Max Follmer

BIO

Max Follmer

The Huffington Post

huffpolitics, congress, slideshow, vulernable Democrats, vulnerable Dems
huffpolitics, congress, slideshow, vulernable Democrats, vulnerable Dems

The Five Most Vulnerable Democrats In 2008

January 28, 2008 08:01 PM


stumbleupon :The Five Most Vulnerable Democrats In 2008   digg: The Five Most Vulnerable Democrats In 2008   reddit: The Five Most Vulnerable Democrats In 2008   del.icio.us: The Five Most Vulnerable Democrats In 2008

With so much attention focused on the white-hot presidential campaign, it is easy to forget the races further down the ticket that voters will be following in November.

Congressional analysts agree that while the Democrats are poised to expand their majorities in both chambers in November, there are still several Democratic members of Congress with big bullseyes on their backs.

"I think that even thought the national political landscape favors the Democrats, there are a handful of Democratic freshmen who currently represent Republican districts - many of whom got into office because of Republican scandals," said Nathan Gonzales, political editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, a nonpartisan newsletter that tracks congressional races.

A number of freshmen House Democrats have been dubbed "scandal babies" by David Wasserman, House Race editor of the Cook Political Report. These lawmakers owe their election victories to the missteps and foibles of their GOP predecessors, Wasserman said.

Democrats in those seats are going to be given a run for their money, he said. But overall the Republicans have more to worry about in 2008.

"The big difference is that Republican open seats are the only competitive open seats," Wasserman said. "Democrats have five people who are going somewhere from the House in 2008, but none are vulnerable."

In the last round of congressional races in 2006, Democrats picked up 31 House seats and retook the majority for the first time in twelve years. This year, sensing that the chess board favors the Democratic Party, 21 GOP lawmakers have announced they are retiring from the House.

And although observers are expecting Democrats to add anywhere from two to seven seats to their House majority, victories for the members below will not be easy:

Nick Lampson (Texas 22nd)

Lampson "has to be near or at the top of the list" of vulnerable Democrats, Gonzales said. His Houston-area district is heavily Republican -- he sits in former GOP House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's old seat -- and Lampson is perhaps the Democrats ultimate "scandal baby." After DeLay was forced out in a cloud of scandal, Lampson faced a write-in GOP opponent with a hyphenated name, and won 52 percent of the vote. But even with a crowded Republican field fighting it out ahead of Texas' March 4 primary, Lampson faces a tough fight in a district where George Bush won 64 percent of the vote in 2004.

Tim Mahoney (Florida 16th)

Mahoney practically owes his seat in the House to three words: Mark Foley scandal. Although Mahoney was running what National Journal called a "respectable" campaign for someone taking on an entrenched incumbent, he was still considered a long shot until allegations surfaced that Foley had sexually explicit Internet chats with teenage male House pages. Foley quickly skipped town and Mahoney became the odds-on favorite to win the GOP-leaning district that stretches from Palm Beach to the Gulf of Mexico. Mahoney carried the district in 2006 with 50 percent of the vote. But George W. Bush won over 54 percent of the district's voters in 2004, and the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported that Republicans outnumber registered voters in the district 42 percent to 36 percent. An August primary will determine which of the three Republicans vying for a spot on the general election ballot will take on Mahoney, but it looks like he is spoiling for a fight: the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza reported that Mahoney had already raised $1.4 million as early as October.

Nancy Boyda (Kansas 2nd)

"A lot of people think that her election to Congress was a fluke and that Jim Ryun [Boyda's predecessor] ran a weak campaign in '06 and did not see this coming until the last minute," Wasserman said. Boyda's eastern Kansas district is GOP country, and its residents broke overwhelmingly for George Bush in 2004, giving him 59 percent of the vote to John Kerry's 39 percent. There are two Republicans - including Ryun - looking to oust Boyda in the fall, and Wasserman said the freshman Democrat is going to have to step up her campaign considerably if she wants to pull out a victory in November. Boyda won her seat with 51 percent of the vote, and Ryun had represented the district for a decade before losing his seat in 2006.

