Apple Said to Weigh Unlimited Music Deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Apple Said to Weigh Unlimited Music Deal stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JORDAN ROBERTSON | March 19, 2008 09:30 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

SAN FRANCISCO — Apple Inc. is mulling a plan to upend its iTunes business by giving people unlimited free access to the music library if they're willing to pay more for the iPod and iPhone devices they use for playing and storing the digital media, according to a report published Wednesday.

Some analysts threw cold water on the plan outlined in the Financial Times, however, saying Cupertino-based Apple would risk creating an "accounting nightmare" and alienating some artists if it started giving away songs on its iTunes online store.

Rumors have buzzed through the industry for a couple years that Apple might open iTunes for free downloads. Meanwhile, Apple's rivals are experimenting with new ways to distribute music online _ including giving it away.

The newspaper cited unnamed music industry sources in reporting that Apple is negotiating with record labels over a deal to offer a monthly music subscription for the iPhone, as well as an unlimited music bundle for both the iPod and iPhone.

The cheapest iPods _ the Shuffle model _ currently start at $49, and the cheapest iPhones start at $399.

The Financial Times didn't say how much the prices of those devices would jump if the proposal were to go through. But it said the sticking point in the discussions how much Apple will pay the labels for access to their music libraries, with Apple currently offering to pay just $20 per device.

Apple did not respond to requests for comment.

Some analysts said the iTunes store is too valuable to Apple for it to give away the music in it.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I think it's a little far-fetched at this stage," said Tim Bajarin, president of technology consulting firm Creative Strategies in Campbell, Calif. "The studios still want to be compensated. And the artists, especially the independent artists, still want to be compensated. I'm skeptical that carte blanche, free access to any music may be in the works."

Only about 10 percent of Apple's revenues come through iTunes _ about $2.5 billion in 2007. But the store has been a critical tool for driving the more-lucrative iPod sales and helping musicians get paid for their work.

Apple sold $8.3 billion in iPods last year, an 8 percent increase over the year before.

The success of iTunes has helped Apple become one of the world's biggest music retailers _ it's currently the No. 2 music retailer in the U.S. behind Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

But it's also exposed Apple to criticism over how the company protects its content and prompted Apple to campaign for new ways to distribute music legally online.

The criticisms center on the inability to play songs bought on iTunes on rival products to the iPod, such as Microsoft Corp.'s Zune player.

To free up online music, Apple CEO Steve Jobs says the major record labels should strip protections known as Digital Rights Management, or DRM, technology, which prevents unauthorized copying, from their songs sold online. Apple, meanwhile, has refused to abandon its own copying protections.

Some of Apple's rivals are already trying out new approaches.

Nokia Corp., the world's largest mobile phone maker, announced a deal with Universal Music Group in December that gives buyers of certain Nokia phones unlimited free downloads of songs from the Universal catalog.

Seattle-based RealNetworks Inc. and Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft both offer music subscriptions that cost $14.99 per month that the companies believe will appeal to customers who are more interested in discovering new music than owning old favorites.

Neil Smith, a vice president of marketing for Rhapsody, said its subscribers delve deeper into back catalogs and check out more independent artists than typical in-person music store shoppers. Subscribers also buy more MP3s than non-subscribers.

"We believe that this kind of approach, where unlimited content can flow seamlessly across different devices and media, is the best thing for the consumer and the industry," said Microsoft spokesman Jason Reindorp. "It brings the focus back to where it should be _ the music."

___

AP Technology Writer Jessica Mintz in Seattle contributed to this report.

SAN FRANCISCO — Apple Inc. is mulling a plan to upend its iTunes business by giving people unlimited free access to the music library if they're willing to pay more for the iPod and iPhone devic...
SAN FRANCISCO — Apple Inc. is mulling a plan to upend its iTunes business by giving people unlimited free access to the music library if they're willing to pay more for the iPod and iPhone devic...
Filed by Michelle Kung  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

how many times will this rumor make the rounds? this is the 3rd time ive heard this in less than a year.

secondly, read the fine print. these songs will only work on one iPod. and they wont be burnable to CD. and if you ever decide to go this route, you will need to get a special iPod that costs more. sure, you can fill it up, but only once. this helps Apple because then no one will buy used iPods--everyone has to buy one from Apple.


this is not going to happen anyways, so dont worry too much about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 03/19/2008
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 141 fans permalink

It will be interesting to see how, and if, the numbers would actually work on this proposal ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 03/19/2008
- Sumocat I'm a Fan of Sumocat 32 fans permalink

"Apple Inc. is negotiating with record labels over a deal to give iPhone and iPod customers free access to the entire iTunes music library if they pay extra for the devices." -- How do you "pay extra" for "free access"? Doesn't the fact you have to pay something mean it's not free?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 03/19/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect