Clinton Firm's Deal Left Pennsylvania Churches In Shambles

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Clinton Firm's Deal Left Pennsylvania Churches In Shambles stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 04-10-08 01:00 PM   |   Updated: 04-18-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Chur

There is an old axiom of government: all politics is local.

And while the saying is cliché, it can certainly prove true. How else does one explain the connection between former President Clinton, a hot shot Italian real estate speculator, and several Pennsylvania church-buying ventures that went terribly wrong?

It began in 2005, when an aide to Clinton helped a young Italian businessman named Raffaello Follieri connected with the business of the former president and his pal Ron Burkle. Follieri had an idea: to buy and redevelop old Catholic churches that were struggling in the wake of sex-abuse scandals. And Yucaipa Companies, which Burkle ran and on which Clinton served as a senior adviser to two funds, came on board.

But the scheme, while in some cases profitable, was also a house of cards. Using the Yucaipa money, Follieri purchased a Philadelphia church that he subsequently let rot. In a separate purchase in Pittsburgh, he instructed the church to be gutted of all its religious objects, then failed to come up with the money needed to finalize the deal.

Follieri's standing was soon on the rocks. In April 2007, Burkle sued the Italian in a Delaware state court for allegedly misappropriating more than $1.3 million. Follieri, he claimed, was spending the money on a lavish lifestyle, including gifts for his movie-star girlfriend Anne Hathaway (of Devil Wears Prada fame). The suit has since been settled. Last week, however, Follieri was arrested and charged with trying to pass a bad $250,000 check.

By that time, any connection between Clinton and Follieri, however tangential, had been severed. The former president began the process of leaving Yucaipa in December 2007 -- in part, The Huffington Post was told, out of anger over the Follieri mess.

But the episode illustrated some of the unique perils of Clinton's post-presidential career. Indeed, at various points in this primary season, Bill Clinton's activities have put him at contrast with his wife's presidential campaign. Take, for instance, revelations this past week that he had been paid $800,000 for speeches by an organization promoting the Colombia Free Trade Agreement -- a pact Sen. Clinton continues to oppose.

The Follieri story is similarly dicey. As Sen. Clinton campaigns across Pennsylvania, two communities in the state's largest cities have been affected by the spoiled real estate venture overseen by her husband's business. And while Bill Clinton, as his aides point out, was never directly associated with the project -- "President Clinton was not involved with the purchase of Vatican properties," said his spokesperson Jay Carson -- the former president did make out quite well during his time with Yucaipa.

Story continues below
advertisement

According to recent tax filings, the former president earned $15.4 million from the private investment firm between 2003 and 2006.

* * *

In the fall of 2005, Follieri was introduced to Yucaipa through Bill Clinton's aide and gatekeeper Doug Band. The Italian claimed he had close ties to the Vatican that he would use to buy run down churches in need of new ownership. The Wall Street Journal reported that in exchange for Clinton and Burkle's help, Follieri offered to assist Sen. Hillary Clinton with the Catholic vote. The senator was not officially running for president at the time.

Soon after their meeting, Yucaipa invested $100 million in the Follieri Group. With those funds, Follieiri quickly purchased two church properties in Philadelphia. Both structures had long been dormant. And he promised sweeping changes, including environmental restoration and structural repairs.

Virtually none of it panned out.

At the Transfiguration Church, which cost the group more than $1 million, Follieri sought to create a "cultural center" in a working class neighborhood. But within a mater of months, things went south. The group did not provide basic upkeep and security. The site became an eyesore. Burglars broke into the church and its adjoining school. A local paper found the once-stately Roman Catholic parish had become a hangout for boozing teenagers, and eventually a homeless man started camping out under the rectory porch. In April 2006, a three-alarm fire was set to the school, forcing more than 100 firefighters to work three hours to put it out. The damage was immense and neighbors grew worried and angered at Follieri's absenteeism.

Frank Quintero, a spokesman for Yucaipa, said the company "made a good profit on the properties, by putting them in hands of responsible developers." As for Transfiguration, security there was no worse than that under prior owners, he said.

"That same homeless guy was probably milling around that church before we owned it and after we owned it," said Quintero. "It's not like we are miracle workers even though Follieri claimed to be in connection with the Vatican. These things take time."

But it was only after a scathing column in the Philadelphia Daily News that Follieri's representatives agreed to meet with the Transfiguration community. They promised more attention and offered a new proposal, to make the site affordable housing. That idea, however, was met with community opposition and like the cultural center it never materialized. Follieiri eventually bowed out. According to city records, Transfiguration was sold in May 2007 for the price of $1.25 million. Currently, it houses the Boys Latin Charter School.

"They were absentee landlords who didn't keep track of what was happening or care," Chris Brennan, the reporter who broke the story of Follieri's mishandling of the church, told The Huffington Post. "When they received some bad publicity from the Daily News, they got moving."

Another Follieri Pennsylvania venture was equally disastrous. In the fall of 2006, the Follieri Group offered a bid on St. Nicholas Church in Pittsburgh, a 108-year-old building and historic city landmark. The church was a staple of the Croatian community, and in 2005, the newly formed Croatian American Cultural and Economic Alliance tried unsuccessfully to buy the building for $250,000. Their bid, observers say, fell through after Follieri promised more money.

2008-04-10-group.jpgAs part of his plan for the property, Follieri had the church undergo massive internal changes. In the spring of 2007, all religious objects including the altar and statues were removed, and the murals were painted over. The community reacted with uproar.

"It is a very touchy subject. It was something that not just Croatians but many people in Pittsburgh had invested in," said Patricia Lowry, a reporter for the Pittsburgh Post Gazette who wrote about St. Nicholas's deconstruction. "People thought that the church should have found a way to sell the building to the Croatians because it was a big part of their heritage."

It was only after the church was gutted that the Follieri Group's financial problems were exposed. In May 2007, Burkle sued and it was revealed just how little cash Follieri had on hand. St. Nicholas held out hope that the deal would still go through. But by March 2008, it became clear that the money simply wasn't there.

Quintero, again, said that Yucaipa had worked to make all of its investments profitable, and that the conditions of the buildings often posed obstacles to their reconstruction.

"Some of the newspaper stuff is inaccurate," he said. "The other thing to keep in mind is that when we bought these properties, they were all dilapidated."

But local officials, at least in Pittsburgh, were nevertheless distraught over the way the transaction was handled. Years after it first bid on the church (the value of the property stayed, according to city records, at $70,200), the Croatian community is once again trying to buy ownership.

"You make all this publicity that Foliieri is buying it and then they don't," said Susan Petrick, secretary of Preserve Croatian Heritage Foundation in Pittsburgh. "They took out the pews that were non-religious. They took out the altars which were marble, they took out the statues and the confessionals...one would hope they would put them all back in, but I don't know about there intention."

* * *

By the time that the St. Nicholas deal fell through, Bill Clinton had already begun the process of divesting himself from Yucaipa. Depending on how certain funds perform, he stands in line to make millions of dollars in addition to the $15.4 million he has already earned.

"Regarding the status of President Clinton's relationship with Yucaipa," explained spokesman Jay Carson, "with the Presidential campaign in full swing the President is taking steps to ensure that there is an appropriate transition for his business relationships should Senator Clinton become the Democratic nominee."

The former president was not associated with the business aspects of the Folierri investment. His involvement, to the extent that there was any, was limited to his position as a senior adviser to Yucaipa. And while he and Follieri met on several occasions -- Follieri was individually called on stage and thanked by Clinton after pledging money for a Clinton Global Initiative project in New Orleans -- the former president does meet "hundreds of people every day," as Carson told The Huffington Post. "President Clinton, who meets with many people every day, has met Follieri several times."

Nevertheless, the Follieri episode had its affects on Clinton. A source with knowledge of why he left Yucaipa said the former president was embarrassed when news of the church-buying venture broke the same morning that world and business leaders were convening to discuss Clinton's global foundation.

He was also concerned that this episode and his broader association with Yucaipa had the potential of creating bad publicity for his wife's presidential bid. And as the Pennsylvania primary approaches, it remains to be seen if those concerns were merited.

Requests for comment from Follieri and officials with the Follieri Group went unanswered. Despite having been sued and severed from Burkle's firm, the contact information on the company's website turned out to be the phone number for Yucaipa Companies.

There is an old axiom of government: all politics is local. And while the saying is cliché, it can certainly prove true. How else does one explain the connection between former President Clinton, a ...
There is an old axiom of government: all politics is local. And while the saying is cliché, it can certainly prove true. How else does one explain the connection between former President Clinton, a ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
325
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

what a paradox.

Hilary clinton calling Obama an "elitist"

A multi-millionaire (over a hundred mil in disclosed wealth) calling a guy who chose public service rather than a blazing career on Wall Street an elitist !

Wow...that takes the cake

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 04/14/2008
- Meggie I'm a Fan of Meggie 80 fans permalink
photo

now that he's rich and famous enough to be running with this crowd, we see this character flaw that had him screwing anything he could get ahold of on a larger scale. he's out of control with no good judgement except to look like a rich playboy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 04/11/2008
- Pharos I'm a Fan of Pharos 9 fans permalink

Guilt by association. Isn't that the justification terrorists use for attacking innocent civilians?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 04/11/2008
- K-Dog76 I'm a Fan of K-Dog76 8 fans permalink

Pharos, The difference. innocent civilians won't be sleeping in the White House. So no this isn't really guilt by association, especially since there are laws the protect people from implicating their spouses... why? Becaus a married couple is considered a single unit... hence filing joint tax returns. Hillary profits from everything Bill does, so go suck on a logic egg.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 04/11/2008
- mcnairbo I'm a Fan of mcnairbo 8 fans permalink

Looks like the Huffington Post has it's own little "Arkansas Project" going here. Who's funding all your smear allegations ? or is your stable of nerds just making this shit up from their vivid imaginations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 04/11/2008
- Susan1968 I'm a Fan of Susan1968 13 fans permalink


I'm surprised you got your post in, mcnairbo.

I posted similar poinst -- they disappeared. Maybe huffpo editors were on their latte break.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 04/11/2008
- Raisean I'm a Fan of Raisean 2 fans permalink

So Bill just went out saying that Hillary wrote her Bosnia speech at 11 at night. And that is wasn't her fault that she forgot that she didn't get shot at! BS... I've said it once and I'll say it again... I've had a gun to my head all because the man wanted my purse, I will never forget or mistaken that! Never! This is such BS... This is a down right offense to anyone who has ever been shot at or a gun pointed at them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 04/11/2008
- K-Dog76 I'm a Fan of K-Dog76 8 fans permalink

Raisean well said. And if Clinton can't get her thoughts straight at 11 pm whats to happen when the phone rings at 3 am?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 04/11/2008

how about a whole line of products with a WWBD on it. with barack being so pure and noble and all he certainly is a jesus for athiests

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 04/11/2008

hey, i got a great campaign slogan for barack. Barack Obama, a jesus for athiests

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 04/11/2008
- joja I'm a Fan of joja 12 fans permalink

flasher --

Mark Penn, is that you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 04/11/2008
- Meggie I'm a Fan of Meggie 80 fans permalink
photo

pretty desperate move to blame Obama for Bill Clinton's bad judgement

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 04/11/2008
photo

It has become obvious through hired help like Penn and others that the Clinton's are not concerned about policy or doing what is right for the majority of Americans but rather their primary goal appears to be how much money can they accumulate by selling their influence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 04/11/2008
- StephenS I'm a Fan of StephenS 4 fans permalink

If the Hillary Clinton only cared about wealth, Hillary Clinton would not need to run for president. Bill was making lots of money before she announced in 2007.

By the way, when do you think Obama will finally give us figures for his 2007 income? The Clintons gave out preliminary 2007 data weeks ago, but the Obamas have released nothing.

I expect the Obamas made $2 million to $3 million in 2007. If the Obamas donated to charity at the Clintons' 2007 rate of about 14.7%, then they earned about $1.6 million. But if Obama gave again that his own personal best rate of 6.1%, then they earned $3.9 million.

Obama said he'll release before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary. If he thinks the numbers will be controversial, he'll release this Friday afternoon or next Friday afternoon. If he thinks they'll look good, I expect him to release April 15 or April 16.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 04/11/2008
- joja I'm a Fan of joja 12 fans permalink

stephen --

Your post is a joke, right?

The Clintons didn't donate jack shit! They funnelled $10 million into their own foundation, dumbfuck!

As the laws are written, they only have to disburse 5% of the money a year, and the records show they've only done so in heavily contested primary states, right before an election. Coincidence? I think not.

Since you're so hot and bothered about the Obamas' 2007 returns, why only a "summary" from the Clintons? Why not the whole return?

And why, oh why, won't the Clintons release their donor list from the prez library? What -- or better yet -- who are they trying to hide?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 04/11/2008
- K-Dog76 I'm a Fan of K-Dog76 8 fans permalink

StephenS- Hillary doesn't just care about wealth, she cares about power... not doing good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/11/2008
- tedbear I'm a Fan of tedbear 6 fans permalink

To Stephen S.: What are you saying, guy? To the greedy there is never, ever, enough money. That is why the wealthy just keep on plugging away, that is why Hillary and Bill want back into the White House. They can clean up like they did before, on the taxpayer's money, just like their best friends the Bushes!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 04/11/2008
- vincealy I'm a Fan of vincealy 4 fans permalink

The media just refuses to cover the shady finances of the Clintons in any real detail. Time to look into who donated to the Clinton foundation and why .?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 04/11/2008
- dawlishgal I'm a Fan of dawlishgal 210 fans permalink
photo

We moved back to Pittsburgh recently after having been gone for a decade and a half. I was shocked when I saw what had happened to that historic and (formerly) lovely old church. Now we know who to blame.

Nothing surprises me anymore about the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 04/11/2008
- joja I'm a Fan of joja 12 fans permalink

OK, Clintonistas, you've been trying to push the Obama-Rezko thing for months now.

How does this compare?

You're a bunch of hypocritical big-mouths, that's all! But I expect nothing less from anyone who would still support two, wily, old con artists like the Clintons. You share their same character flaws -- it's, therefore, understandable.

One day, you'll figure out how badly you've been played by them -- and you'll come to the same conclusion the rest of us did, when we realized that constantly having to defend the Clintons and their actions, just isn't worth it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 04/11/2008
- StephenS I'm a Fan of StephenS 4 fans permalink

It does not seem to compare with Obama-Rezko at all.

Bill Clinton had no personal relationship, involvement in the business of, or business transactions with Raffaello. Bill Clinton did meet Raffaello, and it was one of Bill Clinton's aides who helped Raffaello go into business in 2005 with Yucaipa before Raffaello proved to be incompetent and/or dishonest.

If you go back and actually read the story, you would know the following:

In 2005, a Bill Clinton aide helped Raffaello go into business with Yucaipa Companies (where Bill Clinton was an extremely well-paid senior adviser to two funds) to buy and re-purpose Catholic Church properties. Raffaello did a terrible job, and in 2007 Yucaipa's head Burkle sued Raffaello for misappropriating $1.3 million.

Bill Clinton had nothing to do with the Raffaello purchases. Bill Clinton had begun divesting himself from Yucaipa before the biggest mess became known.

Hillary Clinton probably never met Raffaello. Bill Clinton met him several times. He once called him up on stage after he pledged money for a Clinton Global Initiative project in New Orleans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 04/11/2008
- joja I'm a Fan of joja 12 fans permalink

stephen --

You've learned well from the masters -- Bill & Hillary -- Luke!

You really dodged that one!

Oh, wait a minute -- you forgot Ron Burkle! He's YOUR Rezko!

Enjoy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 04/11/2008
- K-Dog76 I'm a Fan of K-Dog76 8 fans permalink

StephenS apparently you missed the part about Bill raking in about @15 mil from the whole deal. Taking from the poor to give to the poor isn't a bright idea in my book either, which seems to be the Cliunton tack you support.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 04/11/2008

I can't believe how dumb Bill and Ron Burkle are. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to discover Follieri is a bum. I guess Ron Burkle is not that frugal with Other People's Money (OPM).

Moreover, he was attractive because of his "Vatican connections"? Whoaaa!!!! Sleaze.....just plain sleaze.....

I suggest you google Follieri......this guy is way out there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 04/11/2008
- dawlishgal I'm a Fan of dawlishgal 210 fans permalink
photo

I noticed that 'vatican connections"thing too...Apparently, Clinton and his crooked business partners actually thought that hooking up with somebody who could use such connections to rip off the Catholic church was a GOOD THING TO DO. Shocking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 04/11/2008
photo

The PETER PAUL vs. CLINTONS fraud lawsuit in the California court system starts April 24th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 04/11/2008
- K-Dog76 I'm a Fan of K-Dog76 8 fans permalink

Texas4O
Sweet! There will be blood... but the Clintons have a way of turning blood into Bloody Marys...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 04/11/2008
- KQuark I'm a Fan of KQuark 266 fans permalink
photo

I thought Hillary promised that Bill Clinton was completely vetted and she promised no more scandals. Both Clintons are looking at the white house as their next big cha-ching so they can rise to billionaire status.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 04/11/2008
- shelobo I'm a Fan of shelobo 8 fans permalink

Hillarys reasons for wanting the white house back is revenge.Bill and her both hated the fact that some of their so called 'friends' were FOR impeaching him,she dislikes them because the ones who impeached him made the whole Monica affair PUBI,and humiliated her and blew the whistle on him.Even a monkey should be able to see through her reasons and his.And why the media has not been all over Eltons Johns remarks like they were Wrights is odd.I think the media is guilty of racial baised reporting,Johns white ,so it's ok to call AMERICANS WOMEN HATERS? And Hillary meekly replied that this race IS about gender AND race ? Whats up with her suddenly saying anything when she kept her mouth shut for so long and was saying it wasn't about race and sudddenly says it is??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 04/11/2008
- northcan I'm a Fan of northcan 9 fans permalink

Nafta wasn't to have jobs shipped oversees, but Clinton yrs...several foreign company's had private dealing with Clinton, when Gov. in Arkansas.also. Same guys. Chinese partners..­.Indonesia­, Nicuaragua. He had partnered with 'high rollers'...then gave China....."favored nation" status, which benefited Chinese companies oversees. Paid millions, Hillary also. This always 2 for 1 operation.. 'shady' , unethical, corrupt schemes.
People putting 40 years of 'the same criminals' or 'watchlist' contributors, together. I believe it's the blogs, now it informs voters. Many say, Bill is a 'cokehead', but who knows, certainly would explain his dealings in Arkansas with drugs. I've always felt ....drugs and money laundering were involved.
As far as Canada. NAFTA was Hillary trying to sabotage Obama's campaign by leaking info to Cdn Embassy. Liberal party in Canada furious re: 'leaks' , apparently thru Conservative operative at Embassy to Cdn Parliament. P.M. Steven Harper on Senate floor, apologized to Barack Obama, he said was "dishonest, outrageous untruth's, twisted information" given to his office by Clinton operative. I told several media.....and you know...they didn't even check it out.

Some, who support Hillary still using this 'leak' against Obama. Crazy when the media is so biased.. .and Hillary whining about media bias. Elton John last night at a fundraiser said some in America are mysogenis. By the way...I'm a woman...who, has followed this callous couple for 20 plus years. It is always drama. Some, mentioned she is clinically narcissistic, I think they both are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 04/10/2008

Don’t know about narcism, but she must have some neurological disorder that makes her head bob like a bobble head dolls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 04/11/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect