Jason Linkins

BIO

Jason Linkins

The Huffington Post

Elizabeth Edwards Returns McCain's Fire, Demands 'Straight Talk'

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

April 1, 2008 05:48 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Jason Linkins

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.

Days ago, Elizabeth Edwards, wife of former nominee contender John Edwards, took aim at GOP nominee John McCain's health care plan, pointing out that, under the plan, insurance companies "wouldn't have to cover preexisting conditions like melanoma and breast cancer." That meant that she and McCain shared two common traits: both have been diagnosed with cancer, and "Neither one of us would be covered by his health policy."

Afterwards, McCain advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin characterized Edwards' remarks as "disappointing" and scolded her for not fully grasping the Senator's plan. Via ThinkProgress:

Holtz-Eakin said McCain's policy would harness "the power of competition to produce greater coverage for Americans." Because McCain's plan would lower the cost of healthcare through competition, Holtz-Eakin said, it would reduce costs for consumers with or without preexisting conditions.

Naturally, you'd think that those powerful markets would have nigh been harnessed, seeing as how cancer isn't exactly a new affliction. Well, Elizabeth Edwards wasn't having any of it, and hit back hard in a guest post at ThinkProgress' Wonk Room:

I freely admit that I am confused about the role of overnight funding in repurchase markets in the collapse of Bear Stearns. What I am not confused about is John McCain's health care proposal. Apparently Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a senior policy advisor to McCain, thinks I do "not understand the comprehensive nature of the senator's proposal." The problem, Douglas, is that, despite fuzzy language and feel-good lines in the Senator's proposal, I do understand exactly how devastating it will be to people who have the health conditions with which the Senator and I are confronted (melanoma for him, breast cancer for me) but do not have the financial resources we have. In very unconfusing language: they are left outside the clinic doors.

But Edwards didn't leave the matter settled with a clever riposte, either, posing four substantive questions that she didn't think McCain would have the capacity to answer. The fourth was a coup de grace:

Isn't the type of competition you are talking about really a rush to the bottom? As long as you allow insurers to underwrite and deny access, you encourage insurers to offer plans that may be cheap, but that get that way by avoiding people with cancer or other high-cost diseases or by limiting benefits and treatments, particularly if the treatment is expensive or might be needed for a long time. We all live in the real world; those of us lucky enough to have health insurance have seen how insurers cut coverage and up co-pays or deny particular treatments. The insurance company makes money when it doesn't have to pay for our health care. (I suspect that if they could, they would write obstetrical-only policies for nuns.) Doesn't your plan really encourage insurers plans to compete to avoid people with cancer or other high-cost diseases? Don't you think that the kind of competition that starts with a decent level of required coverage, that doesn't exclude the care we actually need, would be better?

In related news: Is it too late to draft Ms. Edwards to run for President?


 
 

Comments
166
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- dax49 See Profile I'm a Fan of dax49 permalink

teflon john mc cain is simply mouthing what his lobbyist friends are feeding him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 04/02/2008
- raker See Profile I'm a Fan of raker permalink

Mrs. Edwards is honest and eloquent, as always. McCain, not so much. I was struck by his suggestion of "trickle-down" health care in the line: "Because McCain's plan would lower the cost of healthcare through competition, Holtz-Eakin said, it would reduce costs for consumers with or without preexisting conditions."


So-called competition through deregulation or lack of regulation has only ever let to higher prices, poorer quality, and astronomical profits for industry. (See: banking, insurance, airlines, oil, gasoline, electricity, cable, and our toxic food supply.) McCain's non-plan would lead the health care system toward further deterioration. We need an end to health insurance. We need universal health care for all. We need a Democratic President and Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 04/02/2008
- JAB20 See Profile I'm a Fan of JAB20 permalink

If McCain thinks deregulation of health care would lower costs, he'd better look at other kinds of deregulation--telephone and the like. Costs go up and the opportunity for fraud (slamming, etc.) increases exponentially.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 04/02/2008
- sparafucilli See Profile I'm a Fan of sparafucilli permalink

To borrow from Seinfeld, under McCain's guaranteed sickness plan, "No HealthCare For You".
Pro-Life until you're born. But after? "Forget 'bout it".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 04/02/2008
- finethnx See Profile I'm a Fan of finethnx permalink

This was included in CNN's story on this, today.

"Edwards has also criticized Barack Obama"s health care plan. She has praised Hillary Clinton's proposal, saying that it resembles her husband's universal health care plan."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/02/elizabeth-edwards-takes-aim-at-mccain-health-care-plan/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 04/02/2008
- cruisepuppy7452a See Profile I'm a Fan of cruisepuppy7452a permalink

As someone who has been blackballed by the inurance companies for the last 15 years, gone without healthcare, coverage, I not only fully endorse what Elizabeth has said, but want to take this further. Folks, universal healthcoverage won't cover anyone with pre exsisting condition. Not going to happen. Only single payer would do that. To think any of the candidates is pushing a program to cover everyone is to buy into yet another great lie. Its not about what you can fford anymore, its what the insurance companies choose to accept. I could pay for mine, but they won't take me regardless. Elizabeth took an issue I have been fighting for, to get everyone seen and heard, taken it to the airwaves, to the streets, Michael Moore did the same thing with Sicko, and yet, nobody demands change. You can be rich, poor, black, white, race no longer matters. If you have a pre exsisting condition, you are screwed. Until we demand change, single payer health care, nothing will change and more will be exluded. You say you don't want to pay higher taxes, but let me ask you this, what is peace of mind worth to you? To millions its worth that higher tax, if we can sleep at night. We must demand two things, living wages to offset the higher tax to cover single payer, are we all are screwed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 04/02/2008
- fredamae See Profile I'm a Fan of fredamae permalink

didnt Edwards only Suspend his campaign? i don't believe he actually dropped his run for POTUS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 04/02/2008
- jpshotwheels See Profile I'm a Fan of jpshotwheels permalink

I am tired of this argument about socialized medicine, its sounds like a Russian label. Well what do you think SSN is? and Medicare is? Unemployment Insurance is? Its all socialism, that doesn't mean we are a Dictatorship, well actually we are under Bush.

These are programs that have worked wonderfully for years, so what is so wrong with it. America is one of the worst Countries on record for Healthcare and Education, yet we claim to be a Superpower. Our infrastructure is so bad, we are 10 - 12 years behind other Countries, India, Saudi Arabia. Our internet service is slow compared to European Countries. They have brainwashed us, if we were attacked tomorrow, by some virtual virus, we would be screwed. Our electrical grids are so vulnerable, its disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 04/02/2008
- jwarrener See Profile I'm a Fan of jwarrener permalink

More proof that in spite of what so many naysayers are saying, Elizabeth and John Edwards are dedicated to the average American. With them in the White House we would have a team working hard to making America a better place to live. Too bad everyone believed the media that there were only two viable candidates for the Democratic nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 04/02/2008
- jpshotwheels See Profile I'm a Fan of jpshotwheels permalink

Don't take this wrong because I truly admire her. However I am very disappointed with both of them for not endorsing Obama. Edwards big argument was Hillary taking money from Lobbyist and many of them from Insurance companies. The insurance companies will love Hillary's Health Care plan. He attacked Hillary over Obama on several occasions, so where does Edwards really stand on issues.

Elizabeth has endorsed Hillary's Healthcare but Hillary has mandates, true this will allow everyone to be covered, but what if people can't afford it, they will be penalized, look what is happened in MA. They can't afford the healthcare premiums but if they don't pay them, this will be taken out of their paychecks, makes no sense to me.

Obama has a plan, similar in some ways to Hillary's, but my personal believe is that the single payer plan will be best for everyone in America. Obama supported that first, so maybe after he is elected and with the help of Americans we can get a single payer plan. A single payer is best for everyone, Hillary would never support that, but Obama could get a movement going. Think about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 04/02/2008
- HuffJob See Profile I'm a Fan of HuffJob permalink

and she endorsed Clinton's health care plan this morning. those people without health care thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 04/02/2008
- ScandalousCandice See Profile I'm a Fan of ScandalousCandice permalink

I am going to sound like a huge jerk for this, but I don't want to hear this woman on the attack of John McCain and his health care plan. She was on Morning Joe going on the attack and I don't care what this woman has to say until her and her husband endorse someone. It's so important right now and this pathetic fence walking is out of control.

I am not interested in anything else she or John Edwards has to say until an endorsement announcement is made. Otherwise they are wasting my time with drivel. I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but I am sick of shameless pandering, and blah blah blah talk. I am not interested in how badly McCain sucks. I already know how much he does. I want to know what she thinks of Hillary's plan or Obama's plan. Whether she likes them or not. Instead of dodging who do you like questions, it would make her come across more meaningful if she was behind someone defending their plans. If none of them appeal to her, then just go away.

Piss or get off the pot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 04/02/2008
- spicegal See Profile I'm a Fan of spicegal permalink

She's a truly amazing woman who would have made an outstanding First Lady.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 AM on 04/02/2008
- Gilda See Profile I'm a Fan of Gilda permalink

She has all the personal characteristics that Hillary is sorely lacking:
honesty, bravery, grace, loyalty, a wicked sense of humor and she appears to be 100% comfortable in her own skin. She is John Edwards best asset.
He should treat her like a queen everyday.
I would have voted for Edwards if Obama didn't get the nomination. He really should
have stayed in the race. It now appears even it is obvious you will lose, you can still
hang on until the bitter end (just stop paying the bills)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 04/02/2008
- sparkandy See Profile I'm a Fan of sparkandy permalink

I say we draft her for President. I'll change from Independent to Democrat for that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 AM on 04/02/2008
- alwayslearning See Profile I'm a Fan of alwayslearning permalink

This is America after all. We found our way to the moon and we landed space vehicles on Mars, certainly finding a way to provide health insurance for every....every single person in this country is possible. That includes those folks with pre-existing conditions. This is not rocket science...it is a money issue and it is time for the money to be expended for the good of the people. After all, what are we working for in this Country? If private companies will not provide for everyone they will soon be out of business. Their profit margin should not determine the life and death of a person. I thank Elizabeth and John Edwards and Hillary Clinton for supporting Universal Health Care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 AM on 04/02/2008
- totalliberal See Profile I'm a Fan of totalliberal permalink

Single payer, guaranteed health care seems to work in all of the rest of of the western industrialised countries. Are we to stupid to make it work here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 AM on 04/02/2008
- wedgie See Profile I'm a Fan of wedgie permalink

No, we're not too stupid to make it work. Our political leaders are just owned lock stock and barrel by the insurance companies and big pharma. There's big money to be made denying people coverage and letting them die.

This is America, after all. Anything for a buck. Including dead Americans.

**

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 04/02/2008
- MetryJen See Profile I'm a Fan of MetryJen permalink

Yes, we are. As soon as anyone even suggests it all the "conservatives" come crawling out of the woodwork screaming and crying about socialism, welfare and the nanny state. Why do you think none of the major candidates embraced it? They know full well that the American public as a whole would never go for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 04/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPolitics Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More


Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More
Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Seth Colter Walls is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is News Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More


Related Tags