iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Clintons: A Case Study In Money And Politics

First Posted: 03/28/08 03:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:25 PM ET

Clinton Cash

Hillary Clinton's ability to loan her presidential campaign $5 million demonstrates how extraordinarily lucrative the post-White House years have been for the former First Lady and her husband.

While Clinton campaign aides are quick to point out that Mrs. Clinton could easily cover the loan from the $9.2 million she made in royalties from her bestselling book Living History, she made the loan by writing a check on a joint banking account she and her husband maintain, according to her staff.

Living History
contributed less than a fifth of the money that the Clintons have earned over the seven years between 2001 and 2006, as documented in Mrs. Clinton's United States Senate and presidential financial disclosure reports -- a sum in excess of $45 million, not including the couple's earnings in 2007 or 2008.

The Clintons have become a case study in the interrelationship of money and politics, a relationship steadily strengthening in scope and magnitude.

A look at Hillary Clinton's financial disclosure reports over the last six years reveals the benefits available to those who hold high public office. Bill Clinton, for example, has become a political ATM, pumping as much as or more than $10 million a year into their joint account.

Some of the cash flow is fully documented in the disclosure reports, including payments of $150,000 to $400,000 for each of the 30 or so speeches Bill Clinton gives annually, for a six-year total of $39.1 million. In 2006 alone, Bill Clinton gave 57 paid speeches for a total of $10.15 million in a wide range of cities - including New York, Chicago, Cleveland, Las Vegas and Denver - and in several countries, among them Denmark, England, Germany, Ireland, Finland, New Zealand and Australia.

Other of the Clinton's income sources are far more difficult to ascertain -- for instance, the flow of cash from billionaire investor Ron Burkle and his Yucaipa companies.

In each of Senator Clinton's past four disclosure statements - 2003-2006 -- there is a line item that reveals only that Bill Clinton received "guaranteed payments to partner" of "over $1,000" from Burkle's Yucaipa.

The disclosure forms do not explain what the guarantee is, and they leave to the imagination how much over $1,000 the annual amounts are. President Clinton, according to news accounts, has helped Burkle in his business dealings.

In her financial disclosure statements, Hillary Clinton lists two seemingly modest investments in Burkle companies, under the category of "Non-Publicly Traded Assets and Unearned Income Sources." One investment in Yucaipa Global Holding is described as worth less than $1,000, while producing interest income of $200 to $1,000 annually. The other, in the Yucaipa Global Partnership Fund, is also listed as being worth less than $1,000, while producing interest payments of $1,000 to $2,500 a year.

Except for honoraria, which must be described in detail, federal disclosure requirements are much more stringent for the elected official than for his or her spouse. The forms declare: "For your spouse, report the source (name and address) and the type of earned income which aggregate $1,000 or more during the reporting period. No amount needs to be specified for your spouse."

Bill Clinton's financial ties to the Yucaipa Companies were first made public on April 11, 2002, when the firm issued a press release announcing that Clinton "will provide counsel to Yucaipa and its investment funds including the Yucaipa American Fund (YAF) and the Yucaipa Corporate Initiative Fund (YCIF). Mr. Clinton will participate in events related to the funds and provide advice in the development of potential investments....Ron Burkle, managing partner of The Yucaipa Companies, said, 'We are proud that President Clinton will serve as a Senior Advisor to our firm.'"

In April 2008, the New York Times reported that


"After leaving the White House in 2001, former President Bill Clinton was inundated with business and job offers, from investment-bank partnerships to seats on corporate boards. He turned them all down, with one exception: He agreed to be an adviser to a family of funds run by the Yucaipa Companies, a California private equity firm controlled by one of his best friends, the billionaire Ronald W. Burkle."

Neither the campaign nor aides to Bill Clinton would provide specific information as to how Bill Clinton is compensated for services he provides to Burkle. Frank Quintero, a Yucaipa spokesman, referred questions to the Clinton campaign.

"The Senator reports all disclosable financial information," Howard Wolfson, Hillary Clinton's communications director, responded in an emailed reply to a series of questions from The Huffington Post.

Matt McKenna, Bill Clinton's press secretary, wrote: "My understanding is Howard answered your Qs. Hope you got everything you needed. Please direct follow-ups on this issue to him."

The former president is said to be currently negotiating an end to his financial relationship with Burkle, in order to avoid conflicts of interest if his wife should become president. The settlement will result in the payment of a substantial sum - the Wall Street Journal reported on January 22 that the figure will be in the $20 million range - but aides to both Bill and Hillary Clinton are unwilling to shed any light on this matter.

Wolfson, referring to the WSJ story, said, "Contrary to published reports, neither the level of President Clinton's compensation for his advisory role, nor the value of his partnership share in the Yucaipa global fund upon his exit, has been determined."

In December, Douglas J. Band, a spokesman for Bill Clinton, told The Huffington Post that the former president "anticipates continuing his business relationships as long as they permit him to devote time to his highest priorities - the work of his foundation and supporting his wife's candidacy. He of course is taking steps now to ensure that should she receive the nomination, there will be an appropriate transition for those relationships."

There are a number of reasons the Yucaipa ties could prove embarrassing to the Clintons.

Bloomberg News on December 17 reported that three of the Yucaipa funds are registered in the Cayman Islands. Senator Clinton, in 2004, declared that she intended to close tax loopholes for "people who create a mailbox, or a drop, or send one person to sit on the beach in some island paradise and claim that it is their offshore headquarters."

Along similar lines, the WSJ's January 22 story pointed out that Clinton has an interest in Yucaipa Global Partnership Fund, making him a partner with the Dubai Investment Group, "an entity connected to the ruler of Dubai, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum." Senator Clinton, according to the WSJ, had separately raised questions about investment funds controlled by foreign governments, because the funds "could be used by foreign governments as 'instruments of foreign policy."

On a much broader scale, Bill Clinton's involvement with the Yucaipa funds raises a basic ethical question for Hillary Clinton, both in connection with her presidential bid and in connection with her service in the U.S. Senate: The purpose in hiring Bill Clinton is to use the connections he had made as President to gain access and to make lucrative deals -- a commonplace but controversial practice regarding former officeholders, a practice with little or no public support - and the money made from these activities in the Clintons' case becomes part of Bill and Hillary's jointly held assets, according to Senator Clinton's communications director.

In other words, money from Yucaipa and the interests it deals with - running the gamut from public employee pension funds to supermarket chains to the Dubai Investment Group - is directly benefiting Hillary Clinton, an incumbent politician charged with voting on issues crucially important to the profits of Yucaipa, its clients, partners and investors.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 476
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
StillAmused
Some mayo on that troll, please...
08:41 AM on 02/11/2008
Just wondering... how would those 'Obama' states tally up if, instead of 'caucuses' of a couple thousand stoked activists, they held full-blown primaries reflecting hundreds of thousands of voters, the same voters who'll go to the polls in November?

Don't I recall a lot of beefing about the 'unrepresentative' Electoral College in the last presidential?

Must be a fig newton of my imagination.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
11:30 PM on 02/10/2008
Heads up for Sen Obama supporters

What Howard Dean neglected to mention about the DNC Credentials Committee

The DNC Credentials The DNC Credentials Committee is made up of 3 people. Those 3 people ALL SERVED in the Cinton Administration


That leads us to the three co-chairs of the DNC Credentials Committee: Alexis Herman, James Roosevelt, Jr. and Aliseo Roques-Arroyo. All three of them served in the Clinton Administration. Okay, as far as we know they are all reputable, upstanding people, but if you were Hillary Clinton and these three people worked for you and your husband during the 8 presidential years Hillary includes on her "35 years of experience," wouldn't you feel like you might have some influence on the three co-chairs? After all, the decision of the DNC Credentials Committee will be political; this is not a judicial process.

http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/editorblog/036
01:09 AM on 02/11/2008
- Part 1 -

Ah, ... but alas, the fact voters in Michigan -&- Florida *already legally cast their votes*, backed up by state law, the DNC are in the clear, and have their legitimate and objective, "out." According to AP News, the Dem state party in Michigan is going to, "allocate the Lion's share of delegates to Hillary Clinton." And since I have read that Senators in Florida are none to happy with the DNC in interfering with their state primary, and Senators who believe that there will never be any "do-over" primary in Michigan, I think the probability that a "do-over" will happen in Florida, is next to nothing; it's never going to happen in my opinion.

see my next comment for continuation of my response to you; thanks. :)
01:11 AM on 02/11/2008
- Part 2 -

You see, at the end of the day, the DNC knows that they are not an actual legal body at the state or federal government level; the DNC is only an organization that "represents" a political party that is elected and funded by American tax-payers. Our state -and- federal governments make and enact laws. The DNC does not have this capacity; at least not in the sense that their Dem Party's rules, that are agreed upon, and serve as contractual obligations for all involved parties to abide by, once the current national election process began/has begun. State -and- Federal law, always trumps 'rules' created by the DNC is it pertains to voter rights in previously cast and legally accepted ballot voting in their state primary, backed-up by state law. True enough, Michigan -and- Florida broke the DNC rules by moving their primary dates forward; but they did so, ... lawfully.
08:55 PM on 02/10/2008
this old fart is as relevant as the old Edsel car--get a life Clinton hater and ali-bama lover
06:57 PM on 02/10/2008
Why won't hilalry disclose her tax returns?

hillary says that the loan came from a joint account, so both hillary and sick willie should be forced to disclose the sources of their ill begotten gains. Unless they're lcoked up in the clinton library with the rest of the dirt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
08:47 PM on 02/10/2008
Message to Tom and you.. you know nothing.
09:03 PM on 02/10/2008
Interesting article which exposes some of the "Clinton's piggy bank". Seems Bill felt these business ties were fine until his wife decided to run for the presidency. This is the sort of thing that makes people question the integrity of the Clinton's.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/22/bill_clinton_severs_burkle_bus.html
05:35 PM on 02/10/2008
By any means necessary! They fought the good fight against the reTHUGs in the 90s and sure they may have broken a few LITTLE rules here and there but hey thats politics. Sorry to see others here suddenly turn on Hil & Bill after all they did for us. It's the ends that matter, not the means, exspecially against the reTHUGS who want to DESTROY this country with their bigoted lies and anti-governmenbt crewsade!

Obama/Edwards 08! See sue peuda! Yes you will!
06:50 PM on 02/10/2008
Please.... It's a little deep.

bill and hillary are not the mythic heroes that you want them to be.

Since leaving office bill has tried to sell America's security to the highest bidder. As a simple example, he took tens of millions from the Arabs and tried to push the sale of US shipping ports to Dubai Ports World.

Need more? He took money from the Communist Chinese Military and in return granted MFN to China who now owns your sorry ass.

Need more? He sold pardons to people like Mark Rich for $.5M each?

Had enough? I could go on all day. The Clintons are scum buddy.
07:49 PM on 02/10/2008
I think he knows that. Reread his post. He's pro Obama. He even says Obama/Edwards and Obama's spanish Campaign slogan.
03:33 PM on 02/10/2008
I thought Romney was shameless in his copying of Obama's messages & slogans.

But Hillary, not to be outdone - is plagerizing, copy-cating, co-opting - however you want to call it - Obama's material, not only content, but trying to do so in style, too.

The Clintons are phoneys who will say or do anything to get elected!!

You'd think with all the money the've spent on the 'best politcal minds', for their campaign - they could come up with something original.

Hillary is as naturally uplifting & inspiring, as a bad case of pink-eye.
03:32 PM on 02/10/2008
YAWN! That's the best you got? So what is Borat's change plan to tackle money in politics?

Let's hope Rezko does not have anything to sing about. I'm sure that Bush Justice dept. will just be chomping at the bit cut him a deal if he get's the nod!

Borat takes all kinds of money from every corporate interest out there. Then has the temerity to condem it, and then then parots on the HuffingGluePost.com regertitate it all over and over and over..
04:41 PM on 02/10/2008
I am really getting sick of having to post this, but it seems this is the only thing the Hillbots can hang on to...so here it is again.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/29/171056/015/838/445627
Obama has been honest about the mistake he made, and the fact that Rezko was trying to buy future influence with him. Obama declared, "I am the first one to acknowledge that it was a boneheaded move for me to purchase this 10-foot strip from Rezko, given that he was already under a cloud of concern. I will also acknowledge that from his perspective, he no doubt believed that by buying the piece of property next to me that he would, if not be doing me a favor, it would help strengthen our relationship." Obama"s mistake was in allowing the appearance of impropriety. He never actually did anything wrong. And that"s the key issue here.

Despite all of these rumors about Obama and Rezko, none of the evidence indicates any actual wrongdoing. Conservative Republican Tom Bevan called the evidence against Obama "pretty darn weak." Conor Clarke of the New Republic reported that Obama"s real estate deal with Rezko was a "nonscandal." According to Clarke, "journalists have followed the smoke and haven"t found the fire. At that point, accusing someone of something that looks wrong stops making sense."

Of course one boneheaded mistake when he was a young lawyer, and nothing but squeaky clean afterwards, will convince the Clinton people.
This is the only thing they can bring up. Talk about destrutive politics. I suppose you have to accuse your opponent of doing something that you are really guilty of yourself
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e

It is amazing that in the race for president the Clintons biggest false talking point is
"I'm filthy dirty and so is he"
Oooooh that is an inspirational presidet.
06:11 PM on 02/10/2008
Even Obama's Chicago newspapers question the Rezko help. Rezko is just the tip of the iceberg.
06:51 PM on 02/10/2008
Retards don't read.
02:44 PM on 02/10/2008
No more Family Dynasty Presidents.
02:43 PM on 02/10/2008
What good does the power and prestige of an ex-president do if he/she is unable to use it in their own country? Bill has done great work helping third world nations but he is all but impotent in helping his own country which is quickly going in the shitter.
02:28 PM on 02/10/2008
BIllary's 25 years in politics = 25 scandals = 100 million dollars + in donations & establishment endorsements

BarMic's 5 years in politics = 5 known scandals = 100 million dollars + in donations & many many more estalishment endorsements

You do the math! How does a newbie non-establishment person get this kind of money? And why are old establishment ones putting up a fight against the known evils?

Maybe the known evils' have their bellies full but not the new evilones.

Also, 100,000 people who donated less than $25 each = less than $2.5 million. Where did the rest of the 5.5 million come from?
03:36 PM on 02/10/2008
we know where Borat's money came from, the same corporte pigs you despise so much. Like PJ O'rourke said on Real Time, the rich like Obama because they think he will be to inept to get anything done! LOL That sounds about right to me! Maybe you guys show up on Capitol Hill and chant Yes we can over and over and that will help things "change" LMAO

Florida's coming in! Hypocrites!
04:43 PM on 02/10/2008
Clinton’s idea of leadership is very different. Her effort to reform health care shortly after her husband took office was notable in that no one mobilized the public. Her team took polls, conducted focus groups, and engaged interest groups. But they never mobilized the public. And although an outsider at the time, she tried to play the insider game. But in the insider’s game, only the insider’s reality counts. So she lost – and so did the millions of us who never had an opportunity to help make the health care “changes” we needed and wanted and deserved.
Now Clinton wants us to hear what she will do “for” us, what “she” will deliver – much as a lawyer, drawing strength not from her client but from her expertise, argues a case. Obama, on the other hand, urges people to join with him in acting for themselves and each other. A former community organizer, he learned that changing ourselves and changing the world go together, and that without mobilizing the strength of people who want change, it won’t happen.
America doesn’t just need “change”—it needs the kind of change that mobilizes those who want and need it, rather than relying on those who resist and fear it. Clinton made her key mistakes on health care in 1994; fourteen years later, what the imbroglio about Martin Luther King and LBJ shows is not racial insensitivity but that she’s never learned the real lesson about how to make change that matters and lasts.
06:53 PM on 02/10/2008
Moron.

hillary is a corporate whore of the worst kind.
hillary voted to clusterbomb mothers and children.

Wife the drool off your keyboard and try reading with your eyes open.

hillary is uniquely unqualified to lead.
02:27 PM on 02/10/2008
BIllary's 25 years in politics = 25 scandals = 100 million dollars + in donations & establishment endorsements

BarMic's 5 years in politics = 5 known scandals = 100 million dollars + in donations & many many more estalishment endorsements

You do the math! How does a newbie non-establishment person get this kind of money? And why are old establishment ones putting up a fight against the known evils?

Maybe the known evils' have their bellies full but not the new evilones.

Also, 100,000 people who donated less than $25 each = less than $2.5 million. Where did the rest of the 5.5 million come from?
02:50 PM on 02/10/2008
Can you give facts and links to the 25 scandals and 5 scandals. I was never good at math, but I think 25 is a little too low and I, for the life of me, cannot get to 5????

Please list all so everyone can be informed. Thanks so much.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:11 PM on 02/10/2008
Republicans are spinning the story about Clinton's money as if there were substance to it. What moral authorities have the GOP dredged up to make their case?

It's Matt Sanchez, last year's CPAC gay porn star and all around he-whore interviewing White House male prostitute and correspondent Jeff Gannon.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=488_1202655555

You can't make up stuff this rich.
02:02 PM on 02/10/2008
Look, the criticism against Hillary is often unfair. But that's the way it is. Obama is the candidate most likely to defeat McCain and win the presidency. Let's nominate him and make sure there is a Democrat in the White House next year.
02:27 PM on 02/10/2008
AMEN!!!! Do you think we can convince the Hillary supporters of this. I hope so.
02:53 PM on 02/10/2008
Would be nice if we could all come together and do what is right for the country instead of focusing on gender and race issues!
01:42 PM on 02/10/2008
Supposedly, Billary had put together the best political minds, to run their campaign. The best pollsters, the best strategists, the best fund-raisers, etc.

Boy, what a mess!! They've had to constantly 're-invent' their canidate, change their message (usually by copying Barack's) & have their canidate loan money to the camapign. And the 'Hallmark Channel' event - great move!! What a success!!

Billary was once self-described as "inevitable establishement canidate". Now, they described themselves as the underdogs.

The Billary campaign is getting its clock cleaned by the junior senator from Illinois.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
naturesway
01:52 PM on 02/10/2008
It's a mystery, alright. Why then does Hillary have more votes than anyone else? She actually leads in voters.
02:33 PM on 02/10/2008
You've been reading too much from the Hillary website. Try thinking for yourself sometime, it actually feels really good. And do some research the votes are virtually tied:

From Countdown with Keith Olbermann -
"But with Senator Clinton winning in big population states like New York and Pennsylvania, the two essentially splitting the popular vote - 7,347,971 votes for Clinton; Obama with 7, 294, 851. The difference between them there is 4/10 of 1 percent. And so how that translates to delegates in Denver, the Obama campaign claiming victory today in the delegate count, putting out a memo saying, Senator Obama had won 845 of them to Senator Clinton‘s 836. NBC is still counting tonight. At this time, a slight lead for Senator Clinton among allocated delegates from Super Tuesday‘s voting. Clinton 786, Obama 775; 117 still to be awarded in some individual states. And since the majority of these are states that Obama won last night. The Illinois Democrat likely to have a slight lead when the counting is done. Senator Clinton having lost the January fundraising counting by a margin of two to one and as a result, it‘s not just some members of her staff working for free but the others are to some degree being paid almost directly out of her pocket."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23051411/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:24 PM on 02/10/2008
She has more votes because of Bill's name and repuatation and spending mega-millions of dollars. She's not qualified to lead the nation and world. She's Mrs. Bill Clinton, nothing more, nothing less.
02:26 PM on 02/10/2008
Also, Hillary out-raised Obama in 2007- by millions.

If Obama was able to manage his money effectively, and Hillary squandered her millions- to the point that she had to loan her campaign $5 mil- why on god's green earth would we put her in charge of America and our economy?
01:22 PM on 02/10/2008
All the "Spray -n-Wash", in all the Costcos across our great land, is not enough to remove the stains, which comes with Billary .

And the smell - please - good lord!

All the scrubbing & air freshener in the world, can't cover up their stench.

Throw that away!

Start new & fresh!

Go Obama!!