bush, bush administration, false intelligence, false Iraq statements, iraq, Iraq statements, Iraq war
bush, bush administration, false intelligence, false Iraq statements, iraq, Iraq statements, Iraq war

Study: False Statements Preceded War

AP   |   January 22, 2008 at 11:13 PM


stumbleupon :Study: False Statements Preceded War   digg: Study: False Statements Preceded War   reddit: Study: False Statements Preceded War   del.icio.us: Study: False Statements Preceded War

WASHINGTON - A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

White House spokesman Scott Stanzel did not comment on the merits of the study Tuesday night but reiterated the administration's position that the world community viewed Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, as a threat.

"The actions taken in 2003 were based on the collective judgment of intelligence agencies around the world," Stanzel said.

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaida," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Named in the study along with Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.

Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida.

The center said the study was based on a database created with public statements over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001, and information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches and interviews.

"The cumulative effect of these false statements -- amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts -- was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war," the study concluded.

"Some journalists -- indeed, even some entire news organizations -- have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, 'independent' validation of the Bush administration's false statements about Iraq," it said.

Read the full report.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
1449
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (18 pages total)

They can tell as many lies as they want...I hold the media totally responsible for printing them and carrying them the world over.
As Pope John Paul II stated, "if it didn't happen on TV, it didn't happen". Well, why'd they let it happen???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 01/26/2008

"Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida."

Sorry, but that makes Powell's (254) second to Bush's (259), not, as the post says, the other way around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 01/25/2008

Here's one for all you conspiracy nuts!

Check out the Republican plan for this Country.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/index.html

Check out when this group was organized and who the players are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 AM on 01/25/2008

Late, but why not impeachment?? Why not??? After all, can you imagine a Democratic President administration being caught in 935 LIES? I mean where is the fairness, compared to the last "impeachment" of a Democratic President? For ONE personal affair lie that did not result in ANY death. We live in surreal times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 01/24/2008

A video of some of the lies, with music:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B25jjXgzx78

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 01/24/2008

15 more and he gets a set of steak knives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 01/24/2008

So what if they told a lot of lies. No harm,, no foul!
Nobody -- except perhaps a few puny brained fools believed those lies, so it cannot be argued that we acted on them. We went to war because our Friend wanted us to and we will always do our Friend's bidding unquestioningly. The lies were merely window dressing and everyone knew it.
Anyone disagreeing with that policy is probably an anti-Friendly type and should be shut up if not locked up or --- well, you knnow what!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 01/24/2008



The bush LEGACY: 935 lies that led to an extended "CREDIT CAR" war that ruined our economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 01/24/2008

Only 65 more lies and Bush will achieve his father's dream of seeing a "thousand points of lies."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 01/24/2008

Where was this report in the MSM six years ago when it still mattered? It's a bit friggin late now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 01/24/2008

It shows that if lie enough, you can get people to believe you and senselessly invade a hapless nation. 935 times to be exact!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 01/24/2008

.

935 "false statements"? Who pulled that number out of their ass? What the hell are they talking about ?Bush lied and lies every time he opens his damn mouth. 935 lies... before breakfast.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 01/24/2008

The Idiot-in-Chief is convinced the "truth" lags behind in proving itself. Current "falsehoods" will be corrected to show Bush was "prescient" in his "reality". That he was "way out in front". He is delusional, ignorant and evil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 01/23/2008

IMPEACHMENT

January 23, 2008, 12:57 pm

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/kucinich-starts-new-impeachment-drive/

Kucinich Starts New Impeachment Drive
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN

Representative Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio may get excluded from Democratic presidential debates, as he has been recently, but no one can deny him the floor in the House.

And today Mr. Kucinich took to the floor to fire off his latest salvo at the Bush administration: his plans to introduce Articles of Impeachment against President Bush on Jan. 28 " the day of Mr. Bush"s State of the Union speech.

Accusing the administration of lying about the need for the war in Iraq, Mr. Kucinich said he did not need to hear the president"s assessment. "We know the State of the Union," he declared. "It"s a lie."

He also fired a volley at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California who has maintained that impeaching Mr. Bush is not on the table for Congressional Democrats. "If impeachment is off the table," Mr. Kucinich said, "truth is off the table. If truth is off the table then this body is living a lie."

Mr. Kucinich introduced Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney last April and in November, with the surprise help of Republicans seeking to embarrass the Democrats, he nearly succeeded in securing an hour of debate on the House floor. House Democratic leaders blocked that, however, by referring the impeachment effort back to the Judiciary Committee.

Anti-Bush groups have been urging Mr. Kucinich to undertake an effort to impeach the president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 01/23/2008

How does the Bush administrations' 935 false statements concerning Iraq compare on the overall IMPEACHMENT METER with Clinton's lying to a Grand Jury about a private, personal relationship?...Is it worse that Clinton tried to conceal an extra-marital relationship than it was (and is) for the Bush administration to lie to one's countrymen (and to the world at large) knowingly, repeatedly, and deliberately -- in order to entangle us in a long and costly war that, as we've come to learn, was not borne out of necessity but, more accurately, borne out of choice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 01/23/2008

Here is a rocking video essay of the lies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B25jjXgzx78

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 01/23/2008

farquaad bush has made a deal with congress.
I won't attack Iran if you don't impeach...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 01/23/2008

For the Bush administration telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 01/23/2008

According to Rachael Maddow the lies were clustered around strategic times -- just before elections, etc. for political gain. Not a big surprise, but how much are Americans willing to take from these idiots? A lot it seems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 01/23/2008

but...."WE'VE NEVER BEEN STAY THE COURSE"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 01/23/2008

"What ever happened to "WE THE PEOPLE" ????????

"We the People" are still here. We come and go as individuals, but "We the People" are as eternal as humanity.

We are a diverse and complex lot, capable of both the highest ideals and the lowest behavior, but on the whole, the vast majority of us are fundamentally good. And most feel in our hearts and minds a great love and desire for freedom and justice. There are darker souls walking among us, however, and though they are mercifully few in number they can do great damage, particularly when the People have fallen into sloth, moral depravity, cowardice and ignorance.

To a troubling degree, such has been the case in the U.S. We have traded our freedom and our future for a hand full of "magic beans." In the wake of 9/11 Bush/Cheney and the neo-cons promised us safety in return for our freedoms (and principles), and the People were ignorant of our own history that those that give away freedom for security will soon have neither (and as Franklin said: those that would trade essential freedom for temporary security deserve neither), as the unchecked government power will soon become greatest threat to your security.

Further, we have traded our future for a pile of imported junk, with a trade deficit in excess of $6 trillion, a national debt in excess of $9 trillion, a costly open-ended war in Iraq, and a resulting collapse of our dollar and standard of living in the indefinate future.

Truth be told, Bush/Cheney are as much a symptom as a cause, and the ultimately responsibility for our situation rests with the People themselves. We are to blame for allowing our situation when we had the power to change it.

We still have that power.

What we do with it is up to us, and it will determine our futures.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 01/23/2008

During the drum beat for War, i wondered and wondered when a study like this would be conducted. Greatest Mass Deception I know of since . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 01/23/2008

Blair's Labour Party is set to get hammered with their lies ... the September 2002 WMD dossier is going to be released -- http://www.newstatesman.com/200801230003

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 01/23/2008

A searchable data base of untrue statements. False statements, not lies! A lie would require intent! Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, McClellan, Powell, and Tenet - the usual suspects. Now how about a data base of true statements? It would be easier to use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 01/23/2008

"I will restore honor and integrity to the White House" (Bush 2001)

Well, I guess integrity will be restored when he leaves the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 01/23/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com