Dead Satellite, Disabled Spy Satellite, Falling Spy Satellite, Satellite Earth, Satellite Falling To Earth, Spy Satellite, US Spy Satellite
Dead Satellite, Disabled Spy Satellite, Falling Spy Satellite, Satellite Earth, Satellite Falling To Earth, Spy Satellite, US Spy Satellite

Disabled Spy Satellite Threatens Earth

EILEEN SULLIVAN | January 26, 2008 09:55 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumbleupon :Disabled Spy Satellite Threatens Earth   digg: Disabled Spy Satellite Threatens Earth   reddit: Disabled Spy Satellite Threatens Earth   del.icio.us: Disabled Spy Satellite Threatens Earth

WASHINGTON — A large U.S. spy satellite has lost power and could hit the Earth in late February or early March, government officials said Saturday.

The satellite, which no longer can be controlled, could contain hazardous materials, and it is unknown where on the planet it might come down, they said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the information is classified as secret. It was not clear how long ago the satellite lost power, or under what circumstances.

"Appropriate government agencies are monitoring the situation," said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, when asked about the situation after it was disclosed by other officials. "Numerous satellites over the years have come out of orbit and fallen harmlessly. We are looking at potential options to mitigate any possible damage this satellite may cause."

He would not comment on whether it is possible for the satellite to perhaps be shot down by a missile. He said it would be inappropriate to discuss any specifics at this time.

A senior government official said that lawmakers and other nations are being kept apprised of the situation.

The spacecraft contains hydrazine _ which is rocket fuel _ according to a government official who was not authorized to speak publicly but spoke on condition of anonymity. Hydrazine, a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor, is a toxic chemical and can cause harm to anyone who contacts it.

Such an uncontrolled re-entry could risk exposure of U.S. secrets, said John Pike, a defense and intelligence expert. Spy satellites typically are disposed of through a controlled re-entry into the ocean so that no one else can access the spacecraft, he said.

Pike also said it's not likely the threat from the satellite could be eliminated by shooting it down with a missile, because that would create debris that would then re-enter the atmosphere and burn up or hit the ground.

Pike, director of the defense research group GlobalSecurity.org, estimated that the spacecraft weighs about 20,000 pounds and is the size of a small bus. He said the satellite would create 10 times less debris than the Columbia space shuttle crash in 2003. Satellites have natural decay periods, and it's possible this one died as long as a year ago and is just now getting ready to re-enter the atmosphere, he said.

Jeffrey Richelson, a senior fellow with the National Security Archive, said the spacecraft likely is a photo reconnaissance satellite. Such eyes in the sky are used to gather visual information from space about adversarial governments and terror groups, including construction at suspected nuclear sites or militant training camps. The satellites also can be used to survey damage from hurricanes, fires and other natural disasters.

The largest uncontrolled re-entry by a NASA spacecraft was Skylab, the 78-ton abandoned space station that fell from orbit in 1979. Its debris dropped harmlessly into the Indian Ocean and across a remote section of western Australia.

In 2000, NASA engineers successfully directed a safe de-orbit of the 17-ton Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, using rockets aboard the satellite to bring it down in a remote part of the Pacific Ocean.

In 2002, officials believe debris from a 7,000-pound science satellite smacked into the Earth's atmosphere and rained down over the Persian Gulf, a few thousand miles from where they first predicted it would plummet.

___

Associated Press writers Pamela Hess and Deb Riechmann contributed to this report.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
52
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- LastDaysCafe See Profile I'm a Fan of LastDaysCafe permalink

Wouldn't it be ironic if this satellite fell on the White House or the Pentagon! Geez what a celebration that would be!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 01/27/2008
- Jtt See Profile I'm a Fan of Jtt permalink

Incidentally, now this story is delisted, here is the likely candidate [NROL 21 ( http://space.skyrocket.de/index_frame.htm?http://skyrocket.de/space/doc_sdat/nrol-21.htm ) being tracked by amateurs. ( http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Jan-2008/0204.html ) [telescope photos]

The British amateurs seem to think its failure was in its non deployment of a solar array [drawn in, in the first photo].

Im not so sure, it was launched in 2006, before the satellite stealth program was discontinued (in 2007). ( http://ph33r.org/updates/2007/11/15/death-of-spy-satellite-program.html )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 01/27/2008
- samuraijack See Profile I'm a Fan of samuraijack permalink

I think better than hitting the White House, Camp David, Crawford, anywhere that Cheney is- the BEST place for the satellite to land is during the wedding of the hideous Bush daughter. "Daddy!! Your fucking spy satellite ruined my wedding!!! I hate you!!!!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 01/27/2008
- helonias See Profile I'm a Fan of helonias permalink

Will it land in a blue state or red state?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 01/27/2008
- helonias See Profile I'm a Fan of helonias permalink

could contain hazardous materials,

Like... plutonium and who knows whats else.

Obviously stuff so terrible that the gov is way to scared to reveal or even talk about.

Our own weapons of mass destruction

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 01/27/2008
- helonias See Profile I'm a Fan of helonias permalink

plutonium coming back to haunt us.

We all better strap bibles to our heads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 01/27/2008
- Edsa See Profile I'm a Fan of Edsa permalink

I hope it lands on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and make that entire area radioactive. That way, there is no more tension between the Muslims and the Jews who are trying to control that piece of real estate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 01/27/2008
- votingplumber See Profile I'm a Fan of votingplumber permalink

`This administration would spin it like this:

Al Quida: We told you people that Bin Lanen was trying to get a nuke to destroy us, I told ya so, now ya got to vote republican to protect us from our own fuck ups. yep, Al Quida,, George Bush.........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 01/27/2008
- Tankan See Profile I'm a Fan of Tankan permalink

Rumor has it that it may crash into an Iranian nuclear facility!

Quite by accident of course!

I guess that means we'll have to replace it with something much more capable!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 01/27/2008
- paixa3 See Profile I'm a Fan of paixa3 permalink

Well, I believe there is a God and I believe in Karma too. The EVIL assholes who put this up, may just end up with this albatros in their backyard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 01/27/2008
- Dendroica See Profile I'm a Fan of Dendroica permalink

God damn, Huffington Post, how hyperbolic can you get? This doesn't "threaten the Earth", it is a serious problem that might cause severe damage, but "threatens Earth"? Pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 01/27/2008
- jubo See Profile I'm a Fan of jubo permalink

Aaaaand how many are up there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 01/27/2008
- wcfar See Profile I'm a Fan of wcfar permalink

I would definitely like to know that Bush and his criminal friends (by the way Wolf-wits just got back on the federal tit at the State of Shame Department-can u believe!) have nooclear satelites up there. I mean I think I ought to know if a heavenly shit-storm of metal parts glowing in the dark is going to cause the fuel of weapons of mass destruction to land in my back yard. Could this be an Iranian thing? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha...man they keep trying don't they. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ROFLMAO!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 AM on 01/27/2008
- Jtt See Profile I'm a Fan of Jtt permalink

I will play devil"s advocate and say the fact that they mention toxic material in a "for instance" type comment is very worrisome. Also if this were a Clinton Era spacecraft (or before) I think this administration would have no problem mentioning it.

And also, the all "power lost" and "no control" sounds like a problem even a newer spacecraft could have, even the monsters they just recently launched, for alive and well clandestine programs ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V ) [look at the payload list for last year] -" or the result of international monkey business in space and a unreported or misreported incident of this flavor: ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/world/asia/18cnd-china.html?hp&ex=1169182800&en=1cccc5a239b55188&ei=5094&partner=homepage )

I hope this is an older sat -- Solar cells are not very stealthy power sources and God only knows what this administration has been up to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 01/27/2008
- Rocketmind See Profile I'm a Fan of Rocketmind permalink

The mention of Beryllium is the kicker: a S.N.A.P. Reactor would have several pounds at least of enriched plutonium, more than enough, vaporized by re-entry burn-up to poison and perhaps kill everyone and every living thing on the planet eventually. Beryllium is a neutron moderator meant to protect other components from inductive charges, hydrogen embrittlement,and radiation damage. Computer chips 'hardened' against radiation would also have beryllium shielding if the radiation was local rather than cosmic. This is bad, the spying is evil, and the future is uncertain due to White house anti-intellectualism & paranoia. Just having these spy devices is treason against humanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 01/27/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in