Obama Campaign Responds With Kitchen Sink Conference Call

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Campaign Responds With Kitchen Sink Conference Call stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-21-08 10:49 AM   |   Updated: 03-29-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Kitchen Sink

There was a palpable sense of anger among aides to Senator Obama during a conference call on Friday, as they ripped into Sen. Hillary Clinton for being untrustworthy, misleading, and un-vetted.

The call crested with David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager suggesting that "It will be next to impossible," for Clinton to win in the general election, when "more than half of the people think that you are not trustworthy." His reference was a recent Gallup poll that had the New York Democrat with a sub-50% rating on honesty and trustworthiness.

Speaking with overt intensity, Plouffe went through a laundry list of issues in which he deemed that Clinton been either dishonest or not fully scrutinized. Some of the topics were newly emergent on the campaign scene.

On NAFTA, he took the New York Democrat to task for claiming a career opposition to the measure when recent White House schedule disclosures show that she attended a meeting in 1993 to push for the bill's passage. The Clinton campaign has stressed that she did this only once in five such meetings and against her private will.

On the controversy surrounding Obama's now-controversial former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Plouffe criticized the Clinton campaign for being hands off the issue in public, only to push the story in private as evidence of Obama's unelectability.

"Her campaign is clearly pushing Rev. Wright to super delegates, Lanny Davis and others have written on this, and yet she claims no knowledge," he said, in reference to a New York Times story and Clinton surrogate Davis' Huffington Post blog. "It is these kind of evasions and misleading of voters."

The Obama camp, it should be noted, pushed a picture of Wright and President Clinton meeting shortly after the Monica Lewinsky scandal to the New York Times on Wednesday night.

Staying on the topic of religion, Plouffe ripped Clinton yet again, this time for what he described as an attempt to sow doubts in the minds of voters as to whether or not Obama was a Muslim.

Story continues below

"We saw on 60 Minutes when Sen. Clinton was asked if she thought Sen. Obama was a Muslim, rather than say flat out no she says, as far as I know," Plouffe said. "This, despite the fact, that she's been at prayer breakfast with Sen. Obama."

The call, which represented perhaps the most emotional attack the Obama campaign has made against Clinton, signifies just how heated the race has become and how much public anger each side is beginning to have for the other.

It also has the potential to backfire. When Obama has gone on offensive in the past, Clinton aides have responded by saying both he and his campaign have abandoned their pledge to run a different, positive race. And certainly, on Friday's call, all pretexts of positivity where thrown from the window.

Indeed, it was the Obama camp who seemed to be throwing the kitchen sink at the Clintons and not the other way around. Greg Craig, who served in the Clinton White House and is closed to the former president and first lady, hit Sen. Clinton repeatedly for resume embellishment. Citing the recently released White House schedules he proclaimed it established that, "she did not attend security briefings... she did not receive a copy or routinely get briefed by the intelligence committee... and there is no evidence that she part took in any of the crises that took place during the eight years of her husband's presidency."

There were, to be sure, lines that neither Craig nor Plouffe would cross, despite being prodded to do so. Craig, for instance, declined to provide a personal anecdote of Sen. Clinton's "untrustworthiness," saying he would only speak to the public record. And Plouffe did not take the bait when asked if he thought these issues would submarine Clinton in a general election. But not without taking another dig:

"Obviously she needs to make some progress on these character traits," he said. "To enter into the general election with over half the electorate not thinking you are trustworthy is a real problem area."

There was a palpable sense of anger among aides to Senator Obama during a conference call on Friday, as they ripped into Sen. Hillary Clinton for being untrustworthy, misleading, and un-vetted. The c...
There was a palpable sense of anger among aides to Senator Obama during a conference call on Friday, as they ripped into Sen. Hillary Clinton for being untrustworthy, misleading, and un-vetted. The c...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1011
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- lcmartin I'm a Fan of lcmartin 2 fans permalink

Why is no one mentioning the thousands of Republicans who are crossing over in states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania although one must sign a pledge to uphold the principles of the Democratic Party. They are doing it because they thing Clinton is not electable, so they are voting for her just to get her on the ballot. It's clear to me that she is tearing apart the Progressive movement apart so that people will become so disenfranchised if she steals the nomination, they will have some sort of revolution or there will be a write-in movement for Obama. I personally would rather write in Obama's name in the general election than to vote for Clinton. For all you die-hard Clinton-ites, I was once a staunch defender of her, but I don't like what I see from her now. For once, we have a candidate of hope, and there are enough of us out there who will work hard for Obama, that we finally have a chance. I've said all along that even if I supported Clinton, she has TOO MUCH BAGGAGE. The Republicans want her to run. Doesn't that tell you something? Think people, think. This election is the most important in our history. The people have spoken, the process had spoken. Obama is ahead. For God's sakes, don't believe people who are old Party like Carville. We need to take back our country from the Bushes, the McCains, and the Clintons. We need new blood.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 03/25/2008
- rvme I'm a Fan of rvme 2 fans permalink

"Oh really" to quote Seth Myers from Saturday Night Live. So when you were a sitting Illinois State Senator your biggest donor helps you buy a house at a discount and that was ethical? Oh Really?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 03/25/2008
- lbrillante I'm a Fan of lbrillante 7 fans permalink

Yes, I have lost all respect for the Clintons and would not vote to put them in the whitehouse on any ticket. Character matters. I don't trust them. I don't trusth them to deliver on their policies. I don't trust her to not be serving special interests. She couldn't get healthcare reform before... I don't trust her to deliver it now. I trust the Clintons to behave in despicable and self serving ways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 03/24/2008

She is unelectable. The good news is that she is not going to get the nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 03/24/2008

It seems that when the Clinton's used their "kitchen sink" tactics prior to Ohio and Texas they were not thinking Obama would come back at them.......well, he did. Then the Rev. Wright garbage came out (which anyone who believes the 30 sec. sound bite should do themselves a favor and listen to the entire sermon to see the context in which the statement was made) and no one said anything about Wright's relationship with Bill Clinton or McCain's religious endorsers and their past statements not to mention Falwell and Robertson stating that 9/11 was God's punishment for AIDS, etc. Seems to me that everyone thinks Obama should sit back and let them all drag his name through the mud and say nothing. I guess Clinton and McCain who seem to have some sort of a "club" going didn't realize that they were dealing with an intelligent, patient and honest candidate when it came to Obama. Welcome to the real world Harold Wolfson, crying about how the Obama campaign has attacked Hillary........Hillary's campaign started it ALL! Be sure that you don't remind the American public about your "kitchen sink" strategy to win Ohio and Texas. It's almost as if you have forgotten all you did to bring on Obama's retribution. PLEZZZZZ, give us all a break and stop making Hillary look like the wounded, sad, weak birdy! Obama 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 03/24/2008
- donaldw6 I'm a Fan of donaldw6 357 fans permalink
photo

Oh, you don't want them to listen to the whole sermon. I'm afraid they might learn something. I'm afraid they'll start listening to this very good and very passionate sermon preached by a very intelligent man. I'm afraid they'll hear his very charitable words for President Clinton, an "intelligent friend in the White House", or more criticism of President Bush, a "dumb Dixiecrat" (snark!), or how he asked his whole congregation for forgiveness for his swearing right there in the middle of the sermon, something we all need to show that we're capable of doing. You don't want them to do that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 03/24/2008

Yeah, Hillary as victim is getting tiring. Poor Hillary. Another point to your point is that Kerry was lambasted when he didn't stand up for himself. Obama is rightfully standing up for himself just as he will do in the General election when the Republican machine throws the same tired kitchen sink at him that didn't work when Hillary did it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 03/24/2008
- marthlois I'm a Fan of marthlois 27 fans permalink

ETHICS ..... yep......ETHICS

This is so very important and has taken such a long rest in the press. We need to get it out there.
3 days after the Pennsylvania primary, the Clintons will go to another hearing regarding the 17 million
dollar lawsuit filed against them by Peter Paul re: campaign fraud. And WHY is this sleeping??????
Clinton camp says this .....Clinton camp says that!

