John Ritter, star of the series "8 Simple Rules for Dating My Teenage Daughter," arrives with wife, Amy Yasbeck, for the 54th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards, Sept. 22, 2002, in Los Angeles. A California jury on has cleared a cardiologist and a radiologist of negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of actor John Ritter, Friday March 14, 2008. The 9-3 verdict in the lawsuit brought by Ritter's widow and children resulted in no damage judgments against the doctors. Verdicts do not have to be unanimous in civil cases. (AP Photo/Laura Rauch, File)

John Ritter's Doctors Cleared Of Negligence In Actor's Death

LINDA DEUTSCH | March 14, 2008 08:41 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GLENDALE, Calif. — A jury cleared a cardiologist and a radiologist Friday of negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of actor John Ritter, who died of a torn aorta in 2003. Jurors found that the radiologist advised Ritter to follow up with treatment by a physician after a body scan two years before his death. Ritter didn't follow the order.

The lawsuit was brought by Ritter's widow and children. The 9-3 verdict means there is no damage judgment against the doctors.

Radiologist Matthew Lotysch testified he told Ritter he had calcification in three coronary arteries and should consult other doctors. But in a related finding, the jury decided that Ritter's failure to pursue that medical consultation was not a cause of his death.

The cardiologist cleared, Dr. Joseph Lee, was summoned to treat Ritter at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center, where he was diagnosed with a heart attack.

When he died on Sept. 11, 2003, Ritter was starring in the TV show "8 Simple Rules ... for Dating My Teenage Daughter." He was 54.

Lawyers for Ritter's widow, Amy Yasbeck, and children claimed Ritter's death resulted in a loss of as much as $67 million in future earnings. Eight other medical personnel and the hospital previously made settlements with the family totaling $14 million.

During the trial, attorneys for the family sought to show that Lee rushed to a faulty diagnosis and failed to have a chest X-ray taken that would have revealed the torn aorta, resulting in surgery that would have saved him.

Testimony showed that an X-ray was ordered as soon as Ritter arrived at the emergency room but for unknown reasons it was never done. Lee was called in later in the evening after Ritter was already diagnosed with a heart attack.

Defense testimony characterized the aortic dissection as lethal and contended that even with surgery the outcome would have been the same.

Attorney Stephen C. Fraser, who represented Lotysch, credited jurors with being sophisticated and intelligent.

"The system worked and we're very, very happy that they did the right thing," Fraser said.

The family's attorney, Michael Plonsker, stood by the wrongful death lawsuit's claims.

"We are still convinced these doctors did something inappropriate but the jury system worked," he said.


 
Comments
37
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

People watch too many shows like Greys Anatomy and ER. People are living long lives due to the advances of medicine. Too long actually. There are many staying alive on machines because no one had the courage to pull the plug and now they suffer needlessly. Also tons of elderly lying in nursing homes with bed sores and God knows what else.
Americans do not deal with death very well. NEWSFLASH: Were all gonna die. Expecting doctors and nurses to perform miracles everyday is ridiculous. John Ritter died because he didn't follow up and take the Doctor's advice. Sometimes it is just your time to go.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 03/17/2008
photo

Let's be crystal clear. The punitive awards in these lawsuits against corporations are always paid indirectly by millions of Americans.

So when Ms Ritter wants another $43 million above the $14 million, she is essentially saying, ”I want millions of average Americans to pay me so that I can live in the extreme lap of luxury never working another day in my life while I grieve.”

This why our system is so screwed up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 03/15/2008
photo

Interesting comments from people who stated the Doctors were "murderers" and wished that they had been able to help sue them.
Imagine that you spent 4 years of med school and 8 years of post grad training to become a specialist physician.
Imagine that your job is seeing and treating people from all walks of life with medical problems. Imagine that any time one of them has a bad outcome, and you were involved in their care, that you could be sued for millions of dollars, whether or not you had anything to do with the bad outcome. Imagine that the outcome of the trial and the jury award would be decided by a group of people with no medical knowledge.
Every physician (and nurse, and xray tech, etc, because they get sued also) in practice in this country works in that atmosphere. (It is true that it is a bit more fair in states with a medical review panel, but there are very few of these)
It's no surprise that practicing physicians are retiring early, moving to less litigation-happy states, refusing to accept free care or medicaid patients, refusing to take trauma call, rescinding obstetric privileges, rescinding intracranial neurosurgery privileges, leaving patient care altogether to go into managment, etc. It's no surprise that highly qualified and intelligent students are no longer to deciding to chose medicine as a career in this country.
I would imagine many prospective physicians would be scared off by comments such as "they can be lucky they didn't deal with me as the family's lawyer", "once again, doctors get away with murder" (right, they actually meant to take his life, and most docs actually really want to kill you, not help you). You would be singing a different tune if your family member died of an intracranial hemorrhage because there was no neurosurgeon available with intracranial privileges within several hundred miles.
As a physician who has been treating patients since 1992, I live with this litigious atmosphere every day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 03/15/2008
photo