Chris Carney (Pennsylvania 10th)

Carney is another of the Democrats' "scandal babies" who benefited from the personal mishaps of former GOP Rep. Don Sherwood -- who was, among other things, accused of choking an alleged mistress. Carney has received good reviews during his freshman term in Congress, Wasserman said, but "he has to prove he can win when the spotlight is on him." Carney won 53 percent of the vote in a northeastern Pennsylvania district that has a solid Republican pedigree: 60 percent of voters supported George W. Bush in 2004. Four Republicans are vying for a win in the April 22 GOP primary.

Gerald McNerney (California 11th)

McNerney wasn't even backed by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the 2006 primary when he won a spot in the general election against incumbent Rep. Richard Pombo. The McNerney-Pombo fight was a nasty one, but the Democrat ended up pulling in 53 percent of the vote. However, all the attention was on Pombo. The incumbent raised the ire of various environmental and conservation groups who labeled Pombo an "eco-thug" according to the National Journal. The district "voted against Richard Pombo more than they voted for Jerry McNerney," Wasserman said. McNerney's San Joaquin Valley district gave George W. Bush 54 percent of the vote in 2004, GOP voters outnumber Democrats in the district, and McNerney faces a formidable opponent in Dean Andal, a businessman from Stockton who is a former state Assemblyman and member of the California Franchise Tax Board. But the Modesto Bee pointed to one possible trump card in McNerney's hand: through the third quarter of 2007 McNerney had raised $1.06 million to Andal's $389,000.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
28
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Lampson's re-election won't be easy, to be sure, but his district isn't "heavily Republican" either. Thanks to DeLay's own re-districting and some demographic shifts, it's not the same Republican safe seat it once was. It is worth remembering that even when DeLay was at his height, anonymous Democratic challengers could be depended upon to get upwards of 32-39% of the popular vote. Lampson is effective, articulate, voting to his right, experienced, and capable. He could, with some help and judicious political tacking rightward, be re-elected.

I'm sure Chumley's a fine fellow and his mother, who plans to vote against Lampson because he too often votes with Republicans, doesn't understand politics...bless her little pinhead. As a loyal Democrat significantly to Lampson's ideological left, I wish the congressman. His district could do a lot worse...and has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 01/29/2008

Wait til Kennedy and Kerry come up for re-election. The women put em in. And they are gonna take em out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

Someone upthread mentioned that Dianne Finestein won't be up for re-election until 2012-here's a trick question for Californians-who was the repug candidate against her in the last election?

Extra credit for non-Californians who can answer this question.

The election before that, she almost got beat by an empty suit named Michael "I am homosexual but not Gay" Huffington.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

I live in Lampson's district, and have grown weary of contacting his office to complain about his Bush-friendly votes in the House. I WILL NOT vote for his reelection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 01/29/2008

.
Another certain loser is Dem Gabby Giffords in Arizona's 8th. This amnesty-supporter is backed only by union Bo$$e$. Her earmarks show that she's a pawn of the military-industrial complex. She won only as the lesser of two evils, since her Repug competition was a genuine light-weight. But now she will face the current Arizona Senate leader. Thankfully, she's doomed to certain defeat.

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 01/29/2008

You can never discount Bob Perry here in TX - he has managed to buy TX politics and as a result TX government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 01/29/2008

From the article in the link below.....

"According to Democratic candidates who ran for House of Representative seats in 2006, Rahm Emanuel, then head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, took sides during the Democratic primary elections, favoring conservative candidates, including former Republicans, and sidelining candidates who were running in favor of withdrawal from Iraq."

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/090607J.shtml

The Florida (16th) is also covered in this great article from truthout.

The battle for the heart and soul of the once great Democratic party is being won by Bush enabling wolves in sheep's clothing. Huffpost is NOT on the side of "we the people."

