Civil Rights Icon Lewis Officially Switches From Clinton To Obama

Civil Rights Icon Lewis Officially Switches From Clinton To Obama

AP   |  BEN EVANS   |   February 27, 2008 at 06:18 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

WASHINGTON — Civil rights leader John Lewis dropped his support for Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid Wednesday in favor of Barack Obama. Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Atlanta, is the most prominent black leader to defect from Clinton's campaign in the face of near-unanimous black support for Obama in recent voting.

He also is a superdelegate who gets a vote at this summer's national convention in Denver.

Keep reading here.

NBC's Andrea Mitchell interviewed Lewis about his decision to switch his endorsement from Clinton to Obama. Lewis told Mitchell that the decision was extremely difficult, "much tougher" than when he helped lead the famous march on Selma, Alabama in 1965.

Watch the video of Mitchell's interview with Lewis below, and tell HuffPost how you think this will impact the campaign as the primaries in Texas and Ohio draw closer:


 
Comments
730
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
photo

hmmmm, so john lewis finds it hard rationalizing an entirely self serving switch in endorsement from hillary to obama? well i for one find it hard understanding it, and i'm for obama...at the moment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 02/28/2008

this has nothing to do with race, gender, or whatever ---- this all about jumping on the bandwagon --- if hil was in the lead, and showing signs of winning ---- john would have sat on his butt !!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 02/28/2008

On February 20, 2008, Hutchins announced his bid to unseat 11-term congressman and civil rights luminary, John Lewis. (http://www.markelhutchins.com/) Hutchins has cited the "winds of change" that are blowing across the country principally resulting from Senator Barack Obama's presidential bid. Hutchins claims that Lewis' "political indebtedness" to Bill and Hillary Clinton and his disconnectedness from the pulse of his constituents, who voted overwhelmingly for Obama in the presidential primary despite Lewis' obstinate support of Clinton's White House bid, was the mitigating factor that swayed his decision to challenge Lewis.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markel_Hutchins

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 02/28/2008

Lewis needs to be sent home.........he guessed wrong....really, big time wrong.
Americans deserve progressive thinkers, and Lewis is still pulling out pics of MLK, when there is a contemporary leader in Barack Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

One question: Is there something wrong for Blacks to vote for Obama because he is Black?

Please remember that we have only been able to vote for a short time and the only options we had were to either not vote or vote for a White candidate. We have voted for Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and so on.
I am far from racist but I find it disturbing that White's have a problem with this. Oh I know, because White's have been in "power" since they stole this country from the Indians they somehow feel threatend. Why? I would think any fair-minded person would would want equal treatment for everyone in this country and that's the way it should be. Who wouldn't want someone that has the interest of the people and would work for those interest. I can't name to many president's other than Kennedy, Johnson and Clinton who have done that. Can anyone name a Republican president that has done the same? Maybe Roosevelt, but that's it. Definitely not Regan who Republicans think is sitting up in Heaven next to God. I wonder why? Because he cut every social program for Blacks and Conservatives love that. Isn't that their rallying cry "keep the Blacks down."
In the next coming months we are going to witness first hand just how racist this county is...so fair/opened minded people get ready for the Racist Right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

Extend that argument and ask is there something wrong with whites voting against Obama because he is black? It could be repression. On the other hand we can use the same argument and as is there something wrong with whites voting for Hillary because she's white or females voting for her because she is female. You would think we could rise above conduct like this. Hell, as long as we don't vote republican, I guess its okay....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 02/28/2008

I think the general accepted logic is that it is okay to support someone who you feel represents your interests -- whether racial, gender, religious, or otherwise.

As such, I have no problem with women supporting Hillary, or even white supremacists supporting Ron Paul.

I think that when you start to vote against (or judge) someone based on race, gender, sexuality, that is where many of the problems start.

Not everyone sees it that way, that's just my own analysis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

Bikerdude,

Yes, there is something wrong with White's not voting for Obama for the sole reason he's black. That in a sense would be racist, the same goes for Blacks who wouldn't vote for a White women/male based on gender/race. As I said we have always voted for whites, but this is the most rarest of opportunities that we have someone viable that looks like us, just as whites always do, and hopefully will work for the WHOLE country no matter what your race, religion, gender, lifestyle or economic standard. Once again it is unprecedented, but I would certainly understand if ALL women voted for Clinton. I would hope that if Clinton didn't win the nomination that her supporters would vote for Obama instead of running to the Right. Do you really think that McCain would have everyone's interest in mind or to continue the Bush model? Last point: I have no problem voting for a Republican, but in my lifetime I haven't had a viable candidate...Regan, Bush no way. Ron Paul...Yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

no in this day and age it's ok to commit yourself to someone and then break the commitment. Heck we do it everyday to partners in business, we do it to partners in marriage why not in politics.....but if Obama would not have ran, Clinton would have been ok.....you know what I say, typicla black, typical american......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 02/28/2008

GET YOUR FACTS CORRECT

African Americans granted to vote in 1870

Women granted to vote in 1920

YOUR POST IS OFFENSIVE AND RACIST

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

I'm a Hillary fan and will sadly miss his support, but I really don't blame him.

If there were an Irish, French, English, Scandinavian, Catholic, democrat from Maine and Texas like myself running, I would switch over too.

There's a couple of other guys from Maine and Texas too, but I won't mention their names for obvious reasons.

But I really don't believe him about how difficult he says it was. That's a crock.

Just make your choice and tell everyone else "Suffah ayuh."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 02/28/2008

Why do you dismiss this as a race thing, instead of the fact that Hillary is going to be out of the race by next in the near future?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 02/28/2008
- dtd I'm a Fan of dtd permalink

He's NOT doing this to fulfill King's dream or further diversity at the highest ranks in government. He's doing this for the same reason he initially endorsed Senator Clinton: political self-interest! He has been a mentor and father-figure to Senator Obama. When he endorsed Senator Clinton, Senator Obama told him, "if feels like a father stabbing me in the back." And it was. He should have stayed neutral, but instead he thought that Senator Obama's chances were small at best--because he's Black. How is that championing civil rights? It's not. He's like most civil rights leaders of that time: out of step and out of touch. African Americans have transcended the pulpit, and Americans as a whole no longer look at us from such a limited prism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 02/28/2008

Your post makes a lot of sense and really shows this guy's true colors

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 02/28/2008

Why are my entries not being posted? Is it because I and my extended family will be leaving the democratic party to vote for McCain if OB gets the nomination?
It is easy to slant opinion here if some of the posts are scrubbed or refused.
Since this is an open blog, I will continue to voice my opposition to the coronation and I appose some here who are demonizing a white woman who has worked hard through the years for postive change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 02/28/2008

This site has censors that wipe most comments that are not pro-obama. It is a lot like Fox News now. Spin and lies are the norm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 02/28/2008

"demonizing a white woman?" who......her husband? Give me a break....however, if you wish to show your own personal racism...this is a free country. Also, McCain will appreciate your vote I'm sure...you and yours..LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 02/28/2008

Yes, Evolin. You've certainly convinced me that the HuffPost is desperately trying to keep the public from discovering that you and your extended family are switching parties if Obama is nominated. They want to prevent a mass defection of Obama supporters. I for one will vote for McCain, now that I know that you and your family are making such a brave move.

Your entry was posted, by the way. I guess they didn't want Time Magazine to get the scoop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 02/28/2008

Few white people have done more for civil rights than the Clintons. Their early work for voter rights for civil rights and for the disenfranchised blacks in the south is the reason John Lewis is their friend. He left her for a reason:
Older blacks are being threatened by this "obama orgy" and are being told to line up for Obama or be pushed aside.( see Jesse Jackson, Claiborn)This tactic was standard in Obama's early rise in Chicago. Racism is alive and well in Obama campaign.Google: Obama, Palmer.This fight for POTUS is far from over. You who say she is finished haven't the remotest clue to how this election season works.It ain't over yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 02/28/2008

Exactly what have the Clintons done for the "black community" that balances out their support of NAFTA and the War on Drugs, which imprisoned African-American males at record levels for non-violent drug offenses?

I REALLY want to see your answer to this question.

You keep harping on the Clintons being "civil rights" crusaders, but civil rights is about a lot more than showing up at a black church and having an office in Harlem.

Tell me exactly what makes up for Clintons support of NAFTA and a record prison population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 02/28/2008
- dtd I'm a Fan of dtd permalink

What the hell have the Clintons done for the African American community? White folks kill me with giving undue credit to other White folks for attending ceremonies, Black churches or merely hanging around with some Black folks. The Clintons have NOT done anymore than the average White Democrat for civil rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 02/28/2008

Does anyone remember how people used to say Hillary has alot of "negatives"?

They were right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 02/28/2008

And St. Obama doesn't !!
Is that what you are implying??
Just wait until the Republican machine produces their "dirt" on Obama and his wif's writings.

I will NEVER jump on this hysterical wave of Obamamania.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 02/28/2008

Exactly - you are so right and I am not falling for the Obama mania either

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 02/28/2008

This is understandable and Hillary said "I respect his decision". However it just points up the position black leaders find themselves in with the black supporters. If they do not support this first black candidate for president they will lose THEIR jobs.
I was listening to talk radio and a black man was very frank about his position. He said he did not care what BO stood for. He was voting to get a black man in office. He said that would help the black people in this country.
So it IS about race and the black people have made it about race.
I am for Hillary, but not just because she is a woman, but because of her skills and ability to keep working towards the ordinary person's welfare.
I believe some are so sexist that they will choose to vote against her for that reason only. That is as sad as those who would vote against a black man only because he is black.

I fully understand how the black people must feel about getting this done for a black man, but demonizing a white woman to do it may back fire........ This is not being done in a decent manner.....by any stretch of the imagination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 02/28/2008

"Obama would help the Black people in this country?" How are those streets of Chicago doing today since the great Obama left? I don't know what that guy was smoking but it sure as hell must be good. Obama has done everything in his power to distance himself from controversial issues pertaining to Black america. Jenna 6, Katrina, NAACP, State of The Black Union Forum. If it was "To Black" Obama stayed back. He will not do a damn thing for the Black community and all they will have, if he manages to become the next president, is a symbol in the white house and that's it. The Clinton administration done more for the black community than any modern day black leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 02/28/2008

bingo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 02/28/2008

If you are not black, I suggest you stop trying to speak for the black community.

Instead, explain to us what the Clintons did for the black community, outide of NAFTA and sending more African-Americans to prison ("The War on Drugs") than any other president in history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 02/28/2008

EXCELLENT MARROB - hopefully more people will wake the hell up by next Tuesday

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 PM on 02/28/2008

So how do you explain the white superdelegates who are changing their votes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 02/28/2008

the demo left is leading the democratic party to a mccain landslide this will be like 1972 mccovern ....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 02/28/2008

John did the right thing. His constituents, and believers in democracy, are grateful. And I suspect he can take the criticism radiating from the comfortable lounge of a desperate political machine. This is a man who took a baseball bat to the side of his head in Alabama... for the cause of liberty. Thank you, Mr. Lewis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 02/28/2008
- Nic I'm a Fan of Nic permalink

This says a lot about Lewis. He is now viewed as an opportunist,a liar,someone who can't keep his word. No backbone,no balls. Hold your nose and vote McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 02/28/2008

I am extremely disappointed in John Lewis' decision to support Obama. First of all, it is betrayal of a loyal friend. What does that say about Lewis' character? Second, if Obama has enough delegates going into the convention, Lewis could have switched without the public betrayal of his friend. Third, if, after the next primaries, Hillary does poorly and withdraws from the race, Lewis could have swithed without the public betrayal of his friend. Hillary says that John Lewis will continue to be her friend. That's big of her. Because in my book, John Lewis is nothing but a low-down dirty scoundrel who betrayed his friend. Just another dirty politican caving into pressure from Obama. What a sorry excuse for a human being.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 02/28/2008

Lewis is an American hero and like many is sick of the race baiting tactics of Billary and her harridans

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 02/28/2008

what a laugh...it's Obama that's played the race card perfectly....I, a lifelong Dem, will be voting for McCain if need be. All it took for me was to see 85 to 95 % support in the AA community to know they weren't really looking at the two whereas in the white community Hill held a small advantage leading me to believe they were actually thinking about the issues and not voting on race.....how sad this is...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 02/28/2008

Hmmm....tough call. Stick with your "friend" that isn't necessarilly the best candidate or who the people in your district support - or - vote for the best candidate and in line with the wishes of your constituency. Not a tough call at all - it's called doing what's right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 02/28/2008

Hey CindyV (and the rest of you), Slate.com has a delegate counter that you can run various scenarios to see if Hillary can overtake Obama in Pledged Delegates. Give it a try:

http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/

I (Obama Supporter) did my scenario giving Hillary the following states that remain with a 55-45 percent margin: OH, TX, PA, RI, WV, Guam, IN, KY, and PR. I gave Obama VT, MS, NC, WY, MT, O, and SD with a 55-45 margin. Hillary gets 514 delegates and Obama gets 467 delegates. Guess what. At the end of the process, after Puerto Rico, Obama still has a 109 "PLEDGED = ELECTED" Delegate lead. The Clinton Campaign has done the math. John Lewis knows that it is next to impossible for the Clinton campaign to make up the Difference in Pledged Delegates. John Lewis and most of the Superdelegates are not gonna play the Clintons Game and GIVE her the nomination. The scenario I laid out is pretty much a worst case scneario for Obama. Why should he wait, as some have suggested in this blog, until next Tuesday. As Hillary says "It's Time To Get Real".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 02/28/2008

BTW, I ran the numbers giving her every state with a 55-45 margin and Obama still had a lead of 57 in "PLEDGED = ELECTED" Delegates. The Clinton Campaign (See Penn, Solis, Wolfson) blew it in not having a strategy post-February 5th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 02/28/2008

I'm only disappointed in Lewis because he didn't come out sooner. He is doing so now when there is no risk to him at all. And how in the world can this be "tougher" than marching in Selma? I don't get it, and it's a hollow endorsement, since it comes so reluctantly. He's still in love with the Clintons, and it doesn't help Obama at all to have Lewis be in such pain about his decision. Who needs him?! We've gotten along pretty well without the old guard in the black leadership (Mfume, Watson, Waters, Bond, etc.). As an African American, I'm sick of them. He has shown absolutely NO COURAGE in this situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 02/28/2008

There's NO loyalty in Politics.

It's like rats on a sinking ship - They all jump, eventually.

He's fooling no one with his phony excuse - something special is happening in our country (paraphrased).

Yeah, something's happening, everyone's jumping on to the anticipated winning team.

Plain and Simple

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 02/28/2008

Hillary and her harridans are going to be dumped into the garbage bin of history on Tuesday night. A great victory for the Democratic party and end of the Bush-Clinton era of politics. The Democratic party will owe a big debt of gratitude to African Americans who led the way in exposing the corrupt slimy Clintons

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

Why do you continue to use the offensive, demeaning, and sexist term "harridan"? If a racist poster were offensive enough to use the "n word" in order to dismiss some Obama supporters, then it wouldn't be tolerated in this venue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 02/28/2008

so does this mean the entire black democratic caucus supports minister louis farrakhan too?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 02/28/2008

Super delegates- time to just SHUT UP. People are still voting and we the voters in the primary are supposed to decide. The Superdelegates are supposed to weigh in at the end if there is not a clear winner. So why are they even going public with how they are voting or switching or re switching or whatever? It is not about them, supposedly, it's about voters. They open their big fat entitled mouths in public to try and sway primaries and try to position themselves for more power by aligning who they think will win. Where are the Democratic party leaders to put a stop to this before they destroy the democratic process and the democratic party?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 02/28/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect