Illegitimate Daughter Denied Jell-O Fortune

Illegitimate Daughter Denied Jell-O Fortune

AP   |  Ben Dobbin   |   March 14, 2008 08:29 AM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

A woman born out of wedlock to a direct descendant of the family that struck it rich marketing Jell-O more than a century ago has been denied what she considers her just deserts.

The Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, ruled Thursday that Elizabeth McNabb of Longview, Wash., cannot share in the multimillion-dollar estate of her late mother, Barbara Woodward Piel.

Piel's grandfather, Orator Francis Woodward, bought the Jell-O trademark in 1899 from inventor Pearle Bixby Wait and, within a decade, turned it into a million-dollar business. Thus was born a ubiquitous 20th-century American dessert, a wobbly standby at church potlucks, school cafeterias and summer camps.

Piel became pregnant in 1955 after a liaison with a married man and put the child -- later named Elizabeth McNabb -- up for adoption in Oregon. Piel soon married and had two other daughters.

At age 19, McNabb embarked on a long quest to find her birth mother. She finally traced her birth certificate through a court order in 1988 and learned about her family history during a four-day visit with Piel in rural Genesee County near Rochester.

After Piel's death in 2003, McNabb was told two trusts established in 1926 and 1963 barred her from sharing in the family fortune. A county surrogate judge decided in December 2005 that, as an "adopted-out" child, McNabb was not a descendant or child of Piel under the terms of the trust.

An appellate court in Rochester reversed that decision a year ago, effectively awarding McNabb a one-third share. It determined the trusts predated amendments to New York law dictating that an adopted child could not inherit from a biological parent unless it was clear the parent planned to include the child among descendants.

The appeals court in Albany disagreed, saying there's no evidence in the legislative history, even before the amendments, indicating that a child put up for adoption should share in an inheritance.

"The amount involved here is about $12 million," said attorney A. Vincent Buzard, who represented McNabb's half-sisters. "If Elizabeth McNabb had been specifically named in the trust, even though adopted-out, she could have shared in this, but she wasn't named."

Wait, a carpenter in Le Roy, N.Y., mixed fruit flavoring into gelatin and began selling the sweet concoction door-to-door in March 1897.

His wife christened it Jell-O. Door-to-door sales never picked up, so Wait sold Jell-O to Woodward for $450. When Wait died in 1915 at age 44, his widow had to take in sewing jobs and boarders to feed the family.

The Jell-O brand is now owned by Kraft Foods Inc.


 
 

Comments
29
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

On to the Supreme Court . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 03/15/2008

They could wrestle her for it, best of 3, in a vat of you know what!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 03/15/2008

Greed. No one should "expect" to get anything from a parent. Want some money? Get an education, get a job, start a business like everyone else in the world working hard to make it. Unfortunately, you're stuck with the inheritance you're getting from those middle class bums who took you in when you weren't wanted by your actual biological parent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 03/15/2008

I guess there is not always room for Jell-O (heirs, that is).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 03/15/2008

look for the unmoderated threads, 15 moneys, 20 some odd threads, no way they can keep up. Be all that you can be, insurgents !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 03/15/2008

Be sure to click on the Advertisers that support HuffPo, without them , we wouldn't be able to hire 15 monkeys that suppress free speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 03/15/2008

Please, enjoy your stay at the HuffPo, we are here to serve at your pleasure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 03/15/2008

The HuffPo does not encourage, condone, or in any way support posting political speech, or any speech for that matter, take your mindless drivel elsewhere, we don't want to hear it. And please, while you are visiting Arianna's site, click on every advertisement that you see, it puts bucks in our pocket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 03/15/2008

Leave it to Albany to screw people again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 03/15/2008

Really?I have a framed dated poster (1925) Jello ad by artist L. Ball. It has the Ole King Cole poem made into a Jello advertisement. I tried to reach the people at the Jello museum and Kraft Foods, but no answer. Guess they aren't interested in anyone getting their funds!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 03/14/2008

For South Park fans:

"Those bastards!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 03/14/2008

Another one of the millions of Americans screwed over by adoption.

Adoption as an institution should be abolished in this country and replaced with mechanisms to preserve natural families.

PS Ben, no one, but no one uses the word "illigetimate" anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 03/14/2008

That's completely ludicrous

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 03/14/2008

Ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 PM on 03/14/2008

How much Jello can one woman eat anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 03/14/2008

This woman should write a best seller, sell the movie rights and get much, much more than would have been her inheritance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 03/14/2008

I think you may have found the best solution for this woman.

Hope she reads your post and follows your advice.

She can name the book and movie, JUSTICE J E L L O!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 03/14/2008

Jello is not a health promoting food. Don't eat it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 03/14/2008

Jello is fun, especially in bed. Don't mess with my jello.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 03/14/2008

Illegitimate Daughter Denied Jell-O Fortune

Now there's a headline you don't see every day!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 03/14/2008

wrong

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 03/14/2008

"just deserts"?? Way to botch a pun with poor copyediting AP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 03/14/2008



The phrase "just deserts" refers to that which one justly deserves and has nothing to do with the differently spelled word which means an after meal sweet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 03/15/2008

that's the correct way to spell it. AP was right. http://www.snopes.com/language/notthink/deserts.asp

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 03/14/2008

If the AP meant the 'pun' to be an eaten sweet [which only makes sense] then jfoxx is correct! Desert is a dry area of land. Dessert is a sweet eaten usually at the end of one's meal....ie JELLO! "Just deserts" is therefore INCORRECT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 03/14/2008

Ballerina, again, "desert" in "just desert" does NOT mean a dry area of land. It means to get what one deserves. AP wrote: "has been denied what she considers her just deserts", she did not get in court what she thought she deserved.
Yes, it was a pun, but one that worked the other way around, and it is pretty dead by now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 03/17/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



 

 Site  Web ask.com