EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Mark Penn Speaks (In Private): Will Still Advise Clintons, Calms Nervous Aides

First Posted: 4/15/08 Updated: 5/25/11

Penn

Mark Penn, who resigned over the weekend as the Clinton campaign's chief strategist, went into full damage control mode on Monday, hosting a conference call with Burson Marsteller's managing directors to persuade them that the fallout from his resignation was both overblown and would soon pass.

Peppered with questions from colleagues -- one mentioned her "pretty panicked client," another asked bluntly, "Ultimately did you think that it was the best thing for the company [to work for Clinton's campaign]?" -- Penn insisted that "the situation has played itself out."

But he confirmed that while his title with the campaign had changed -- and his work load would undoubtedly decrease -- he still would play a direct advisory role for Clinton.

"I think you've heard that I made the decision to step down as chief strategist of the Clinton campaign. Penn Schoen and Berland is going to continue to poll for it and I'll continue to play a role advising Senator Clinton and former President Clinton as well as the rest of the leadership of the campaign," he said.

Later, he added: "The title, the position of chief strategist tended to be one that drew a tremendous amount of attention. And, number two, yes, I will have more time. We will continue - Penn and Schoen will continue to do the polling and I will be advising, but the net of it will still be that I will have more time than I otherwise would have had so that definitely is going to be the case."

The Huffington Post was able to listen to the roughly 25 minute call, in which Penn defended his decision to meet with Colombia's ambassador to the U.S. to discuss a free trade agreement that Sen. Clinton opposes. Told that junior staff members were wondering why he would risk the appearance of a conflict of interest, the Burson CEO responded by saying the meeting was merely a "courtesy call," and indicated that he had held similar meetings before.

"It's an interesting question," he said. "As I said, it was someone I worked for -- remember, we had the contract for a year before it was even about the free trade agreement, and periodically, maybe, I would have a check-in breakfast every six months. So it did not catch - it's interesting, because somebody working on the account was well versed in politics and it just didn't occur to anybody. I would have to say that it just didn't get flagged."

Suggesting that he had been the victim of a double standard, Penn cited Charlie Black's presence on Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign. Black had served as chair of BKSH & Associates, a lobbying firm associated with Burson-Marsteller, up until leaving the post in March 2008.

"It is interesting Charlie Black was the chief strategist for McCain and he left only after McCain got the nomination. So I have to look back and see whether or not - in the end, hindsight is foresight, but I think it's a question," said Penn. "If you look at the McCain-Charlie Black experience versus mine - obviously, the press just gave considerable more attention to what goes on overt at the Clinton campaign."

On Sunday evening, the Clinton campaign announced that Penn would be stepping down from his role as the campaign's chief strategist following the fallout from his meeting with the Colombia ambassador. Since then, however, there had been debate over exactly what involvement the pollster would have with the campaign. On Monday, Marc Ambinder reported that Penn would "remain a key member of the campaign's senior staff."

Later in the day, Ben Smith quoted an anonymous Clinton aide saying: "Its a change. He went from being in charge to being one of the important voices."

On the conference call, Penn addressed this issue early on, not deviating much from the campaign's talking points.

"While I will continue to advise the Clintons on the campaign, I obviously will have in this other role more time for what I do best, working here," said Penn

The call was meant to address "particularly, I think, what the message should be in our conversations with our clients, our prospects, [and] our staff." Saying he had three call this morning from prospective clients now eager to sign up with the firm, Penn pledged that the controversial meeting would "cycle through the news as these things do."

"There will probably be another day," he said, "but there really is only a one two three to the story but not really much more."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
  • Comments
  • 949
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rosal
kindness always wins
03:31 PM on 04/08/2008
Does anybody need more prove she cares more about her campaign and winning, than about the people she pretends to represent: Blue collar workers?
She is more loyal to him, than to supporters­. Pennsylvan­ia workers take note. Colombia will get more of your jobs. Funny, Bush and Clinton's main strategist are pushing for the same thing.
02:49 PM on 04/08/2008
The Mark Penn demise is simply another symptom of Hillary Clintons shambolic campaign. The campaign has been in meltdown for some time and it's sad to watch. All those years of plotting and planning have been for nothing. She and her supporters are in shell shock they delude themselves
that the super deligates will be as deluded as they are. Somehow I don't think so!
But let it go on, let the remaining states have their say, let the fat lady sing it simply won't make any difference it's all over.
photo
souris
...be careful what you wish for...
01:28 PM on 04/08/2008
..........­......Mark Penn, just another reason NOT to vote for Billary!!!
01:06 PM on 04/08/2008
Clinton Campaign Owes UC Davis Money
Campus May Turn Debt Over To Collection Agency
Reporting
Steve Large
DAVIS (CBS13) ― Bill Clinton may have charmed the crowd at UC Davis in January, when 7500 people showed up to see him, but charm has not covered the Clinton campaign bill.

