Did Hillary Clinton Really Support NAFTA? Aides, Biographers Say No

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Did Hillary Clinton Really Support NAFTA? Aides, Biographers Say No stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 02-14-08 01:13 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Hillary Nafta

As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arguing that she was once a supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement that contributed to the loss hundreds of thousands of American jobs.

"A little more than a year ago," an Obama mailer reads, "Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was a 'boon' to the economy." The piece goes on to argue that the New York Senator is "changing her tune" now that she's campaigning in the Buckeye State.

The attack is, most observers say, misleading. The "boon" line, a paraphrase lifted from a September 2006 Newsday article, has yet to be confirmed as an authentic quote. But, more importantly, the mailer misrepresents what former Clinton administration officials and biographers say was Hillary Clinton's long-held opposition to the legislation.

"In August in 92, we had to make a decision," Mickey Kantor the former U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Clinton adviser, and free trade advocate recalled for the Huffington Post. "President Clinton had to make a decision as governor, whether or not he would support [George H.W. Bush's] NAFTA, and of course he did... Hillary Clinton was one of the great skeptics in the discussion as to whether he should do. So she was always skeptical beginning in 1992 and onward."

Indeed, as Kantor went on to note, Hillary Clinton long held reservations over the labor and environmental fallouts of the free trade agreement. In addition, she was, at the time, eager to see her health care reform (not NAFTA) pushed through Congress. As such, Clinton biographer Sally Bedell Smith writes in her book "For Love of Politics," her disapproval of the trade agreement was both political and philosophical.

The economic team and other key advisors, including Mack McLarty, Mickey Kantor, and David Gergen, were likewise urging Bill to use his momentum to push or congressional ratification of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)...Liberal Democrats, including Hillary, opposed it primarily because it could take jobs away from American workers. But as an advocate of global economic cooperation, Bill was drawn to its free-trade philosophy.

It fell to Mickey Kantor, the U.S. Trade Representative responsible for implementing NAFTA, to reason with Hillary. One day in August, he sat her down on a bench behind the White House and tried to strike a compromise. "I said, 'If you want to drop NAFTA, we can kill it, but we shouldn't,'" Kantor recalled. "I said, 'The way to do it is to introduce health care, spend a month on it, and then do NAFTA, then go back to health care.'" With misgivings, Hillary acquiesced to the proposed sequence.

Carl Bernstein, another Clinton biographer, echoed much the same tale during a recent appearance on CNN.

"'Bill,'" he recalled Hillary Clinton as saying, "'you are doing Republican economics when you are doing NAFTA.' She was against NAFTA. And if she would somehow come out and tell the real story of what she fought for in the White House and failed in a big argument with her husband she would end up moving much closer to those [John] Edwards followers."

So why didn't we hear such protests from Hillary Clinton during her husband's administration?

Story continues below

"The whole time that she was first lady," said Robert Shapiro, the undersecretary of commerce during the Clinton White House years, "she, like everybody else...[was] not supposed to deviate from the position of the administration. There is no freedom of speech in there, and that certainly applies to a first lady."

On the 2008 campaign trail, Clinton has been free of those shackles. And, on many occasions, she has expressed misgivings about NAFTA, although usually she qualifies her statements by saying she supports the underlying idea.

"I believe in the general principles it represented," she said last February, noting that she voted against CAFTA [the Central American Free Trade Agreement] because of a lack of environmental and labor standards. "But what we have learned is that we have to drive a tougher bargain. Our market is the market that everybody wants to be in. We should quit giving it away so willy-nilly. I believe we need tougher enforcement of the trade agreements we already have."

Clinton ``is committed to free trade and to the growing role of the international economy,'' Steven Rattner, a Clinton fundraiser and co-founder of Quadrangle Group LLC, a New York buyout firm told Bloomberg.com. ``She would absolutely do the right thing as president.''

More recently, at the Las Vegas Democratic Debate on November 15, 2007, she offered the following, more concise declaration: "NAFTA was a mistake to the extent that it did not deliver on what we had hoped it would."

As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arg...
As the 2008 campaign shifts to economically hard-hit states like Ohio, so too do the topics of political debate. This week, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has attacked Sen. Hillary Clinton on trade, arg...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
216
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

So why didn't we hear such protests from Hillary Clinton during her husband's administration?

"The whole time that she was first lady," said Robert Shapiro, the undersecretary of commerce during the Clinton White House years, "she, like everybody else...[was] not supposed to deviate from the position of the administration. There is no freedom of speech in there, and that certainly applies to a first lady."

Regardless of the excuse she buckled and sold out, so what makes us think it will be any different if she's President?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 02/25/2008

This story is worthless and sloppy. Relying on Clinton's aides to confirm something Clinton claims? Why don't you just reprint one of her press releases? Next.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 02/24/2008
- AKJM I'm a Fan of AKJM 20 fans permalink
photo

Obama has voted to EXPAND NAFTA into Peru. Now he speaks of Americans ignoring South America. I don't see how he can call Clinton on it. Obama possess a "say/do" conflict typical of Republicans. I won't vote for him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 02/15/2008
- Ping I'm a Fan of Ping 63 fans permalink

Oh, Please..... It was a co-Presidency right? That's why she is ready on day one. Nafta passed on Clintons watch, Bill and Hillary's. This is more BS revisionist history from the Clinton camp.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 02/15/2008
- hinnis I'm a Fan of hinnis 17 fans permalink

Based upon what evidence do you make such a silly assertion? And, please be specific with sites to your credible information. Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 02/16/2008

Hillary has solutions but, they seem to turn into failures, requiring new solutions.

AUMF, NAFTA, Predatory lending bill, Patriot Act, Bankruptcy bill, Kyle/Lieberman resolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 02/15/2008
- eggman I'm a Fan of eggman 20 fans permalink

I'd just like to point out that Huffpost highlighted this story that favors Sen. Clinton and suggests Sen. Obama is not entirely truthful. There's no question Ariana is pro-Obama but at least the site is able to show a little balance in this regard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 02/15/2008
- Nutcase I'm a Fan of Nutcase 50 fans permalink
photo

Will there be a second instance?

cognito ergo populistae

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 02/15/2008
- hinnis I'm a Fan of hinnis 17 fans permalink

Not likely. The corporate media has already coronated Obama, just like they did Bush those many years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 02/16/2008

""NAFTA was a mistake to the extent that it did not deliver on what we had hoped it would."

Hillary's words about NAFTA sound very similar to her rationalization about voting to authorize Bush to invade Iraq in 2002... just more Clinton calculation, triangulation and strangulation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 02/15/2008
- ariadne1 I'm a Fan of ariadne1 2 fans permalink

oops, previous post to the wrong site

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 02/15/2008
- ariadne1 I'm a Fan of ariadne1 2 fans permalink

a muslim ‎is an adherent of the religion of Islam.

barak obama is a christian, he has attended the same church for approximately 20 years.

where do you get your misinformation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 02/15/2008
- hinnis I'm a Fan of hinnis 17 fans permalink

You're right, he does attend a "Christian" church, which is based upon black values, black leaders, and supports such people as Louis Farrakhan, who received their lifetime achievement award last November.

http://www.tucc.org/about.htm

Yes, the same Louis Farrakhan who calls white people "blue-eyed devils," the "Anti-Christ," his "mortal enemy," and states that white people are not yet human. The same Farrakhan who calls Jews "bloodsuckers," and their religion a "gutter religion." Obama has said that he doesn't subscribe to the racist views of Farrakhan, but he still attends the church, and still considers their Pastor, Rev. Wright, whose name is on the award given to Farrakhan, as his mentor and spiritual advisor. According to Rev. Wright, white America's bigotry is to blame not only for whatever ills continue to plague the black community, but also for our country's conflicts with other nations. After 9/11, he said, "In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just disappeared as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns." I wasn't aware that only white people suffered on 9/11 or that it was a wake-up call to white people. Is it really a "Christian" belief to attribute most of the worlds ills to one race; do you think Jesus would blame "white people" for most of the worlds problems (or any other race, for that matter); or, do you think Jesus might not base his opinion on the color of one's skin, but rather on the content of their character (to quote Dr. King). I do not believe that Jesus is a racist, therefore, I am sure that the later is true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 02/16/2008
- ariadne1 I'm a Fan of ariadne1 2 fans permalink

ah, yes. as co-president, this is part of her 35 years of experience, she most assuredly helped her husband come to the conclusion that nafta was a go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 02/15/2008
- cambio I'm a Fan of cambio 5 fans permalink

David Sirota says yes, many people say yes actually..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/hillary-clinton-pretends-_b_86747.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 02/15/2008
- jade7243 I'm a Fan of jade7243 136 fans permalink

I think Sirota has the REAL unCLINTONIZED history and not the Clinton's REDACTED versions. When you can put support of NAFTA dierctly in her mouth... well, I know she'll find it hard to swallow....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 02/15/2008

hillary the corporate whore was behind NAFTA all the way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 AM on 02/15/2008
- Nutcase I'm a Fan of Nutcase 50 fans permalink
photo

Oh, I see you're one of those who supports Obama's claims of wanting to unify the party. Actually, they are both corporate whores.

cognito ergo populistae

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 02/15/2008

This was posted on Huffinton Post today.

"Hillary Clinton has made statements unequivocally trumpeting NAFTA as the greatest thing since sliced bread. The Buffalo News reports that back in 1998, Clinton attended the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and thanked praised corporations for mounting "a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA." Yes, you read that right: She traveled to Davos to thank corporate interests for their campaign ramming NAFTA through Congress.

On November 1, 1996, United Press International reported that on a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton "touted the president's support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region."

The Associated Press followed up the next day noting that Hillary Clinton touted the fact that "the president would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement."

In her memoir, Clinton wrote, "Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for president in 1996. He couldn't hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill's successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA."

Yes, we are all expected to just forget that, so that Hillary Clinton's campaign can manufacture supposed "outrage" that anyone would say she supported NAFTA - all at a time her chief strategist, Mark Penn, simultaneously heads a firm that is right now pushing to expand NAFTA into South America.

What a total insult to America's intelligence."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 02/15/2008

Excellent research job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 AM on 02/15/2008

I guess I missed something. NAFTA is like creationism. It just poofed into existance.

If she doesn't support it she can pull the US out of it with a six month notice when she becomes prez. Hold your breath everyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 02/15/2008

Virtually all of Obama's criticisms of Hillary are simply recycled talking points from her critics of the right and left that Obama thinks he can just toss her way as if they were proven facts.

This is the arrogance of Obama: trying to capitalize on Republican attacks on "fellow" Democrats. This is why Obama is dividing the party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 02/15/2008
- Thad I'm a Fan of Thad 4 fans permalink

Yes. Because sponsoring a flag-burning amendment and supporting Bush's saber-rattling against Iran isn't divisive at ALL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 02/15/2008

I am not a Clinton supporter, yet I think you should know your facts. She did not support an amendment. A law is not an amendment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 02/16/2008

What does it matter if a talking point is recycled as long is it as true?

As an example, hillary is a corporate whore. If I rephrase that to a 'hooker for big business' it doesn't change the fact that the clintons put their wallets and their egos ahead of the interest of the American people.

The clintons took tens of millions of dollars in donations which they solicited from the Arabs and then tried to push the sale of the control and security of American shipping ports to the UAE.

Does it matter if a Republican says this first? No - of course not. The elemental fact remains the same - the clintons tried to fatten their wallets at the expense of the safety of American citizens.

So to say that Obama repeats Republican talking points is - well, just dumb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 02/15/2008
- Heidfeld I'm a Fan of Heidfeld 11 fans permalink

Who is the corporate whore now? When Obama uses lobbyist money to pay off Superdelegates, is that his idea of "putting his wallet behind the interest of the American people?"

Harper's Magazine

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/11/0081275

"Williams subsequently set up a conference call between Obama and a group of financial-industry lobbyists. That, too, went well, and in June of 2004, Williams helped organize "a little fund-raiser" for Obama at The Bond Market Association."

"He has taken in an additional $3.8 million for the Hopefund, his leadership PAC."

Now follow along:

http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=336

"Obama, who narrowly leads in the count of pledged, "non-super" delegates, has doled out more than $694,000 to superdelegates from his political action committee, Hope Fund, or campaign committee since 2005. Of the 81 elected officials who had announced as of Feb. 12 that their superdelegate votes would go to the Illinois senator, 34, or 40 percent of this group, have received campaign contributions from him in the 2006 or 2008 election cycles, totaling $228,000."

Straight from the lobbyists to the Superdelegates. Obama really does want to change things huh?

Yes SHE Can

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 02/15/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect