McCain Loan Raises FEC Questions

JIM KUHNHENN | February 21, 2008 12:56 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


WASHINGTON — The government's top campaign finance regulator says John McCain can't drop out of the primary election's public financing system until he answers questions about a loan he obtained to kickstart his once faltering presidential campaign.

Federal Election Commission Chairman David Mason, in a letter to McCain this week, said the all-but-certain Republican nominee needs to assure the commission that he did not use the promise of public money to help secure a $4 million line of credit he obtained in November.

McCain's lawyer, Trevor Potter, said Wednesday evening that McCain has withdrawn from the system and that the FEC can't stop him. Potter, who was FEC chairman in 1994, said the campaign did not encumber the public funds in any way.

"Well, it was done before in another campaign. ... We think it's perfectly legal. One of our advisers is a former chairman of the FEC, and we are confident that it was an appropriate thing to do," McCain told a news conference Thursday.

McCain, a longtime advocate of stricter limits on money in politics, was one of the few leading presidential candidates to seek FEC certification for public money during the primaries. The FEC determined that he was entitled to at least $5.8 million. But McCain did not obtain the money, and he notified the FEC earlier this month that he would bypass the system, freeing him from its spending limits.

But just as McCain was beginning to turn his attention to a likely Democratic opponent, Mason, a Republican appointee to the commission, essentially said, "Not so fast."

By accepting the public money, McCain would be limited to spending about $54 million for the primaries, a ceiling his campaign is near. That would significantly hinder his ability to finance his campaign between now and the Republican National Convention in September.

Complicating the dispute is the FEC's current lack of a quorum. The six-member commission has four vacancies and Senate Democrats and Republicans are at loggerheads over how to fill them.

In his letter, Mason told McCain he would need the votes of four commissioners to accept his withdrawal from the system.

"The commission will consider your request at such a time as it has a quorum," Mason wrote.

Without action by the Senate, McCain could be waiting indefinitely.

"We believe that Senator McCain had a clear legal right to withdraw from the primary matching fund system and he has done so," Potter said. "No FEC action was or is required for withdrawal."

Potter said McCain will continue with his campaign and not adhere to the public financing system's limits on spending. Without a full commission, Mason has little enforcement power. Likewise, without an FEC, McCain has no way to appeal Mason's conclusion.

At issue is the fine print in the loan agreement between McCain and Fidelity & Trust Bank. McCain secured the loan using his list of contributors, his promise to use that list to raise money to pay off the loan and by taking out a life insurance policy.

But the agreement also said that if McCain were to withdraw from the public financing system before the end of 2007 and then were to lose the New Hampshire primary by more than 10 percentage points, he would have had to reapply to the FEC for public matching funds and provide the bank additional collateral for the loan.

In his letter to McCain, Mason said the commission would allow a candidate to withdraw from the public finance system as long as he had not received any public funds and had not pledged the certification of such funds "as security for private financing."

Citing the loan agreement, Mason wrote: "We note that in your letter, you state that neither you nor your (presidential campaign) committee has pledged the certification of matching payment funds as security for private financing. In preparation for commission consideration of your request upon establishment of a quorum, we invite you to expand on the rationale for that conclusion."

McCain has been an outspoken critic of the FEC and he and Mason have had ideological differences over campaign finance law for years.

"We will of course carefully review and respond to the questions asked about the collateral for the campaign's bank loan," Potter said Wednesday. "We very carefully negotiated that loan on the basis that the federal matching funds certification we held would not be security or collateral for that loan."

One former Republican FEC chairman, Michael Toner, said McCain should not need action by the FEC to pull out of public financing.

"If a candidate indicates he or she does not want the money and does so before payments are made and does not take advantage of the promise of future payments, then he or she is free to withdraw from the system," said Toner, who advised former GOP presidential contender Fred Thompson. "That's my understanding of exactly what happened here."

The dispute comes at an awkward time for McCain. While he has sought to bypass the public financing system for the primaries, he would like to participate in the system for the general election and he is attempting to hold Democrat Barack Obama to his offer to participate in the system too.

If McCain were to face Obama in the general election under public financing rules, each would get about $85 million to spend between September and Election Day in November. McCain would be the clear beneficiary because Obama has become the most prolific fundraiser in presidential politics and likely would be able to amass much more than $85 million from his donors.

___

Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov

(This version CORRECTS SUBS graf 3 to ADD background on Potter and SUBS graf 14 to correct name of bank.)

Cindy McCain, wife of Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., looks on as he speaks at a news conference in Toledo, Ohio. Thursday, Feb. 21, 2008. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

 

Comments
17
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

Great job pointing out the REAL story.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 02/22/2008

I agree, THIS is the story that I want the news organizations to take a hard look at. Not some possible romance with a lobbyist. I could not care less about what two consenting adults do or don't do.

But McCain's not only playing fast and loose with the public financing, but then being a hypocrite in demanding Obama use it? Now THAT is a news story.

I hope that there is enough juice to not get this story killed by all those McCain butt kissers in the media.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 02/22/2008

THIS is the story that I want the news organizations to take a hard look at. Not some possible romance with a lobbyist. I could not care less about what two consenting adults do or don't do.

But McCain's not only playing fast and loose with the public financing, but then being a hypocrite in demanding Obama use it? Now THAT is a news story.

I hope that there is enough juice to not get this story killed by all those McCain butt kissers in the media.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 02/22/2008

McWar is going to lose this argument and he knows it.

However, he should take solace in the fact that the

public funding will far exceed any dollars he could

bring in privately. The GOP Leaders hate him

and will do very little to help him and NEVER part

with their sacred dollars to finance his campaign.

He has lost it all before the convention.

Bye-bye McWar!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 02/22/2008

THIS is the story worth reporting on.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 02/22/2008

I just had a thought. Could it be that the leadership of the Republican Party - so disgruntled with their soon to be nominee (McCain) might be the source of the dirt given to the NYT article. Could it be that their anonymous sources have not been identified because they may come from the ranks of Buchanan, Romney, Rush, Coulter, etc. I find their recent advocacy for McCain interesting (Me thinks they do protest too much). Let's say they get McCain to go before the national media and deny all charges only to drop the other shoe two or three days later knowing that McCain will be forced to withdraw from the race as an unacceptable nominee only to be replaced by Romney -heir apparent to the crown without ever having to go through any primaries or caucus activity. Which would explain why Romney "suspended" his campaign and Huckabee refused to withdraw because they all knew they held trump cards to his demise and they would publicly humiliate him regarding information that GOP was well aware of before last evening. Then the GOP could easily state that they put all their support in defending McCain against the liberal press and he lied to them - allowing them a free pass to dump McCain and go to their true conservative selection (Romney). Think about it. This is too neatly packaged.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 02/21/2008

Actually, the GOP doesn't really care if it wins the White House this time around as long as they keep enough seats in Congress to maintain their obstructionist approach to governing. What the GOP is looking forward to is 2012 when they can run Romney again and use the problems that the Democrats will have had in getting anything done as their main campaign point.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 02/22/2008


repubs are going into action with crippling wounds in november.

they really should reconsider this nomination. the repubs should open their convention and appoint a nominee after a good political discussion which could also serve as a platform for emerging talent in republican party which they desperately need.

they could treat this convention like 76 where reagan's insurgency and high profile at the convention set the stage for his nomination in 80.

it might seem a little disorganized at first but they would actually have a stronger candidate in November.

McCain is clearly a catastrophe for the repubs. a lot of republican congressmen will go down in the ship with commander McCain on the bridge.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 02/21/2008

Oh no, the leading Republican is involved in at least two scandals in two days. What a pity, seems like he's just a clone of old GW himself. How can we ever be expected to get things rolling in the right direction while the scandals develop at such a pace, we don't? Bwahahaha See ya sucka!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 02/21/2008

McCain Received $100,000 From Firm Of CONVICTED FELON Abramoff Notoriety

February 12, 2008 02:38 PM
On the stump, Sen. John McCain has touted his work tackling the excesses of the lobbying industry to bolster his reputation as a "maverick" reformer.

"Ask Jack Abramoff if I'm an insider in Washington," McCain often contends. "You'd probably have to go during visiting hours in the prison, and he'll tell you and his lobbyist cronies of the change I made there."

But how much change did McCain actually effect? And is he all that removed from Washington's special interests?

A review of campaign finance filings shows that the Arizona Republican has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from employees of Greenberg Traurig, the very firm where Abramoff once reigned.

Those donations include several thousand dollars from registered lobbyists who represent, or have represented, businesses such as NewsCorp, Rupert Murdoch's media empire; Spi Spirits, a Cyprus based company that has fought with the Russian government for the rights to the Stolichnaya vodka brand name; El Paso Corp, a major energy company; General Motors; and the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a group of businesses and trade associations "concerned" about the shortage of lesser skilled and unskilled labor.

All told, McCain has received more than $400,000 from lobbying firms, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And among his major fundraisers ("bundlers") 59 have been identified as lobbyists by the non-profit organization Public Citizen.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 02/21/2008

Oh please, who has the most to gain from this? Mike Huckabee? Hardly. What were we ALL talking about yesterday? 3 things.

Barack Obama x 2 & Michelle Obama. Barack with his irresponsible comments on Pakistan which has caused a serious problem for our country. Barack for now going back on his pledge to use only & only public funds should he win the primary & Michelle with her usual anti-white sentimants.
I smell a rat. On the eve of this debate tonight in Austin, it was a pure GENIUS move to change the entire communication in the public's mind & eye. Don't think the Obama camp has the money, clout & dishonesty to use NYT? Where have you been? Sleeping?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 02/21/2008

Its seems that the Republicans were more upset about McCain being their nominee that the dems are. Who MO is it to release info like this?
As for Pakistan, who said no country will be able to hide Al Quida or any other terrists?
then when it was reported that terrorists were gathering in Pakistan were told not to go after them due to Pakistan being a sovereign country?
the rat you've been smelling is more likely a FOX.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 02/22/2008

Irresponsible? You mean the same surgical strike into Pakistan that actually got someone from 9/11

The one GWB and McBush chided Obama about and then they did exactly what he proposed in that debate and it worked,

Do your homework, Thanks for playing

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 02/21/2008

I remember another loan from Lincoln Savings and Loan Association that was pretty questionable, too. Interesting how these things always repeat themselves when it comes to John McCain. Can we get Russ Feingold's take on the situation?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 02/21/2008

"The dispute comes at an awkward time for McCain. While he has sought to bypass the public financing system for the primaries, he would like to participate in the system for the general election and he is attempting to hold Democrat Barack Obama to his offer to participate in the system too."

Flip then flop -If Johnny boy wants out of the system to raise more $$$$ he can't jump back in when his likely Dem.opponent will raise more $$ than him. Thanks for playing buh-bye.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 02/21/2008

This is the story I (your public) wants to know about. McCain wasn't funding romantic, adulterous trysts with taxpayer money like Ghouliani. He WAS going to filch the money to pay off the campaign loan from taxpayers.
This will certainly endear him to the entire right-wing (and he needs that; Right, right?).

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 02/21/2008

The wheels are coming off...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/21/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
Cindy McCain, wife of Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., looks on as he speaks at a news conference in Toledo, Ohio. Thursday, Feb. 21, 2008. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

Popular Stories on HuffPost
M.S. Bellows, Jr. Clinton's Open Letter To Obama On MI and FL

On a day when it appears that the Michigan controversy may be resolved in a way...

Obama Vice President Picks: Who Are The Frontrunners?

With the Democratic nomination now in its endgame, it's time to speculate on...

Obama Suggests Offer Maybe Clinton Can't Refuse

On Friday, Barack Obama publicly raised the possibility of helping Hillary Clinton pay...

Bill Clinton's Angry Confrontation With Voter (VIDEO)

From "CBS News RAW": While campaigning in Fayetteville, W.Va., Bill Clinton argued with...

Eva Mendes Topless And Toe Sucking In New Photoshoot (PICTURES)

Actress and Calvin Klein spokeswoman Eva Mendes posed for a provocative photospread in the...

Obama Campaign Launches "Vote For Change" Voter Registration Drive

Today, May 10, marks the first day of what the Obama campaign is calling its "Vote For...

"Saturday Night Live's" Message From Hillary Clinton: "I Have No Ethical Standards" (VIDEO)

Last night's all new "Saturday Night Live"

Nancy Pelosi Cuts Short Press Conference, Makes "Beeline" For Obama During His DC Visit

CBS caught Senator Obama on Capitol Hill in a swarm of...

Clinton Supporters Send Last-Ditch Obama Attack Emails To Supers

As the Democratic primary nears its long-awaited conclusion, undecided superdelegates have...

Al Meyerhoff McCain to Me in 1999: Bush "As Dumb as a Stump"

As a lawyer might say (OK, I am one), I have no personal knowledge of whether John or...

Arianna Huffington Truth Alert: McCain's Freudian Slip is Showing (and Very Telling)

At the same time that former West Wingers...

Kevin Phillips Washington's Great "No Inflation" Hoax

Billionaire California bond manager Bill Gross calls it "a haute con job." Bloomberg...

 
 

 Site  Web ASK_logo