The University of California in Davis is ready to take the Clinton presidenti­al campaign to a collection agency if they do not pay back the thousands of dollars they are still owed.

Here's a breakdown of expenses:

- The UC Davis Marching Band cost $500.
- Cleanup services after the rally cost $250.
- UC Davis Police officers didn't come as cheap. The security bill is more than $5,600.

"I'm more than willing to be held accountabl­e for it, because that's the way life is," Hillary Clinton said to a Montana crowd on Monday. There is no word whether she'll apply that philosophy here, or if she even knows about the outstandin­g debt.

Her Sacramento campaign office closed its doors after Super Tuesday, and her campaign spokespeop­le didn't return my calls.

UC Davis is planning to put its final bill out this week, and if the debt has not been settled within a month, they are going to turn the matter over to a collection agency.

(© MMVIII, CBS Broadcasti­ng Inc. All Rights Reserved.)
From Our Partners
01:12 PM on 04/08/2008
I believe Mark Penn has been paid 10M by Clinton, yet she is stiffing a public university­. Typical behavior that we have come to expect from her.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 04/08/2008
She says she's against NAFTA while her campaign manager meets with Colombian officials in an effort to push it forward. She claims that it's no big deal, and she has dealt with it, but he is still on her payroll. And if you still have any doubts about her pro-busine­ss, anti-labor views, read about where she stands on outsourcin­g:

http://www­.counterpu­nch.org/ro­ckwell0331­2008.html

Hillary Clinton is the Manchurian Candidate.
01:06 PM on 04/08/2008
It is not only Penn in her campaign' This is the Clintons mind set read this
http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2008/04­/08/washin­gton/08lob­by.html?_r­=1&th&emc=­th&oref=sl­ogin
JPFL
A church steeple with a lightning rod on top?
11:28 AM on 04/08/2008
Her man privately pushes for the deal while publicly she's against it, which is a typical Clintonian tactic. If you honestly believe she didn't know about this, then you must assume that her 'chief' executive skills are not fit for duty.
11:13 AM on 04/08/2008
Penn is an anti-union lobbyist . He's worked for Clinton for over 10 years. Why doesn't anyone ask Hillary or Penn if he mentioned her stance on trade to Uribe--and if she knew about his trip?

This seems EXACTLY like Canada and NAFTA. She's saying one thing in public ("I'm against it") and then having her trusted advisor telling the government a different message privately. Why would the Colombian president suddenly start attacking Obama after meeting with Penn?

Rendell's an idiot, or as corrupt as she is, if he can't see what she's up to. As for Penn--he's still getting millions, still polling, still telling her what to say based on his results. Nothing has changed at all.
11:39 AM on 04/08/2008
The media is also playing softball with Clinton about Bill's ties to the leader of Columbia. Last summer he awarded Bill a national award and Bill returned the favor by making Uribe a special guest at his summit last fall. The Clintons are very cozy with a leader tied to state-spon­sored terrorism, narco-traf­ficking, and assassinat­ions of opposition leaders, including labor workers. Why did Uribe, after Penn's visit, attack Obama on his anti trade stance but not Hillary - isn't she against the deal too? Or is she? Was Penn's visit a back door meeting?

Penn's "replaceme­nt" Geoff Garin is also remarkably pro NAFTA, anti worker. Back in 1993, when the Clinton administra­tion was gearing up to promote NAFTA, Garin told The New York Times that Bill Clinton could close the deal by playing on the ignorance of Americans regarding trade policy in general and NAFTA in particular­.

Hey Pennsylvan­ia's working middle class, Hillary Clinton's new strategist thinks you are a bunch of ignorant Americans!

Howard Wolfson, Hillary's campaign spokesman, still has an equity interest in his old firm, Glover Park Group, which signed a contract in 2007 at $40,000 per month with the Columbian government to promote the trade deal. 6 Glover Park Group employees gave Hillary's campaign a total of $20,000.

If Hillary Clinton were really for the working people of America and not the rich corporate CEO's, wouldn't her campaign staff reflect that? Why would she have all of these free traders working for her?

More lies?
12:16 PM on 04/08/2008
The Canadian PM denies that Obama rumor about Clinton having any contact over NAFTA. Only his supporters keep insisting that is what happened. It makes the campaign look dishonest, in my opinion, to push a false story such as he did.

Penn's firm is not the same as Clinton's campaign. That is clear. It's an awkward situation that she handled by demoting him. Her position on this is clear. It has been clear. It will remain clear.

If Obama supporters can't get that, it's because they want to continue with the same ole' Hillary Hating stuff.

Having trouble talking positive about your candidate?

:)

I'd have a problem doing that, too, with him. Slippery guy.
12:31 PM on 04/08/2008
When Penn was supposed to be OUT, the spin was "Good for her! He can't screw up her campaign anymore!" , now to "What strength of character and leadership she shows by executing his demotion that isn't really a demotion."

Criticizin­g Clinton makes me a "Hillary basher" I guess.

If she ends up being the democratic nominee, I'll vote for her, but I'm going to have to smoke a lot of crack before heading to the voting booth.
03:11 PM on 04/08/2008
Of course the PM denied it, he was in on it!

There was a major shouting match in the Canadian Parliament about the whole thing. I've seen the video myself. The Prime Minister wants Clinton to win because she won't upset the NAFTA applecart. When Goolsbee met with a Canadian official his position of re-negotia­ting NAFTA was conveyed. Two days after that meeting one of the Canadian Prime Minister's reps trounced on Obama for wanted to re-negotia­te(funny how he didn't mention Clinton, who at the time had publicly declared the same thing).

If you want specific facts I can provide them. Following this quote is a link to the entire article.

Here's a direct quote from a Canadian newspaper:

"At the end of an extended conversati­on, Brodie was asked about remarks aimed by the Democratic candidates at Ohio's anti-NAFTA voters that carried serious economic implicatio­ns for Canada.

Since 75 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S., Obama and Clinton's musings about reopening the North American free-trade pact had caused some concern.

Brodie downplayed those concerns.

"Quite a few people heard it," said one source in the room.

"He said someone from (Hillary) Clinton's campaign is telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt. . . That someone called us and told us not to worry."

Government officials did not deny the conversati­on took place."

Here's the link:

http://www­.macleans.­ca/article­.jsp?conte­nt=n030513­2A&source=­srch
11:10 AM on 04/08/2008
I've yet to see any reporter ask this simple question of the Clinton campaign, which comes under the infallible adage, "follow the money":

In other words, Is Mark Penn still on the campaign payroll? And is he continuing at his huge salary, or has he taken a pay cut?

Hillary's on CNN this morning making a big boast about how her campaign did the right thing by getting rid of Penn.
But I've seen nothing that, beyond a public spanking, offers any hard evidence that Mark Penn is still not a (highly) paid member of Hillary's team.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
desertdweller
What would RFK do?
10:47 AM on 04/08/2008
Rule Number One: Never trust a man with a comb-over. Any man who would adopt such a contrivanc­e as a comb-over is fundamenta­lly dishonest.
11:35 AM on 04/08/2008
nestici, thanks for the wp url. I agree that this is a great column.
01:04 PM on 04/08/2008
...hiding reality...­.
10:14 AM on 04/08/2008
She is really having a trouble running her campaign, she can't even fire Mark Penn!

Great Washington post column:

http://www­.washingto­npost.com/­wp-dyn/con­tent/artic­le/2008/04­/07/AR2008­040702196.­html
10:33 AM on 04/08/2008
more clinton hypocracy.­.......she is against "free trade ",but her chief stratagist isn't ???? unemployed union brothers in pennsylvan­ia -take note....th­e millionair­ess doesn't really care about you- just her own power.
....and what a slap-in-th­e-face ....penn resigns- but not really !!!!!! who is she kidding. just as she still subbtly embraced geraldine ferraro's racist remarks,sh­e is still embracing penn and his free-trade philosphy by still using him !
10:14 AM on 04/08/2008
CNN) — Hillary Clinton predicted on Tuesday the recent controvers­y surroundin­g her top advisor's meeting with the Colombian government wouldn't prove damaging to her campaign, and suggested she dealt with the matter more definitive­ly than Barack Obama did when he faced a similar situation.

"I don't think (it will hurt), because I think people want to know where I stand," Clinton said on CNN's American Morning, reiteratin­g her opposition to a free trade agreement with the Colombians­.

"I find it kind of curious, we took action, and I think it was appropriat­e," she continued. "Contrast that to Senator Obama's campaign where, as far as I know, nothing was ever done when one of his top economic advisers representi­ng the campaign, unlike Mr. Penn who was not representi­ng the campaign, but Mr. Obama's representa­tive told the Canadian government basically not to pay any attention to what Senator Obama was saying about NAFTA."


"As Far as I know" makes its return, haha. Maybe "as far as she knows", she's winning. Sometimes I wonder if she really think that.
10:52 AM on 04/08/2008
Wow, Hillary is STILL LYING!!!! Granted, it's to CNN, who will let her say anything unchalleng­ed.

But she knows saying "Mr. Obama's representa­tive told the Canadian government not to pay any attention to what Senator Obama was saying about NAFTA" is a bald-faced LIE. And that the truth is that was HER campaign ( probably Penn himself) who gave Canada that message!!!­!

She's a piece of work!

As for wanting to know where she stands, it's pretty obvious to me. She talks against free trade in public and has Penn represent a different position for her in private. It can't be a coincidenc­e that no one is saying he DIDN'T represent Clinton. And no coincidenc­e that after the meeting, Pres. Uribe started to attack Obama.

What. A. Liar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kidvidkid
11:53 AM on 04/08/2008
"As far as I know" is a really fun game that everyone can play! It's the adult equivalent of "No offense, but...." -- you can get away with almost anything by adding it!

"Bill isn't sleeping with other women any more...as far as I know."
"Nor is HRC...as far as I know."
"Mark Penn isn't the love child of a leech and a sponge...a­s far as I know."

Hillary Clinton...­ready to waffle on Day 1.
10:09 AM on 04/08/2008
I know this sounds petty, but does this fellow ever shave? He looks like an unmade bed!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:18 AM on 04/08/2008
Nah, I think it's only fair. People criticize women public figures all the time for their appearance­. I think it's only fair! I mean I criticize HRC for her bumble bee suit, so why not say Mark Penn looks like Pig Pen. Actually Pig Pen is a lot cuter and much more likeable. Sorry Pig Pen, don't sue me for slander! LOL

What is it with guys like him, though, and Rush Limbaugh and Rove and Dick Morris and Carville..­..they all leave a lot to be desired in the appearance department­.
12:37 PM on 04/08/2008
Is isn't weight or anything--­it's grooming. They need to clean up.
09:37 AM on 04/08/2008
Gov. Rendell: Clinton should dump Penn altogether
http://blo­gs.usatoda­y.com/onpo­litics/200­8/04/gov-r­endell-cli­.html
Rendell isn't doing Hillary any favors making his feelings public (even if he's right)

I think Penn has a pretty big mouth and that's why he still has a job with the Clintons.

Who knows, maybe the Clinton Foundation needs a pollster like South Carolina needed a library when votes were on the line.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:58 AM on 04/08/2008
Thanks for the link. I love it! Trust Rendell to speak his mind. Actually, he knows his state better than HRC does. He has to say he would fire Penn completely if he wants to get re-elected as the governor of PA. He relies too much on the votes of the union members.

Even though this story seems to have lost a bit of traction in the MSM, I don't think the unions will let it die. I don't have the link at the moment, but I did read somewhere were Hoffa's trade union were still making a big deal about it and that they were mad that Penn hadn't been completely fired.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rosal
kindness always wins
03:45 PM on 04/08/2008
Actually, Penn is so close to the Clintons, I wonder how much stuff about them he knows? Is that why they cannot fire him?
09:34 AM on 04/08/2008
Well, it's looking like they killed the Colombia FTA story across the boards. Too hot to handle and most likely opens a pandora's box of controvers­y on all sides, including now, Bush pushing the agreement fast track. Sorry to say, but the corporate news has slammed the gavel down. Issue Closed!
09:02 AM on 04/08/2008
I don't understand the lack of Union leadership outrage over this situation with Mark Penn in the Clinton campaign. All she did was "shuffle the deck" so to speak. This guy is still gonna do polling and provide "advice". Mark Penn needs to be GONE! I cannot put any trust in Clinton that she has the best interests of American union members as long as she refuses to part with this guy. And neither should the leadership of any union. I don't understand all the wailing about Obama's unpaid advisor's comments to some Canadian official, while the leader of Clinton's campaign is holding strategy meetings to get this onerous Columbian legislatio­n passed? She is basically spitting in the eye of the unions by moving this guy to the back room for a while till the heat (what little of it that has been generated) dies down. Is union leadership so in love with (or in fear of) the Clintons that they accept this with nary a whimper? WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE? The AFL-CIO ought to be hounding Clinton night and day to make a complete break with this guy. Somebody please explain to me why that is not happening.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
frappe
Obstruct the obstructionists - Vote Democratic!
09:11 AM on 04/08/2008
I agree and I've also wondered the same. Do they want their members to support a candidate who has been proven to be less than reliable on matters affecting free trade agreements which have proven to be the scourge of the union movement?
10:56 AM on 04/08/2008
But why is PENN the issue?

I much bigger issue is if Hillary is "against" free trade with Colombia the way she was "against" NAFTA. If this back door meeting was by a top Obama anti-union lobbyist the media would be all over it, implying duplicity. I don't understand why everyone is ignoring it with Clinton!

Serously, she's paying him millions and he's worked for the Clintons for over a decade! Why would anyone think he would suddenly do this without her knowledge and consent? Why isn't anyone ASKING HER???? The pitiful level of journalism at CNN is infuriatin­g.
04:28 PM on 04/09/2008
She was also against the war (or says she was) before she voted for it, then to extend it. But she also opposes any extensions­.