Actress Amy Yasbeck, widow of actor John Ritter, arrives at the Los Angeles County Superior courthouse Monday, March 3, 2008, in Glendale, Calif. (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

John Ritter's Widow Sobs Through Her Testimony Of His Final Minutes

LINDA DEUTSCH | March 3, 2008 09:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GLENDALE, Calif. — Sobbing into her hands, John Ritter's widow on Monday gave jurors in a wrongful-death trial a minute-by-minute account of events leading up to the actor's death in 2003. Amy Yasbeck sometimes could barely speak through her tears as she recounted the last hours in which she was summoned to a hospital and told her husband was having a heart attack and needed an angiogram.

She said that Ritter, who was in a hospital bed, was "scared" and asked Dr. Joseph Lee, one of the two defendants in the lawsuit, if he could get a second opinion before he agreed to the procedure.

"Dr. Lee said, 'No, there's no time. You're in the middle of a heart attack,'" Yasbeck testified.

She said Lee asked Ritter to sign a consent form and read him its details.

Asked by her lawyer, Moses Lebovits, what happened next, Yasbeck broke into gasping sobs.

"I leaned down to John's ear and said, 'I know you're scared but you have to be brave and do this because these guys know what they're doing.' And he was brave for all the time I saw him," she said.

Yasbeck said that as Ritter was wheeled down a hall on a gurney he used sign language to say "I love you." She said she mouthed the same words back.

"He went around the corner and that's the last time I saw him," she said.

Ritter, 54, fell ill earlier in the day while working on the sitcom "8 Simple Rules ... for Dating My Teenage Daughter" and died of a torn aorta at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Burbank. His family is suing Lee and a radiologist, Dr. Matthew Lotysch, who did a body scan on Ritter two years earlier, for $67 million.

The doctors deny wrongdoing. The radiologist has testified the aorta was normal in the scan but Ritter had coronary artery disease at a relatively young age.

Yasbeck told of the long wait to hear what was happening after Ritter was wheeled away, and of overhearing someone calling "code blue," which she recognized from an audition she had done for the show "ER."

Shortly after that, she said, a doctor who had arrived from the Disney studios came out and told her Ritter was "crashing" and that a surgeon had been summoned.

She said the doctor drew a picture for her and explained that Ritter's aorta had shredded and "it was a bad thing."

At some point _ after she was joined by Ritter's ex-wife, Nancy Ritter, and their son Jason _ the surgeon came to them.

"He said it was over and John's dead, that they worked on John for a long time but the damage was done by the time he got there. It was a fait accompli and John was dead," Yasbeck said.

Yasbeck then told of going home to tell her 5-year-old daughter, Stella, that her father had died. She waited until the next morning because the child was asleep.

Asked by her lawyer to tell jurors what Stella lost with Ritter's death, she said, "As much as I lost my husband and the love of my life and my soul mate, what I lost was Stella's father."

She said when it came to child rearing, "I really was dependent on him. I was 36 years old. He was so freaking wise about this stuff. And Stella, every day she wakes up and there's a new way to miss her father. I can't make up for that. It's a new road to face every day."

The testimony was offered in part to demonstrate to jurors the devastation suffered by the family from the loss of Ritter. In the courtroom audience, his brother, Tom, wiped his eyes.

Nancy Ritter, who was married to the actor for 19 years, also took the stand and testified about his importance to their three children and his decision to have a complete body scan two years before he died.

She said she urged him to do it and when it was over he told her it had gone well.

"He implied to me that he was reassured he was OK. Maybe he was protecting me," she said.

The plaintiffs rested their case after Yasbeck's testimony and the defense opened its presentation with a brief appearance by Ritter's personal trainer, who said the actor was concerned about improving his health and was working out regularly.

The current lawsuit follows settlements with the hospital and eight other medical personnel for about $14 million.


 
Comments
15
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

John Ritter's death was a tragedy, and my condolences go out to his daughter and widow.

However... the family has ALREADY won via settlements $14 MILLION.... and that, implicitly, not EVEN from the two KEY doctors, the attending and the body-scanner.

And the family is here still suing in court for an ADDITIONAL $67 MILLION.

Regardless of the number of medicos involved, a potential total of $81M for a single death -- and not of a healthy walk-in -- but from a mid-heart-attack, post-collapse, wheel-in? Absolutely and utterly absurd.

As if Mr. Ritter did not have life insurance. (How much OUGHT to be pertinent, no?)

Sh*t doesn't always go well mid-crisis. (I lost a close relative due to mid-heart-attack angioplasty, so this story hits extremely close to home.)

But what exactly shoulda woulda Mr. Ritter have done differently in his life over his last two years had the "you should have told him his aorta was fragile" body scan actually said "FRAGILE"?

And IF the mid-attack doctor had known of a "FRAGILE" stamp on the aorta, what then? Refrain from a potentially life SAVING procedure? With my relative still in mind, I say THAT would have been the wrongful death; you're fragile... we can't try.

(Note per the article that Mr. Ritter's widow did not testify as to what the results of the scan were, but as to what she says Ritter said the doctor said.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 03/04/2008
photo

The point of the lawsuit is that his death was entirely preventable if the doctor just ordered a chest x-ray which is standard protocol for the symptoms he presented. He was treated for a heart attack, but he was not having a heart attack. He had an aortic dissection which was made worse by the treatment he received. Those of you just reading this article are not getting the full story. The aorta did not shred. He had a tear that was made worse by the treatment he received. His existing condition which would have been obvious if they had just done an x-ray.

Yes, doctors are human and make mistakes, but protocols are put in place to prevent exactly this type of tragedy from happening.

If any money is awarded, it will be used to educate the public and prevent other unnecessary deaths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 03/04/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

The aorta will usually show signs of thinning and expanding before it tears like this. That would have shown up on a scan. And if he had heart trouble anyway they should have been looking at those measurements. It's unfortunate that he died, but they should have seen it coming. And it happened while they were looking at his heart, so that's two strikes. Granted a torn aorta is usually a death sentence unless he's already on the table, but he was! Go get em, Amy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 03/04/2008
photo

Agreeing here with XCITIZEN. And, that is surprising coming from me. I fully support Personal Injury attorneys who are really the only ones out there helping the average citizen fight against true screw-ups by companies, HMOs, impaired physicians, and other potential harm-doers. However, THIS hospital is the one that saved my daughter's life in 2006 and a better, more concerned facility would be hard to find anywhere.

Doctor's are not saints. Sometimes they make egregious mistakes and need to be taken to court. It appears that John Ritter's ER doctors did the best that could be done with the information they were receiving. Sometimes losing a loved one makes people a little irrational about what is "just reality" and what they wish could have been done.

I doubt that any doctor, or any facility could have helped Ritter by the time he arrived at Providence St. Joseph's. If appears as if perhaps Ritter KNEW he had a serious heart condition but ignored it ... perhaps knowing he wouldn't be insurable if he confided the info ... and bang, nobody would have hired him without star-insurance. It seems he made it into a crap-shoot, a gamble, and was standing deeply in the middle of de-Nile on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 03/04/2008
- Bibbo I'm a Fan of Bibbo 11 fans permalink


Fools!!! You have no idea what you're doing.Continue to sue everytime life hands you a problem and you'll totally screw up any chance the USA has of getting universal health care thats both affordable and high quality. The hidden costs due to defensive medicine is just that...hidden...its vastly underestimated and is strangling the health care in the USA. True malpractice should not be dealt with by suing but the offender should lose his ability to practice untill or unless the problem is resolved.Most cases of legitimate malpractice aren't brought forward(in large part to prevent a suit) and most lawsuits are due to personality clashes not malpractice. The John Edwards of the world are sociopathic opportunists who encourage lawsuits to enrich themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 03/04/2008

I read the story. So how does she warrant a lawsuit? Why would the hospital settle? The aorta shread. He didn't have a chance and I don't understand how anyone is responsible. Go home Amy take care of your family without money form those who didn't merit your suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 03/04/2008
- wadenelson1 I'm a Fan of wadenelson1 223 fans permalink
photo

Poor guy. I hope, I really do, he doesn't have to spend eternity watching re-runs of 3's Company.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 03/04/2008
- Theda I'm a Fan of Theda 17 fans permalink
photo

Ritter looked bad at age 54....bloated and in awful shape.
He started having an affair with Amy while he was still married to Nancy Morgan. Then he cheated on both ladies with a Hollywood hooker!
John lived a very wild and decadent personal life. Probably took a heavy toll on him. No wonder he died at 54. Just like Michael Landon, who also died at age 54.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 03/05/2008
- XCITIZEN I'm a Fan of XCITIZEN 57 fans permalink
photo

Shit happens, folks. Is it really necessary to screw the hospital out of 67 million bucks? People die all the time due to a combination of their own physical illness and misinterpretations by the medical establishment. That doesn't warrant a 67 million dollar settlement. I aint a doctor, and I sure as hell aint a lawyer, but on it's surface, this is story doesn't really provide a clear, legitimate case for a 67 million settlement - he died, she cried, the little girl is sad - does not equal 67 million dollars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 03/04/2008
- blooddoc I'm a Fan of blooddoc 8 fans permalink
photo

Well said. Gross medical negligence should always be brought to light and the victims compensated, but we should not confuse negligence with unfavorable outcomes. It sounds trite, but life is neither fair nor kind and bad things happen to good people. Lashing out via litigation won't bring back a loved one, but it will make life - and health care - more difficult and expensive for all of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 03/04/2008

my wish for you is that when you have your big (and inevitable) experience with the health care system...that you get exactly the same quality of care that Ritter got. let me know how goes, huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 03/04/2008

so very sad, been on an operating table a few 2 many times myself,and the fear thing really hurts my feelings. GB the whole entire family and each of his friends!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 03/04/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

I hate how easily we jump into lawsuits. But in this case I think it has merit. Aortic root measurements are easy to do. One of my kids has had a number of them. A simple ultrasound would have shown what's going on. And some doctors are quick to dismiss differences instead of acting on the side of caution. Add to that he was already in the hospital, under a cardiologist's care and in the process of looking at his heart. They were right there when it happened. Who better to handle it on the spot when it happens on the table in front of them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 03/04/2008
- Navy26Yrs I'm a Fan of Navy26Yrs 4 fans permalink
photo

If you have heart trouble and you are still alert and stable - go to a HEART HOSPITAL - it's your best chance of survival.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 03/04/2008

I take your point, but also...it is also ONLY your best chance for survival. IMO, and from multiple experiences of my own and my family and friends...our medical health system is severely flawed. I hate to say that...but you don't need to watch SIcko to know that it's true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 03/04/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect