More

AF General: Spy Satellite Could Hit US

LOLITA C. BALDOR   01/29/08 11:09 PM ET   AP

Us Satellite

WASHINGTON — The U.S. military is developing contingency plans to deal with the possibility that a large spy satellite expected to fall to Earth in late February or early March could hit North America.

Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, who heads of U.S. Northern Command, told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the size of the satellite suggests that some number of pieces will not burn up as the orbiting vehicle re-enters the Earth's atmosphere and will hit the ground.

"We're aware that this satellite is out there," Renuart said. "We're aware it is a fairly substantial size. And we know there is at least some percentage that it could land on ground as opposed to in the water."

A U.S. official confirmed that the spy satellite is designated by the military as US 193. It was launched in December 2006 but almost immediately lost power and cannot be controlled. It carried a sophisticated and secret imaging sensor but the satellite's central computer failed shortly after launch. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the information is classified as secret.

Renuart added that, "As it looks like it might re-enter into the North American area," then the U.S. military along with the Homeland Security Department and the Federal Emergency Management Agency will either have to deal with the impact or assist Canadian or Mexican authorities.

Military agencies, he said, are doing an analysis to determine which pieces most likely would survive re-entry. But he cautioned that officials won't have much detail on where or when it will crash until it begins to move through the atmosphere and break up.

Renuart added that there does not as yet appear to be much concern about sensitive technologies on the satellite falling into enemy hands.

"I'm not aware that we have a security issue," he said. "It's really just a big thing falling on the ground that we want to make sure we're prepared for."

The satellite includes some small engines that contain a toxic chemical called hydrazine _ which is rocket fuel. But Renuart said they are not large booster engines with substantial amounts of fuel.

Video images of the satellite captured by John Locker, a British amateur satellite watcher, show it to be about 13 feet to 16.5 feet across. He believes it weighs a maximum of 10,000 pounds. Locker calculated its size with data on its altitude and location provided by other amateur satellite watchers, using the International Space Station as a yardstick.

Satellite watchers _ a worldwide network of hobbyists who track satellites for fun _ have been plotting the satellite's degradation for a year. They estimate it is now at an altitude of about 173 miles, and Locker believes it is dropping about 1,640 feet a day.

Where it lands will be difficult to predict until the satellite falls to about 59 miles above the Earth and enters the atmosphere. It will then begin to burn up, with flares visible from the ground, said Ted Molczan, a Canadian satellite tracker. From that point on, he said, it will take about 30 minutes to fall.

In the past 50 years of monitoring space, 17,000 manmade objects have re-entered the Earth's atmosphere.

___

Associated Press writer Pamela Hess contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

U.S. Northern Command: http://www.northcom.mil/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mort
Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken.
12:56 PM on 01/30/2008
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!

Widespread panic in the streets, evacuate your homes, kiss your butts goodbye.

(Until the next wildly speculative disaster proclamation)
12:28 PM on 01/30/2008
Would somebody kindly explain why our multi-billion dollar 'missle shield' doesn't just shoot this thing out of the sky somewhere over the ocean?

Or why our multi-billion dollar pie-in-the-sky NASA team doesn't take a ride and fix this thing?

I think our money is not well spent folks.

NASA, in particular, who's new objective seems to be making the space station a more comfortable place for rich space tourists, seems particularly ineffective.
12:07 PM on 01/30/2008
Run for the hills! the terrorists are controlling out satilites!!!! Perhaps it will fall on washington...I'm just saying.
yappnmutt
humping legs for liberty
10:52 AM on 01/30/2008
oh goody! now we get to attack iran!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:26 AM on 01/30/2008
I wonder how much one could get for taking it in for scrap metal?
09:54 AM on 01/30/2008
If it lands on you or your loved ones just try suing. Go ahead, try.
09:51 AM on 01/30/2008
And how much plutonium is in it?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ProfessorDuh
09:31 AM on 01/30/2008
A spy satellite falls on the new U.S. police state? That's called "synchronicity."
08:44 AM on 01/30/2008
"The U.S. military is developing contingency plans to deal with the possibility that a large spy satellite expected to fall to Earth"

Contingency plans...bullshit. What do they think their gonna do? Catch it with a butterfly net? It would be re-entering the atmosphere at something like mach 10, which is way faster than their alleged to be workable anti- missile system could counter.

And do us all a favor, please keep Homeland Security and FEMA away from this event if it actually occurs. It wouldn't need to be made any worse than it would be by their participation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isis
I, Robot
08:27 AM on 01/30/2008
This doesn't give me much confidence in the Air Force or the military.
06:23 AM on 01/30/2008
It would be sweet justice if it were to land on the NYT building.

I can only hope.
06:02 AM on 01/30/2008
When Skylab fell out of the sky in 1979, entrepreneurs were selling Skylab protection helmets and pools were formed to guess where and when it would hit. Maybe we should be doing this again to focus attention on the event. Otherwise, it might hit Milwaukee or something and Bush will claim it's an Iranian missile and start his war...
04:05 AM on 01/30/2008
I would appreciate to know why science (maybe a mathematician or astronomer) can not predict exactly when and where this will land.

What is science missing here?

Thanks,

Jim
03:55 AM on 01/30/2008
Time to ask the Chinese to blow it to smithereens once it starts entering the atmosphere.[so it dosn't leave a gazillion pieces in orbit] They blew one of theirs up for target practice with a ballistic missile. Got it the first shot too.
02:19 AM on 01/30/2008
Perfect dunny target to test our ABM system.

Just make sure it falls in the ocean, otherwise, the AF should set aside dome $$$ for a big lawsuit.