2008 presidential race, Barack Obama, George Bush, Hillary Clinton
2008 presidential race, Barack Obama, George Bush, Hillary Clinton

Bush: "Peace And Prosperity" At Stake In Election

DEB RIECHMANN | February 7, 2008 09:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


WASHINGTON — President Bush, rallying conservatives for a battle against Democratic presidential hopefuls Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, says "prosperity and peace" are at stake in the upcoming election for his successor.

"We have had good debates and soon we will have a nominee who will carry the conservative banner into this election and beyond," Bush said in prepared remarks of a speech he was to give Friday to the Conservative Political Action Conference.

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," the president said in speech excerpts the White House released on Thursday night. "So with confidence in our vision and faith in our values, let us go forward ... fight for victory ... and keep the White House in 2008."

Bush is not expected to mention by name John McCain, who almost surely will be the GOP's presidential nominee. Conservatives are resigned to seeing McCain lead the Republican ticket, but the Arizona senator has a long history of disputes over economic and social issues with the party's right flank.

It remains unclear whether conservative voters will stay at home in November, or try to influence McCain's positions _ and his choice of a running mate. In his own defense, McCain says he is a true conservative and has lined up endorsements of many conservative political leaders.

After Republican Mitt Romney announced on Thursday that he was suspending his campaign, Bush had to pencil in minor changes to his speech, making it more forward-looking to the November election. Still, the White House says it's not time yet for Bush to formally weigh in on the election.

Instead, he is using his speech to the conservative gathering as a venue for comparing and contrasting Republican philosophies with those of GOP critics.

He defended his record on the economy, saying tax cuts contributed to a record 52 months of job creation, which just ended. Bush backed his decision to twice veto legislation that would have paved the way for taxpayer-funded embryo research, and lauded medical advances in stem cell research that would yield good results without destroying embryos.

On Iraq, the president defended his decision to send thousands more U.S. troops into Iraq.

"Our critics had a different view," he said. "They looked at rising violence in Iraq and declared the war was lost. Some concluded the surge had failed before it had even fully begun. ... We stood our ground and we are seeing the results. ... The progress in Iraq is fragile and there are tough days ahead, yet even the enemy recognizes that they are on the wrong side of events."

Bush said his administration stayed on the offense against extremists in Afghanistan because it recognized that the threat was not just a matter of law enforcement. "One commentator said most Afghans would oppose an American invasion and fight the foreign occupiers," Bush said.

Instead, Bush said the hardline Taliban regime was ousted, the Afghan people elected a new president and parliament, roads and hospitals are being built, and while Afghanistan has a long recovery ahead, the United States, NATO and other allies are working to secure the country.

Last year was the bloodiest year in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led toppling of the Taliban in 2001.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered 2,200 Marines to go to southern Afghanistan this spring. And on Thursday in the Afghan capital of Kabul, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and her British counterpart, Foreign Secretary David Miliband, made a renewed push to portray the war as winnable and worthy of international support despite a so-far-unsuccessful struggle to get more allies to commit frontline forces.

___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov

Comments for this post are now closed



Comments
968
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

I will volunteer to help build the scaffold that stretches the neck of this mass murdererer.

America's SHAME! As long as this rat bastard lives, we all share the ignominy!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 02/11/2008

Is he still around?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 02/11/2008

Peace and Prosperity was what we had 8 years ago and we will have once Bushy is out of office.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 02/11/2008

"Peace and Prosperity" were at stake when you were "selected" too, Georgie. Unfortunately we now have neither.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 02/10/2008

"Peace and prosperity"... where did he mention that before? Oh yes...

"It was amazing I won. I was running against peace and prosperity and incumbency."
--GWB, Jun. 14, 2001

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 02/10/2008

Let's see... in the last 8 years we've become embroiled in 2 unwinnable wars, the dollar has taken a nosedive, the US economy is tanking and our national debt has tripled.

Whose peace and prosperity is this fecking moron babbling about?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 02/09/2008

When will Clinton and Obama, two fine lawyers, debate on the constitutional question of overeaching executive power? Clinton at least has stated she will roll back executive orders and signing statements authored by the Bush dictatorship.
I would want the real minutiae of governmental powers to get an airing. Does it sound too scholarly and boring for us to hear their opinions?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 02/09/2008

Peace: 911, attack Iraq, attack the middle class.

Prosperity: stagnant wages, jobs hurrying overseas, subprime bubble, recession looming, massive unemployment coming.

This is Georgewellian speak, and watch the red staters lick as the balls of their masters, as they tell them its the illegal immagrants that have taken their jobs, are driving down their wages, and are threatening their women and children.

And watch the dems, somehow, someway, find a way to self destruct, like deers in the headlights, as the Roveian semi bares down on them, with a swift boat lashed to its bed.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 02/09/2008

All of you people wish you had half the intelligence of Bush.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 02/09/2008

If you think the Idiot King is intelligent, I am truly amazed you managed to get on the "internets" on your own.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 02/11/2008

PP, I can see that you're just a pea brain just by saying what you said. But a pea brain is still a genius compared to your idiot preznit. BTW, there is a record of the actual IQ of your idiot preznit. His IQ is 88, the lowest recorded IQ of any US pres. Guess who's got the second lowest. The other George. Barbara should not have been allowed to spawn.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 02/10/2008

7+ years later... and this. There simply are no words.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 02/10/2008

Is that supposed to be funny? Bu$h woulda failed my class for sure.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 02/09/2008

Bush and "intelligence": an OXYMORON. In fact, the future generation will replace the word "MORON" with "BUSH".

Bush's face looks more like the bottom of a toilet, where everyone on Earth would dump feces on. And that's all Bush is useful for.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 02/09/2008

Georgie has half the intelligence of a bush!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 02/09/2008

This delusional retarded asshole George W. Bush is only useful for only one thing: for my dogs to poop on his face. Other than that nothing - absolutely nothing this moron says is worth listening to.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 02/09/2008

Wow, what hubris!

I guess the word 'delusional' comes to mind first.
Then I go to 'peace and prosperity', oh he must mean properity and piece to the corporate whores.

It's amazing what you can self delude yourselves with when you don't read or follow the news, deny the existence of reality and then create your own.

Bush, go, go quickly and go quietly. You have polluted the air with your lies and drivel long enough. Crawford awaits. Judgement awaits and karma awaits.

In the meantime, no matter which Dem you support now, vote Dem in '08, our lives and futures depend on it...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 02/09/2008

The irony of Bush invoking "peace and prosperity" is a hoot. Check out this 2001 onion report:

Bush declares: Our long Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity is Finally Over!"
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28784

It's terribly prophetic.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 02/09/2008


Good catch, retro!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 02/09/2008

Continue the Bush version of peace and prosperity at your own peril.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 02/09/2008

The significance of what George Bush is saying and demonstrating is raw 'power.' He has moved the nation in a direction that has lost traction in his own party, notwithstanding the democrats who abandoned him years ago, yet he will basically escape responsibility and accountability which would be swift to the average Joe or Jane for a minor brush with law.

Regardless, if Obama or Clinton becomes president, it is becoming ever clearer that America first issue is class, not race. The error to default to race, is primarily because so many white males possess 'power' and 'money' that it is simplier to correlate their behavior with their race, than to look beyond it, and note that the better explanation is their social and or economic standing, which ultimately drives their politics, uniquely mixed with their value and belief systems nonetheless borne out of 'white priviledge.'

And, in spite of those 'things' any of us may or may not perceive that George Bush has done, there is absolutely nothing short of letting his tenure expire that we can do. The American people are powerless, as they have given their power to their legislators whose own 'power' is measured how they behave in relations to the power in charge. In other words, fight the power in charge, and risk not being in charge themselves.

America is basically a top down political animal; and the bread & butter issues are distractions to the big boy games between the democratic 'insiders' and the republican 'insiders.' Can it change? Possibly.

Obama just might be 'too dumb' (not in a negative sense of the term) to try to realize that he can't possibly effect a system where 'those in power' and 'those vying for power' like things as it lies.

And, for our sakes, we should at least take a chance to give the man, a chance.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 02/09/2008

Always good for a laugh, ain't he?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 AM on 02/09/2008

Who has been campaigning on "peace and prosperity," and "freedom?"

Elect Ron Paul!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 02/09/2008

Perhaps I missed the peace and prosperity. Was it in 2006 while I was dodgeing IEDs and sniper bullets in Iraq? Must not apply to the military I suppose.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 02/08/2008

What Peace? What Prosperity?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 02/08/2008

Exactly.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 02/08/2008

That was EXACTLY my reaction!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 02/09/2008

. . . "Prosperity and peace" are at stake in the upcoming election . . . . . . if any more fucking Republicans are elected.

You can quote me on this.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 02/08/2008

"Peace and prosperity"-how do these two concepts relate to Bush"s legacy? Unless they are use to show how he has negated and rendered obsolete the meaning behind peace and prosperity. Bush should not worry about any democratic candidate unbalancing peace and prosperity- it"s already out of kilter.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 02/08/2008

I heard a story once about an Emperor, he had no clothes, yet he walked down the street naked as a j bird, little pecker and all, I think that story was based on dumbya.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 02/08/2008

How is it that you get peace from eternal war, and prosperity from world record deficits? Think George W. Orwell...war is peace and freedom is slavery. These bastards are actually using "1984" as their playbook!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 02/08/2008

It's in plain sight now. Jaw-dropping, isn't it?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 02/08/2008

It is jaw-dropping, especially the fact that it is out of plain sight for a large fraction of the population, thanks to the Ministry of Propaganda.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 02/08/2008

This is a good example of why no matter what happens, we need to win back the Whitehouse. I've talked a lot a crap about Obama and his supporters and read a lot the other way. I've heard people say they won't vote for Hillary no matter what. Well, your an IDIOT, then!

This is the face that should unite our party and progressive thinkers, no matter what!

I think Hillary will have a better chance to win in the long run, and believe she deserves it more and will do a better job at not protecting against the very real threats that are in the world today, than Obama will. I could be wrong about that, but that's my opinion.

But I know, either one is better for American values than John Mccain and the weight he is feeling from the forces of darkness.

I WILL vote Democrat no matter what and be just as energized as I am now. If you Obama people want to pout if Hillary wins, you are the Ralph Naders of 08 and the blood will partially be on YOUR hands!!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 02/08/2008

Steve, I agree. I'm an Obama supporter, but I WILL vote the Democratic ticket in November NO MATTER WHO IS THE NOMINEE. We cannot let our country fall back into the hands of the Republicans for another four years.

Here is what I have been posting off and on for a while now:

REPEAT AFTER ME:

I prefer Obama, but I will support Clinton if she is the nominee.

I prefer Clinton, but I will support Obama if he is the nominee.

I will vote, and I will vote the Democratic ticket in November.

I will not even think about voting for a Republican in November.

REPEAT. REPEAT. REPEAT.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 02/08/2008

I will vote Dem in November. For President. For Rep. For Town Council. For Dog Catcher.

I will not vote for a single Republican, even if running unopposed. In November, 2006 I voted for a dead man (Jerry Garcia) rather than vote for a Rep running unopposed. I suggest you do the same.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 02/11/2008

Leave the whole mess in repuke hands. The dums
won't change much, just put bandages on what
the pukes have done to try to cover the hemorrhage of our society's life blood. They all serve a ruling class. Better a revolution
brought on by another 4 years of repuke class
war.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 02/08/2008

Be careful what you wish for: Revolutions often leave countries far more oppressive.

Kucinich is my candidate.

But I WILL vote for the dem candidate.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 02/11/2008

I've seen lots of