Look to truthout.org for a liberal point of view that does not feel the need to worship at the Altar of the Holy Democratic party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

Dennis Kucinich is the MOST VULNERABLE democrat in the entire country. He's the only one who cares more about America and the American People than about the money from corporations. He's the only one who had the guts to bring articles of impeachment against Cheney and soon to do the same against Bush. Everyone ignores that fact and now gives all the credit to Wexler. The entire Main Stream Media is bringing all their vast resources to bear to replace Dennis Kucinich in his Ohio district. If they are successful with that, this country is in more danger than we've ever been. MSM has, for more than 20 years, had a huge influence on politics and on who wins elections, but when they put a target on one man's back, just to shut him up, that's criminal. It's well past time our elected officials, those that make the laws, do something about this corporate media interference in local elections. We need the fairness doctrine and we need airtight libel laws for everyone, including politicians and even Presidents with airtight penalties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 01/29/2008
photo

Excellent point. What Mr. Follmer also forgets to mention is that the DCCC has twice the ca$h of its Republican counterpart. Fundraising for Republican campaign dollars is like waiting for Godot at this point. The malaise in the GOP voting "body" is not going to wear off by November, unless a polarizing individual like HRC is the Democratic nominee.
These incumbents may be safer than Mr. Follmer thinks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 01/29/2008

Nancy Boyda (Kansas 2nd) "A lot of people think that her election to Congress was a fluke and that Jim Ryun [Boyda's predecessor] ran a weak campaign in '06 and did not see this coming until the last minute," Wasserman said. Boyda's eastern Kansas district is GOP country" "and Wasserman said the freshman Democrat is going to have to step up her campaign considerably if she wants to pull out a victory in November."
Wasserman makes the same mistake in his reporting as Ryun did in his campaign. Boyda not only won, but she did it her way, turning away the national Dem strategists' playbook. She is a target, but she knows the landscape extremely well. Even local political reporters totally missed the story in 2006. In short, the national political reporters must do the hard work, on-the-ground reporting, to truly assess Boyda.


    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 01/29/2008

Hmmm....what would it take to make the five most vulnerable Democrats: Carper, Schumer, Feinstein, Reid, and Pelosi?

Since it's limited to five, I'm not too overly concerned that it be thse specific five. Any corporatist "third way" Republican-lite DLC Bush enabling co-conspiratorial freak will do.

If you have any ideas, please post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 01/29/2008


Please add my candidate running for an open Republican seat in a swing State, trotting out Liberal Lions like Kerry, Kennedy and Clyburn and making hope and social justice the dream of the Party instead of kitchen table issue just did her in, the district will not vote for a Dem if the top of the ticket with a desire to return to the left or any fringe but away from the Clinton center and Liberal Grudge group identity ugly politics as a white female she cant make it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 01/29/2008

I think all these prediction are silly at this early stage of the election. It will depend on who is the nominee for the dems. If it is Hillary I think you will see a lot more dems losing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 01/29/2008

I'm not sure that Bush winning a district in 2004 has much to do with 2008. Unless he won it by more than 60%, it's doubtful he could win it again in 2008.

Since his 2004 "victory", Bush's personal approval rating has fallen 15-20 points nationwide. So, in Mark Foley's old district, Bush's 54% would probably be closer to 40% today. Even winning 60% in 2004 would mean that the district barely leans Republican today

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 01/29/2008

Perhaps it is time for the Dem to actually pick up the plateform they should all be running under-
End the War
Investigate & PROSECUTE both Public Officials and Private Corporateers who have
misled US to War
Undermined and stolen our Constitutional Rights
being acting outside the limits of our Laws
Exercised business & Political Business in such a way as to result in '93 WTC, The Cole... and ultimately 9/11 attacks
the Dems could resolve many of the problems facing US today If they Finaly bring US Justice and hold those truely accountable for their corruption and basically Treason (War Crimes Crimes against Humanity Crimes against Nature (Enviro), Hell I'm sure their are some Religious groups who'd be happy to see Crimes against God Added too (I'd allow it, even though I'm an Atheist- they've invoked such a Deity, so they must be responsible to it).
But yet none of the BIG 3 have had the balls to take on the REAL FIGHT!
Why are we still fighting issues form decades ago- becasue no matter who's in office- they control the Game.
26 yrs a Dem - I'll vote for anyone NOT REPUG OR DUM. No Expereince necessary (in fact all the better, your hands aren't slicked up fro all the blood, perhaps you may be able to HOLD ON TO THE CAUSE long enough to actually get something positive done! Joe the Garbage Man for Pres!! Couldn't fuck US up more than these Career Politicians (con men)have done for decades!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 01/29/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect