Smoke rises from the heavily fortified Green Zone that houses the U.S. embassy and the Iraqi government offices in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, March 27, 2008. Shiite militants are continuing to hammer the U.S-protected Green Zone with rockets and mortars for the fifth day this week. (AP Photo/Khalid Mohammed)

US Embassy Personnel In Baghdad Told Not To Leave 'Reinforced Structures' Due To Incoming Insurgent Fire

MATTHEW LEE | March 27, 2008 08:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


WASHINGTON — The State Department has instructed all personnel at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad not to leave reinforced structures due to incoming insurgent rocket fire that has killed two American government workers this week.

In a memo sent Thursday to embassy staff and obtained by The Associated Press, the department says employees are required to wear helmets, body armor and other protective gear if they must venture outside and strongly advises them to sleep in blast-resistant locations instead of the less secure trailers that most occupy.

"Due to the continuing threat of indirect fire in the International Zone, all personnel are advised to remain under hard cover at all times," it says. "Personnel should only move outside of hard cover for essential reasons."

"Essential outdoor movements should be sharply limited in duration," the memo says, adding that personal protective equipment "is mandatory for all outside movements."

"We strongly recommend personnel do not sleep in their trailers," it goes on to say, offering space inside the Saddam Hussein-era palace that is the embassy's temporary home as well as room at an as-yet uncompleted new embassy compound and a limited supply of cots.

In a separate public notice to American citizens in Iraq, the embassy said the restrictions would remain in place "until further notice."

The staff memo says all personnel under the authority of the chief of mission "are required to wear body armor, helmet and protective eyewear any time they are outside of building structures in the International Zone. In addition, chief of mission personnel in the International Zone have been advised to remain inside of hardened structures at all times, except for mission essential movements."

The memo and warden notice were sent after a second American citizen was killed by a rocket attack in the Green Zone on Thursday. A U.S. citizen military contractor died of his wounds on Monday after being severely injured with four others in an attack.

One explosion from a rocket launched by suspected Shiite militiamen on Thursday ignited a fire in the central area of the zone that sent a massive column of thick, black smoke drifting over the Tigris River.

U.S. military officials said that among the weapons used in recent attacks are 107mm rockets made in Iran. One official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, said they have included rockets stamped with 2007 Iranian manufacture dates.

Military and diplomatic officials would not say what had been hit inside the Green Zone. A U.S. military statement said one civilian was killed and 14 wounded "in the vicinity" of the protected district.

The first wave of rockets this week came on Easter Sunday. The Green Zone _ and areas nearby _ have barely had a breather since.

On Sunday, at least 12 Iraqis were killed that day outside the Green Zone, apparently by salvos that went astray.


 

Comments
a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:3:"cnt";s:3:"667";}}
Pending Comments
a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:3:"cnt";s:1:"0";}}

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

Oh no they didn't!! They're DRIVING to the airport and experiencing the adventure of dodging IED's!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 03/28/2008

I saw Bush"s War on PBS also, the sheer magnitude of the Cheney-Rumsfeld conspiracy to have the war they always wanted, borders on criminal. They collaborated to undermine the State Department, as well as the CIA and blow any chance of nailing OBL in Afghanistan. I read a lot about this sorted episode of US political history, I even read a piece in US News and World Report on how Franks was feuding with Rumsfeld over troop strength. What I didn"t know was the reason Franks and his general staff left soon after Baghdad fell. I was not aware that he was angry about the dismissal of the armed Iraqi military and police, which deviated from the plan. Franks turned down a cushy reassignment and retired rather than serve the incompetent idealistic neo-cons in the Pentagon. Bush was willing to ignore his own instincts and misgivings on the cooked intelligence that George Tenet was presenting him. Cheney always had the last word, always operating in the shadows, if you will. Fast-forward 5 years, most of the players are gone except for Cheney and Rice, the big neo-con wet dream-nightmare realized, thousands of casualties on both sides, billions spend, the original mission capturing OBL "dead or alive" unrealized and Cheney comments, SO! Is Nuremberg still available?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 03/28/2008

I just watched it on-line. Pretty much says what alot of us already know(the ones paying atteation anyway). I came away with some new info too. This "war' has been pretty much a fustercluck and fubar since the beginning!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 03/28/2008

The only thing in "Bush's War" not already covered in the documentary "No End In Sight" was the new-found candor of Richard Armitage. It seems his rage at the malfeasance of this administration grows day by day. Perhaps Director Robert Greenwald should conduct a sitdown with Mr. Armitage. He has much to tell.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 03/28/2008

We [the USA] can bomb anyone in the world we want illegally that is our right, right? It's a little ridiculous to lecture Iran about supplying weapons to Iraqi's when your doing the same thing on a much grander scale.
If our leaders judged themselves with the same yard stick as they do for the Iranian's they would have to declare war upon themselves!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 03/28/2008

I guess we can say that that Shia surge is successful!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 03/28/2008

Just about every report to the nation by Bush is made before captive audiences. It is always on some military base, or before a particular federal department where most of the attendees are either partisan hacks or toadies. Why doesn't Bush conduct a speech with questions from the public before people who do not have a prepunched admission stub?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 03/28/2008

Bush 2003 : "Bring' em on".

Bush 2008 : "Bring' em in".

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 AM on 03/28/2008

hahahahaahahaha. classic.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 03/28/2008

Republicans = Military Failure

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 AM on 03/28/2008

So much for the surge, maybe McCain, Cheney and Bush can go over there and tell us how good things are going - with the buzz of 50 helicopter gun ships overhead and 10, 000 troops in an 8 block radius protecting them, but remember it's WORKING!!!!!!!!!!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 AM on 03/28/2008

The surge is working.

See the surge work.

... as McCain's eyeballs roll up into his forehead, his body shakes a little and he mutters something incoherent about "victory".

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 AM on 03/28/2008

Whose this guy "Serge"?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 03/28/2008

Wasn't he the guy on Beverly Hills Cop who was trying to serve Eddie an esspresso?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 03/28/2008

Hang in there, Troops. Be careful. Thank you.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 AM on 03/28/2008

George? The phones are ringing.....we have Iraq on one line.......the Fed on the other. ....and the plane is waiting to wisk you away to South America.....

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 03/28/2008

Come on, we ll be merican hillibillie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mU2lJKkQ04

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 03/28/2008

Too bad for the 4003 dead US service members. But even worse for the "two dead American citizens" that died from recent rocket attacks on the Green Zone... THEY DON'T EVEN COUNT. Still 4003... and counting.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 03/28/2008

Dissent isn't whining. But you are right America is on a highway to hell.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 03/28/2008

Its a hoot. I love dissent. I'm a libertarian. You folks are the "Fairness Doctrine".

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 03/28/2008

What does America know about war? Nothing I'm afraid.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 03/28/2008

Way to go J A's... and we're just hearing about this now.

Here's our false flag attack with Iran tacked to it. .

Do Not Believe for one minute.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 03/28/2008

Is this Deja Vu of Saigon in April 1975? Now lets see -- The White House web site says that In April 1975 Dick Cheney was Deputy Assistant to the President when Gerald Ford "assumed the Presidency" in August 1974. So?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 03/28/2008

Well, call me stupid but I thought the LEAST the surge had accomplished was to secure the Green Zone's immediate mortar-grounds against just this kind of harassment. What? Is this not a failure? What's the real spin, apart from the (much appreciated) smart remarks?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 03/27/2008

Just what are you accusing them of? Thinking??!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 03/28/2008

Can someone tell me what they are thinking? We haven't been able to bring about any order or peace to Iraq, yet we feel capable of taming another rogue country. What troops and resources are available for such an endeavor? I am completely dumbfounded why the Republicans would even consider such a disaster.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 03/27/2008

I remember my father telling about how Russia lays plans for a hundred years. And their agenda reflects it. Was in Marines in 76', Carters time. His hesitancy with the hostages in Iran, are what really got this ball rolling. And from Reagan on, Iran has always been the goal. Thats what happens to warmongers when they "lose" anything. Like Vietnam, war to them is a football game, to lose is not an option. Warriors - REAL ones, will tell you no one wins in any conflict. Ticker tape parades don't bring your friends back with you, medals don't replace shattered bodies/souls. Bombs still require boots on ground to assess results. Russia said step to Iran, and you step to us. Chinas busy buying all the real estate it can - all over the world, with emphasis on Middle East. Both Russia and China rebuilding their Navies......4K + dead, would be tip of iceberg, if we continue on this course. With an already overstreched military.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 03/28/2008

Republicans aren't interested in security for the country. It would interfer with their plans on holding power in the country through fear and would dry up the money pit that has been feeding Republican coffers.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 03/27/2008

Mostly, they are trying to destabilizing the Arab nations in order to assure that Israel stays the preeminent superpower in the region... and secure fossil fuels.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 03/27/2008

We can always outsource our military needs to say China and India. Plenty of man power there just laying around waiting to be ripped off the streets and sent into war.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 03/27/2008

No troops required.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 03/27/2008

Pin point bombing.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 03/28/2008

As long as that pinpoint is 5 x 5. That's kilometers.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 03/28/2008

Shock&awe.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 03/27/2008

Perhaps you should Google up (Hillary supporter) Maddy Albright's comment, (sic) "What good is it if we have all these weapons and we don't use them?". Circa 1998 or 99?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 03/27/2008

Shock and awe, no troops required.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 03/27/2008

They aren't interested in the welfare of America or Americans, in case yo-u haven't figured that out.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 03/27/2008

Iran is the plan.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 03/27/2008

Irans been the plan since Carter "acted" too weak, the plus was justification to build bases in the middle of all that oil. Why else would terrorists based out of Afghanistan, be fought in another country - that had NADA to do with 9/11.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 AM on 03/28/2008

Bush will probably drop a few and create a national crisis as a parting gift before the general election.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 03/27/2008