"Another Hillary SECRETHere's an update on the Peter Paul vs. Clintons lawsuit:

DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. Go to Link (Los Angeles Superior Court) and look in the CIVIL Column, then Click on CASE SUMMARIES then enter these numbers in the box BC304174. It is an active case and has been since January. Sen. Clinton he has not disclosed it. Even after bringing up Rezko and calling Sen. Obama "Ken Starr". I think, before we go any further, she needs to disclose this.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/n ews/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=494 78

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lPgC0-0bY0Q
utube has parts 1 and 2.
WHY IS THE PRESS KEEPING THIS QUIET?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 03/24/2008
- globality I'm a Fan of globality 23 fans permalink

That is so true

Pardons, library donors, filegate, travelgate, Chines connection, finances, disbarment, Vinod Gupta, deals with shady characters is the caucuses, campaign law violations, and much more

They dont stand a chance

www.clintonscandals2008.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 03/23/2008
- ljsfolly I'm a Fan of ljsfolly 6 fans permalink

I can truly say that there is definite proof in this thread that the Hillary supporters are not highly educated nor are they in the highest IQ range. Most can get to the blogs and write what they write to get approved for the blog but the spew is like watching defenders of Fox news. The people of whom I speak rarely have done any research beyond their favorite talking heads and other blogs. You can say anything on tv on any channel and it does not have to be the truth or have you not noticed all of the lies and misrepresentations on cable news. The blogs are much the same and you can also read and write the most far out crap as you want to and lie. Liars frequent this HuffPo as they believe if they write the lies often and loud enough (with CAPs) people will believe it to be gospel. And the amount of trolls as they are called here multiplies when something negative comes across the news. How many are really republicans who love Hillary or write they do? How many are just people who somehow think she does tell the truth. Those who love her should remember she is proud of her war vote and will never say sorry for it. At least John Edwards said that much. You won't see her comforting the maimed or the families of the war dead either. Her endorsement of McCain to be president sould have made you think about who she really is and is she really a democrat but no you love her. Her lies about the overseas trip where she went to Bosnia with her kid at 16 with Sinbad and Sheryl Crow. Somehow she was able to bend down and kiss the little girl who gave her flowers on the tarmac all the while she was running for her life dodging bullets? Weird. The african trip she says she took but never did with wilson. She is making up stuff that she doesn't believe we will find out about. Something is very wrong. How about the weeks of multiple personalities when she had her advisors trying out the different Hillary's to see which one stuck. Seems to me if she doesn't ave a clue who she is and the advisors can play games like that with her now what will she be when she might be in an important situation? If she can be all lovey with Barack one day ten shame on him the next day it makes for one unstable woman. If she flips out like she has on occasion I don't worry about the 2-3 or 4 am phone call, I worry about which hillary might have er finger on any button.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 03/23/2008

Check out this link,next news breaking story

http://www.obamatruth.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 03/22/2008

I clicked on your link and the link is nothing more than an empty smear. Senator Obama graduated at the top of his class from Harvard Law Review. If he had a lust for personal wealth, he could have fulfilled that lust promptly upon graduation. As a top Harvard law grad. and editor of the law review, Senator Obama could have landed a plum Supreme Court clerkship. After that, Senator Obama could have picked anywhere he wanted to work and his beginning salary would have been in the triple digits. This didn't happen. As each year passed, Senator Obama's salary would have gone up and up and up until partnership was offered. Partnership in a top law firm is worth millions a year.

Michelle Obama also graduated from a prestigious law school. She did begin her career making very good money in corporate America. But, she left this life and went into public service for years. Now, she makes good money (not as good as if she had stayed a corporate lawyer since she would now be a partner) working for a hospital.

Keep right on pushing this nonsense. It will not work, not this year, not this time. The Obamas have a net worth that is based almost entirely on their house. Both of the other candidates running have much higher net worths. The Clintons are worth millions as is Senator McCain. Do I think they have a "lust for personal wealth?" No, but they certainly are a great deal wealthier than Senator Obama and this is not because Senator Obama lacked the opportunities to have acquired more wealth as of this point in his life. Do get your facts straight and do try and not fall for meaningless hate-filled links posing as "news."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 03/22/2008
- adled I'm a Fan of adled 2 fans permalink

Strangely, Seaofdreams only has this one entry in his profile. Hmmm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 03/22/2008

Kimberly - you go, girl!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 03/23/2008

Right on Kim! Not this time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 03/24/2008
- Fabienne I'm a Fan of Fabienne 31 fans permalink

Senator Obama has the least money of anyone left in the race, his assets worth about $1.7 million as opposed to the Clintons' $34.5 million (don't know McCain's, but it's considerably more than Obama's).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 03/25/2008

It may be "next to impossible" for Hillary to win, but it is impossible for Obama to win if nominated, because he cannot win the "battleground states". He cannot win those states because of his association with the Reverend Wright. He should have realized that he couldn't run for president while being associated with someone with such toxic views. Obama clearly doesn't share those views, but he did attend Wright's church for the past twenty years. This is not a smear. I am simply stating what I perceive the situation to be.

Obama showed incredibly poor judgment in thinking he could finesse his relationship with a "liberation theology" preacher, and an often angry one at that. It demonstrates to me that he cannot carry through on his promises if elected. Nevertheless, he remains my choice, in theory anyway. I have supported his campaign, as in sending money and writing campaign songs that I posted on You Tube.

However, I am a retired math professor, not a blue-collar worker in Ohio or Pennsylvania. As far as I am concerned, we are back to 1972, with Obama playing the role of George McGovern. Except that in 1972, no one could have defeated Nixon, whereas Hillary can defeat McCain, and as I have stated before, better a two-headed president than a wrong-headed one.

So, if we don't want to have McCain as the next president, we have to try to get Hillary Clinton nominated; Bill, warts and all. In my view, that is the reality we have to face.

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 03/22/2008

Since in my family I actually have some of the recently much-maligned working white men, I do not believe this issue has the impact you think it does. Working white men are neither ignorant, nor stupid. They are simply very hard working and have little time to surf the internet. They did find the time to listen to Senator Obama's uplifting speech and they do h

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 03/22/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

Wrights views are pablum next to Rapture Hagee/McCain. Are you living in this country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 03/22/2008
- Ginko I'm a Fan of Ginko 7 fans permalink

EXACTLY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 03/22/2008
- pithymaxim I'm a Fan of pithymaxim 9 fans permalink

This jingoistic xenophobic bashing of Rev. Wright reflects the toxic and willful inability to understand or empathize with the tragic black experience. Do you expect feeling human beings who have been systematically oppressed to develop a Stockholm syndrome and praise the oppressors? Be grateful? The hurt and anger has to be vented or it will fester and cause social implosion. People think the Tuskegee situation is in the past. Breast cancer research and chemo is aimed at white genetics, not Asian, not African-American. And non-white women do not respond to these drugs. Blacks carry a few white genes through no fault of their own, inbred forcibly as a result of rape during slavery. They incur the diseases without the same level of medical research. Openly intelligent blacks were forcibly selected out of the gene pool in America, nutrition dismal, and you expect this to be swallowed without any grieving process by the black community? The Jewish community is allowed to express anger and clamp down on any sign of anti-Semitism. And rightfully so. The black community has every right to discuss what happened to them in the sanctuary of the Black Church. You want to dispose of Rev. Wright so you can throw away any responsibilty of white society at large. It is sad that a math professor, supposedly capable of sophisticated abstract thought, cannot go one step farther to understand rather than merely label and discard . I would ask you to consider the entire American landscape and repost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 03/23/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

Hillary cannot win...I am retired too, but I will not vote for Hillary Clinton come hell or high water and there are millions like me. At least McCain suffered for his country and besides I do not believe his current rant. I think he simply wants to win and then throw it back in their faces...how those idiots shamed him and took away his chance in 2000 to win the Republican nomination. I can stand four years of McCain. I cannot take a 15 second soundbite from Hillary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 03/23/2008
- isisdawnra I'm a Fan of isisdawnra 3 fans permalink

hilly is so proud of fighting for what she beleives to be right. But to me she wants to FIGHT everyone in every direction she looks. So now the hilly camp is chiding Obama for going negative? Do as I say not as I do. Comes to mind
The people are speaking hilly ......... listen.....
We don't want you or your annoying negativity

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 03/22/2008
- Ginko I'm a Fan of Ginko 7 fans permalink

so a woman being strong "wants to fight" but a man who is being strong is ok by you. Barack continues to play the race card and you condone that but Hillary stands up and points out his dirty politics and she's wrong. You, are a sexist my friend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 03/22/2008

Did I miss something? Did Obama play the race card? Please enlighten me. I thought he had been staying away from race until Tuesday. Is that what you are refering to... the speech on race? Do you consider that speech playing the race card? I truly need to know this. Also, can you please tell me if I am a sexist for disagreeing with the tactics of the Clinton campaign?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 03/22/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

Again you post no facts, just your opinion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 03/22/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

"I continue to be astonished at the willingness of Clinton supporters to elide, obfuscate, tolerate, condone, and defend behavior from their candidate that would provoke their outrage if it came from anyone else."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 03/23/2008
- Anie I'm a Fan of Anie 4 fans permalink
photo

Balanced column.

As for the 60 minutes problem, Obama himself (in his "positive" mode of campaigning) complained about 10 days, ago to an audience, that Hillary released the Kenya photo of him in travel-related garb -- not true: see the actual source of the photo floated for two days before Drudge reported "obtaining" a copy of an email with the photo.
http://andrys1.blogspot.com/2008/02/source-of-obama-photo-from-kenya.html

Then Obama complained further, during that rally, that Hillary had not defended him on 60 minutes with a clear statement (she is to be his defender on his personal religion?). BUT what's odd is she DID defend him clearly. *Twice*. She was asked three different times about the Muslim/Christian thing and she answered very clearly the first two times -- and it was bizarre for the 60 minutes guy to ask her a third time, which obviously puzzled her, as it did many who saw it. For details of all 3 questions and 8 or so denials, see Eric Boehlert's excellent detailing of all this, including the first two questions that most TV videoclips left out (and which Obama team would have known about on the original program but preferred to pretend did not exist).
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200803110002

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 03/22/2008
photo

Sad...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 AM on 03/22/2008

Obama's aids are talking about Clinton' s ethical aspect does not fit in general election makes people to hardly believe a dog does not bark and a cat does not cry "MEO". Obama is soaking in his pastor's anti-American rhetoric for more than 20 years and they want people to believe Obama is pro-American by soaking in such anger of anti-American. Obama's denial is understandable for the sake of a presidential run, and unacceptable for forcing the people to believe the opposite. Sometime one can put words into others' mouth or sell one's perception by propaganda repeatedly as carried out by Obama's team in this campaign. But, you can not change the facts even Obama is crying for change. and change. Not this one those.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 03/22/2008
- anghiari I'm a Fan of anghiari 22 fans permalink

And Hillary's husband lied Under oath and had his law license revoked...he has no shame nor has she nor have any of those who support her.

"I continue to be astonished at the willingness of Clinton supporters to elide, obfuscate, tolerate, condone, and defend behavior from their candidate that would provoke their outrage if it came from anyone else."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 03/23/2008

Obama speak about ethics? 1. Rezko land deal and 20 year friendship 2. Jeremiah Wright- 20 year friendship and espousal of the Black Value System 3. Exelon- provided softball legislation easing nuclear waste disposal protocols. Result: campaign donations for Obama 4. Shaming his own grandmother to vy for political advantage 5. Using race as leverage to win a nomination

I have gone from being utterly inspired by Barack Obama during his keynote address to completely disenchanted with him as a person. No more free passes. If Democrats nominate Obama, he will be soundly defeated by John McCain. McCain has been quiet for now, but all of the above points will be intensely magnified once the Republican attack machine says go. It's the element of surprise that will bring his campaign to a bitter end. DO DEMOCRATS REALLY THINK SOMEONE WITH THIS MANY FLAWS IS VIABLE? Republicans WANT Obama to be the nominee. Every damn day, he's on the television apologizing for offensive comments. We already have someone in office that has a lot of apologizing to do. The American people deserve more than empty apologies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 AM on 03/22/2008

But will you vote for the McCain/Hillary ticket? That's the real question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 AM on 03/22/2008

i will vote for mccain-never obama. Don't forget, michelle obama said she would never vote for hillary if she were the nominee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 03/22/2008

You can fool the Hillary supporters, which you are one of,keep hate alive vote Hillary, No thanks.

Feel the Love, Vote Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 AM on 03/22/2008

Hate seems to be Obama's campaign. I mean he has listened and educated his children in the hate against white people. It is frightening that you call this love-you may need therapy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/22/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

McCain can't remember what country he's in. Who has the bomb, and when will the Rapture start. Sounds like the illiterates choice to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 03/22/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect