"The Daily Show" Reports From "Anti-Hillary HQ" To Explain Press Bias

You're right. And if Billary wins the primary, the B.O. spurned supporters won't vote for her as well. The Dems have already shut down. Congratu-freakin'-lations. You know, I was stunned when they didn't win in '04. But this time around it's like watching a train wreck, as it occurs, in incredibly slow motion.

Shenygirl wrote"
"Why is Zogby, the famous pollster, and a proud Arab American, so dedicated to electing Obama? Could he possibly be rigging the poll numbers?"

OMG! All this time we have been letting an Arab (muslim terrorist) skew all our polls! This whole time I thought American's weren't keen on the Iraq war, but now we know the truth, Zogby has been skewing the results! And the coup de gras is that now Zogby the Arab (muslim terrorist) is backing another (muslim terrorist)! Thanks for connecting the dots for me Sheny!

I am so glad I am not the only one that feels the same way as you Shenygirl1.

Why is it so hard for Clinton supporters to acknowledge that their candidate is just too flawed to ignore? Clinton isn't losing support because of some "media conspiracy." The truth is, candidates receive more scrutiny at certain points than others, and anyone who is familiar with trends in journalism understands this. It certainly doesn't help Clinton that she continues to make the most provocative comments about her opponent. "The media," (as if it's a monolith) will focus on the candidate who is making the most noise. Fortunately for her, they are ignoring the more serious ledes. :)

Btw, I didn't see the Clinton folks complaining when MSNBC continued to run a feature (headliners and legends or something) canonizing Clinton or when she has enjoyed more airtime.. including positive airtime throughout the course of the race. There is no rising bias against her, but Obama is now experiencing what she's enjoyed the past year. Clinton has been in a honeymoon phase with the press until recently while Obama is well acquainted with how unkind the press can be..

BILLARY ARE FRAUD ONE LIE WILL MORE LIE PEOPLE DUMB SUCKER NAFTA FIASCO created by Bill and we never stop it and UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE NEVER HAPPEN JUST SCAM THEY KNOW NEVER PASS ,ONLY FOOL STILL TRUST CLINTONIES, KEEPING DINASTIES

You'll get over it

Amen, brother.

Well, before you get to Grenada don't forget Cuba. John Kennedy did a good job there as well as Viet Nam. The whole world's a village, remember? Great democratic slogan. And, Jimmy Carter in Iran. Great leader there. And, Bill Clinton bombing baby food plants in Iraq. Really impressed the locals. Don't forget Bill's success with the warlords in Somalia. Yeah, you guys have a lock on the right stuff. Us republicans will just sit back and wait for you guys to implode. Happens to democrats about every two years.

Yeah, Hillary has told us how "vetted" she is, and sure, lots has been written and dished and much even further disected but it works to her advantage these days for it is "assumed", as so MUCH HAS BEEN written/disected/etc ad nauseum, no need to "really" bring up so consequently , it give sHillary (and Bill, her "partner"...) a sorta' free pass/ride presently as attention is on Obama to find some worthwhile dustups !!! Hillary (and Bill) complain they are "abused" due to media bias...a LOL, for they have had rather an easy ride in the lead upping to this present campaign --WE, the people have been HAMMERED with Hillary's inevitibility...coyly and with ploys that are obvious if one bothered to pay attention to and way before any primary vote was cast to even suggest elsewise in the hearts/minds/quests of the voters !!! TIRE OF THE CLINTONS WHINING !!!! FInd it but another coy ploy..Her REAL record deserves CURRENT VETTING, but is NOT being done, she gets another free pass yet WHINES endlessly as voters are finding they DO have a credible alternate to select. WHO really wants 4more years of harangued excuses of why fors and why nots and how all just out to get "them" cuz so they are so "beautiful" schickt !!! MANY DO NOT and want a CHANGE and ARE willing to roll the dice !!!

Ya no..

Pero, no es tiempo por ESTE mujer. Lo siento.

Un otro tiempo. Un otra mujer. Hay MUCHAS Gran Mujeres, MUCHAS otras..

If the polls can be trusted, the "mo" has reduced a 21% lead for Clinton to a lead within the margin of error. If I trusted polls, I'd offer that as proof of momentum, or at least as an indication that many Democrats supported Clinton primarily because they believed she was most electable, but that they no longer believe it.
My question for the Clinton "supporters" is this...if you are so enthusiastic about your candidate, why are your posts filled with attacks on Obama, rather than a list of her attributes?
I used to say that I'd support any of the Democratic candidates enthusiastically. As this campaign has worn on, and Clinton's support has eroded, she has lashed out at the press, at Obama, and Obama's supporters, rather than address the problems in her campaign. Sure, the media mistreats you, Hillary...do something about it! Work with them, and don't block them or try to manipulate them. Nobody likes to have their jobs made harder for them. Figure out how to answer questions without giving too much information, and without looking like you are stonewalling. How successful can a President be if they can't find a way to work with the media?

SHOW OHIO IDIOT THEY LOSS JOBS CUZ CLINTON AND THEY WILL BE BUMB SOON , THEY STILL FOOL TRUST THE DUMB BITCH,MANY AMERICAN WOMEN JUST BIG MOUTH .only illegal alien vote her

SHOW OHIO IDIOT THEY LOSS JOBS CUZ CLINTON AND THEY WILL BE BUMB SOON , THEY STILL FOOL TRUST THE DUMB BITCH

TO MAMY DUMB SUCKER STILL TRUST CLINTONIES PERVERT

well to be honest, and i'm not trying to start something here, i'm sincerely trying to be objective. Part of this media bias that people talk about is really more about how long the candidates have been in the public eye rather than a calculated bias. obama isnt' as scrutinized because he's been in the public eye for a couple years. he hasn't been in the white house for 8 years. I think to say it's media bias without that in consideration is a premature and irrational argument. I mean you can put stuff in that's not there.

Susan, try Taylor Marsh's web site. We've moved to a place where intelligence trumps "Are not!" as a counter-argument.

Why did Hillary lose the last 10 primaries? Why have all of the five major Ohio newspapers endorsed Obama? She's the charlatan, the one that feels entititled....her and Bill are running the biggest scam on the America people I have ever seen, exploiting the dumbing down of Americans, like you are too stupid to see the truth....she is so loathed in Washington, D.C. that if she is elected she will accomplish very little; her wonkiness is all talk....I'd rather be inspired by someone who asks of all of us to get involved the process....all she does is recite a list of things she'll do for the AMerican people...she's so full of it. You are an idiot.

The Hard Way for Hillary supporters www.politicalamnesia.blogspot.com

The media is so deep in the tank for Hillary...

Obama won Tsunami Tuesday hands down. He won more STATES, more DELEGATES, and more VOTES. Where are the headlines? Everyone reported a tie or that Hillary was in the lead by muddying the waters including super delegates (that are all now jumping ship to Obama).

He was always winning. He was never not winning. But listening to the MSM, you think that he just took the lead and became the front-runner after his streak of 11-straight wins.

The media has been driving HRC viability all along. Her campaign tanked in Iowa.