Executions May Be Carried Out at Gitmo

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Executions May Be Carried Out at Gitmo stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL MELIA and ANDREW O. SELSKY | February 12, 2008 11:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This undated file photo provided by ABC News shows Waleed bin Attash. Bin Attash, a Yemeni portrayed as an al-Qaida operative and a member of a terrorist family, confessed to plotting the bombings of the USS Cole and two U.S. embassies in Africa, killing hundreds, according to a Pentagon transcript of a Guantanamo Bay hearing, released Monday March 19, 2007. The Pentagon has charged bin Attash and five other detainees at Guantanamo Bay with murder and war crimes in connection with the Sept. 11 terror attacks, and officials said Monday Feb. 11, 2008, the United States will seek the death penalty. (AP Photo/ABC News)

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — If six suspected terrorists are sentenced to death at Guantanamo Bay for the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. Army regulations that were quietly amended two years ago open the possibility of execution by lethal injection at the military base in Cuba, experts said Tuesday.

Any executions would probably add to international outrage over Guantanamo, since capital punishment is banned in 130 countries, including the 27-nation European Union.

Conducting the executions on U.S. soil could open the way for the detainees' lawyers to go to U.S. courts to fight the death sentences. But the updated regulations make it possible for the executions to be carried out at Guantanamo.

David Sheldon, an attorney and former member of the Navy's legal corps, said an execution chamber at Guantanamo would be largely beyond the reach of U.S. courts.

"I think that's the administration's idea, to try to use Guantanamo as a base to not be under the umbrella of the federal district courts," he said. "If one is detained in North Carolina or South Carolina in a Navy brig, one could conceivably file a petition of habeas corpus and because of where they're located, invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court."

The condemned men could even be buried at Guantanamo. A Muslim section of the cemetery at Guantanamo has been dedicated by an Islamic cultural adviser, said Bruce Lloyd, spokesman for the Guantanamo Naval Station. Among those buried elsewhere at the cemetery are U.S. servicemen.

"A small area of the cemetery has been fenced off and remains ready for the burial of any Muslim who may die here and not be repatriated to another country, for whatever reason," Lloyd told The Associated Press.

When two Saudis and a Yemeni committed suicide at Guantanamo in 2006, military officers said the men could be buried at the cemetery, but the remains were instead sent back to their homelands.

Story continues below
advertisement

Up until recently, experts on military law said, it was understood that military regulations required executions to be carried out by lethal injection at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas.

But in January 2006, the Army changed its procedures for military executions, allowing "other locations" to be used. The new regulations say that only the president can approve an execution and that the secretary of the Army will authorize the location.

"Military executions will be by lethal injection," the regulations say.

The last U.S. military execution was in 1961, when President Kennedy signed off on the hanging of Army Pfc. John A. Bennett for the rape and attempted murder of an 11-year-old Austrian girl.

Brig. Gen. Thomas W. Hartmann refused to discuss details on executions when he announced Monday the Pentagon was charging the six Guantanamo detainees and seeking the death penalty.

"We are a long way from determining the details of the death penalty, and when that time comes ... we will follow the law at that time and the procedures that are in place," Hartmann said.

Eugene Fidell, a Washington defense attorney and expert on military law, said Guantanamo Bay could be an execution site, but added that the U.S. would face an international outcry.

"It would be highly controversial because a lot of the world simply doesn't believe in the death penalty any more," Fidell said.

The Bush administration has instructed U.S. diplomats abroad to defend its decision to seek the death penalty for the six men by recalling the executions of Nazi war criminals after World War II.

A four-page cable sent to U.S. embassies and obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press says that execution as punishment for extreme violations of the laws of war is internationally accepted.

The cable points to the 1945-46 Nuremberg war crimes trials in Germany. Twelve of Adolf Hitler's senior aides were sentenced to death at the trials, though not all were executed in the end.

No death chamber is known to exist at Guantanamo, but Scott Silliman, a former Air Force lawyer and who is now a Duke University professor, said the military may decide to build one there. The 2006 Army regulations also call for a viewing room to the death chamber, where at least two news media representatives would be witnesses.

The trial for the six detainees is still months away. And given the slow pace of the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay, verdicts are unlikely before President Bush leaves office next January.

The accused include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of Sept. 11; Mohammed al-Qahtani, whom officials have labeled the 20th hijacker; and Waleed bin Attash, who investigators say selected and trained some of the 19 hijackers.

Many support the use of the death penalty for men blamed for the Sept. 11 attacks.

"If these guys are found guilty, I can't think of any other case more appropriate for the death penalty," said Charles "Cully" Stimson, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "An overwhelming majority of Americans support the death penalty."

Michael Khambatta of the International Committee of the Red Cross said his organization would approve the death penalty only when there are "procedural and judicial guarantees that meet international standards."

Khambatta, who is the deputy head of the ICRC's Washington delegation, declined to comment publicly on whether the ICRC considers the U.S. war-crimes trials fair.

___

On the Net:

U.S. Army execution procedures: http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/r190_55.pdf

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — If six suspected terrorists are sentenced to death at Guantanamo Bay for the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. Army regulations that were quietly amended two years ago open the poss...
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — If six suspected terrorists are sentenced to death at Guantanamo Bay for the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. Army regulations that were quietly amended two years ago open the poss...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
235
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- rabun666 I'm a Fan of rabun666 14 fans permalink

Will the executions be first, before the kangaroo court meets. Just as well since the proceeds will be secret and the American public wouldn't know the difference anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 02/13/2008
- Tankan I'm a Fan of Tankan 3 fans permalink

Oh! They've decided to kill them already!

Strike the word justice from the American language!

More martyrs for the cause!

As smart as the Brits were in Ireland!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 02/13/2008
- jpopphan I'm a Fan of jpopphan 10 fans permalink

Peforming these executions at Guantánamo is a horrible idea. Hell, executing them period is a bad idea and will only add to the fire of anti-Americanism that has swept the world.

We must tread lightly and with caution. Once these men are killed, we can't bring them back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 02/13/2008
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 263 fans permalink
photo

"Once these men are killed, we can't bring them back."


And that's a bad thing how?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 02/13/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 257 fans permalink

Dead men tell no tales of BushCo crimes, thats why.

But you hate the constitution and the bills of rights, don't you, ram.

Why on earth would you trust the 1000 lies BushCo to torture a confession from whomever, then convict and kill them in a kangaroo court?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 02/14/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 257 fans permalink

Americans! Why do you so many of you believe that waterboarding and other forms of torture prevented attacks?

Why do you believe BushCo after thousands of lies?

Condi couldn't be bothered to stop 9/11, which gave BushCo all it's power. Why would BushCo even WANT to stop more terror attacks?

If you torture someone into saying that they are terrorist and were planning an attack, YOU HAVE NOT PREVENTED A TERROR ATTACK!

All you got was a FALSE confession!

Police get false confession all the time even without torture.

Folks, you know the CYA liars in BushCo would have no qualms about using torture to inflate their anti-terror "success".

Torture DOES NOT WORK!

Are we so cowardly, that we will give up everything our country and constitution stand for, give up our standing and good will in the world, because we think we NIGHT get some shred of evidence by torture?

In the 24 scenario, where they supposedly torture the bomb deactivation codes from the terrorist, do you really believe that a dedicated terrorist, wouldn't lie? What's wrong with you people who advocate torture?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 02/13/2008
- thebassguy I'm a Fan of thebassguy 5 fans permalink
photo

i also hate this administration and I'm not a fan of the death-penalty, but I do think one of the men needs to be publicly martyred, no back-room hidden execution.

That'd be "Sheik" Kalheed Mohammed. He is much more responsible for the 9/11 murders that OBL or GWB, believe it or not. And we knew this long before we tortured the bastard!

Or should we just let him go like the extreme left would have it? Life in prison for these guys is a joke, and they'd have a great easy life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 02/13/2008
- izzat7 I'm a Fan of izzat7 4 fans permalink

I wonder why Mr.Bush just purchased 9980 acres of land in Paraguay????(with a military base)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 02/13/2008
- rmreddicks I'm a Fan of rmreddicks 35 fans permalink
photo

These would be reprehensible shadow executions. There would be a mixture of responsibilities allowing all perpetrators to deny to the U.S. populace any responsibility that does not include domestic political gain.

I certainly expect that Cuba will re-submit and strengthen its protests to the U.N. and demand an end to the U.S. occupation of its sovereign territory.

U.S. willingness to "legally" execute people convicted through torture on foreign soil should give pause and shivers throughout the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 02/13/2008

Would Chimpy & Cheney agree to: Only if we have impeachment at the same time, and if the crimes are the same, equal penalties? With pardons to those with little evidence, unless evidence missing or destroyed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 02/13/2008
- edgraham I'm a Fan of edgraham 3 fans permalink

When did the USA become the country that is opposed to everything we were told America stands for? Were we just lied to as kids?

Ed Graham

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 02/13/2008

Has anyone figured out how political this is? After six-and-a-half years the administration suddenly decides to put six guys on trial for 9/11/01? What do we know in 2008 that we didn't know back then?

Answer: Nothing, except we know we torture, and that knowledge can only help the defense. But 2001 wasn't an election year, with the Republicans in deep trouble. The trials won't take place until after the election, but Bush and his cronies can milk the publicity cow from now until November, presumably helping McCain. And that's the whole point of this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 02/13/2008
photo

That, and I have a deep gut feeling that their chickens are coming home to roost and they need to get rid of the "evidence.­" We also have:

Cheney office fire
Bush Sr. library fire
Bank warehose fire(s)

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 02/13/2008
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 229 fans permalink
photo

One nation under god who's kid said turn the other cheek and love thine enemy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 02/13/2008
- Tankan I'm a Fan of Tankan 3 fans permalink

Yeah! Give them a fair trial!

Then murder them!

Civilized justice, American style!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 02/13/2008
- farseer I'm a Fan of farseer 7 fans permalink
photo

I don't mind those folks being tried, as long as the trials are fair.

Bush administration officials who started an illegal war, should likewise be tried for violating international law. To learn more, google "illegality of iraq war"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 02/13/2008

You mean to say that KING GEORGE and his mousey sidekick DICKY are finally get their just punishment­......A FIRING SQUAD!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 02/13/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 22 fans permalink
photo

The verdict and sentence should be carried out before any trial begins. We need to proceed in a new direction after 9-11.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 02/13/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect