iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Spitzer As Client 9: Read Text Messages From Spitzer To Prostitute

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/28/08 03:46 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:25 PM ET

Spitzer

Gov. Eliot Spitzer is believed to be the man identified as Client 9 in an affidavit in the federal investigation into a prostitution ring known as Emperor's Club VIP.

A wiretap recording captured "Client 9" on a telephone call confirming plans to have a woman travel from New York to Washington, where he had reserved a hotel room.

Some highlights:

Client 9 - believed to be Spitzer - paid $4,300 for a woman named "Kristen" to come from New York to D.C. A portion of that money, however, likely went to credit for future appointments.

"Kristen" was described as "an American, petite, very pretty brunette, 5 feet 5 inches, and 105 pounds." Client 9 had to be "reminded" what she looked like, suggesting that this was not the first time the two had done business.

Client 9, according to another woman associated with the Emperor's Club, "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe." There was no elaboration.

"Kristen" described her interaction with Client 9 -- which took place on Valentine's Day -- as follows:

'I don't think he's difficult. I mean it's just kind of like . . . whatever. . . I'm here for a purpose. I know what my purpose is. I am not a . . . moron, you know what I mean. So maybe that's why girls maybe think they're difficult . . . ," she continued. "That's what it is, because you're here for a [purpose]. Let's not get it twisted - I know what I do, you know."


Below is the section of the affidavit detailing Spitzer's alleged activities:

++++++

b. February 13, 2008, Interstate Transportation

From New York To Washinqton, D.C.

73. On February 11, 2008, at approximately 10:53 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, sent a text message to CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie," a/k/a "Kate," the defendant, at the 3390 Number. In the text message, LEWIS wrote: 'Pls let me know if [Client-9's] 'package' (believed to be a reference to a deposit of money sent by mail) arrives 2mrw. Appt wd b on Wed." (Call 3728C). SUWAL sent a text message back to LEWIS, stating: 'K." (Call 3731C).

74. On February 12, 2008, at approximately 2:37 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a 'Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, called a prostitute who the Emperors Club marketed using the name "Kristen." During the call, LEWIS left a message for "Kristen" that the "deposit" had not arrived today, but that they should be able to do the trip if the deposit arrived tomorrow. (Call 9324R) . At approximately 4 : 03 p.m. , LEWIS received a call from "Kristen." During the call, "Kristen" said that she had heard the message, and that was fine. LEWIS and "Kristen" then discussed the time that "Kristen" would take the train from New York to Washington, D.C. LEWIS told "Kristen" that there was a 5:39 p.m. train that arrived at 9:00 p.m., and that "Kristen" would be taking the train out of Penn Station. LEWIS confirmed that Client-9 would be paying for everything - train tickets, cab fare from the hotel and back, mini bar or room service, travel time, and hotel. LEWIS said that they would probably not know until 3 p.m. if the deposit arrived because Client-9 would not do traditional wire transferring. (Call 9362) .

75. At approximately 8:12 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from Client-9. During the call, LEWIS told Client-9 that the "package" did not arrive today. LEWIS asked Client-9 if there was a return address on the envelope, and Client-9 said no. LEWIS asked: "You had QAT . . .," and Client-9 said: "Yup, same as in the past, no question about it." LEWIS asked Client-9 what time he was interested in having the appointment tomorrow. Client-9 told her 9:00 p.m. or 10:OO p.m. LEWIS told Client-9 to call her back in five minutes. (Call 9460R) .

76. At approximately 8:14 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, called MARK BRENER, a/k/a "Michael," the defendant, at the 0937 Number. During the call, LEWIS told BRENER that Client-9 had just called about an appointment for tomorrow, and that he had around $400 or $500 credit. SUWAL said that she did not feel comfortable saying that Client-9 had a $400 credit when she did not know that for a fact. SUWAL and BRENER talked in the background about whether Client-9 could proceed with the appointment without his deposit having arrived. (Call 9462R). At approximately 8:23 p.m., LEWIS called Client-9, and told him that the 'office" said he could not proceed with the appointment with his available credit. After discussing ways to resolve the situation, LEWIS and Client-9 agreed to speak the following day. (Call 9467R) . 77. On February 12, 2008, at approximately 9:22 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, sent a text message to ''Kristen." In the text message, LEWIS wrote: 'If D.C. appt. happens u will need 2 leave NYC @ 4:45pm. Is that possible?" (Call 9515R). "Kristen" wrote back: "Yes." (Call 9516R) .

