This is so great. Can we add further links? Say, the closest places of worship of the candidate's denomination?

The fact that you don't have Ron Paul and act like he is invisble. Even though he beat Rudy in every state, came in 2nd in NV, and is kicking butt in LA shows that your articles are nothing more than propoganda pieces.

You have no credibility. I will be unsubscribing from your service. And treat you like you do the honorable Dr. Paul. You don't exist.

You reap what you sow.
I fart in your general direction.

Please report unsdecideds.

I know I'm going to be called the "crazy Ron Paul supporter," but why on earth can you guys not at least acknowledge that he is in the race? It's the media's fault for not giving him ample time or everyone would be on board with the man. Please, even if you think he's a "kook" or whatever else everyone calls him, can you appease us Paulians by covering him?

As a sociologist, in a field where many peers make thier living doing polling data, this is a sad day.
Your ridiculing of poll data is intended purely to cast doubt on one of the most scientifically-rigorous endeavors in politics. Pollsters never make black-white claims about polling data, but rather, try to identify trends. It is not the fault of statisticians that the public does not know how to read and understand a poll. That is YOUR fault - the media that presents it to them without qualification. The methodologies to all polls are explained, and their implications can be understood by those with an ounce of gray matter.
The truly grave mistake that is not realized in the middle of this silliness:

Polling data is the only way by which to truly verify the integrity of an election, and kno0w whether or not a recount is needed! It is entirely possible that, when the pre-polls are wrong, AND the exit polls as well, - that it is in fact the ELECTION and not the POLLS that are the fraud.

Bill Clinton is bullshit and claims the Huff-post deliberately left him out of the astrology readings to slight him. "The first Black President" is so upset he threatening to cancel the minstral-show he planned for tonight.

My efforts with say no to polls has had the following results: Tuesday 1.22.08: refused three poll requests via phone, two on email. Wed 1.23.08: refused five poll via phone. Thurs 1.24.08: refused SEVEN polls via phone. It is so freeing to say I am not answering polls anymore and saying very sweetly "Goodbye!" and hanging up.

This is worth noting...the difference between sun-sign astrology and "complete" astrology is the difference between a horse race poll and a real one which is designed to flesh out the real thoughts of the participants (similar, one would suppose to the internal (secret) polls run by the campaigns themselves.

Speaking of bad astrology--what is up with the racist and misogynistic astro-claptrap being published on Huffpo by Michael Lutin wherein Hillary is a man eating gym teacher (dyke!!!), etc, etc, etc.

I am not criticising Huffpo for publishing a popular astrologer, rather I say shame, shame, shame for allowing the bigotry expressed in all of Lutin's past 3 posts.

if HuffPo is truly committed to protecting our democracy and the democratic process, why not launch a nationwide campaign entitled

SAY NO TO ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES

?

SAY NO TO POLLSTERS is like SAY NO TO WATERBOARDING when the real issue is TORTURE - admirable, but in the end an obscuration of (and diversion from) the real issue of massive vote fraud

i cannot understand why no presidential candidate, of either party, is willing to clearly and loudly stand up for every citizen's right to have their vote counted in a fair and accurate manner

i would give every american a free "I VOTED" pencil if they used it to mark an X on a paper ballot

our democratic process is very clearly broken down by corruption, fraud and dirty tricks but, apparently, those in a position to fix it are the ones who got there thanks to the aforementioned corruption, fraud and dirty tricks

MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA IN 2008

The forecasts are Sun sign fortune cookie readings that don't explain the character or intent of the individuals. For that a full chart is needed as has been shown. Then an in-depth analysis will show that Hillary has her Scorpio evil secrets but with a cut-throat couple of aspects. It will reveal that Obama is an idealist with a dark side and we're not talking skin color here. However Edwards may seem, he's actually the best of the three for what we need here and now and he's a lot cleaner than the others. I wish Kucinich had more support because he's got the truth on his side and the hottest wife!

Asstrology is for the sheeple. The election is rigged. We will have Hillary or Barack. Or both. Either way? We lose. N-O-T-H-I-N-G will change in the next four years. Except for the middle class. We'll get poorer. Oh...and maybe more police on the streets.
My pessimistic attitude is usually correct. Sorry for being honest.

New Hampshire just released the recount of votes that Kucincich wanted. The error was 112 votes cast - so the election results were valid and fair. Hillary Clinton won. The polls were wrong.

Polls are propaganda tools. The media who gets its revenues from corporate advertisers take the polls. Who pays for the polls? The same advertisers and the polls reflect the views of whoever pays for them. They don't deserve discussion as they reflect made up lies intended to influence voting - and are just another means of tampering with the ballot and depriving us of a democracy.

Actually, a serious outlook from a non-partisan astrologer (there are only a few) is BETTER than a poll. The planets don't alter their orbits, after all, so the story is right there and stays there. One example is a detailed look at all the primary contenders done in October, saying Clinton-Romney, and holding steady throughout all of this, unwavering, at http://www.astrologysoftware.com/community/sessions/getarticle.asp?ID=216&orig=

The planets don't change their minds, so the overview is very much more stable, no kidding...and, surely, they couldn't do worse than the press or the polls...

Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll taken Jan. 18-22 among 337 likely Republican voters nationwide. The margin of error is plus or minus 5 points.

McCain: 22%
Huckabee: 18%
Romney: 17%
Giuliani: 12%

Notice how Ron Paul is not included? Even if you don't support a particular candidate, doesn't it bother you how wealthy people who own the major news outlets decide who will be allowed to participate in the national debate and who will be censored? Do you still believe all that bull about promoting democracy?

The American people are against the Iraq war but our leaders know better. Folks who post here are against the "say no to pollster petitiion." It was a bad idea, give it up!