Mystery: NY Results Say Obama Got Zero Votes In 80 Districts

OLD NEWS - MISSING VOTES IN DISTRICTS ALSO FOR CLINTON. What's up with Hufffington? This was reported almost immediately after election in NY and is not only a problem for Obama - They have found numerous districts with no votes for Clinton, too. So how about some old, slanted news. What a pathetic site. All reports including The NY Times indicate worker error - and the workers up in Harlem were of Obama's base so there is no hanky panky suspected there, they just don't know how to read, (maybe that's why they believe everything that comes out of Obama's mouth). AND THERE ARE OVER 6000 DISTRICTS in the State of NY. Really people you believe everything you hear and see. No wonder you are known as Obambots - It is clear the masses have spoken and we will have an empty headed President to follow the current nightmare. Maybe you people can find out who really killed Kennedy in this report also.

Maybe Hillary picked up all of Guliani's votes?

Ok, Finally someone is looking at these voting machines and saying something. It is my guess that John Edwards Won in the South and probably picked up whole lot of votes in New Hampshire and everywhere else he ran, but the machines were set to make it a 2 person race in the Dem party--Clinton and Obama. His votes were changed. Right now we have "two frontrunners" who have disenfrachised the people of this country, and they only care if it pertains to them. The electronic voting scandal makes the US worse then any 3rd world country we have sent Jimmy Carter to watch. Bush NEVER won in 2000 & 2004. I repeat, Bush NEVER won in 2000 & 2004. We are in trouble now.

We should be ashamed - all of us. How did we get to 2008 AD and apparently not have the ability to count ballots?!? Using the Diebold machines (I don't know if there are others) that don't have the ability for anyone to ensure the accuracy of the voter counts.

How in the hell did we get to this? We are trying to create democracies elsewhere, but apparently we can't get an honest democracy here. This is pathetic. :-(

I'm stunned--can't believe I haven't seen anything about this story until just now. Most foul. What is the meaning of this??!!

Well, now how stupid do those in charge think we are? Scumbags doing their scummy work, I say. I think this should be investigated.

Oh god here comes the closet conspiracy theories.

Evidently the people of Harlem and the other New York districts presented here simply have the smarts to have voted for the right candidate. Perhaps they saw clearly beyond race and wanted to see their accomplished senator go to the White House instead of some heavy-on-smiles, light-on-experience 'charmer.' Clinton won New York handily, so why would anyone risk vote tampering where she was going to crush Obama? It's just stupid. But maybe you're right, maybe Bill snuck out of his Harlem office and went around and jimmied all the voting machines himself. Wow, what a loyal husband.

Is that a typo? 80 districts? New York state has 150 districts according to the elections board. That's more than have the state Obama got zero?!? Does anyone have links where I can find up to the minute news on this story. Obama getting shafted in more than half the state is a big, big deal.

This is so depressing! Here we go with that Gore/Bush shit again. Were did all of Obama's supporters go? Maybe they moved to Malibu, I don't know. This is proof yet again that while the U.S. meddles in elections in other countries (to make sure nobody cheats) they are cheating right here in our backyard. I hope history will show that George W. Bush was the first "president" to "win" from rigged elections and carefully appointed Supreme Court justices...

Not one vote for a black man in an entire Harlem district.

KInd of hard to believe isn't it?

Well I'm guessing that this really will put a hole in the black people voting for a black candidate for racial reasons theory.

Not a single person. Wow is all I can say.

Shall we call the political free DoJ in?

Seems like all of her big victories smell like a Florida swamp. In New Hampshire she won in the Diebold machine count towns and Obama won in the hand count towns. In California you have 50,000+ Independent's ballots not counted because of a dumb ballot design. Oh yes, and she won Florida and Michigan.

I think Susan B. Anthony would be ashamed of Hillary's behavior.

Susan B.Anthony and Fredrick Douglas worked together for a common goal of making things right and fair.

Hillary is out for herself, and she isn't playing fair to her party. She is looking like another George Bush!!!!!!!!!

Why would anyone believe the NY Times? they endorsed Hilary Clinton it's hard to believe anything that's put out by the NY Times. If some of u bloggers would do you own research instead listing to polls, cynics, and anaylsts you would know Obama won 65% of the NY Black vote and won most of the outer NY counties, but the critics won't tell us that! I can't understand what people see in a sleezy corrupt politician such as Hilary.

YES WE CAN!

Hillary is a VENTRILOQUIST for her husband's Un-Constitutional THIRD term presidency.

I also heard from someone that chunks of pages from books of registered voters weren't at the poll cite the day of the election. People were denied a right! Sorry but this does happen from the top and the board of Elections people have some explaining to do!

I know these missing votes had to be human error and I wouldn't put it past intentional. I know in my own little town of 2000 I worked the polls and this is an all White republican farming town and we had 40 votes for Obama. Obviously Bill and Hillary are using the system and probably paying people. I witnessed elected officals afraid to Endorce Him because of promises she has made to people they remained quiet. She paid staff to work for her and used Dem Headquarters to petition out of. I bet the whole western NY regions numbers are wrong as well, Western NY's don't like her and even in petitioning he did better.
Looks Fishy and I demand a recount!!!!!!!!!!

If you can stand to inform yourself on the state of our elections, watch this film.

http://www.uncountedthemovie.com/about-the-film.html

Or watch this one:

http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/

There are innumerable ways to steal an election. Voting machines are the best method yet devised: designed to make hacking insanely easy and to leave no trace. Why are so many people in this country in denial about this? It's nightmare-making to contemplate the fact that so many elections in this country not decided by voters - but it's a fact and it isn't exactly news.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Does anyone know exactly what voting machine systems were used in the New York primary?

Given the vulnerability that is purposefully designed into the Diebold, Sequoia, ES&S, etc., voting systems, totals could have been altered at any level, precinct, city, state: replacing a memory card takes about 5 seconds and leaves absolutely no trace.

When someone remarks on a surprise victory that has no rational explanation, the thieves can, and do, sit back, smirk, crow "prove it," and bitch about those crazy inaccurate polls. Then those of us who are pretty sure we just got royally hosed - again - get to slink off muttering.

The New Hampshire election was almost certainly hacked. The paper ballots in 81% of NH counties were tabulated by Diebold. According to the totals, Hillary Clinton won over Barack Obama 39.4% to 36.8%. According to the Diebold AccVote Optical-Scan voting machine count, Hillary took 52.95% of the votes compared to 47.05% for Obama. However, the paper ballot count in the non-Diebold counties gave Obama 52.93% of the votes compared to 47.07% for Hillary. Isn't that worth a puzzled frown?

The New Hampshire recount was a "criminal enterprise," according to blackboxvoting.org's Bev Harris.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM

Whatever you care about, unless we clean up our elections, you can kiss it goodbye. That is, unless you are Halliburton or Blackwater.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hmsMHBNK1Tq-YZqsW4FAocXAuDSQD8UL6N8O0

Remember the undervote in Florida? It has been tidily swept under the rug:

A team of university computer experts who examined the machines after the election suggested the problem was voter confusion over a poorly designed ballot that had drawn complaints from voters. The District 13 race was listed at the top of the second page of the ballot without the same type of header that preceded other races on the ballot.

"GAO acknowledges the possibility that the large undervote in Florida's 13th Congressional District race could have been caused by factors such as voters who intentionally undervoted or voters who did not properly cast their ballots on the (voting machines), potentially because of issues relating to interaction between voters and ballot," the government report said.


How's that for reassurance? They are pretty sure that maybe there might have been some kind of design flaw in the ballot that possibly might have caused voters to screw up their votes. Yeah, right, the voters screwed up, not the machines.

Do you think maybe there ought to be a way to be ABSOLUTELY SURE the fucking machines are working?

OK, in plain, understandable language: all the candidates agreed fl and mi votes would not be added to the delegate tally. now, while it's easy to manipulate the language to say the votes "won't count" or that voters are being "disenfranchised," the point of fact is they all agreed. however, now it's becoming a convenient talking point to score a political point by saying these voters are being disenfranchised and blaming obama's campaign for it -- when everybody knows good and well (and there is hard-copy evidence) that clinton, edwards and obama agreed not to accept delegates from those two states. not sure whether obama would react the same way if the shoe were on the other foot, but that hypothetical has no place in this argument, because that's not the situation. clinton knew, and now she's trying to garner votes by changing the rules and creating a fear tactic to paint obama in a negative light and scare the dnc into swaying the nomination her way. people should stop blindly following her fingerpointing at obama and the dnc and instead ask their local democratic party officials why they allowed this to happen, and they should ask clinton why she's had a sudden change of heart.

Ok, Finally someone is looking at these voting machines and saying something. It is my guess that John Edwards Won in the South and probably picked up whole lot of votes in New Hampshire and everywhere else he ran, but the machines were set to make it a 2 person race in the Dem party--Clinton and Obama. His votes were changed. Right now we have "two frontrunners" who have disenfrachised the people of this country, and they only care if it pertains to them. The electronic voting scandal makes the US worse then any 3rd world country we have sent Jimmy Carter to watch. Bush NEVER won in 2000 & 2004. I repeat, Bush NEVER won in 2000 & 2004. We are in trouble now.

Is it me, am I missing something? Why isn't anyone talking about why Hillary doesn't do well in the Caucus Primary States? Simple answer . . . . there's no opportunity to lose votes or disenfranchise voters!

Maybe this is what the Clinton's (2 for 1) mean when they say they're the only ones capable of beating the Republican in the General - they learned well from the Bush, Jr. election cycles.

After reading the responses in here, it is just amazing to see how easily Hillary Clinton supporters can brush off such obvious voting irregularities. I guess our democracy doesn't mean as much as getting your candidate elected, huh?