Scarlett is smokin' either way. Probably ten times hotter than anyone working at Us Weekly. So she's got that.

I'm not quite sure that I understand the alleged harm. Who gives a crap if she had a nose job or not? It doesn't change her pay rate or who would like to work with her. She needs to prove damages, not just falsity, right?

Besides, she is a public figure and thus needs to prove more than falsity and damages. Did US meet actual malice? Seems unlikely, but I guess we will find in due time if she actually goes through with the law suit.

More likely, her threat to sue is merely a PR effort to fight allegedly defamatory speech with speech of her own.

US weekly must have the same intelligence source as the Bush administration - despite all obvious lack of evidence, reality is what you choose to believe - not what is true.