78. At approximately 3: 20 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from Client-9. During the call, LEWIS told Client-9 that they were still trying to determine if his deposit had arrived. Client-9 told LEWIS that he had made a re'servation at the hotel, and had paid for it in his name. Client-9 said that there would be a key waiting for her, and told LEWIS that what he had on account with her covered the "transportation" (believed to be a reference to the cost of the trainfare for "Kristen" from New York to Washington, D.C.). LEWIS said that she would try to make it work. (Call 9636R). At approximately 3:24 p.m., LEWIS, using the 6587 Number, called CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie," a/k/a "Kate," the defendant, at the 3390 Number. LEWIS explained to SUWAL what Client-9 had proposed. SUWAL told LEWIS she would call her back. (Call 9642R) . At approximately 3 : 53 p.m., MARK BRENER, a/k/a "Michael," the defendant, using the 0937 Number, called LEWIS at the 6587 Number. BRENER and LEWIS discussed the problem about Client-9's deposit. (Call 9654R). At approximately 4:18 p.m., SUWAL, using the 3390 Number, sent a text message to LEWIS at the 6587 Number, stating: "[Plackage arrived. Pls be sure he rsvp hotel." (Call 9659R) .

79. At approximately 4:21 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle, " the defendant, using the 6587 Number, called "Kri~ten.~ During the call, LEWIS told "Kristen" that the package had arrived, and that "theyu (believed to be a reference to MARK BRENER, a/k/a "Michael," and CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie," a/k/a "Kate," the defendants) just got the mail. LEWIS told "Kristen" to get to Penn Station and call her when she picked up her tickets. (Call 9661R) . At approximately 4 :48 p.m., LEWIS sent a text message to "Kristen," stating: "TRAIN INFO Departing from Penn St. Arriving 8 Union St. Washington, DC NYC to DC Train # 129 Dep. 5:39pm Arr. 9pm." (Call 9G79R). At approximately 4:54 p.m., LEWIS sent another text message to "KristenItt stating: "TRAIN INFO Return trip DC to NYC Train #84 Dep. 2/14 8:35pm Arr. ll:57am." (Call 9683R).

80. At approximately 4:58 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received an incoming call from Client-9. During the call, LEWIS told Client-9 that his package arrived today, and Client-9 said good. LEWIS asked Client-9 what time he was expecting to have the appointment. Client-9 told LEWIS maybe 10:OO p.m. or so, and asked who it was. LEWIS said it was "Kristen," and Client-9 said"great, okay, wonderful ." LEWIS told Client-9 that she would give him a final price later, and asked Client-9 whether he could give "Kristen" "extra funds" at this appointment in order to avoid payment issues in the future. Client-9 said maybe, and that he would see if he could do that. LEWIS explained that the agency did not want a model accepting funds for a future appointment, but that she was going to make an exception that way a deposit could be made so that he would have a credit, and they would not have to "go through this" next time. Client-9 said perfect, and that he would call her regarding the room number. (Call 9686R) .

81. At approximately 7:51 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from Client-9. During the call, LEWIS told Client-9 that the balance was around ,"2611 (believed to be a reference to $2,600), but she would give him an exact number later. LEWIS asked if when "Kristen" went to pick up the key she would have to give a name or would she be able to say that she was one of Client-9's guests for whom he left an envelope. ~EW1~'and Client-9 discussed how to arrange for "Kristen" to get the key to her hotel room. LEWIS said that she would prefer if "Kristen" did not have to give a name. Client-9 said that he was trying to 'think this through." Client-9 repeated that his balance was '2600," and stated that maybe he would give "her," a reference to "Kristen," '3600" and have a thousand on balance. LEWIS suggested making it "1500fl more. Client-9 said that would make it "4100," and said that he would look for a bank and see about it. Client-9 told LEWIS to let him go down and take care of this, and suggested that maybe he could put it [the hotel key] in an envelope with the concierge. (Call 9725R).

82. At approximately 8:47 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from Client-9. During the call, Client-9 told LEWIS to tell "Kristen" to go to the hotel and go to room 871. Client-9 told LEWIS that the door would be open. Client-9 told LEWIS that there would be a key in the room, but the door would be ajar. LEWIS asked if the hotel staff might pass by the door and close it, and Client-9 said no it was okay. Client-9 explained that the door would not be visibly open, but if someone pushed it, the door would open. LEWIS told Client-9 that his balance was $2,721.41, and that if he wanted to do an additional "150OU or even "2000" it would be better. Client-9 said that he did not know if he could get to a machine to do that, but he would see. LEWIS said that 'Kristen" would go directly to room ,871. Client-9 asked LEWIS to remind- him what 'Kristen" looked like, and LEWIS said that she was an American, petite, very pretty brunette, 5 feet 5 inches, and 105 pounds. Client-9 said that she should go straight to 871, and if for any reason it did not work out, she should call LEWIS. (Call 9731) .

83. At approximately 9:32 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from "Kristen." During the call, '"Kristen" said that she was in the room. LEWIS told "Kristen" that she would call her back when she knew when Client-9 would be there. (Call 9734R).

84. At approximately 9:36 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a 'Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, received a call from "Kristen." During the call, LEWIS told "Kristen" that "he," a reference to Client-9, was at the hotel. "Kristen" told LEWIS that she just talked to him. 'Kristen" said that Client-9 was coming'to her. LEWIS told "Kristen" that Client-9 should be giving her "extra," and that the extra should be deposited into- LEWIS told "Kristen" to text her when he arrived and LEWIS would start the four hours then, and also to let her know if he left early. (Call 9741R).

85. On February 14, 2008, at approximately 12:02 a.m.,

TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, received a call from "Kristen." During the call, "Kristen" told LEWIS , that "he," a reference to Client-9, had left. LEWIS asked "Kristen" what time he got there, and "Kristen" said "15 after . . . maybe 10." LEWIS asked "Kristen" how she thought the appointment went, and "Kristen" said that she thought it went very well. LEWIS asked "Kristen" how much she collected, and 'Kristen" said $4,300. "Kristen" said that she liked him, and that she did not think he was difficult. "Kristen" stated: 'I don't think he's difficult. I mean it's just kind of like . . . whatever. . . I'm here for a purpose. I know what my purpose is. I am not a . . . moron, you know what I mean. So maybe that's why girls maybe think they're difficult . . . . " "Kristen" continued: "That's what it is, because you're here for a [purpose]. Let's not get it twisted - I know what I do, you know." LEWIS responded: "You look at it very uniquely, because . . . no one .ever says it that way." LEWIS continued that from what she had been told "he" (believed to be a reference to Client-9) "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe - you know - I mean that . . . very basic things. . . . "Kristen" responded: "I have a way of dealing with that . . . I'd be like listen dude, you really want the sex? . . . You know what I mean." Near the end of the call, LEWIS and "Kristen" discussed "Kristen's" departure via Amtrak, the room that Client-9 had provided for "Kristen," and "Kristen's" share of the cash that Client-9 had provided to her. (Call 9750R)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Gov. Eliot Spitzer is believed to be the man identified as Client 9 in an affidavit in the federal investigation into a prostitution ring known as Emperor's Club VIP. A wiretap recording captured "C...
Gov. Eliot Spitzer is believed to be the man identified as Client 9 in an affidavit in the federal investigation into a prostitution ring known as Emperor's Club VIP. A wiretap recording captured "C...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 133
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
06:02 PM on 03/11/2008
one less stone we have to cast at the Repugs this fall.
10:11 PM on 03/11/2008
You can say that again. For one Spitzer we lost Foley, Vitter and Craig. Bad math.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
04:24 PM on 03/11/2008
Sad that sex allegations can only bring down an American politician but not war, death, destruction and lying!!


America is sick!
04:40 PM on 03/11/2008
Very sick.
04:18 PM on 03/11/2008
I figured the "unsafe" was a reference to no condoms as well (especially with the reply do you want the sex or not).
And anyone thinking this is all a big conspiracy should check themselves. The guy had an approval rating of 33 percent and was on the outs with the state's electorate. The guy broke numerous laws (knowingly broke them) and really doesn't have a leg to stand on.
02:52 PM on 03/11/2008
Here's what I don't get: Nowhere in the text message does it say anything about him usually liking things that "weren't safe" (which if you read it, was actually no more an implication that he doesn't like condoms). It simply said they weren't sure if he was going to ask to not have to use one or not, basically. This headline is very misleading.
02:02 PM on 03/11/2008
Give it a few days, and we will all soon learn that Bill Clinton was known as "Client No. 10."
04:26 PM on 03/11/2008
You sound like an ASS-HOLE.
I hope that President Clinton will slup you silly.
06:37 PM on 03/11/2008
Slup?

You must mean SLURP, given the blowjob context, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drjay79
01:54 PM on 03/11/2008
If the wives would give their husbands a good blow job this would not happen.
04:12 PM on 03/11/2008
There is a lot of truth to that statement.
That said, I'd be willing to bet more wives would be willing to give blow jobs a lot more often if their husbands would spend some quality time kneeling at the alter and worshipping accordingly. After all, what man doesn't like to be called "God"? Oral sex is a 2 way street. Many men don't have a clue as to how to please a woman orally and many women are reluctant to speak up about what they like for fear of being thought badly of by the man. It's that whole "Madonna/whore" vicious circle that ends up leaving many marriages sexually frustrating.
I was good friends with 2 women who both became expensive call girls like the ones at the agency in question. They used to tell me great stories about "the business". While some clients wanted something "kinky" like more than 1 girl or anal sex or s & m, most clients just wanted a blow job followed by some pretty garden variety intercourse. Most of the men just wanted an attractive woman with a good figure who smelled nice and had a manicure to pretend like the client was an attractive man that they enjoyed having sex with.
That said, many of their clients were over 50, overweight, in bad shape and flawed in the personal grooming department. I'm sure their wives find them only slightly less unattractive than my friends did.
04:43 PM on 03/11/2008
I know how to eat Pu...
I give free domos on sundays at noon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KYJurisDoctor
01:32 PM on 03/11/2008
So SAD.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Catseyes
01:13 PM on 03/11/2008
Wall Street was all giggly and happy yesterday when they heard the news about Spitzer. Now they can get back to what they do best .......Lie...Cheat.....&....Steal... With Spitzer out of the way and the new Lieutenant Governor taking over.......It'll be like taking money from a blind man..
12:56 PM on 03/11/2008
"NY Rethuglicans threaten impeachment."

Just remembering a sobering proverb by Poor Ricard (Ben Franklin).

"Wink at small faults. Thine may be great ones."

Nice to know the FEDs have more than enough $$$ to pursue critical matters affecting national security, once again. I always knew Bush's unconstitutional wiretapping was going to save us from ourselves!
12:45 PM on 03/11/2008
Yo Puritans,

Ye without sin, cast the first stone!
12:39 PM on 03/11/2008
Spitzer paid advance money to the prostitute.....atleast it shows we democrats do observe pay-as-go rules.

;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrabop
when bop isn't enough
12:22 PM on 03/11/2008
Kind of got a taste for the man when the "drivers liscenes for illegals" issue came up. That seemed a little perverse, almost like he was doing it because he could. He has a taste for going out on a limb. McCrazy should put him on his ticket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seenitall
California Dem.
12:21 PM on 03/11/2008
Men do this to their wives all the time but someone needs to explain to me how these men, Clinton,Spitzer, et al, who have young daughters, are able to do this without any concern for how this destroys them.
04:19 PM on 03/11/2008
They do not believe they will ever get caught. And, they don't believe their young daughters will ever be touched by this sort of thing.
It's DENIAL that is fueled by LUST. Look at all of the pedophiles caught on "To Catch A Predator". I can't tell you how many times I've seen those guys, once caught, say that they almost didn't go to the decoy house because they'd seen the show, yet still they showed up! They risked everything - job, marriage, family, respect and FREEDOM! Lust is a powerful thing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BetterDays
PP, not SGK
11:25 AM on 03/11/2008
Just when the Democrats are able to start taking the high road after all the Republican scandals, some idiot like Spitzer has to drop trou' to prove his masculinity and take risks. Buy a sports car, bungie jump, ski dive, take mind-numbing pharmaceuticals or view porn while pleasuring yourself 100 times a day but quit hurting the party and those of us who actually care about our country.

Reminds one of the President Clinton's blowjobs in the Oval Office.
11:14 AM on 03/11/2008
"I have a way of dealing with that . . . I'd be like listen dude, you really want the sex?"

She sounds like an utterly fascinating woman. I'm sure losing his job and betraying his family was all well worth it.