Marc Cooper

BIO

Marc Cooper

The Huffington Post

Obama Slugs Back At "Trial Lawyer" Edwards

December 31, 2007 11:46 AM


stumbleupon :Obama Slugs Back At "Trial Lawyer" Edwards   digg: Obama Slugs Back At "Trial Lawyer" Edwards   reddit: Obama Slugs Back At "Trial Lawyer" Edwards   del.icio.us: Obama Slugs Back At "Trial Lawyer" Edwards

Des Moines, Iowa-- As the John Edwards campaign shows beefed-up muscle going into the last days of the caucus race, rival Barack Obama is concentrating most of his fire against the former North Carolina senator instead of confronting Hillary Clinton.

It's much more Obama versus Edwards than Barack versus Hillary.

During a Des Moines speech Sunday night to a heated crowd of 1,500 supporters, Obama vigorously rebutted statements made earlier in the day by Edwards that Obama was "too nice" to be an effective President. "I have to say, I've been doing this my whole life," Obama said, referring to his long record of personal political activism. "When you talk about change, you might just want to try the guy who's actually done it before," Obama said, implying that Edwards is a Johnny-come-lately to the arena of social reform.

Obama said that as a young man he was offered many lucrative choices but turned them down in favor of low-paid work as a community organizer and as a civil rights lawyer, a theme he has sounded repeatedly on the stump over the past weeks. For the first time, and in a direct shot at Edwards, Obama said one of the big bucks options he turned down was to work as a "trial lawyer."

Edwards has made millions as a trial lawyer and boasts of how he has used that position to take on bog corporations.

The increased friction between Obama and Edwards comes as a barrage of polls show both candidates, along with Hillary Clinton, in a virtual tie to win the first-in-the-country caucuses. Any expectations that Edwards, running third in most national polls, would eventually fade here in Iowa have dissipated as some surveys show him in the lead in the Hawkeye State.

Obama's senior campaign advisor, David Axelrod, denied to The Huffington Post that his campaign had until recently underestimated Edward's strength, especially in Iowa's rural areas. "We came into Iowa months ago knowing that Edwards had built a strong presence," he said. "Senator Edwards has been working those areas for six years. But I've been out there these last few days and can tell you our rallies are two, three times bigger than his."

On a Monday morning media conference call, Obama's national campaign manager, David Plouffe, virtually ignored Hillary Clinton in his discussion of Iowa, preferring to compare his campaign with that of Edwards. He also argued that growing crowd sizes for Obama were evidence of his superior positioning in the contest.

Admitting to "an amazing amount of volatility" in the Iowa race, Plouffe nevertheless expressed confidence that the Obama campaign was outdrawing and out-organizing the Edwards operation . "We just had the best weekend of the campaign in attracting new supporters, knocking on 90,000 doors," he said.

Plouffe excoriated Edwards and Clinton for benefiting from what he called a "blizzard of outside money," referring to independent expenditures made by so-called 527 groups not officially affiliated with the candidates. Plouffe denounced the support being given to the Edwards and Clinton effort by certain unions and women's group. "It's now one against seven," Plouffe said, portraying the Obama campaign as a David standing against special interest Goliaths.

In the past both Plouffe and Axelrod have worked for 527 fund-raising groups similar to those now supporting their rivals. While Plouffe would not say his campaign explicitly thought such 527's should be banned, he said on two different occasions during the call, that the link between some union-backed groups and the Edwards campaign "is an issue that deserves more scrutiny."

Check out the rest of HuffPost's Iowa coverage.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
706
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

"Instead, he chose to become an ambulance chaser, shaking down doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies for (paraphrasing his class warfare rhetoric) not a million, not ten million, but hundreds of millions."
Conservative Originalist

I laugh whenever I see people beating up on Edwards for being a trial lawyer. Why? I know perfectly well that if he were still practicing law and any of his critics had a family member whose health was destroyed by a major medical mistake or corporate negligence, they'd be in Edwards' office on their knees, begging him to take their case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 01/02/2008

It's Not Good Enough to be Right

Out here on the web? We nailed it, pretty much. Iraq. Torture. The Constitution. Corruption. Morality.
Start with The Huffington Post. Then go to Talking Points Memo, Hullabaloo, Think Progress, Crooks and Liars, Daily Kos, and Salon. Round it off with The Young Turks, The Sideshow, and Americablog, and you get a pretty good picture of what's really going on.

At these and many other online blogs, on the truly momentous issues of our times, the men and women who've so clearly articulated what our grand experiment really is all about, deserve our praise and our gratitude.

But impossible as it may seem, it won't be enough to be right.

You see, it's an old problem we liberals have. We're intelligent. We speak in full sentences. We're righteous in our indignation, and Republicans hate us. They hate the very word liberal. They will do and say anything, not to prove their hollow arguments, but to win.

Make no mistake, they can win. It's simple, really. All we have to do is believe too much in our idealism. And somehow, in the hard white light of the general election, our candidate, our cause that we hold so dear, gets lost.

We've done this before. And even though we've been right before, and we're right now, we've lost before, and we can lose now.

They're waiting for us. They too, feel historical momentums. We can never underestimate the power of the politics of hate, which is the main thing they get that we don't get.

So, go ahead. Be idealistic. It will feel good, feel right.

But I have to ask: who lead on every important issue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 01/01/2008
- Kane I'm a Fan of Kane permalink

John Edwards has a new applause line about the outrage of high CEO compensation. "You've got the head CEO of one of the biggest health insurance companies in America, last year he didn't make a million dollars, he didn't make tens of millions of dollars, he made hundreds of millions of dollars. Hundreds of millions of dollars," Edwards told voters in Laconia, N.H. last week, about an unnamed executive.

Edwards also did not name another chief executive who did quite well last year: Wesley Edens, the president of Fortress Investment Group, the New York hedge fund and private equity firm that paid Edwards nearly $500,000 for his work as a part-time adviser in 2006, where Edwards has about $16 million invested, and whose employees earlier this year raised $167,000 for Edwards' campaign, his largest single source of contributions.

Edwards' populist message has been undermined in other ways by his work at Fortress, which he said in an interview earlier this year that he chose as a place of employment because he wanted to learn more about capital markets and their relationship with poverty. Edwards has railed against companies that use offshore tax shelters; many of Fortress' hedge funds are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, which allows foreign investors and large institutional investors to avoid U.S. taxes on their gains with Fortress.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/31/executive_compensation_an_issu_1.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 01/01/2008

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama_and_campaign_contributor_Antoin_%22Tony%22_Rezko

There is a reason why Obama made Judicial Watch's 10 most Corrupt Politicians in 2006 (honorable mention in the top 20) and top 10 in 2007.

Basically Obama was involved in several questionable land deals in the slum areas of Chicago - representing as an attorney - this Tony Rezko who will go to trial in February - unfortunately after most of the primaries. This is all over the news in Illinois as it happened while Obama was a state senator and involves his wife Michelle.

This site is impartial and just a collection of the news articles from Illinois and court documents.

The web is filled however with conservative websites touting this corruption of Obama. It will all probably hit the national news after the Democrats have foolishly selected Obama and it's too late to turn the page.

Not only a potential 4 to 8 years of Republicans if Obama moves forward in the line as a President, but good chance the Republicans will win back Congress.

Fight on Edwards and Biden!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 AM on 01/01/2008

Easy shots now, eh Obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 AM on 01/01/2008



I hope Edwards whips Obama's dilettante ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 01/01/2008

Of course Giuliani quit Iowa. He is a quitter. He quit on the minority population of NY when he was mayor, he quit on the Firemen before and after 9/11, and he lied to and quit on sevice and rescue workers after 9/11. Now he telling the primary voters of all the first states, to go fuck themselves...Imagine if this guy gets into the White House....he ight just decide to "quit on America" when things don't go his way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 01/01/2008
photo

NIce guys finish last. What we need is a real creep! But wait, isn't that what we've had for the last twenty eight years? Hasn't worked very well, has it? That's what happens when you take the advice of a racist baseball manager.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 12/31/2007
photo

So I can never vote for a "trial lawyer" as if they are some sort of criminal to be banished? I happen to think trial lawyer skills are a great asset and Obama is taking a low, cheap, easy shot---just reaks of desperation. Edwards is the smartest candidate; he's re-tooled his thinking for current issues and he's on the money and able to manage a great campaign with less money and scads of hard work. He can handle the media too without manipulating it. Edwards is a winner; if he looses, WE LOSE MUCH MORE. Edwards 08!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 12/31/2007

John Edwards fought for consumers against large corporations. Obama's voted with the Republicans limiting consumers' rights to sue in a class action suit. (surprised me too)

Obama's a lawyer.

He illustrates that old adage that "those who can't, teach."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 12/31/2007

John Edwards is a trial lawyer. That's how he made his millions. Senator Obama chose to go to the south side of Chicago and help people and pass up the big bucks. He's never had money until he wrote his books.

Wasn't Edwards part of the DLC when he was in the senate? I believe he was. And he's been saying he'll take away health insurance from the congress. A president can't do that. Where did he come up with this?

Edwards should just go back to NC and to his 28,000 square foot house with his $400 haircuts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 12/31/2007

I agree wholeheartedly with "Anybody by Clinton." She will loose in the general, and she is a corporatist to boot. I wish it was just Obama or Edwards vying for the nomination against her, because they appear to be splitting the anti-Clinton vote which is a shame.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 12/31/2007
photo

PART 1 of 2:

As far as the MSM and big corporations are concerned, the fix is in. It is a race between Hillary and Obama from now till November 2008. To hell with the will of the voters. The issues are irrelevant. To hell with bringing the troops home. Defense contactors support Hillary. To hell with the poor. Only the corporations donating to the "cause" would receive welfare. To hell with those needing healthcare, but denied it by corporations. A single payer healthcare system favored by two-third of Americans is off the table (see http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119127620102645595.html ).

The question is what do we do about it " "we" being those among us who would have liked to see a dramatic turn away from the disastrous foreign and domestic agenda of the NeoCons and fascists currently occupying our White House. We, who expected more from the Democratic Congress. We who would like a step away from corporatism in America.

Should we throw in the towel, and say to heck with it all, and that nothing can change?

I, for one, am not ready to do that. The struggle goes on.

Two months ago, I doubled my monthly contribution to Kucinich. And I adopted an intern to work on his campaign.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 12/31/2007

I'm outta here. Happy New Year's, one and all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 12/31/2007
photo


Going strictly by their positions on the most important issues of the day, there is no question in my mind about who I would vote for: Kucinich.

Additionally, I owe him my vote and financial support. Kucinich marched with us when we were trying to stop this fraud called Iraq war from starting.

Kucinich was with us then, and he has been with true progressives and liberals every step of the way.

On other major issues, there is no one even close to Kucinich in representing true progressive and liberal views.

However, generally speaking, progressives and liberals let Kucinich down. Instead, they decided to be led by the MSM, of which HuffPost is now an integral part.

Progressives and liberals had their very own candidate, and they ignored him.

Now, we fully deserve what we will have as the Democratic nominee. Among the others, I think Edwards looks the most promising - not going by principles, but mainly going by his approach to problem solving.

For a true progressive or libearl to be ever nominated, we must wait for a white guy, six-foot five, gorgeous hair, nice clothes, and hopefully, at least a fraction of Kucinich's integrity, principles, and comapssion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 12/31/2007
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
ALASKA GOP SENATOR RIPS PALIN: YOU ABANDONED US

Alaska's Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski issued a...

Sarah Palin Turns Pro

I wish Hunter S. Thompson had lived to see this. As...

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPost Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More

Sam Stein is the White House correspondent for the Huffington Post. Previously he worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Ryan Grim is the senior congressional correspondent for the Huffington Post. He is a former staff reporter with Politico.com and Washington City Paper.
Read More

Jason Linkins is editor of Huffington Post's media commentary blog Eat the Press. He is based in Washington, DC, and previously contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is the Senior News Editor at the Huffington Post. She is based in New York.
Read More