Republican Obstructionism Breaks Congressional Record

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Republican Obstructionism Breaks Congressional Record stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-20-07 12:50 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Lazy Elephants

As this year's congressional session closes out, obstructionism by the Republican minority reached a fever pitch and effectively stymied much of the Democrats' legislative program. In just the past few weeks alone, two bills that made up a major part of the Democratic agenda were killed through GOP parliamentary maneuvers.

On December 7, Republicans derailed an energy bill that would have reduced dependence on foreign oil, by denying it the 60 votes it needed to make it through the Senate. Democrats were forced to pass a watered-down measure. A few days later, a bill that would have expanded government-provided health insurance for children made it through the Senate but succumbed to President Bush's veto.

The two episodes underscored what has become an epidemic of gridlock within the halls of government. Indeed, a recent study by the progressive-research organization, Campaign for America's Future, claims that "conservatives in the U.S. Senate" have set a "modern-day record for obstruction." Only half way through the 110th Congress there have been 62 cloture votes to move beyond a filibuster, one more than the previous record set during the entirety of the 107th Congress in 2002.

The congressional gridlock has been glaringly reflected in public dissatisfaction. A recent Zogby poll reveals that only 13% of Americans have a positive view of congress. But a double digit majority says it prefers Democrats -not Republicans--running Capitol Hill.

"There is incredible Republican unity, some say they are staying on this ship as it sinks," Eric Lotke, research director at Campaign for America's Future told the Huffington Post. "What the Dems did wasn't half bad they got some things done on student loans and minimum wage. And I think the failure headlines are overstated. But that's only one hand. On the other hand, boy I wish they had done actual filibustering."

Indeed, many of items that made up the Democratic wish list in the 2006 elections ended up stuck under the weight of parliamentary procedure in the year that followed; including almost all Iraq-war related legislation, immigration reform, and even a bill to allow residents of the District of Columbia to vote.

"By sticking with President Bush on issue after issue - from changing course in Iraq, to closing tax loopholes on big oil companies - and by filibustering measures that passed overwhelmingly, this year's class of Bush Republicans shattered the two-year record in just the first year of session," Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, told the Huffington Post. "Their feat was akin to Mark McGwire breaking Roger Maris' home run record of 61 in a season by the All-Star break. Unfortunately, while Bush Republicans may be the real winners in their game of obstruction, the American people have lost."

The record books may be shattered. But conservatives respond by noting that only two years ago it was the Democratic minority that was holding up the Republican agenda. Moreover, they add, the items being pushed are far from, as the Democrats suggest, consensus legislation.

Story continues below
advertisement

"You can almost argue that the Republicans learned form the Democrats when they were filibustering Republican judges effectively," Brian Darling, director of U.S. Senate Relations at the conservative Heritage Foundation, told The Huffington Post. "[Reid] should not bring up such controversial pieces of legislation... any measure that puts conditions on the way the war is fought is going to be filibustered by Republicans. So bringing it up again and again without extended session shows the Democratic leadership is not really committed to passing these measures, just in making statements."

And yet, for all the political back-and-forth over who is to blame, the Campaign for America's Future report underscores what many consider a far more worrisome issue facing government. The proliferation of the filibuster, political observers argue, is simply, and sadly, a modern political reality.

"There is a tendency when you lose power to hunker down," Stu Rothenberg, editor of the non-partisan Rothenberg Political Report, told The Huffington Post. "Even the study notes that the previous record was in the 107th Congress. This is the 110th. Meaning it is a development. This is not the Republicans doing something totally out of the blue. This is how the Senate now works where the minority party increasingly feels like it has got its back up against the wall."

Solutions to the gridlock are few and far between. Democrats and Republicans could work more closely behind closed doors to hammer out deals before legislative showdowns. But neither party's ideological base is much interested in compromise. Or, Reid and the Democrats could stage more all-night sessions, in an effort to pressure and embarrass their Republican colleagues into acquiescence.

But, as Rothenberg notes, "you are not going to have [Sens.] John Warner or Ted Kennedy or Ted Stevens sleeping in cots..." Meaning both parties are often left waiting for the other to relent. "The system can't go on like this," Rothenberg said. "At some point you just keep putting it off, there is going to be an explosion among the electorate or a third party. There are too many filibusters and too many objections. And it just stinks."

As this year's congressional session closes out, obstructionism by the Republican minority reached a fever pitch and effectively stymied much of the Democrats' legislative program. In just the past fe...
As this year's congressional session closes out, obstructionism by the Republican minority reached a fever pitch and effectively stymied much of the Democrats' legislative program. In just the past fe...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
70
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

The only way that some people will EVER be
removed from the federal feed trough is kicking
and screaming, and likely in handcuffs.
Further, on energy independence, treat it like
the drug thing, focus on demand reduction.
The 'consumers' are Most Powerful on this one,
if no one buys their crap, it'll be .50/gal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 12/25/2007

Since the senate majority controls the legislation, the number of filibusters is due to the lack of bipartisanship on the part of the majority. Democrats consistently pushed through legislation knowing full well that it was unacceptable to the minority to the point the legislation would surely be filibustered! Democrats also knew beforehand that Democrats did not have the votes to override these upcoming filibusters before they bills were even written. Simply stated the number of filibusters is controlled by the Democrats not the Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 12/25/2007
- imsosure I'm a Fan of imsosure 27 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 12/25/2007
- Manx I'm a Fan of Manx 19 fans permalink

If the situation were reversed and the Democrats were blocking progress, the Republicans would be on every TV show available denouncing Democrats as "obstructi­onists." They would repeat the word, "obstructionists," over and over and over. This strategy works because people tend to believe what they hear repeatedly. Democrats should saturate TV and brand the Republicans for what they are - obstructionists. Repetition works. Every other word uttered by a Democrat should be "obstructi­onists." Wake up, Democrats!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 12/22/2007
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 386 fans permalink
photo

Wasn't too long ago that the Republicans were saying that filibusters were unconstitutional. It didn't take long for them to learn to love the filibuster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 12/21/2007
- Kontessa I'm a Fan of Kontessa 8 fans permalink

Well, This is news! In the past year, AII... we have ever heard in the oh, so, accomodating to the whining, hypocritical Republican fascists, media, was how incompetent and ineffective the Democrats are and in the years preceeding this past one, ALL we heard in the news was how obstructionist the Democrats were.
That's some liberal-le­aning-favo­ring media we have alright!!

-Has there been any more repulsive Republican liar than Florida's fascist Adam Putnam, bursting out of the gate last January, viciously attacking Nancy Pelosi about the airplane she used to fly home to San Francisco?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 12/21/2007
- MikeDu I'm a Fan of MikeDu 147 fans permalink
photo

Shall we visit the past for a moment? Do you recall the Repub's "righteous indignation" over a *single* Dem threat of a filibuster a couple years back? They called it 'the nuclear option', they threatened to change the constitution. They screamed and yelled and beat their breasts, they wept public tears.

Now look at them. Putting up roadblock to ANYTHING, no matter how vital to the nation, that might be construed as a Dem success. my God, what a disgusting lot (Lott).

But this is nothing new. Go back to the early 90s. They obstructed and obstructed court appointmenrt, conservation initiatives, etc. etc. til the ignorant masses began blaming the victim and put the perpetrators into power. This is an old old OLD Repub tactic. And its a win-win for them. They claim the government doesn't work - deliberately making it so the government doesn't work 'proves their point'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 12/21/2007
- Tator I'm a Fan of Tator 9 fans permalink

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA "Obstructionism" is now the new word for Democrat Failure. Sorry it is not selling. Look at your poll numbers.

Democrats have failed to do anything except load up the budget with PORK PORK PORK.

I figured the Dems would hold Congress at least 4 cycles, but keep this up and it might last 2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 AM on 12/21/2007
- NWGuy I'm a Fan of NWGuy 8 fans permalink
photo

as Marrob questioned above -"Why aren't the Democrats on television every night calling these scumbag republicans obstructionist??" the real question. All the republicans have to do to make the democrats look bad is stand in the way. They don't have to push any bills, or really fight anything, just be passive-aggressive and the democrats won't be able to pass hardly a thing. Sadly, its working. If the democrats were smart they would have made a big deal over how the republicans really are obstructing and made them look bad. However, for some reason, the democrats keep wanting to play nice and be 'fair'. From the responses I've gotten from letters I've written to my own democratic senators, it seems that they are more concerned with "working together", and "understanding the views of others", etc. than getting any meaningful legislation through. While it sounds nice to take the "we play fair" road, the republicans have no desire to do the same and laugh while stabbing the democrats in the back. I believe that we really are in the midst of a war, but it is a war to save the America the founding fathers built and the one I grew up loving, from the self-serving purposes of the current republicans. Time to take off the gloves, get bloodied and do what is needed to save the country!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 12/20/2007
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

I Hope this is a case of the republicans getting enough rope to hang themselves. "obstructionist" won't set well with the american people considering the obstructionist's republicans are serving the rich , not the american voter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 12/20/2007
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 45 fans permalink
photo

the so called leaders of both parties have destoyed the parties . they both need to get rid of the old guard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 12/20/2007
- ljsfolly I'm a Fan of ljsfolly 6 fans permalink

Blame is high on everyone's list it seems. Who is complaining that called or wrote their congress rep and told them what they think/thought? I think that the republicans have decided that nothing the dems want should be passed regardless of how good it looks or what the people at home want. They stopped working for those who elected them when they were elected that is why the republican controlled congress got us so deep in the sewer. They have follwed bush and all of the wing nuts they had in charge as leaders for the bush years and before in the clinton years. All for one and all for corporations/big business and for sure not the common American. Sure the dems could have, could do better but it's foolish to blame them for all that bush and his illegal cronies have done. Just look at the Justice Department, the Supreme Court. Are they biased againest us and in bushes pockets?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 12/20/2007

Some one should tell KOs and DU. that they bad mouth democrats all the time. I think they are just lying Republicans on those sites

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 12/20/2007

That's certainly one way of looking at it, but it's really only half of the story. We keep hearing that "it takes 60 votes to do anything in the Senate", but we rarely hear why. Of course, the reason for the 60 vote requirement is that the legislation is being filibustered. But most of the time, it's not republicans who are actually filibustering; it's actually our majority leader - Harry Reid - who is doing most of the filibustering.

Rather than making republicans actually filibuster the legislation they don't like, Reid generously allows them to have the 60 vote requirement without actually filibustering. He commonly invokes a parliamentary procedure known as a "unanimous consent request" to request a 60 vote requirement for the passage of or amendments to virtually any bill that does not have the overwhelming support both parties - bills that would gain 60 votes anyway. In fact, he bragged in their final press conference that most of the legislation they have passed has commonly gained over 70 votes.

Reid has invoked this procedure even when the republicans do not request it. He is therefore effectively filibustering most legislation himself, on the republican's behalf.

So it seems that the "nuke-u-ler" option has been taken off the table, and replaced by the "60 vote requirement".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 12/20/2007

"Even the study notes that the previous record was in the 107th Congress. This is the 110th. Meaning it is a development. This is not the Republicans doing something totally out of the blue. This is how the Senate now works where the minority party increasingly feels like it has got its back up against the wall."

Next year stop working up political bills that have no chance of being signed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 12/20/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect