As New Hampshire Dust Settles, New Clinton, Obama Strategies Emerge

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - As New Hampshire Dust Settles, New Clinton, Obama Strategies Emerge stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 01-11-08 04:27 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Hillaryecon

The strategic goal behind Hillary Clinton's announcement today of an aggressive $70 billion economic stimulus package is to shift the debate onto favorable turf with proposals to improve economic conditions for the increasing number of financially strapped voters -- and away from the Iraq war and Clinton's 2002 vote in favor of the war, a vote which has fueled Obama's candidacy.

Obama has not yet countered Clinton's January 11 economic offensive, but today and yesterday he won a series of endorsements from top Democratic officials -- Senators John Kerry, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, and Arizona governor Janet Napolitano. These endorsements send a worrisome signal to the Clinton campaign that politicians in these areas judge her as more polarizing than Obama -- more likely to energize the Republican base -- and fear that she could damage the chances of local Democrats on the ballot next November.

Clinton's economic policy announcement is a direct outgrowth of the January 8 New Hampshire primary. Clinton's strategists are convinced that the recent rise in unemployment and the manufacturing slowdown, which voters have been paying growing attention to over the winter, played to her strengths in the Granite State. Aides believe that, combined with a surge of support among women, Clinton's 'crying' incident, and the possible role of race in bringing white voters to the New York senator's side, they see the makings of a reconfigured strategy to carry the campaign forward.

This approach would emphasize the virtues of her experience and the economic success of Bill Clinton's two administrations, to undermine Obama's more abstract message of hope and unity.

Today, Clinton proposed the following economic measures: housing assistance, especially to those threatened by foreclosure; energy assistance to poor and moderate income households; and extended unemployment insurance. This investment in "growing" the economy could, if deemed necessary, be quickly followed by a $40 billion tax rebate for low-income workers which would include cash payments in the form of a refundable tax credit to those whose income is so low that they do not pay taxes.

While Clinton is moving quickly to stake out her economic positions, Obama is touting his three new major endorsements.

There is no real certainty among political observers about the motivations behind Kerry's decision, whose announcement received the most publicity. Speculation ranged from the view that Kerry has made an impartial assessment of the strengths of Clinton and Obama, to more skeptical analyses arguing that Kerry remains deeply ambitious and is backing the candidate he sees as least likely to win in November, thus increasing his own chances to run in 2012.

Johnson, however, has no presidential ambitions, and has been scarred by seeing his fellow South Dakota Democratic Senator, Tom Daschle, go down to defeat in 2004. His endorsement of Obama, in this view, is based on a judgment that in his state, Clinton -- with her persistently high negatives -- would be more damaging to down-ballot Democrats than Obama.

Johnson reinforced this interpretation in his endorsement announcement:

"I'm supporting Senator Barack Obama in his race for the presidency because he is in a unique position to reach across party lines and unite our country," Johnson said. "As a red state Senator fighting for common ground, I look forward to working with a President who is more concerned with good ideas than partisan bickering, and I believe Senator Obama is that person."

Like Kerry, Napolitano could have mixed motives. Democrats are making substantial gains in Arizona and she, like Johnson, says she has concluded that Obama would do better down-ballot than Clinton in her state, which is steadily turning from red to pink, if not to purple. "I think he's a new young voice who has new appeal, particularly for those of us in the West," she told the Washington Post.

At the same time, Napolitano, a popular mountain-state politician, could be among those considered for a vice presidential slot by Obama, especially since the mountain states are a key Democratic target this year. It is virtually certain that Clinton would not pick a female running mate. Conversely, that is not out of the question for Obama, and Napolitano would likely be those on a list of possible running mates.

The strategic goal behind Hillary Clinton's announcement today of an aggressive $70 billion economic stimulus package is to shift the debate onto favorable turf with proposals to improve economic cond...
The strategic goal behind Hillary Clinton's announcement today of an aggressive $70 billion economic stimulus package is to shift the debate onto favorable turf with proposals to improve economic cond...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
240
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 137 fans permalink

Each day I see carefully staged photographs, carefully scripted speeches. It all looks and sounds so nice.

Then I look at the Congressional Record, and it does not look so nice anymore.

I see the pollsters constantly probing, adjusting their message, and I know that somewhere out there, there is a demographic aimed at me.

All trying to convince me, and those others carefully-computed to "think like me," that this time it's gonna be different. That here is the Savior. Here is Change.

But http://thomas.loc.gov daily tells me differently.

If the criminal element that is now running amuck in our Government is allowed to continue, as "Ike" Eisenhower warned us 47 years ago this month, there will be no change .. and soon, there will be no Republic.

If there is no Law Enforcement, there will soon be no Law. And then, there will be no Protection under the laws. No Republic.

Or at least, no Republic that matters anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 01/12/2008
- m4rk0 I'm a Fan of m4rk0 2 fans permalink

If by chance HRC were to win this thing and serve 2 terms that would mean that a Bush or Clinton would be in the executive branch for 36 consecutive years (1980 - 2016). Out of the hundreds of millions of people living in the U.S. that's the best that we can do? People running our country from 2 families? That does not sit well with me. It seems un-American. We can do better and deserve better. Please spread Barack's message of hope and change!

oligarchy:
1. a. Government by a few, especially by a small faction of persons or families.b. Those making up such a government.
2. A state governed by a few persons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 01/12/2008
- kathcalla I'm a Fan of kathcalla 3 fans permalink

THIS IS NO FAIRY TALE! OH NO!
When Obama Rallied in person in Jersey City at Saint Peters College Auditorium on the day after New Hampshire Primary
5,000 people showed up to support Obama: Black, White, Asian, Latina (Equal distribution of white, black, latina, asian,I know because I was there! and I've never seen anything like it before in my life -anywhere!)

While Obama is in Las Vegas and South Carolina:
New Jersey Has Active Obama Events SCHEDULE
60 Plus NJ Events in Princeton, Jersey City, Newark, Paterson, Teaneck, Monmouth, Ocean County....­everywhere­!

Day: 01/12/2008
Obama Campaign Action Day 60 Plus NJ Events
posted by: KathyCallahan [edit event]
Summary:
Today Saturday Jan 12 Is Grassroots Action Day:
You can Go door to door and make calls from Obama headquarters with grassroots team in every local community
Description:
Today Saturday Jan 12 Is Grassroots Action Day: MORE THAN 60 EVENTS scheduled at 10 a.m., 11, 12 p.m., 2, 3 and 4, 5 P.M.
You can Go door to door and make calls from Obama headquarters with grassroots team in every local community.

Go Now: BarackObama.Com
click on state click on Nj and you are almost there! Map of events and locations

Call: Obama Headquarters
100 Executive Dr
Suite 100
West Orange, NJ 07052
973-243-7076

Where:
100 Executive Dr Suite 100
West Orange, NJ 07052 973-243-7076
07052
When: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM

First Posted On BLUEJERSEY.COM

KathCalla@aol.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 01/12/2008
- cloudy I'm a Fan of cloudy 2 fans permalink

Aides believe that, combined with a surge of support among women, Clinton's 'crying' incident, and the possible role of race in bringing white voters to the New York senator's side, they see the makings of a reconfigured strategy to carry the campaign forward.

Think about the above quote for a minute, even if you "get it" in one second. THIS is the strategic thinking -- as reported not by an Obama operative but by a press observer who also has some pretty hard-nosed things to say about the motives of major politicians endorsing Obama -- of Hillary Clinton's "aides"?????? If this were the ONLY difference between Obama and Clinton, and if that "strategy" for "bringing white voters to [HRC's] side ..." were not further reflected in her own remarks, dubbed "peculiar" by the exquisitely tactful New York Times, about Dr King and LBJ, it would be sufficient reason for progressives generally to go to the polls and to vote (or caucus) for Senator Obama. We already HAVE one party indulging in that kind of politics -- and it's high time for the Democratic Party not only to move away from the OVERT embrace of race-baiting, bigotry, and other forms of persecution, including of dissidents, but also from the FULL RANGE of such things, to the extent possible.

A lot of people see no substantive difference between Obama and Clinton, seeing it mainly as a difference in style and the question of who is more electable. (In contrast to what most polls of Democrats show, I see Obama as much more electable, apparently the reason given in the column why some leading politicians like the Governor of Arizona -- a potential swing state -- have endorsed him.

A "strategy"? How about a strategy of getting out and voting or caucusing for Barack Obama in your home state??????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 01/12/2008

Obama asks S.C. black voters to have faith

Where is the beef....

Is Barack Obama's message Image Oriented vs. Issue Oriented?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=1510
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 01/12/2008
- isis I'm a Fan of isis 14 fans permalink
photo

As we head into hard times let's not forget that this happened last time we had a long drawn out war. Maybe we should come up with a way to solve problems in the world without having these wars that the middle class end up paying for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 01/12/2008
- bobh I'm a Fan of bobh 11 fans permalink

"Anyway anyone with a brain who's been through this site a few times knows it might as well be called Obama-ting Post."

Yes, the site reeked with schadenfreude until the unanticipated events of last Tuesday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 01/12/2008

THE SUPPLY-SIDE SCAM

George Bush’s $3 trillion dollar tax giveaway to the rich over the past 7 years has been a disaster for average Americans. Supply-side (trickle-down) economics is a bogus theory promoted by those who benefit from it. In a mature capitalist system, supply side never rules, it’s always the demand side of the equation that governs growth and well-being. Think about the 1930s Depression, General Motors had plenty of supply, but demand evaporated.

Previous U.S. economic downturns have been cured with only $200-300 billion in tax cuts targeted to the middle class, because the consumer (the great middle class and 2/3rd of the economy) spends that tax cut and primes the economic pump. But George Bush has raised the debt that our children and grandchildren will have to pay from $6 trillion to over $9 trillion for current economic growth (i.e. we all get trickled on, as the rich spend some small fraction of their gains). Unfortunately, this growth is largely and uniquely without wage gains, and so has shrunk the middle class that makes America strong and great. Also, this growth has already over ($3 trillion flushed down the toilet and gone!), as the FED has had to cut interest rates because recession is looming. Massive debt has led to a weak dollar, which is now at record lows vs. other major currencies because of FED interest rate cuts. In turn, the record low dollar has produced record oil prices ($100/barrel); and any additional needed FED interest rate cuts could cause a free fall in the value of the dollar, guaranteeing recession or worse, stagflation.

The middle class is slowly being tapped out, as home values (most of their net worth and the credit card of last resort) are falling in price, and a considerable number of homeowners are heading for foreclosure. With the rich-poor divide increasing, we’re headed toward previous shining examples of trickle-down economics: South America of the recent past and feudalism in the Middle Ages. SUPPY-SIDE ECONOMICS IS NEW FEUDALISM AND SERFDOM!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 01/12/2008
- VivaZapata I'm a Fan of VivaZapata 61 fans permalink
photo

what worked for a skewed constituency in NH is the same thing that will send democratic politicians running the other way because they see the tearing on the wall and know that those water drops will be all the ammo that the republicans will need to bury her and them (the other dems running for office) in november.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 01/12/2008
- partyofone I'm a Fan of partyofone 45 fans permalink

The article says Clinton is proposing "an aggressive $70 billion economic stimulus package ... improve economic conditions for the increasing number of financially strapped voters".

Now there's a laugh. The only "voters" Hillary is concerned about are those profiting by billions from unchecked corporate greed and defense contracts. These are the same billionaires who are financing her campaign. Clinton's plan uses tax dollars as WELFARE FOR CORPORATIONS who are paying mega millions in greedy bonuses to top exectives. Why should hardworking citizens subsidize Hillary's corporate cronies?

If the Democrats nominate and the nation elects Hillary Bush-Clint­on-Bush-Cl­inton NOTHING WILL CHANGE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 AM on 01/12/2008
- truthyguy I'm a Fan of truthyguy 42 fans permalink

Clinton's strategy is simple: Swift Boat

Obama was absent from the IL Senate most of the time - false
Obama was educated as a radical Muslim - false
Obama lacks experience - false

Don't look behind the curtain. Ignore that woman behind the curtain. I am the great and powerful Hillary of Oz. I can grant your wishes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 AM on 01/12/2008

That's a bit of spin. Obama has been endorsed by 4 sitting Senators now, but Clinton has been endorsed by 10. Anyway anyone with a brain who's been through this site a few times knows it might as well be called Obama-ting Post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 01/12/2008

Thomas Edsell's analysis and emphasis that Obama is more electable than Hillary Clinton is more of a fairly tale, but consistent with his and Huffpost's preference for Obama, than Obama's campaign itself. Not too many pundits would argue that Obama is more electable in the general elections than Hillary Clinton except those who would like to see Hillary pushed aside. By throwing the elections to Republican would certainly maintain or even the increase the popularity of HuffPost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 01/12/2008
photo

Where does Sen. Clinton suggest these billions that she'd like to hand out will come from? Borrow it from China?

I could read the GAO report days ago, i'm certainly hoping that she's got better access than me. And this GAO report, while worse than previous reports, is not that much different in pointing out our direction.

I don't want to hear any more BS about hope, change, or even experience until one of these people will level with me. They know, and i know that they know...so i know that they aren't being straight with the public.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...won't get fooled again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 01/12/2008
photo

Oil 100 US Dollars a barrel.
Gold 900 US Dollars an ounce.
America in danger of loosing Triple A Credit Rating.
Trouble with Iran.
Looks like the Democrats are going to inherit 1974, again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 01/12/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect