DNC: Florida, Michigan Delegates Will Be Seated On Committees

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

Politico   |  David Paul Kuhn   |   April 3, 2008 09:30 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The Democratic National Committee said Tuesday that Florida and Michigan members will be seated on the three standing committees -- including the critical Credentials Committee--at the party's 2008 national convention, a position that could affect the selection of the Democratic nominee.

While both states were stripped of their delegates to the convention, according to the DNC's interpretation of party rules, members from those states will be seated on the Credentials Committee. The Credentials Committee, which can meet prior to convention, resolves disputes over whether to seat delegates at the convention.

Read the whole story here.


 
 

Comments
86
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- BrooklynLager See Profile I'm a Fan of BrooklynLager permalink

This doesn't seem like a bad compromise. First of all, it's *reasonably* fair, although it's hard for me to believe that Obama couldn't win Michigan if there had been campaigning there, but I doubt he minds taking the delegate hit.

The important thing is to reach a compromise while the election is still fluid. If you wait until June then it's meaningless, since all the candidates will have to do is crunch the numbers and see if it gives them a victory or not. And by not compromising at all, you allow Hillary to keep demagoguing the issue even though it was her campaign's chief strategist who was among those that voted to strip MI and FL in the first place, and even though she agreed, both in words and by her pledge, that the two states wouldn't count.

I'd advise both candidates to take it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 04/03/2008
- TN See Profile I'm a Fan of TN permalink

C-Span showed the hearing, headed by Donna Brazil, the head of the democratic national committee, flat out refusing to allow Florida to count. I believe this was in late 2006 or early 2007. After a gut renching explaination of how the republican controled state overpowered the democrats, donna says, I'm going to teach florida a lesson, My sister and my friends live in florida and I'm going to teach them a lesson too. WHAT-you can flat out blame Florida on Donna Brazil, who made the call, while the other committee members held their heads down. Hey Donna fess up - who is being taught the lesson now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 04/03/2008
- BrooklynLager See Profile I'm a Fan of BrooklynLager permalink

You don't know what you're talking about. Donna Brazile is not and was never the head of the DNC. And she wasn't even chair of the committee that made this decision. And you spelled her name wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 04/03/2008
- BrooklynLager See Profile I'm a Fan of BrooklynLager permalink

Why are you giving the committee a free pass on voting for it? I'm guessing it's because Clinton Strategist Harold Ickes voted "yes". This was back when he expected Hillary Clinton to have the nomination wrapped up by February 5th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 04/03/2008
- whichchange See Profile I'm a Fan of whichchange permalink

All this talk about MI and FL violating the rules neglects a few facts:

1 - IA and NH also violated the rules. No primary/Caucus was to be held before Jan 14, 2008
2 - The order was supposed to be (IA, NV no earlier than Jan 14, 2008), (NH no earlier than Jan 22), SC no earlier than Jan 29, and the rest no earlier than Feb 5th.

So then both IA and NH violated the rules but why the double standard in punishing only MI and FL?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 04/03/2008
- BrooklynLager See Profile I'm a Fan of BrooklynLager permalink

Because Iowa and New Hamshire moved their primaries up *in reaction to* Florida and Michigan doing the same thing. Don't forget that in the Republican primaries, FL and MI were counted, just halved, but the candidates still needed time to campaign there. Giuliani, in fact, made Florida the centerpiece of his entire candidacy. So the Republicans need more time between the primaries, and moved to have Iowa and New Hampshire moved further up.

This should be obvious to you: why else would the first two states bother? Do you think they felt that they needed to be even MORE first?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 04/03/2008
- Whinger See Profile I'm a Fan of Whinger permalink

That's the way it should have been all along, self interest seeks to deny the greater good!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 04/03/2008
- Nonamnesiac See Profile I'm a Fan of Nonamnesiac permalink

This is convoluted, but at least someone is trying to fix the MI/FL problem so that the Dems don't lose in November. Under this portion of the resolution, FL takes part in the lead up to the Convention, but can't vote on whether their delegates are seated at the Convention. Let's see what else happens.

Regardless of what Obama and Clinton partisans want, the FL/MI problem must be fixed to the satisfaction of the voters of both states if the Dems want to win in November. Just ignore the self-serving howl from the Obama and Clinton people -- who are more interested in beating each other in August than in beating McCain in November.

At least someone is trying something. If it doesn't work, then they must try something else.

And I don't think Hillary is qualified to be President, so Obamsits stop that stupid accusation. Her thinking is so narrowly inside the box that she doesn't even know there is something outside the box. And in the box is warmongering, imperialism, NAFTA, love of Walmart -- she's just a lying anti-labor idiot who is brilliant if you give her 4 things to think about and don't even hint there might be a fifth. Can you imagine someone calling Putin as someone without a soul -- personally attacking him -- when the position she is running for requires her to meet with him on critical issues? What a limited, Lieberman/McCain-like idiot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 04/03/2008
- AnninCA See Profile I'm a Fan of AnninCA permalink

The DNC isn't about taking sides.

It has, as described, rules.

This is apparently one way to resolve the problem.

I guess you thought everything would just be tweaked to make sure Obama is shooed in, even though he can't really win?

Too bad.......we have real rules, real processes, and real safety nets against such nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 04/03/2008
- danceswithyids See Profile I'm a Fan of danceswithyids permalink

Finally the DNC is removing their collective heads from their rears.
If MI and FLA aren't seated it is basically a lock that McCain takes both important states, as far as the road to the presidency is concerned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 04/03/2008
- IRIE See Profile I'm a Fan of IRIE permalink

What is wrong with Florida? Why do they always have such a hard time with elections. They should revoke Florida's right to vote they obviously can not handle the responsibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 04/03/2008
- speakingtruth2power See Profile I'm a Fan of speakingtruth2power permalink


In Florida's case, it was done by their GOP majority

but in both cases the people must be represented,

just not in a way that changes the eventual winner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 04/03/2008
- michelvaillant See Profile I'm a Fan of michelvaillant permalink

Immediately after the November election, the democratic party needs to do a few things:

1. Fire Howard Dean's ass.

2. Either make a credible effort to explain to the public the role and purpose of superdelegates or just get rid of them entirely. Simply saying that super-delegates should vote with the majority of pledged delegates makes them absolutely irrelevant, giving credence to republicans' accusations that democrats are experts at creating useless and inefficient bureaucracies.

3. Don't come up with stupid rules that allows republicans to render your primary election void.

4. Eliminate the idiotic and archaic caucus system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 04/03/2008
- debwarot See Profile I'm a Fan of debwarot permalink

I'm not sure seating the Florida and Michigan delegates on committees only is the best solution and I hope it will not be the end solution. However, it is a start. Lets just remember, please, that this whole situation is not the making of a single presidential candidate, despite what the other candidate may have stated. Not only are there many fingers in the pie, there are also some questionable policies and regulations.

As I understand it , current DNC policies allow for two options for the votes of these states - either a revote or splitting the votes in half.

While I agree that a major analysis and review of current procedures and regs are required, I cannot go along with abolishing the caucus system. I can see where you might call it archaic, but when it works, it is really quite laudable - town hall politics in a pretty pure form. And, I would think that is something most of us here on this site would find exciting

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 04/03/2008
- danceswithyids See Profile I'm a Fan of danceswithyids permalink

Amen, not sure why John assumes you are a republican.
Since all your suggestions would make our democratic process, democratic.
As a Democrat, I like it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 04/03/2008
- JohnTalbutt See Profile I'm a Fan of JohnTalbutt permalink

If he is not a Republican he is further to the right. Check his profile, It is all attacks and insults about Democrats. He gets exposed, he squeels, You say Amen.
God bless you.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 04/03/2008
- JohnTalbutt See Profile I'm a Fan of JohnTalbutt permalink

It may be obviouos to every one but in just in case - REPUBLICAN TROLL ALERT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 04/03/2008
- michelvaillant See Profile I'm a Fan of michelvaillant permalink

You are the new kind of democrat: "if you are not with me, you are a republican."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 04/03/2008
- JohnTalbutt See Profile I'm a Fan of JohnTalbutt permalink

In August the rules committee voted 14 to 1 not to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates from primaries held before Super Tuesday. The vote was 14 to 1, not to seat and the lone dissenter was an Obama supporter.

Any change of rules to deal with the Fla. and Mich. problem to unfairly give Hillary the nomination would be a disaster handing the Republicans not only the Presidency but also whopping majorities in both houses, not to mention state houses and other local elections. The distaste for such a maneuver would be so deep within the broader electorate that none of us for either Hillary or Obama could overcome it.
Therefore the seating of the Florida and Michigan delegates can not be done in such a way as it grossly distorts the delegate count as it is currently being established.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 04/03/2008
- HuffJob See Profile I'm a Fan of HuffJob permalink

oh boy the Obama hand wringers will be out in full force now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 04/03/2008
- AnninCA See Profile I'm a Fan of AnninCA permalink

*hehe......about time!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 04/03/2008
- speakingtruth2power See Profile I'm a Fan of speakingtruth2power permalink


Your sense of humor is very trollish.

Nobody believes you are for Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 04/03/2008
- mrJJ See Profile I'm a Fan of mrJJ permalink

No worries... Its all in the math. Popular votes, delegate votes, states, Supers?

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/phrigndumass

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 04/03/2008
- savertime See Profile I'm a Fan of savertime permalink

So in 2012, the states will decide to have their primary/caucuses whenever? Since there is no penalty, why not? The rules can always be changed in the middle of the primaries.

What does this say to all the states that abided by the rules? Florida and Michigan should forfeit their delegates to the convention. Hillary Clinton is a hypocrit and without principle to use "democracy" in her cause for more delegates. If she were ahead in the delegate count and popular vote count, would she still wage this fight for the people of Michigan and Florida? I think not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 04/03/2008
- AnninCA See Profile I'm a Fan of AnninCA permalink

These ARE the rules. The rules allow for compromise to be reached. Of course, both candidates had to agree. Obama blocked compromise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 04/03/2008
- debwarot See Profile I'm a Fan of debwarot permalink

Yep, both candidates have to agree, and this has not always been the case with Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton blocked using a caucus in Florida. It would have been less expensive than a revote and it also would have made the voting machine replacement issue irrelevant, but she blocked this option anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 04/03/2008
- Aleka See Profile I'm a Fan of Aleka permalink

Yes, Anna, we know..in your reality he did. In everyone else's reality, however, he did not. Thanks for posting!

*hooting*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 04/03/2008
- mrJJ See Profile I'm a Fan of mrJJ permalink

ROFLMAO ... really? I havnt seen anything posted that say Obama blocked compromise.

.compromise ( ) n. A settlement of differences in which each side makes concessions. The result of such a settlement.

Perhaps you mean agree to demands?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/03/2008
- Independent_voter See Profile I'm a Fan of Independent_voter permalink

Dear ann,
your mythic heroine refused to allow a caucus in MI.

So kindly stop lying your ass off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 04/03/2008
- NewJerseyMike See Profile I'm a Fan of NewJerseyMike permalink

* sniff ***

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 04/03/2008
- Carolanne See Profile I'm a Fan of Carolanne permalink

This insanity has to stop. Florida and Michigan should be seated just as they voted and those of you diehard Obama fans who won't vote for Hillary and you Hillary fans who won't vote for Obama in November and say you'll vote for McCain instead are childish and assinine. A party member votes for the party and remember our goal.......to take back the White House. Voting for McCain just because your candidate didn't make it is absurd. You want four more years of Bush philosophies, just continue on this path and you got them. Vote for McCain, you must be out of your minds!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 04/03/2008
- AnninCA See Profile I'm a Fan of AnninCA permalink

Even I couldn't really vote for McCain. I do believe a lot of the older Dems will cross-over, though, and vote Republican.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 04/03/2008