Thank you. I'm a firefighte­r/paramedi­c and I see this stuff all the time. I've actually had to kick, literally, a lawyer out of my ambulance because he was soliciting business while I was treating a patient.

Doctors are not the miracle workers portrayed on television. They are not demi-gods come down to Earth to dispense happy meds to the masses and be worshipped. They are ordinary human beings with knowldge and skills in the medical field. They make mistakes, yes, but from my experience they do everythinig in their powerto help.

A bad outcome is not always the fault of the medical professional, a mistake is not always malpractice, a misdiagnosis is not always something that needs a cash award to rectify.

We do our best, always. Sometimes bad things happen to good people. It's not always someones fault.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 03/15/2008
- StrayTalk I'm a Fan of StrayTalk 7 fans permalink
photo

My regular doctor was "fired" from his group practice for "spending too much time with each patient" (his words) and also because he began using alternative (herbs and vitamins) as the first line of treatment. The last doctor I went to didn't even look at my injuries from a fall on rocks from hiking. I guess that would have taken an extra 45 seconds. He did look at the x-ray . I recommend that everyone read Jerome Groopman's book- How Doctors Think. He is an MD who readily admits even his own past failings. Many doctors unfortunately are very arrogant and afraid to admit they don't know something let alone ever admitting they are wrong. Sometimes they are just sleep deprived or preoccupied with something else. I know I've worked and socialized with them. Thank God for Doctors-- but Thank God for lawyers also!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 03/15/2008
photo

Many medical problems mimic the signs and symptoms of a acute myocardial infarction (heart attack). Everything from hyperventilation, to hypertensive crisis, to an aortic dissection. An aortic dissection is extremely rare and usually fatal wthin 2-3 minutes. They are almost always fatal and almost never get any treatment at all. Usually the paramdics or family are the last ones to see them alive and they do not make it to surgery.

The medical profession is not an exact science. You cannot say "this and this happened so this is unequivically this." It's not that easy. You have to try the most plausible cause first and try to rule that out. Then go on to the next plausible cause and rule it out. An aortic dissetion would be down that list as it's rare.

The doctors were not negligent if they were doing everything prudent and what any doctor would do in the same situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 03/15/2008
photo

BTW. Blamingthe radiologist for Ritter's death 2 years before he had an acute emergency is asinine and smacks of ambulance chasing by the lawyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 03/15/2008
- andyg I'm a Fan of andyg 4 fans permalink

the radiologist told him to see another doctor to get checked out, he didn't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 03/15/2008
- TJS I'm a Fan of TJS 4 fans permalink

For all those who wish Ritter's family had won another $67 million in addition to the $14 million they already received, I have one question. Who is going to pay for that? The answer, of course, is that we pay. The little people, who already pay too much for health insurance, ultimately pay for these excessive verdicts with higher premiums, because the doctors must charge more to cover their higher malpractice premiums. This was not a case of an ordinary guy getting a million bucks to support their family. 67 million was an obscene figure. If the doctors screwed up, hold them accountable, but 67 +14 million is not accountability, it is greed. And remember, the lawyers get a third!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 03/15/2008
- Boobaloo I'm a Fan of Boobaloo 30 fans permalink

Great comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 03/15/2008

At least Ritter's case went to trial, unlike the vast majority of malpractice cases, where there isn't enough money to divide to bother making the assertion of a valid malpractice complaint in court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 03/15/2008

Thank you, jurors. Well, 6 of you anyway.

$14M from prior settlements is enough. MORE than enough.

The man was mid-heart attack, and the doc tried to SAVE HIS LIFE !!!.

What was the doc supposed to do had he been told Ritter's system was fragile... WITHHOLD treatment !?!

6 of them got the idea. The other 3? Cases in point for what's wrong with the jury system in technical, let alone civil, trials.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 03/15/2008
- lacitepq I'm a Fan of lacitepq 4 fans permalink
photo

Despite the infinite testimony of friends and relatives about what a great guy John Ritter was, it seems like the jury was able to stick to the facts and render a fair verdict. I got the sense that perhaps his wife was so emotionally distraught about losing her husband that her judgement may have been kind of fuzzy when bringing this case. Its always a shock to lose someone in the prime of their life but that doesn't always mean that someone is at fault. She'd already rec'd 14 million for gods sake . She should thank her lucky stars she is so priviledged and she has a daughter by John to remember him by. Time to move on...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 03/15/2008

Are you kidding? Sounds to me like the hospital/doctors were totally at fault. It wasn't the clogged arteries that he didn't follow up on that killed him. It was the TORN AORTA. Clearly, the ordered x-ray should have been done. That's negligence right there.

People are so quick to call plaintiffs in these lawsuits greedy. You have to take it on a case by case basis. This sounds like they Ritter family put a strong case forward.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 03/14/2008
- dora rice I'm a Fan of dora rice 10 fans permalink
photo

THEY DEFINITELY WERE AT FAULT. THEY TREATED HIM FOR A HEART ATTACK ON AN
ASSUMPTION. TO BAD I WASN'T THEIR LAWYER. THEY WERE TOTALLY AT FAULT.
i CAN'T EVEN BELIEVE HE HAD AN EKG THAT SHOWED A HEART ATTACK. ALL BS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 03/15/2008
- rini I'm a Fan of rini 33 fans permalink
photo

Often, heart attacks do not show up on the EKG. It is a crude, but useful test, if interpreted with caution, which the doctors did. They were concerned about him. He had chest pain. He had no genetic disease that would put him at huge risk for aortic dissection. Perhaps he had high blood pressure. This is also a risk factor for heart attack, which is much more common.

The doctors missed the diagnosis. It is a shame but it wasn't malpractice. They acted reasonably and tried to save his life. They didn't ignore protocol or his symptoms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 03/15/2008

Dora Rice: I didn't catch what institution your medical degree is from?

If you are interested to know, not all heart attacks have definitive abnormalites on an EKG, and some don't have any abnormalities on an EKG. The signs and symptoms of aortic dissection and heart attack are often similar, if not often identical, and the EKG may show abnormalities that don't distinguish between the two, or even between some non cardiac problems.

Also, an aortic dissection can sometimes CAUSE a heart attack, by shearing off flow into one of the coronaries, leading to definitive EKG abnormalites of a heart attack, with the dissection itself not apparent until later. Sometimes patients arrest and die before properly ordered and timely initiated testing is complete.

Thus, it is NOT ALWAYS an either/or dichotomy.

Nice job of displaying your complete ignorance of the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 03/16/2008
- Serena67 I'm a Fan of Serena67 2 fans permalink

I miss John Ritter. What a sad loss of such a wonderful man and talented actor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 03/14/2008
- Martskers I'm a Fan of Martskers 2 fans permalink

And so, once again, doctors get away with murder. What else is new?

Ritter was just one of the 100,000 people who die EVERY YEAR because of medical mistakes. Watch Dennis Quaid talk about the epidemic this constitutes on Sunday's "60 Minutes."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 03/14/2008

Oh please! Shit happens. This man had a congenitally abnormal aorta. Most people die when they present to an ER with his acute illness. The docs did every thing they could to evaluate this problem. Do you understand that the mortality rate of life is 100%? Amy needs to go out and get a job if she needs the money (Idoubt it).. Why is it the docs fault that this man presented with an acute dissection that in the best of circumstances has a high fatality rate? If you are angry about your life, blame your employer, you spouse, you self, the economy, your Representative or Senator, but not the doctors who have to go to work every day and worry about this shit. They do the best they can.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 03/15/2008
- rini I'm a Fan of rini 33 fans permalink
photo

Listen, there are many medical mistakes in hospitals. Many of the mistakes are blatant malpractice. Some are justifiable. I believe that most hospitals are understaffed due to financial pressures. There should be more certified RNs and more physicians per patient. Something should be done. Perhaps the CEO's of the large corporations that own many hospitals and demand a profit should be scrutinized, not the hard working health care workers.

Lawsuits won't help because doctors are already scared to death of them and try their best.

Also, it was reasonable to treat Mr. RItter for a heart attack, since this is much more common than aortic dissection. There was no obvious red flag that it was not a heart attack, until the end. This case was not obvious malpractice, which can be common. It was a tragedy, but not malpractice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 03/15/2008

What greedy, selfish, people Ritter's family is. He was such a good, nice guy, I will bet he is turning in his grave. Why doesn't his golddigging wife get a job, rahther than trying to bilk hospitals and the poor doctors who did theior best to try to save John's life. Aren't most of his children grown? Get a job, rather than trying to sue your way into fortune. Hasn't your family been priviledged enough? Try to exist on what ordinary Amerians have to, with outsourcing jobs, places hiring two workers part time so that they don't have to pay benefits, and trying to decide between gas and clothing and food after paying the bills, These Ritter's REALLY take the cake! Thank goodness the jury say through this sham game. I'll bet the foundation Amy is trying to start in John's name will be a nice tax shelter for her millions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 03/14/2008
- grisgris I'm a Fan of grisgris 3 fans permalink

Not everyone who brings a medical malpractice suit is "trying to bilk hospitals and the poor doctors". I worked in hospitals all through undergrad. Many of my friends are doctors. Doctors and hospitals make mistakes. And, doctors and hospitals are sometimes guilty of gross negligence. If someone you love is injured or dies from what is medical malpractice, you will understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 03/14/2008
- rini I'm a Fan of rini 33 fans permalink
photo

In many hospitals there are situations where there is gross negligence, which is often not noticed, even in cases of death due to the negligence.

However, there are also lawsuits in cases where there was no malpractice.

It has been found, in several studies, that lawsuit rates and malpractice are usually not linked at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 03/15/2008
- allensf I'm a Fan of allensf 2 fans permalink

people like this selfish, greedy family affect everyone in this country. It is disgusting cases like this that cause malpractice premiums to skyrocket and drive Doctors away. The MD degree no longer attracts the best and brightest American students as the field has become painful to be in. Many areas in the country do not have certain services because the specialists were driven out by malpractice.

Years and years of cholesterol buildup and hardening of the arteries finally culminated in a vascular catastrophe for Mr. Ritter and the family wants to hold a Doctor responsible for the whole loss. "Ohhhh...he could have earned 60 million dollars and those doctors took that fortune away from us". Its really too bad that the family already gained 14 million dollars. If I was those doctors I would counter sue. Disgusting people like this have often made me want to quit my profession as a Physician

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 03/14/2008
- dora rice I'm a Fan of dora rice 10 fans permalink
photo

FACT ONE: THEY TREATED HIM FOR A HEART ATTACK.
FACT TOW.; HE DIDN'T HAVE A HEART ATTACK.
FACT THREE: THESE PROFFESSIONALS WHO LEARN FOR 10 YEARS THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF A HEART ATTACK, SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
HE DISPLAYED WERE NOT S& S OF A HEART ATTACK. THEY ASSUMED. THEY CAN BE LUCKY
THAT THEY DIDN'T DEAL WITH ME AS THE FAMILY'S LAWYER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 03/15/2008

FACT ONE: THEY TREATED HIM FOR A HEART ATTACK.

FACT TWO: HE DIDN'T HAVE A HEART ATTACK.

FACT THREE: HE HAD AN AORTIC DISSECTION.

FACT FOUR: THE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF A HEART ATTACK AND AN AORTIC DISSECTION ARE OFTEN VERY SIMILAR, IF NOT IDENTICAL, AND NOT ALWAYS EASILY DISTINGUISHED EVEN BY VERY COMPETENT AND EXPERIENCED PHYSICIANS.

FACT FIVE: SOME HEART ATTACKS WITH CONSISTENT SYMPT0MS HAVE NO DEFINITIVE ECG ABNORMALITIES, AND MIGHT TAKE 6 HOURS OR MORE UNTIL THE FIRST DIAGNOSTIC RISE IN CARDIAC ENZYMES CONFIRMS FINALLY WHAT IT IS, VS. ESOPHAGEAL SPASM OR SEVERE BILIARY SPASM FROM A GALLBLADDER ATTACK (BOTH OF WHICH CAN FAIRLY OFTEN MIMIC A HEART ATTACK WITH VERY SIMILAR, IF NOT IDENTICAL SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS EARLY ON)

FACT SIX: EVEN IF FULLY AWARE THAT AN AORTIC DISSECTION IS ONE OF A LIST OF POSSIBILITIES, IT TAKES A WHILE TO CONFIRM IT IF PRESENT, AND IF THE COMPETENT DOCTOR IS TOO SUSPICIOUS OF AN AORTIC DISSECTION TOO SOON IN TOO MANY PEOPLE WITH SIMILAR SITUATIONS (THE MAJORITY OF WHICH WILL TURN OUT NOT TO HAVE AN AORTIC DISSECTION) THE DOCTOR MAY HAVE PEOPLE DIE NEEDLESSLY DUE TO WITHHOLDING FOR TOO LONG ANTICOAGULANT AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPIES FOR HEART ATTACKS NOT YET COMPLETELY CONFIRMED.

FACT SEVEN: I'VE BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR DEALING WITH AND TREATING REAL PEOPLE WITH THIS CIRCUMSTANCE HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF TIMES OVER THE LAST 24 YEARS, HAVE SAVED MANY, AND LOST SOME EVEN THOUGH THINKING OF AND DOING THE RIGHT THINGS IN THE RIGHT TIMEFRAMES. EVIDENTLY, MR. RITTER'S JURY FELT SIMILARLY ABOUT THE SPECIFICS OF JOHN'S SITUATION.

FACT EIGHT; YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, AND DON'T KNOW JACK ABOUT IT. BUT WHY SHOULD THAT STOP YOUR NASTY AND IGNORANT COMMENTS?

THOUGHTFUL ATTORNEYS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT.

IGNORANT NASTY ATTORNEYS, PLEASE BUZZ OFF!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 03/16/2008
- Jami I'm a Fan of Jami permalink

Law suits such as this are intended to force physicians to take more care with their patients. Nothing improper was done by Mr. Ritter's family. I don't know about this case, but in many states, potential cases go before a medical review board before you can get into court. Under that system, if there hadn't been some unanswered questions that might have led to a finding of wrongful death, the case wouldn't have gotten into court. Ms. Yasbeck was simply asking for what the law allows in the case of wrongful death. The trial also brought out details that Ms. Yasbeck probably didn't know until then and perhaps what she learned will help her be able to move on with her healing and give her a way to deal with explaining what happened to her young daughter. Just as people feel a need for justice when their loved one dies at the hands of a thug, they also feel the need to fight for justice when the loved one dies under questionable circumstances. I can't imagine anyone not trying to right such a wrong for a family member if they believed that was the case.

Allensf, I would guess that if you were unfortunate enough to die a wrongful death, your family would be requesting an amount representing your lost future earnings, as the law provides. And I'm sure that amount would seem outrageous to many people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 03/15/2008
- poomplet I'm a Fan of poomplet 18 fans permalink
photo

Thank god!!!

I am/was appalled at the level of greed & pathetic pandering displayed by the family & their high-power legal team. He was a multi-millionaire to begin with...they won $14 million from the hospital, and then they try to ruin 2 doctors' lives and get another $67 million.

Then they trot out a bunch of celeb friends who have NO bearing on this case say what a great guy he was & sway the jury, and try to blame emergency workers who did all they could, knowing what they knew (and could have known).

Luckily, the jury saw through these manipulitive tacktics & saw the core of the matter; Ritter was told to see a specialist 2 years ago...he did not, and he died.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 03/14/2008
- deckard70 I'm a Fan of deckard70 3 fans permalink

Agreed. And it is disgusting that the system -- if the jury had not been sensible -- would have allowed a wealthy person like Ritter to be worth more in death than a poor person in death. Disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 03/14/2008
- grisgris I'm a Fan of grisgris 3 fans permalink

One of the things the family was suing for was loss of future earning capacity. In other words, they were asking for the jury to award them what Ritter would have probably earned (based on his past earnings) over his estimated lifetime if he had not died. The fact is, a person who makes more money IS worth more MONETARILY than "a poor person".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 03/14/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect