afghanistan, Afghanistan and taliban, Afghanistan attacks, taliban, taliban attacks, Taliban violence, warwire
afghanistan, Afghanistan and taliban, Afghanistan attacks, taliban, taliban attacks, Taliban violence, warwire

Taliban Attacks In Afghanistan Soared In 2007

The Guardian (U.K.)   |   February 2, 2008 08:12 PM


stumbleupon :Taliban Attacks In Afghanistan Soared In 2007   digg: Taliban Attacks In Afghanistan Soared In 2007   reddit: Taliban Attacks In Afghanistan Soared In 2007   del.icio.us: Taliban Attacks In Afghanistan Soared In 2007

Attacks by the Taliban in Afghanistan surged last year, according to previously unpublished figures from allied military forces fighting insurgents.

Statistics compiled by the multinational International Stabilisation Force in Afghanistan show attacks on international troops and the Afghan government have gone up by between a fifth and a third.

But although admitting the figures show a 'significant rise', Nato insists the geographic extent of the violence remains limited. 'Seventy per cent of the incidents took place in just 10 per cent of the country, where no more than 6 per cent of the population live, and many have been initiated by our forces as we engage with the enemy,' a Nato source said. 'That is the same area as in 2006 which shows the insurgency is not spreading.'

The figures, expected to be released shortly, will fuel the bitter dispute between Nato countries over military contributions. Nato has about 37,000 troops in Afghanistan, including 14,000 from the US and 7,700 from Britain. The US has 11,000 other soldiers operating outside the Nato mission and has announced that more than 3,000 more troops will be deployed over this year.
Recent weeks have seen fierce criticism of European nations' efforts in Afghanistan by US Defence Secretary Robert Gates. In recent days there has been a bad-tempered exchange between Berlin and Washington after the Germans received a 'stern' letter from Gates asking for an increase in the 3,500 soldiers that they have deployed in the north of Afghanistan. Canada threatened to withdraw its troops, who have been fighting in the south and taking heavy casualties, if other nations did not do more.

In an attempt to cool the row, the US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, is flying to London this week and a mini-summit of Nato defence ministers is also planned. The argument comes as a series of reports warning of 'failure' in the strategically critical country. British policy in Afghanistan sustained a major blow with the rejection of the nomination of Paddy Ashdown to a post as UN special envoy in Afghanistan.

To read the entire story, click here.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
17
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Foxy News just reported that the violence in Afghanistan was under control because it was being contained to about 10% of the country. Do you think that may have something to do with the fact that around 90% of the country is either unpopulated or sparsely populated?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 02/03/2008



The Taliban doesn't play fair... everyone knows we're busy in Iraq -- y'know, the front line in the 'war on terror'.

Junior says so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 02/03/2008

Send more well-trained troops to A-stan/P-stan border.
You can't build peace when regular Afghanis are more scared of offending militants than Afghani authorities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 02/03/2008

If bin Laden is still alive he has to be rolling on the ground with laughter. Bush just keeps playing right into his hands and doing EXACTLY what bin Laden wants him to do. See what happens when you let a moron be POTUS?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 02/03/2008

I thought Chimpy Boy said we had them on the run. Apparently what he meant was they're running right at us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 02/03/2008

What do you expect if they have the perfect place
between borders to hide. A place by the way that even
the central government of Pakistan has no control
over. Perfect for their peek-a-boo tactics to date.
Reminds me of chasing cockroaches in the summer
months. Only cure could be to stop funding Pakistan,
as they are certainly not using your tax $ to arrest
or find any terrorists that I'm aware of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 02/03/2008

Didn't Bush say the Taliban was out of business forever?

Damn short "forever".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 AM on 02/03/2008

Remember back in the day when BushCo was taking victory laps and Laura was gonna banish all those women's burkhas?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 02/03/2008

Republicans = Military Failure

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 02/03/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com