Clinton Biographer Tries To Answer: How Did Hillary Win NH?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Clinton Biographer Tries To Answer: How Did Hillary Win NH? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 01-11-08 10:22 AM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Bedellsmith

Hillary Clinton's upset victory in New Hampshire this week starkly underscores the unique and long-standing political union she has built with her husband, according to Clinton biographer Sally Bedell Smith.

"Look at what was being reported from inside her campaign, culminating in Bill taking over. It was a classic case," Smith said in an interview. "What happens when they are up against the wall, is that they only trust each other."

Smith spent more than three years and conducted more than 160 interviews in the process of writing her latest book, "For Love of Politics -- Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years." The work probes deep into the Clinton marriage and argues that a shared political partnership has defined the couple for more than three decades. And Clinton's unexpected win over rival Barack Obama, said Smith, was but one more chapter in the symbiotic history of America's most famous power couple.

In the wake of news reports of infighting within Hillary's team, of fundraisers threatening to rescind their support, and of a possible restructuring of the campaign strategy, the candidate naturally turned to her husband, Smith said. "He was deployed to do the dirty work for her. Just as she was deployed to do the dirty work for him," she said referring to Hillary Clinton's role during the last years of her husband's embattled presidency.

Clinton's strong New Hampshire showing, Smith argued, simultaneously revealed the candidate's weakness and strengths. One of the most telling moments of the New Hampshire primary, Smith said, occurred when the stress of the campaign apparently began to gnaw at Senator Clinton's psyche. Asked a question about how she maintained her composure while on the trail, the New York Democrat quivered and visibly started to tear up. The highly-publicized incident was seen by many as Clinton's turning point as New Hampshire voters responded positively to her emotional reaction. For Smith, however, the fact that the tears became so widely discussed was as telling as the display itself.

"Just the very notion of that," Smith said, "shows how ingrained the mistrust is of whatever she says or does. So much of what she has said for so many years has been calculated that it is so tough to judge something like that given her history. It is tough to except it at face value... The fact that it is a matter of debate is incredibly revealing."

Yet it was a return to aggressive politicking, Smith said, that ultimately helped Clinton turn around her electoral fortunes. Following her third place finish in the Iowa caucus, the former First Lady responded with vigor, taking Obama to task for policy positions, contradictory votes, and accusing him of offering "false hope."

"The thing that surprised me the most were in the last few days of Iowa," said Smith. "It was the woefully subdued affect she had. She was lowering her voice, speaking slowly, trying to be presidential, I guess. That seemed out of character. When she sprang to life was [during the New Hampshire] debate, when she got her back up. That was the Hillary who everyone knows. Her essential role for her is to be confrontational. And it worked for her in the debates."

"Even at the weepy moment, when her eyes were filling were tears. What was most remarkable was that she stayed relentlessly on the attack," Smith added. "She got emotional up to a point and then just never deviated from her focus, which was to continue to throw the daggers at Obama and Edwards. She got in some deft points while she was apparently melting."

Hillary Clinton's upset victory in New Hampshire this week starkly underscores the unique and long-standing political union she has built with her husband, according to Clinton biographer Sally Bedell...
Hillary Clinton's upset victory in New Hampshire this week starkly underscores the unique and long-standing political union she has built with her husband, according to Clinton biographer Sally Bedell...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
26
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

None of the voting machines in New Hampshire are connected. Early votes and absentee votes are all on paper ballots. Electronic Machine votes are also substantiated with a paper ballot. None of the machines are connected to a central source. It would be virtually impossible to manipulate the New Hampshire vote. It is no where near the type if tampered systems exisitng in Ohio and Florida. So get over it people Xenator Clinotn won this Primary election fair and square.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 AM on 01/13/2008
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 8 fans permalink

Sam Stein,

I like many much of your work here. Please take a strong stand for open democracy & write specifically about the questionable voting count up in NH.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 01/11/2008

Uh, I have an answer: DIEBOLD CORPORATION!

From article today, “Analysts at the Election Defense Alliance (EDA) have confirmed that based on the official results on the New Hampshire Secretary of state web site, there is a remarkable relationship between Obama and Clinton votes, when you look at votes tabulated by op-scan v. votes tabulated by hand:

Clinton Diebold Optical scan 91,717 52.95%
Obama Diebold Optical scan 81,495 47.05%
Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05%
Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95%

The percentages appear to be swapped. That seems highly unusual, to say the least.”


Only 20% of New Hampshire's primary ballots were counted by hand. The other 80% were counted exclusively by Diebold Corporation machines. There have been many investigations, indictments, and reporting (that is public record) finding Diebold voting machines not only hackable, but Diebold employees were instructed to change previous election votes,

Diebold machines should not be allowed in the US election process AT ALL!!! Diebold (recently changed their company name to Premier Election Solutions) needs to be shut down –they are corrupt, criminal, and they are ruining the US democratic process and the US democracy!!

If you do not have any of the public information regarding Diebold, now Premier Election Solutions, please get yourselves informed.

Bev Harris, the founder of Black Box Voting also identified and broke the story on the criminal records of a number of individuals who owned, programmed, and printed ballots in the elections industry. The information is out there.

Look at all the investigations, pending indictments, and sentencing of people involved on Black Box Voting Org.
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ & http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/1954.html

Diebold Corporation strikes again!! Diebold rigged another election and they will rig the November 2008 Presidential election too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 01/11/2008
- AnninCA I'm a Fan of AnninCA 54 fans permalink

The fact that she misted up and leveled has drawn such extraordinary attention that I wonder how anyone could POSSIBLY doubt that sexism is very much a part of this election.

Today's story about Bush misting up was funny. Not because of the cause of the misting. That's obviously not funny.

But because of the contrast in reactions.

I've decided the entire story is completely insane.

It's obviously a cover-up.

Fear. Can a woman run a country?

Oh good grief, Hillary isn't the first woman to assert this skill in the world.

Golda and Margret have already paved the way.

So relax, life isn't going to change as you know it.

Your wives will still bring you your coffee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 01/11/2008

Never mind all the pathetic "rationalizations" or "excuses" of why Hillary won, in here and all the other threads. Try this article for an insightful and clean slice through all the endless column inches of garbage:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/jeff_jarvis/2008/01/sexism_racism_cynicism_whining.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 01/11/2008
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 8 fans permalink

Explain this:

Clinton Optical scan 91,717 52.95%
Obama Optical scan 81,495 47.05%

Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05%
Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95%

http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 01/11/2008

She was crying because she was going to lose. Losing your sh*t and staying on message is NOT a meltdown or an authentic moment. It's a moment of really bad acting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 01/11/2008
- Lisette I'm a Fan of Lisette 38 fans permalink
photo

Why does everyone try to paint Hillary as something she is not.

People see her for what she is, which is that she IS calculating, and then someone comes along and says what you see and hear is not what you see and hear.

Hillary has very deep emotional problems and would run a very paranoid Presidency.

And it is very insulting for anyone to say otherwise.

Then for the last grasp to hang on to, it is said she is a woman and women need to unite. What garbage!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 01/11/2008
- snruB I'm a Fan of snruB 5 fans permalink
photo

The last paragraph is my reason for concluding that it was phony...she continued to weep while she attacked Barack...sounding as if she was almost crying because she was so frustrated the public didn't get that Barack was weak, unexperienced, and wrong

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 01/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect