Citigroup\'s Job Cuts Could Exceed 30,000

Citigroup's Job Cuts Could Exceed 30,000

CNBC   |  Charlie Gasparino   |   March 4, 2008 08:27 AM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Citigroup's job cuts could reach 30,000 or more over the next year and a half because of increasing writedowns from subprime-related debt, CNBC has learned.

The layoffs would exceed the previously reported 24,000 job cuts that had been expected at the banking giant.

Chief Executive Vikram S. Pandit is currently conducting a massive cost review and could cut as much as 10 percent of the bank's workforce of 370,000, according to people familiar with the situation.

In the past, Citigroup would lay off people and then hire them back as consultants. But with more bad-debt writedowns looming, Pandit wants to make the cuts permanent, sources say.

Keep Reading

-- OR --

Read about how Citigroup and Wachovia are facing separate lawsuits filed in a U.S. Federal court in New York by a small fund. The suit, according to Reuters, claims that the banks "each improperly required the fund to pay out more money from insurance derivatives contracts known as credit default swaps amid a decline in the value of the mortgage-backed bonds."


 
 

Comments
26
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong permalink

I'm sure one of our resident libertarians will be along to tell us that these 30,000 are all lazy and their lack of success is purely their own fault.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 03/05/2008
- Dendroica See Profile I'm a Fan of Dendroica permalink

I've had friends who work in banking, and I got the low-down on these layoffs.

They've been changing job titles for months, essentially promoting people into positions where they were seriously overcrowded. Imagine having 17 executives in one room, and nobody underneath them to execute their orders... Then they put on a freeze, and they've been trying to prevent these people from transferring to other parts of the company, because they are now "overqualified" for those positions that they held until very recently!

Why are they doing this? They are taking the people with the highest seniority and pushing them out, before they hit their 25th year. Because once they do that, they get lifelong health care and a pension.

So what happens if you are about to lose your job, and you are willing to do anything to stay? They'll tell you you CAN stay at your earlier position, but they'll "roll back the odometer." In essence, that 22 years you've been with the company is now HISTORY. You can stay at your job, but you'll lose all of those years you've put in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 AM on 03/05/2008
- PT See Profile I'm a Fan of PT permalink

WAMU just bought out employees over the age of 45 and up.This coupled with outsourcing many financial jobs to India over the past decade seems to be the going trend in the banking industry. Sad thing -- most employees with seniority saw this coming a decade ago but failed to seek an alternative safety net for the future -- I've seen long-term employees get too comfortable with their mode of living, not realizing that many banking institutions could care less about employee loyalty and or value in the long run.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 03/05/2008
- Harrier See Profile I'm a Fan of Harrier permalink

In my view, because the finance industry owns lawmakers, this trend of earning super normal profits and having the tax payers pick up the pieces during the down times will continue. For those in the industry, if you're not in the inside, you will always be on the outside. This industry, outside oil is the most corrupt in this country-it is all smoke and mirrors

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 AM on 03/05/2008
- falco See Profile I'm a Fan of falco permalink

Let's see, the Rockefellers own Citigroup. Yet the Rockefellers, with all that they own, have to lay people off? Hell, they have enough money to pay off everyone's mortgage in the US, subprime or not. Did you know that the Rockefellers dominate in ownership of the following? Exxon Mobil, Bechtel, Halliburton, and Chase (Chase and Citi agreed to pay nearly $300 million to settle government charges they helped Enron manipulate its financial statements and mislead investors)? Here's a link that explains more:
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/25/1/14. Guys who work for them - George Schultz, Paul Bremer, Henry Kissinger. Didn't billions go missing on Bremer's watch over in Iraq? Anyways, just thought people might like to know who is laying them off -- who really cares about America and Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 03/04/2008
- MilwaukeeDan See Profile I'm a Fan of MilwaukeeDan permalink

Paul Bremer (L), likkudist, "lost" billions in Iraq, and Gen. Franks called him the "the dumbest son of a bitch he ever mett" got a metal from Bush for his "work". I want to puke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 03/05/2008
- PT See Profile I'm a Fan of PT permalink

also factor in -- Citigroup's largest shareholders --- Abu Dhabi Investment Authority ( investment arm of Abu Dhabi gov), Kingdom Holding Company owned by Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia and Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. Recently they announced that they may not be able to help Citigroup's financial woes. Care to wonder why the U.S. government is so intent on focusing interests in Dubai and other Gulf countries? Or even wonder who actually holds and controls the purse strings of some of the major financial institutions?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 03/05/2008
- Wigglesworth See Profile I'm a Fan of Wigglesworth permalink

Thanks for this comment. I don't hear any US presidential candidates talking about this stuff in detail. John Edwards got labelled the "candidate of anger," and got shut out by the media. Ralph Nader has stepped up to pretend he is running, but bringing attention to these issues is part of his real agenda.
It is difficult for people to grasp because the scope is so great, and because it is hard to accept that our elected leaders on BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE let this disaster happen to our once great economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 03/04/2008
- studlyguy See Profile I'm a Fan of studlyguy permalink

that nasty thing called cause and effect is coming back to the banks hey days of duping people into subcrime mortgage loans the banks thought they had it made is now coming back at them with a vengeance ,now it's time to pay the piper for all the misdeeds from banks,and man it's going to be one VERY SCARY TIMES,i see some bank failures in the future and the sad part as usual they brought it on themselves the power of here we go again GREED,blinded them ,they'll be going down the economic abyss with the rest of us as the $ becomes worthlesss piece of paper ,and INFLATION eats us alive,and the ones who also should be prosecuted for the crimes against it's people Bush and the FED willl get away with it without paying the consequences for their criminal activities, and take their money in 1/20/09 and run without so much as a peep from unjustice dept and spineless,coward congress and we the people as our economy is freefall downward spiral turns America economy into another depression 2008

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 03/04/2008
- mmckinl See Profile I'm a Fan of mmckinl permalink

Just the beginning of lay offs for the financial sector ...

All , and I mean All financial institutions will be laying off workers. There is no choice. The losses have been historic and the business going forward will be stunted for years to come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 03/04/2008
- abbiehoffmansghost See Profile I'm a Fan of abbiehoffmansghost permalink

I empathize with those that lose jobs but I am a firm believer that outside of academics, police, fire, and medical jobs that people should actually produce something and I don't mean shuffling papers. The U.S. government is always decried as a bureaucratic albatross yet it's not just them; corporate America and the money making industry is the best and biggest example. America isn't just a service industry nation it's a nation that wants to make money for the sake of making money, nothing more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 03/04/2008
- Dendroica See Profile I'm a Fan of Dendroica permalink

Improvements in IT and outsourcing phone banks to India and Paraguay have really hurt banking. They can do with half as many employees as in the past.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 AM on 03/05/2008
- mmckinl See Profile I'm a Fan of mmckinl permalink

Exactly : John Bogle's take ...

"This country is moving to a world where we"re no longer making anything," Mr. Bogle says. "We"re merely trading pieces of paper, swapping stocks and bonds back and forth with one another, and paying our financial croupiers a veritable fortune."

"I have no problem with people making a lot of money if they"re making contributions to society. But the financial industry withdraws money that businesses earn before it is passed down to investors at the bottom of the food chain."

Taking a chunk of investors" returns

The finance sector " hedge funds, mutual funds, brokerages, money managers, investment bankers, banks and insurance companies " now generates far more profits than the combined profits of the U.S. energy and health care sectors, and almost three times as much as either manufacturing or information technology, he says.

In the past 25 years, that share has gone from about 6 percent of the earnings of the 500 giant corporations in the Standard & Poor"s 500 index to an all-time high of 27 percent last year (2006).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 03/04/2008
- mrcontinental See Profile I'm a Fan of mrcontinental permalink

And it's all an illusion, just worthless fiat money which will soon have no value whatsoever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 03/04/2008
- javaman See Profile I'm a Fan of javaman permalink

So is this yet another sign of morons* booming economy? 30k out of work!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 03/04/2008
- mmckinl See Profile I'm a Fan of mmckinl permalink

If only this were the end.

It is the beginning ....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 03/04/2008
- Mike169 See Profile I'm a Fan of Mike169 permalink

I know there's a golden parachute for someone in all this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 03/04/2008
- fact finder See Profile I'm a Fan of fact finder permalink

When you play with fire you get burned. 1776

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 03/04/2008
- argeec See Profile I'm a Fan of argeec permalink

Citigroup should never have existed in the first place.
They had to get Glass-Steagall repealed in order to do the mergers.
Then they lead in the subprime debacle.
Thanks to Sandy Weill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 03/04/2008
- joebaggadonuts See Profile I'm a Fan of joebaggadonuts permalink

Yup. Now Sandy is retired and his heir apparent Chuck is fired, (with benefits) so the big C is left to clean up the mess. Guess for whom the bell tolls?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 03/04/2008
- Wigglesworth See Profile I'm a Fan of Wigglesworth permalink

...On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. One of the effects of the repeal is it allowed commercial & investment banks to consolidate... (Source: Wikipedia)
I''m off to read about Glass-Steagall. Can you explain more to a non-financial, but interested person? What will be the fall-out from these layoffs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 03/04/2008
- mojoman See Profile I'm a Fan of mojoman permalink

Read the transcript or watch the PBS Frontline piece on Citigroup & the repeal of Glass Steagall, it was done within the last 5 years.
One of the key players is former Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who worked with Sandy Weill and Greenspan to overturn Glass Steagall. Within months of the repeal of Glass Steagall, Rubin took a top position at Citigroup, eventually Chairman.
He's currently the Chairman of the Executive Committee at Citigroup, and is a top adviser to Hillary. Should she win, expect more of the same, with Rubin leading the charge for taxpayers to bail out the (now failing) investment banks. IMHO both he and Greenspan should be in jail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 03/05/2008
- doneflyin See Profile I'm a Fan of doneflyin permalink

Well, I know one thing. This is one of the reason the Republicans hated Bill Clinton. He was a better Republican then they were.

No more Clintons, no more Bushes ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 03/04/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



 

 Site  Web ask.com