Experts: Why The West Can\'t Infiltrate Al Qaeda

Experts: Why The West Can't Infiltrate Al Qaeda

MSNBC   |   March 20, 2008 04:33 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

decade after al-Qaeda issued a global declaration of war against America, U.S. spy agencies have had little luck recruiting well-placed informants and are finding the upper reaches of the network tougher to penetrate than the Kremlin during the Cold War, according to U.S. and European intelligence officials.

Some counterterrorism officials say their agencies missed early opportunities to attack the network from within. Relying on Cold War tactics such as cash rewards for tips failed to take into account the religious motivations of Islamist radicals and produced few results.

Since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, officials said, al-Qaeda has tightened its internal security at the top, placing an even greater emphasis on personal and tribal loyalties to determine who can gain access to its leaders.

Alain Chouet, former chief of the security intelligence service of the DGSE, France's foreign spy agency, said it can take years for informants to burrow their way into radical Islamist networks. Even if they're successful at first, he said, new al-Qaeda members are often "highly disposable" -- prime candidates for suicide missions.

He said it might be too late for Western intelligence agencies, having missed earlier chances, to redouble efforts to infiltrate the network. "I think you cannot penetrate such a movement now," he said.


 
Comments
30
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

"U.S. spy agencies have had little luck recruiting well-placed informants... according to U.S. and European intelligence officials."

I'm having a great of difficulty imagining a scenario in which the above question could be answered in the affirmative.

If the CIA had managed to infiltrate al Qaeda, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be telling the press.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 AM on 03/23/2008

Maybe our spies can't penetrate religious extremist groups for the same reason the FBi couldn't really penetrate the supposed network of crime and drugs that were destroying our youth in the 60's...dude, it's the wig, headband, granny glasses and brown wingtips...it's the entire idea...it's the idea that torture can work..it's making a graduate of a bible college and former ice cream truck driver the guy in charge of fixing baghdad's broken infrastructure...it's making a former professional judge of arabian horses the guy in charge of FEMA..it's electing a guy you think you'd like to have at your barbeque in stead of a guy who could read the instruction on how to store the food so you don't get food poisoning...it's strangling the goose that lays the golden egg, it's peeing in the soup, it's what makes humans so damn frustrating...it's called stupidity. Without stupidity the Babylonians would still rule the world, without stupidity the old an corrupt would always be in power, without stupidity new ideas could never arise..thank goondness for stupidity. I'm glad I had a chance to see the USA at the heighth of its power but now it's begun to believe its own BS...and that is the ultimate stupidity. I hear the US Peso is still valued in Zimbabwe..Oh, no! Mugabe is going to be elected out of office...maybe they'd like our alfred e. neuman lookalike..he's gonna be available soon and I suspect he might just want to leave the country to avoid proscecution..after all, that too would be a "mission to keep"...out of jail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 03/21/2008
photo

When you're in this type of war, you play by their rules, not yours. Their rules say kill the relatives of your enemy and you defeat your enemy. When we start killing the old men and women, and the young boys and girls, then we will start winning the war. It's a sick way to fight a war, but it's their rules we're going to have to start using. Ours will keep us there for another 100 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 AM on 03/21/2008

How do you infiltrate an organization that requests you kill Americans or others to prove your loyalty?I'm sure Al Qaeda would allow anyone to join and use them as they see fit and I doubt anyone would rise in ranking until they had a sufficient bodycount.Why do you need experts for such an obvious thought process?Direct engagement with known Al Qaeda members and engagement through friends and relatives of known members is probably the only method available,but I wouldn't call that infiltration on a high level either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 03/21/2008
photo

Look, the reason 'thay' ca'nt penetrate the networks is that every time their data mining, eavesdropping or simply good field work of agents raises flags, they are tol to ignore it or hold for more evidence, Just ask Mohammed Atta. Somehow, elements within FBI/CIA protected hem because it would lead to solid information that the 9/11 gang were simply patsys in a larger, totally illigal network within the US government. This goes all the way back to Lansdale and Lemnitzer.

I swear the anglo/american fincial, Oil and defence elite is the conroller of certain black operations. Sad as that is...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 AM on 03/21/2008
- Enid I'm a Fan of Enid permalink


There are many truths in the world.

