hrc, what was wrong with the original DNC stance that you agreed to?? Did you not read it and sign it?? Do you believe, like BUsh, that rules don't apply to him? Is this an indication that you will use signing statements as the president? Sorry, has acceptable as you would be to me as president (even tho I support Obama first) - that is NO i repeat NO appropriate and intelligent context that I can put your stance on MI and FLA in.

SO can I demand a "re-vote" in November if it doesn't come out how I like it?

"In interviews with two Chicago newspapers published Saturday, the Illinois senator disclosed he had accepted $250,000 in campaign donations from Rezko _ about $100,000 more than had previously been disclosed."

Back on January 27th, Obama Spokesman Bill Burton dismissed reports from the LA Times that estrimated the amount of the Rezko donation at $200.000 as way too high.
Two days later, he announced that the $150.000 given to charity included _all_ and _any_ donations one could _reasonably_ come up with.

Now we are at $250.000 and who does believe that this is the final sum? I don't!

Same story as with Rezko's involvement concering the real estate deal where the role shifted from "hardly any influence" to "we went there and had a look around because I wanted to hear his oppinion as an expert".

This Rezko thing is far from over and the way information trickles out of the Obama Camp is less than satisfactory.

Q. When will the democrats get it together?

A. After the United States is over.

You know of course. That Hillary started campaigning for Florida to be counted before the Florida vote. Then she went down for a fundraiser on the day of the vote and celebrated her "victory" there. So she's been setting up this conflict since the beginning. So she "followed" the rules, to the letter of the law (if only just). It's just that now she needs to change the rules to win. Oh by the way also arguing that Obama is the one who "broke" the rules because some of his national ads ended up playing on some cable in Florida.

Typical.

If granted, this will be a special primary election for both states, not a revote. And if granted how fair will this be to the candidates who were on the ballot at the time, maybe the outcome would have been different if all the candidates name were on a ballot. It's possible the blue collar worker state of Michigan could have swung to Edwards, changing his campaign and moving it forward. We could be looking at an Obama vs. Edwards or Edwards vs Clinton contest.

Other states have patiently waited their turn in accordance with the establish rules, the importance of the contest should be theirs not the states that sought out importance and jumped ahead of the line even after they were instructed not to (you see they have not filed suit ----no legal grounds to challenge the DNC electoral processes handed out?). Florida & Michigan delegate count should be removed from the overall count required for the nomination. A revote helps two candidates, one I'm supporting however, a special primary election revote does a disservice to the other candidates and their supporters who campaigned in earnest and followed the rules.

The Clinton campaign is now requesting revotes in all states that Obama won. She is claiming that nobody told her they were having primaries and even if someone did tell her, the Obama people told her they were insignificant. She did not campaign in good faith and now all the good people in those states are being screwed. It is all Obama's minister's fault. She was busy researching 20 years of sermons and didn't realize you had to campaign past super Tuesday.

Integrity used to be a good thing....

I am having trust issues with Senator Clinton. When she says with a sincerity in her face that the elections in Michigan were fair" even though her name was the only one on the ballot, it makes me pause. It speaks volumes, if she can distort the obvious what will she distort if she becomes president. Don"t say this is just politics, that is not good enough. Will there be an even greater credibility gap if she becomes president?

I recently received a letter from the DNC asking for money and stating that I should support the party in November. My reply was to send their letter back to them with this statement: If my vote didn't count in January why should you expect it in November. The DNC strong armed the states into agreeing to the stupid rules letting the four "traditional states" go first in the primaries which is nonsense. Florida has 10.2 million registered voters; add Michigan's 7.1 million and you have 17.3 million registered voters. The four states in question combined have only 6.0 million registered. Not only that, but 3.2 million more people VOTED in Florida and Michigan than in the FOUR traditional states. The stupid caucuses in Iowa and Nevada only produced 368 thousand and 55 thousand votes, respectively. As for the candidates campaigning here in Florida, who needs them. I watched all the debates and had all the candidates rammed down my throat for the better part of a year by the news media, so why go to some rally and wave a silly sign around to hear the same horseshit in person that you can hear on TV. A lot of other Democrats here in Florida feel the same way that I do and if the DNC doesn't get its head out of it's ass this will be a McCain state in November.

SHE CAN"T WIN!!! The NUMBERS are NOT THERE!!!
For the good of the Party, the Country, People around the world, somebody please go tell the adults to step in and put an END TO THIS MADNESS!!! If the Republicans pull this off AGAIN!!! because of THIS self-inflected nonsense PEOPLE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!! I AM NOT KIDDING!! The stakes are far TOO HIGH!!! This is far bigger and far more important than the Clintons and the Clinton Dynasty. You guys GO figure it out!! Hillary Clinton can be the Vice-President, Secretary of State, Supreme Court Nominee, WHATEVER!!! For all of ours sakes, will you guys get it together and end this so we can turn our collective attentions to dismantling this Republican Doomsday Cult. GEEZ!!! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!
-Mad Dog

The fact is, unless she won both states 100 percent, she could not win the pledged delegate count. And there is no way that can happen. It is OVER for the rule of dynastic presidents. As it should be.

OK, Obamanables, take your shots. What has she done NOW? Revote not enough? Fair and square, it sounds like. But somehow this is going to be construed as calculating and evil, right?

I cant believe that the media has let Clinton gt away with her conflicting positions. She agreed to follow the party rules and that Florida and Michagan would not count. When she thought the election was hers. But once se started losing and needed the delegates, she started demanding that they count and that it was "unfair" and that sje "won." Nobody in the media is getting her to explain how this position isn't completely self serving and a fraud. Just like her husband, Hillary believes she is above the "law" and that she can do anything as long as she wins. The Clintons dont have one ounce of integrity or shame.

Is anybody going to ask Hillary about Hsu? Why isn't the msm onto this and reporting it. Why is Hillary allowed to call the shots all of the time; this state is important and this state isn't, she decides that she wants Michigan and Florida to count , she's telling the media that Obama should be more vetted when his involvement with Rezco and the flap over his pastor is nothing compared to what she has been and is involved in. She hasn't released any earmarks and she hasn't released her taxes. I am sick of wondering what she is up to and what she is going to do next. There have been 20 debates. I'm not watching anymore. I 've had it with Hillary and her campaign strategists and can't wait till this is over.

I'm curious about your definition of sabotage here? Michigan voters endorsed "uncommitted" as I recall. This will all get worked out, and in the end, all this kerfluffle could have been avoided if Michigan had just voted when it was originally supposed to!