Edwards is such a drama queen. I believe he's lost nearly all respect and credibility. He didn't have to endorse any one, but he could have took the more dignified route of Joe Biden and Al Gore who announced they would stay neutral. Or have the balls to endorse promptly like Kucinich did because he really believed Obama was the next best thing to himself.

Jeeze - Obama supporters are clueless about politics.

You don't need Edwards or his supporters to win the general?

You don't need Hillary's supporters to win the general?

You're going to win against ROVE & company all on your own?

And in November when the GOP starts revealing all the secret terrorist plots against the USA using the old "mushroom cloud" scare tactics, Obama will say:

"We have HOPE to keep us safe. The Audacity of HOPE will protect us from terrorists!"

Yeah - you'll win against McCain. Right.

Edward's relevance diminishes more and more each Tuesday.

Barack Obama dose not need John Edwards!!! Tell one reason why he needs him. I can hear you.

Mr. Edwards. Thought you cared about the American worker:

Hillary Clinton Flip Flops on NAFTA (Meet The Press)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ0swdRvYgw

Dear Senator Edwards:

Please hold off on your endorsement of Obama until you read this website with several informative reports of Obama's dealings with Rezko, the fraudster now under Federal indictment.

Because, once this trial begins in early March, the mainstream press will finally have to pay attention to Obama's questionable ties to Rezko's dubious business deals.

It would be a shame that you would risk your reputation endorsing Obama just weeks prior to the flurry of press this trial will attract.

http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-bagman-is-sent-to-jail-over-35m.html

Edwards should not endorse and should follow the lead of our rightful President, Al Gore by insisting the voters decide this and nothing like Chicago 1968 come out again.

As a democrat and an Edwards supporter I can appreciate the need to get an "endorsement". However, I think Edwards also realizes that his supporters are individualistic and will follow their own heart. I don't need a politician to to tell me how I should vote or whom I should support, so regardless of Edwards decision, my support will be for Barack Obama.

After reading his book "The Audacity of Hope" I realized that this man is far deeper than his speeches. That his understanding of the democratic process reaches beyond the bickering and petty discourse that has enshrouded the process for the last three decades. His vision of change is paramount if we are to move forward and change the mindset of Washington D.C....With Clinton or McCain, I just see the same ole Washington that I have come to despise.

I thinks Edwards should endorse Hillary Clinton. I think she is far more respectful of Edwards than Obama is...Obama seemed to be distancing himself from Edwards while answering a question from a reporter today. I think Edwards would have a far greater chance to be President in the future (or Supreme Court Justice or anything he wants) if he endorses Hillary.

where pray, in all those accumulated reports does with work "sneak" appear? You gone Daily News on HP??

I still maintain that the photo of the two looks like an FBI surveilence tape of mafia types meeting in a quarry.

I think Obama had entranced a lot of young people and some older who are so anxious to have something better then Bush that they are falling for a snake oil salesman because his rhetoric sounds good. We can't afford to make a mistake because four years of Mccain will be no different then having Bush in the White House.

To John and Elizabeth Edwards -

As a longtime admirer, I'm gritting my teeth at the volley of reports that you are going to endorse Hillary Clinton.

I just wanted to note, with all respect and good humor, that Molly Ivins weighed in on Hillary in a broadside only Molly could deliver. We can only imagine what she would say now, but here she is in 2006:

http://freepress.org/columns/display/1/2006/1304

I think she would share your concerns about Obama but I believe she would go along with Gary Hart:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/politics-as-transcendence_b_86490.html

I can't tell you how much I hope that you will endorse Obama. He at least does not represent, as the Clintons do, business as usual and, for what it's worth, one of the most embarrassing campaigns in recent Democratic history.

For our children, for our grandchildren - we have to try something else.

Edwards as VP, what a depressing thought. That that prevaricating trial lawyer greedy for power could be second in line is almost as scary as Cheney in the same position.

I grew to respect John Edwards in the early stages of the presidential race, but if he flip flops to endorse Clinton at this stage I will never support him again.