It just depends on the one telling the tail

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 03/21/2008

Al Queda is hard to infiltrate for two reasons. First, it's members are fanatical assholes and Two, the vast majority of Muslims consider these assholes "Brothers in Faith." How sad and pathetic.

Then you have the "The Jackal" (Al Jazeera) network, that salivates every time bin laden or one of his lesser nut-jobs has a "message" to relay. What a bunch of crap!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 03/21/2008
photo

Because they're too small, a few thousand, and have no structure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 03/20/2008

robeson, you hit it. There is no "central command". Anyone can call themselves Al Qaeda, as Americans call any Muslims fighting them in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is a stupid story for stupid American consumption. What infuriates Americans is all their high tech and the billions spent and they can't put down a bunch of guys living in the stone age.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 03/21/2008

A quote from Al JAzeera:
"Haggani is very well respected in his home province of Paktia [in Afghanistan]. He lead the network of fighters, including Taliban and foreign fighters of al-Qaeda."

Everyone is an idiot , except for me, sez MiwaukeeDan. Ah, the usual logic of a lunatic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 03/22/2008

This is the most apt comment on this issue - as brief as the reality of Al-Qaeda.

Al-Qaeda as a vast conspiracy was a figment of western imagination. The closest it came to was Carlos the Jackal.

Al-Qaeda was SO small and so unknown that just about ANYBODY could have been the sponsor of that outfit (this will undoubtedly help the conspiracy theorists who say 911 was an inside job). Native muslim populations among whom they lived certainly weren't their benefactors. OBL was a benefactor - first of the corrupt warlords, then when the threadbare Taliban ousted the warlords (for which they were celebrated in their country - for bringing peace from extortion and roadblocks), he supplied them trucks and cars. And the Taliban were thankful.

1) what could have been a minor group - easily exorcisable - was made into a "worthy opponent". OBL was made into a media celebrity by front page pictures on Time/Newsweek PRIOR to 911. A leader was CREATED for the muslim world (they didn't know who the hell he was before that !). An example of "astroturfing" at it's best.

2) OBL was seeking to portray a far bigger presence than actually existed - and western media complied in that construction. I recently read somewhere that most of the "guards" for OBL were hired for the day. And that there really were very few people who actually were in the "organization" in those early days.

3) a majority of the people caught in Afghanistan hadn't even heard of OBL, and were in fact Taliban.

4) the situation in Afghanistan cleverly camoflaged the reality of OBL - since western public opinion would not be able to fathom the distinctions, it was easy to camoflage Taliban behavior as Al-Qaeda behavior ("one of those turbaned individuals").

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 03/24/2008

The answer is arrogance, xenophobia and a plethora of intelligence agencies and a diplomatic corps that are repositories for the denizens of cronyism, patronisim and nepotism as well as racism and bigotry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

Sorry, typo that should have read "hard to infiltrate Al Queda" not "9/11"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

If its so hard to infliltrate 9/11, why was John Walker Lindh -- a mixed up white boy from up scale Marin county north of San Francisco -- able to just walk on in and enlist? The book "Road to 9/11" by Peter Dale Scott describes the real reason the CIA "can't" get people inside Al Queda. They aren't really trying. Scott interviews several people who were in the agency and they all give more or less the same story. The CIA has grown fat and lazy. The agents are all tied to embassies and spend most of their time going to coctail parties making "contacts" and waiting to be approached. That worked fairly well for the cold war since we had embassies in the USSR but not so much when the enemy is in caves in Afghanastan and Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

Republicans = Military Failure

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 03/20/2008

NO THEY CAN'T and the real reason why is BECAUSE there really is NO "al Qaeda"!!!

In fact al Qaeda is a fictional "Boogey Man" created by the CIA at the request of the Bush Regime to help in its quest to establish a Corporate/Fascist Govt in America and Europe!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

How's that plan working out?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

Yeah, and that's why you can't walk into Norte or Sureno areas either....geesh.

"Ya gotta know the territory!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ9U4Cbb4wg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 03/20/2008
photo

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it might have something to do with not having any allies left to provide a back story for agents in the areas where al Qaeda recruits. The guy who appeared out of nowhere with an American accent six months ago is not going to be a first draft choice. Being a fanatic doesn't equate with being stupid, look at Dick Cheney. Fanatic - yes. dumb - no.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 03/20/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect