Barack Obama's Media Damage-Control Tour

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar   |   March 17, 2008 09:14 AM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

On Friday night, Senator Barack Obama appeared on all three cable networks — yes, even Fox! — to address the controversy which flared up on Thursday/Friday of last week regarding controversial comments made by his long-term pastor, mentor and spiritual advisor, Pastor Jeremiah Wright. He also published a blog post here on HuffPo which was picked up by the networks, which provided a blueprint for his statements and for which his interviews were a follow-up. The major points of emphasis were as follows: (1) He was not aware or fully aware of the comments; (2) Pastor Wright has been a long-term figure in his life with whom he does not always agree, like most people might view the officiant at their place of worship; (3) Pastor Wright was a marine, served the country, and has a rich intellectual tradition and a strong record of good works and spearheading social change; (4) Pastor Wright was stepping down from the church, and was stepping down from his role on Obama's religious steering committee; and (5) He repudiates all the controversial comments raised and distance himself from the statements, but would not and did not repudiate the man himself.

It was a smart move on Obama's part — get out, address, diffuse, distance — though of course the rumblings about Wright's rhetoric and church have been sounding for a while now (see here.) A few takeaways from each interview, the video clips of which are provided below:

(1) Did Obama ask Wright to step down from his campaign, or did Wright do so voluntarily? He didn't say:

OLBERMANN: Your campaign saying this afternoon, it had no plans to ask Reverend Wright to step down. Obviously, that has changed. Did he step down tonight or did you ask him to leave?

OBAMA: You know, I think, there was a recognition that he's on the verge of retirement, he's taking a sabbatical and it was important for him to step out of the spotlight in this situation.

Olbermann did not press him on that point; neither of the other two interviewers asked about that. (Olbermann also did not press Obama on repudiating the statements vs. the man — when Olbermann asked him about that, Obama said he repudiated the statements but not the man, and Olbermann did not follow up. Note that in his Special Comment earlier in the week, he had specifically said to Hillary Clinton that it was not enough to reject the comments of Geraldine Ferraro, she had to "reject and denounce" the person or else Ferraro was "speaking with your approval.")

(2) The big question of the Wright issue seems to be "what did Obama know and when did he know it?" Major Garrett tried to establish how regularly Obama would have been in church to have heard the statements:

GARRETT: As a member in good standing, were you a regular attendee of Sunday services?

OBAMA: You know, I won't say that I was a perfect attendee. I was regular in spurts, because there was times when, for example, our child had just been born, our first child. And so we didn't go as regularly then.

Garrett asked Obama if he would have quit the church if he'd heard the statements; Obama tried to put it in context of Wright's miliarty service and intellectual tradition, and said that the statements were cherry-piced from hundreds of sermons Wright had delivered, and said that in his experience they were not reflective of the tone and tenor of the church, and that had he heard such remarks "I don't think that it would have been reflective of my values or my faith experience." Garrett asked again if he would then have quit and Obama said yes. "But, frankly," he said, "That has not been my experience at Trinity United Church of Christ. "

Anderson Cooper also tried to establish whether Obama could have been familiar with this strain of Wright's rhetoric previously, noting that Obama had attested to listening to tapes of Wright while he was at law school (great catch by Cooper here, by the way). See below:


COOPER: But, I mean, uncles are blood relatives who you're kind of stuck with at family gatherings, even when they say outrageous things. You can't get rid of them. You can walk out of a church. You can walk go up to a pastor and say, this is wrong.

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: And, as I said, Anderson, if I had heard any of those statements, I probably would have walked up, and I probably would have told Reverend Wright that they were wrong. But they were not statements that I heard when I was in church.

COOPER: So, no one in the church ever said to you, man, last week, you missed this sermon; Reverend Wright said this; or...

OBAMA: No.

COOPER: I mean, I think I read in your books that you listened to tapes of Reverend Wright when you were at Harvard Law School.

OBAMA: I did.

COOPER: So, you had no idea?

OBAMA: I understand. I did not. Well, I want to be clear that, when I ran for president, some of these statements started surfacing.

COOPER: Right.

OBAMA: And, at that point, I was very concerned about it. I had conversations with Reverend Wright about it. And I put out statements indicating that these were not my beliefs. But, as I said before, he was on the verge of retirement. He's preached his last sermon. He will be no longer a pastor at the end of March 31. And, so, our belief was that the most appropriate way to handle it was to be very clear about my strong condemnation of the statements, but to continue to be a part of the church.

(3) One interesting thing which I noted: Obama rightly notes that Pastor Wright's sermons reflect his experience as an African American, which is different than his own, and notes that such an experience is part of what his candidacy is trying to grapple with and move beyond. On Olbermann:

He's an African-American man, who, because of his life experience continues to have a lot of anger and frustration, and will express that in ways that are very different from me and my generation, partly because I benefited from the struggles of that early generation. And so, part of what we're seeing here is a transition from the past to the future. And I hope that our politics represents the future.

...and on CNN:

And part of what I think I see is Reverend Wright as somebody who grew up in the '60s, had very different life experiences than I had, has continued to harbor a lot of anger and frustration about discrimination that he may have experienced. And, so, his life experiences have been very different than mine. And part of what is going on within the African-American community is a transition, in which some of the rhetoric and statements and -- and frustrations of the past have given way to opportunities that I have experienced, and -- which is part of the reason why I speak in very different terms. And that's part of what our campaign has been about, is to surface some of these issues and to be able to move forward and get beyond them.

Obama did not raise this point on Fox.

The videos are collected below; also included is a YouTube videos of some of Pastor Wright's comments, plus links to transcripts of each of the interviews.

Anderson Cooper on CNN:







Major Garrett on Fox:







Olbermann on MSNBC:







YouTube clip of Pastor Jeremiah Wright:







Transcript of Fox Interview [RealClear Politics]
Transcript of CNN Interview [CNN]
Transcript of MSNBC interview [MSNBC]
Barack Obama: On My Faith And My Church [HuffPo]

Related on HuffPost:

Raymond Roker: Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?

Frank Schaeffer: Obama's Minister Committed "Treason" But When My Father Said the Same Thing He Was a Republican HeroLecia Shorter: Reverend Jeremiah Wright: Anti-American Or A Man Speaking Truth To Power
Earl Ofari Hutchinson: White Guilt Not the Problem with Obama Surge
Gerald Posner: Reverend Wright and Barack
Andy Borowitz: Obama Converts To Judaism*

*For the satire-challenged: Barack Obama did not, in fact, convert to Judaism.


 
Comments
79
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

So is Sklar a real reporter or a blogger who supports a candidate at the expense of another? If she's a media critic, why does her criticism seem to be one-sided? I'd like to know because arent real reporters supposed to be objective? If she's a Hillary supporter, thats fine, just let me know so that when I read some of this stuff I know that its coming from a biased position.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 AM on 03/19/2008
- anywho I'm a Fan of anywho 3 fans permalink

So Ms. Sklar, how DID you get your job?
Because OBAMA is the best thing to happen to America in 40 years. To miss this opportunity would be akin to becoming Rumpelstiltskins.
Haven't we already lost enough? Under Bill Clinton the Democrats lost the House and the Senate. He bold faced lied to the nation about sex with an intern. Clinton was Impeached. We lost millions of jobs through Bill Clinton signing in NAFTA.
Under Bush we lost world respect. We got a war that was built on lie after lie. We got an inarticulate aristocratic "dolt" for a President who seems genuinely unable to tell "his" people the truth, EVER. We have greed on Wall Street and greed on main street that has lead to an unbelievable housing fiasco. And now the American people are told we must bail out these poor rich people. Meantime we leave 47 million AMERICANS without healthcare, again. The country is broke and in dept to third world nations. Gas has almost tripled in price in seven years. Consumers are squealing; credit card companies have become more and more predatory. Insurance companies now practice Delay, Deny & Defend on virtually every claim, Health companies just deny. We have a media complicit in being the lapdogs of the right wing, the corporations. We have a media determined to thwart the will of the American people to the point of becoming an arm of the corporate greed machine. There is no "fair and balanced " anywhere. Each spin cycle the media becomes ever more bold in their excesses with the relentless negative opinions piled on even the most tepid Liberal views. Once again they want to destroy all that is good. Puppets, all of them.
OBAMA is the best thing this country has and the media continue to belittle and nit pick and kick him relentlessly. He is wonderful. Articulate, a visionary, wholesome, attractive and SMART. His roots and ancestry are PERFECT for healing and growing so that America can be strong again. Can the media stop this outrageous assault against this amazing person? The media seems determined to destroy this most perfect person. Are they cannibalizing their children's future own but not realizing it? Why do they insist on demeaning him day in and day out? His speech today was MLK s "I Have A Dream" stature and yet MSNBC, CNN and FOX will go down in history as having destroyed, not with a bullet but with propaganda all hope for our nation going forward. And yet the media's attempt to belittle or minimise OBAMAs speech today will not thwart the millions and millions of black and white and every color and background in between. The "people" of America will not be ridiculed again! There will be a Revolution if you the media continue to defy the will of the people by poising the well yet again. Can the media come to it's senses and treat OBAMA as he should be treated? Why do the Clintons intimidate them? Why? They have done nothing for Americans. Nothing. They were a soap opera. Mrs. Clinton couldn't get Healthcare passed...she has supported all votes pertaining to this bankrupting war, and would be nowhere in politics if it hadn't been for her husband. She stayed with a liar and a womaniser....what kind of example is that? Do we want this type of "history" going forward as our American President? Your President, your children's President, the American future? Do you not think the world will not laugh at us even more? Are you in the media all just paid functionaries with no conscience or are you Americans united in the future of your country? Please stand up and say "no more".
OBAMA is the future. OBAMA is brilliant.­...wonderf­ul...he is hope for America. The media has a responsibility to the American people (not to their advertisers) and and to the future of this country; to yours and my children over and above making $$$ and egos and supporting the destruction of a good man. At this moment the people desperately need hope. With OBAMA leading the people we can be inspired to rally, to unite and coalesce into the United States of America(ns) again. Media, I beg you, stop destroying this man

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 03/18/2008
- MSaldana I'm a Fan of MSaldana 3 fans permalink

God, this blather is just so telling. In a trance, much?

-MS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 03/20/2008
- kroses98 I'm a Fan of kroses98 13 fans permalink

And when, pray tell, Rachel, is your "idol," Hillary, going on her own "Media Damage Control Tour?" She has never done such a thing, not because she does not need to do it, but because she is unable to ever say she that has been "wrong," or has ever made a "mistake." She, on the other hand, pretends that she is "perfect," but we know better! That is characteristic symptom of pathological narcissism, to be unable to admit "fault" or "imperfection," such as to say, "I made a mistake by voting to authorize George Bush to go to war in Iraq!" She has been given many opportunities to atone for this, but has always failed to do so! The closest thing she has ever said is, "If I had known then, what I know now, ................" That is extremely narcissistic! So is her sense of entitlement, to think that she is singularly the person deserving of the presidency! I give Barack Obama a lot of credit for speaking from the heart about his imperfections, his defects, and yes, even his mistakes! That takes character, a quality so sorely missing in Hillary Clinton!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 03/18/2008
- ErikW65 I'm a Fan of ErikW65 11 fans permalink

At the end of the day, it's stiil just guilt by association. Rev. Wright's anger was palpable, but that doesn't warrant labelling it hate speech, as some here have tried to do. Religious leaders sometimes say whacky things in the heat of the moment. It's called free speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 03/18/2008
- anywho I'm a Fan of anywho 3 fans permalink

You must be ignorant or over 30.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 03/18/2008
- anywho I'm a Fan of anywho 3 fans permalink

opps I take that back. You were right I didn't fully ready your whole content. Sorry. Go OBAMA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 03/18/2008
photo

Why can't we have a candidate who runs a faithless campaign? I'm not asking for an atheist... just a candidate who has the decency to keep God out of politics and pay attention to science. I want a president who doesn't start all his/her stupid sentences with "I believe..." but rather "The facts are such... ". I'm fucking tired of "faith based initiatives", "is he a Muslim or not", "are we ready to accept a Mormon president" and other crap like this. Can we have at least four years of science-based initiatives? In December the democratic congress clobbered the budget for scientific research while churches in the US kept their tax free status. There is a silent war on science going on and we're paying attention to what a moronic pastor said five years ago? Holy shit, we're fucked!
*end rant*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 03/18/2008
- kiga I'm a Fan of kiga permalink

How can anybody believe that Obama did not know about his pastor's words and anti American rhetoric. Maybe Obama should ask his 6 years old! As usual, it is not going to be what the person did that will bring them down, it would be lying about it (like Obama did) is going to bring him down. Either her is uninformed (which I highly doubt), or he thinks we are really that stupid. The problem is that he cannot change his story now. He should have denounced Rev. Wright years ago. "God damn America" is as anti American as it gets. Super duper delegates, please WAKE UP!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 AM on 03/18/2008
- Suprshrink I'm a Fan of Suprshrink 6 fans permalink

It is not possible to believe that Obama did not know what Wright was preaching, whether he was present or not on any given Sunday. It is also not possible to believe that Obama would have distanced himself from Wright given that he needed to break through Clinton's lead with African Americans. He benefitted clearly from the angry, get even, racist rhetoric and, though he was successful at blaming the Clintons for injecting race into the election, in fact only Obama had anything to gain from the racist rhetoric. Clinton could only lose support by employing a racist strategy.

It was clear that Obama could not appeal to the Black vote because he was also Black, so he had to find a way to make racism an issue. But consider this, if Clinton had been trying to inject race into the primary, why didn't she bring up Rev. Wright months ago? Even now she has not exploited the issue, even though the Obama campaign hammered Geraldine Ferraro who is a loyal democrat who could never be considered a racist. Yet, her name was dragged through the mud.

I notice quite conspicuously that Obama supporters not only diminish the significance of the Wright issue but attack Clinton for various and sundry reasons to take the heat off of their guy. But let me tell you, if you even hope Clinton supporters would be able to vote for Obama if he were the candidate, this is not the way to win over the other half of the democratic party. Take your lumps. This is politics and, whether you want to admit it or not, Obama is a politician just like any other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 03/17/2008
- ErikW65 I'm a Fan of ErikW65 11 fans permalink

How is it possible for any person to say what can or cannot be believed by any other?

Obama challenged anyone to state an instance in which he blamed the Clintons for injecting race into the election, after Ferraro made the ridiculous accusation that Obama had called her a racist.

I completely disagree with your statement that "Obama could not appeal to the Black vote because he was also Black, so he had to find a way to make racism an issue." It was Hillary's MLK Jr./LBJ gaffe in SC, and Bill's snide comment about how Jesse Jackson had won SC as well, those insensitive statements revealed that the Clintons were throwing black support under the bus, in an attempt to play a divisive racial strategy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 AM on 03/18/2008
- kroses98 I'm a Fan of kroses98 13 fans permalink

Obama supporters realize that a large percentage of Clinton supporters are really Republicans in "sheep's clothing," attempting to suppress Obama's vote. They do this to give Clinton the nomination, because she will be so easy to beat in the General Election. Such Republicans have even received their "Marching Orders" from none other than Rush Limbaugh himself, who takes credit for 24% of the Clinton vote in the Mississippi Primary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 03/18/2008
- MSaldana I'm a Fan of MSaldana 3 fans permalink

Bwaaa-haa-haa... LOLOL!!!

-MS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 03/20/2008
- Suprshrink I'm a Fan of Suprshrink 6 fans permalink

There is simply no way one could believe that Obama did not know what Wright was preaching, whether he was there or not. There is also no way that Obama would have distanced himself from this preacher because he needed the African American community to be mad and willing to get even. No matter how you cut this, Obama has been playing the race card and, because the media gave him a pass, he was able to avoid this issue until right now. Can you imagine how this election would have unfolded if this had surfaced even 3 months ago?

I have believed for some time that Obama has used code words, such as "hoodwinked" and "bamboozled" (both used by Malcolm X) to gain the African American vote. He had to do something to break into Clinton's lead with African Americans but he had to make it look like it was the Clintons doing it. If he had sought the votes of Blacks based solely on their shared heritage, it would have been obvious that he was trying to use race to get elected.

Though his campaign successfully accused the Clintons of injecting race into the election, it is clear that had they wished to do that, they would have driven this story of Obama/Wright from the very beginning. They could have destroyed Obama if they chose to and they did not. Even when this news broke, they did not exploit the news. However, in contrast, the Obama campaign hammered away on Geraldine Ferraro knowing full well that she is not a racist and that she is a loyal democrat.

Now, I don't want to sway anyone's vote because of this situation. Everyone must decide for themselves how they want to include this in their decision making. But I do want to point out that those who have posted in favor of Obama have done so by attacking Clinton even though she did not create this scandal or exploit it.

If you want Clinton supporters to vote for Obama if he is the nominee, you need to back off. You need to take your lumps and let others make up their own minds. Your candidate is not squeaky clean even though you want to see him that way. It is politics and your guy is a politician just like everyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 03/17/2008
- Mollye I'm a Fan of Mollye 9 fans permalink

Outstanding commentary. You should send this to every available outlet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 03/17/2008
- Ashall I'm a Fan of Ashall 5 fans permalink

Suprshrink -
What tripe! The only people who are concerned with what Rev. Wright says is the media. Here in Iowa at our County Conference this past weekend, after several days of listening to the same old, same old, we talked about this nonsense and all agreed, that's exactly what it is. We all wish our media would get on to something of importance. We're a nation in crisis due to the economy. I don't see anyone trying to help the government figure out what to do. Keeping the focus on what Rev. Wright or any other pastor does or says won't help people pay the bills. Now that the government has justified its bail out of the Bear Sterns fiasco while voters are being ousted from their homes, I'm sure the republicans want to keep the banter on the democratic party...even if it means trashing Rev. Wright!

You people go to movies that are scary, wild, crazy, and unfit for children with language in most cases worse than a drunken sailor (no offense intended)....do these influence your life or your thinking? If they do, then you need medical attention!

BTW...I'll bet Barack got the terms "hoodwinked" and "bamboozled" from his white grandfather. He was about the same age as my own Dad...also very white...who said the same things in the same way that Barack uses them.

And one last thing, in our county in Iowa Barack Obama's pledged delegates/­alternates attended 100% while Clinton had only 58% in attendance. Either those who pledged for Hillary were sick of her nastiness over the past couple of months or they decided to just jump ship. Had they really been concerned about supporting their candidate, they could have made sure an alternate was in attendance to take their place. We Obama supporters don't have to run down Hillary - her tactics are making a not-so-nice impression on their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 03/18/2008
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 116 fans permalink

For Obama to say that he didn't hear the hateful "sermons" is laughable.

If you watch the tapes of these "sermons", you notice that the congregation is definately "down" with what Rev. Wright was spewing. These tapes are "for sale" on their web site, which means they are proud of this garbage.

You can't convince me that Obama never heard these diatribes at some point. You also can't convince me that he never heard ABOUT these sermons from other members.

That fact that he exposes his family, including his children to this rascist pastor is dispicable. This man does NOT deserve another vote in this campaign.

It's too late for "damage control". The damage has been done for the last 20 years and Senator Obama and his angry wife are definately influenced by this anti-American rascist "spiritual advisor".

It's now up to the voters to decide whether THAT kind of influence is good for the country. I feel bad for all the citizens who voted for this man under false pretences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 03/17/2008
- ErikW65 I'm a Fan of ErikW65 11 fans permalink

Wright's words were provocative, divisive, angry, and controversial, but not hateful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 03/18/2008
- sej100 I'm a Fan of sej100 27 fans permalink

I dont believe a word from Obama now. he would have resigned from the church really? He didnt resign when they honored Louis Farrakan or when Rev Wright visited Libya with farrakan now did he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 03/17/2008
- ErikW65 I'm a Fan of ErikW65 11 fans permalink

It's all so much guilt by association. Look at what Falwell said about 9/11. Religious zealots say whacky things in the heat of the moment. It's called free speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 AM on 03/18/2008
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 251 fans permalink
photo

Notice a body-language similarity in all three images? It's jokingly called the "head tilt of compassion." The speaker is very self-conscious of his situation and is trying hard to appear sincere. (He may even BE sincere.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 03/17/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 490 fans permalink
photo

At least now everybody knows he's not a muslim, since that was the big outrage before this outrage. Too bad there's still so much fear of different groups of people in this country. Maybe this can be turned into a teaching moment, as they say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 03/17/2008
- slow2 I'm a Fan of slow2 10 fans permalink

MSM has failed again.

With its tedious play/replay of Wright's words, the msm has fed the flames of racism and hate. These clips are intended solely to damage, not to edify. Were education or information the object, there would be comparisons with white preachers, and/or other black preachers.

Billy Graham, close to many presidents, was accused of anti-Semitism in the Nixon era. Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell made numerous inflammatory statements after 9/11; and some of that speech continues on The 700 Club, daily (where Hillary Clinton visited recently; guess she didn't mention her pro-choice stance). Homosexuals have been the target of much of that speech, even to the blaming of those persons for 9/11.

Many "end times" preachers look for Armageddon and support war in the middle East; their sermons and writings support this belief that the "rapture" will occur after a middle East war, and they'll be saved.

Where are cable news and msm when it's time to look at ALL religions and other preachers?

There is an agenda here, and the agenda does not include providing data possibly unfavorable to any candidate other than Barack Obama with these incessantly played Wright clips.

Why? And, will the public tire of these tirades? Or, will the public continue to feed on this diet of guilt by association that maligns Senator Obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 03/17/2008
- mjc I'm a Fan of mjc 9 fans permalink

Once again, Obama, the sainted, above the fray, is relieved of any responsibility of belonging to and supporting and advocating a purveyor of hate America. It isn't guilt by association; it is guilt BY close association. Obama cites Wright as his friend, his mentor, the man who brought him to Jesus, the man who baptized his children and earlier had married he and his wife. That isn't minor citations of someone who you can then just toss over the side when you're running for office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 03/17/2008
photo

So it's the MSM's fault that someone who's running for President's preacher, who is a very important person in Chicago, someone who baptized the candidate's kids, someone who that candidate thought of as a spiritual adviser, someone who should know he'd be on TV five days after 9/11, spouted out all that byle? Give me a break!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 03/17/2008
- anywho I'm a Fan of anywho 3 fans permalink

........and who pray do you support? Hillary with her liar for a "husband". A man who was Impeached, who brought in NAFTA, who bold faced lid to the nation? Do want this instead?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 03/19/2008
- BlogAngel I'm a Fan of BlogAngel 4 fans permalink

Obama's responses are entirely unbelievable. Look at the Trinity video: this isn't an unusual church service. Those parishioners aren't stunned by what Wright's saying. They're amen-ing. The hate-filled blogs, "monster" comments and racist accusations against the Clintons and anyone who supports the Clintons are exactly this type of hate-filled attitude.

What's the difference between Wrights' "they're all racists" sermons and Conservatives calling anyone who wants peace "unpatriotic?" Rev. Wright certainly shaped Obama's thinking - or Obama chose that church because it FIT his thinking.

No! Members of the same church with the same minister for 20 years do not typically disagree with the beliefs and sermons of that minister. There are many, many African American churches with wonderful ministers who marched with King and lived through terrible injustice who preach peace and unity, not hate and blame. Michelle Obama is in that "us against them" column, too. Obama-Wright is not the leadership we need.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 03/17/2008
- Nommo I'm a Fan of Nommo 77 fans permalink
photo

Whites are only concerned about the crimes that their "others" commit. Their government finds every way to steal their homes and jobs, befoul their environments, and somehow blame that on Black people, on Latino people and whoever else is a handy target.

Give Black people and education and they will take your jobs, then they will take your daughters. In the meantime, call your credit card company or tech support and tell me that the person you get on the other end is white and somewhere in the contiguous 48. Not! That is the best part of democracy, you get to pick your own poison.

What they are saying about Rev. Wright is pretty much the same they said about Dr. King. In the meantime, that 3 trillion dollar debt y'all are about to stick your kids with? As of B. Clinton's welfare reform, you cannot pin this one on the Black citizens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 03/19/2008

Whats the big deal? Most of the things Wright said in that clip were not incorrect. Actually, the only thing I would contend against is that Jesus was a black man. In truth, he was probably light brown, like most people living in that region of the world today. The incorrect part of Rev. White's clip is that, he too, is living and thinking in the paradigm of racism. We, as a society, have been living in that paradigm for the duration of our nation's history since it was "discovered" by Europeans. The paradigm of racism is something we all need to move beyond, but it is tough to do so because much of our knowledge on race relations is based on experiences that we have had while utilizing the paradigm of racism, in fact, even referring to racism or race relations causes that paradigm to continue its existence. If only we could simply forget about the concepts of racism and race relations, we might be able to see one another without this unnecessarily dark lens further obscuring our sight. But it is difficult to do and, I feel, is something we will not accomplish except by a succession of stable and humanistically prosperous generations, so that our children's, children's children live in a world where there is no need or use of the paradigm of racism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 03/17/2008
- ndolomar I'm a Fan of ndolomar 11 fans permalink

democrats eating their own. why was this fuss not raised with the religious zealots on the right claimed that katrina and 9/11 happened because of homosexuality and liberal sin? no one wants to admit it -- and everyone will dance around the issue because they're afraid to come right out and say it: wright is an angry, black man -- and the whole world (especially conservative, white america) is afraid of the angry, black man. apparently, angry white men are ok, even though they're historically responsible for some of the most reprehensible race-related crimes in america (slavery, lynching, poll tax, assault/murder during the civil rights movement). obama was born during a different era -- and also to a WHITE woman. seems among all this negative politicking nonsense, people forgot he's biracial, and grew up in predominantly white areas around a lot of white people. however, i guess in order to win an election and fix this nation's economy and end the middle eastern crises, it's much better to focus all our attention on something that -- like it or not also is true -- distracts us from the message and pits us against each other. mccain is going to win in november because the electorate, whether by obama's supporters or just in general, was assumed to be smarter than it actually is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 03/17/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect