3 killed in militant attack on Afghan president

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

AMIR SHAH | April 27, 2008 02:26 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Relatives surrounded the body of Nasir Ahmad Latefi, a local Shiite leader, who was killed in a attack against the Afghan President Hamid Karzai during a ceremony marking the 16th anniversary the defeat of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in Kabul, Afghanistan on Sunday, April 27, 2008 Suspected Taliban militants attacked a ceremony attended by the Afghan president on Sunday, unleashing automatic weapons and rocket fire that sent foreign dignitaries and senior members of the government fleeing for cover. Three people were killed, including a lawmaker, and eight others were wounded in the attack. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)

KABUL, Afghanistan — Militants firing rockets and automatic rifles attacked the Afghan president at a ceremony in Kabul on Sunday, missing their target but killing three and wounding eight others.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the assault that sent President Hamid Karzai and foreign ambassadors scurrying for cover, underscoring the fragile grip of his U.S.-backed government.

Gunmen opened fire as a 21-gun salute echoed over the capital at an anniversary ceremony to mark the mujahedeen victory over the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

Hundreds of people, including army and police that had formed an honor guard inspected by Karzai minutes earlier, fled in chaos as shots rang out. The president was hustled away, surrounded by bodyguards, and left in a convoy of four black SUVs.

The gunfire apparently came from a three-story guesthouse, popular with migrant laborers, about 300 yards from the stands where Karzai was seated alongside Cabinet ministers and senior diplomats, who all escaped unharmed. A U.S. Embassy official confirmed U.S. Ambassador William Wood was also not hurt.

A lawmaker who was about 30 yards from the president was killed in the attack.

Residents reported that a 30-minute gunbattle broke out between security forces and gunmen holed up in the guesthouse, located in a neighborhood of ruined mud brick buildings.

Defense Minister Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak said three attackers were killed by security forces, and assault rifles and machine guns were confiscated.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujaheed said six militants were deployed to target the president, and three of those militants died in the attack. He said they were armed with guns, rockets and suicide vests although no suicide bombings were reported.

The initial moments of the attack, which came as a marching band played the finale of the national anthem, were broadcast live until TV transmissions were cut. Hundreds of dignitaries could be seen diving for cover. Two lawmakers were hit by the gunfire. One of the men slumped back in his seat, while the other lay on the ground.

Less than two hours later, Karzai appeared on state-run TV and said "everything is OK."

Appearing calm, Karzai said "the enemy of Afghanistan" tried to disrupt the ceremony but was thwarted by security forces. He said several suspects were arrested and smiled as he signed off his brief recorded statement.

About 100 people were rounded up for questioning, an Afghan intelligence official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to media.

Associated Press reporters saw a half dozen people, who appeared to be migrant laborers from northern Afghanistan, sitting in the back of a police van outside the guesthouse, which was pocked with bullet holes. Windows were smashed, and police barred the reporters from entering.

The militant attack, the first in the capital since mid-March, came despite unprecedented tight security for Sunday's celebrations. In January, three Taliban suicide attackers hit Kabul's upscale Serena Hotel, killing eight people, including an American.

For days Kabul was ringed by checkpoints with security forces and plainclothes intelligence officials searching vehicles. The area where the ceremonies took place had been blocked by troops, tanks and armored personnel carriers, and was closed to the general public.

The live coverage of the assassination attempt will add to the sense of insecurity in the Afghan capital, which has been spared the worst of the violence as fighting has escalated between Taliban insurgents and NATO and U.S.-led forces.

The fighting left about 8,000 dead last year, mostly militants in the south and east of the country, where Karzai's government has only a tenuous grip and little public support.

NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer joined several foreign leaders, including some from neighboring Pakistan, in condemning Sunday's attack.

"The Taliban has demonstrated once again that they will use the most extreme violence to oppose Afghanistan's freedom and democratic development," de Hoop Scheffer said in a statement.

The presidency said Nasir Ahmad Latefi, a local Shiite leader, and a 10-year boy died in the attack. Lawmaker Fazel Rahman Samkanai died of his injuries at a hospital, Defense Ministry spokesman Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi said.

Taliban spokesman Mujaheed said the insurgents had managed to penetrate the security cordon and reach the national stadium near the parade area where the event was held.

He said BM-12 missiles _ a crude rocket launched from a small platform _ were used in the attack. He spoke to an AP reporter by phone from an undisclosed location.

Mohammad Saleh Saljoqi, a lawmaker at the ceremony, said there was continuous AK-47 fire, and one rocket, which he described as a rocket-propelled grenade, hit inside the Eid Gah mosque opposite where Karzai was sitting. Another rocket struck after the president had already left, about 50 yards away.

Karzai, who has led Afghanistan since soon after a U.S.-led invasion ousted the Taliban regime in 2001, has escaped several assassination attempts.

His narrowest escape since he became president came in September 2002 when a gunman opened fire at close quarters as he visited the southern city of Kandahar. Three people, including the gunman, died in that attack.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Pennington, Rahim Faiez, Fisnik Abrashi and Alisa Tang in Kabul and Noor Khan in Kandahar contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
53
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

"Afghan President", more like the American installed mayor of Kabul. Good luck getting NATO to contribute troops to this mess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 04/28/2008

Since he escaped unharmed...............

The Hit was Obviously a CIA operation

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 04/28/2008

Better get another puppet ready.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 04/28/2008

We could have been kicking the Talaban's ass and be do mop-up operations, if the chimp in the WH hadn't lied to the American and took into an unnecessary war.

Impeach Bu&h and Darth Vader, or better yet wait until after Obama and the dems win the WH and increase their control of congress. Then we can try these two clowns and members of their close nit cabinet for WAR CRIMES.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 04/27/2008

Magisterludi
I agree with you , the solution for Afghanistan is rebuilding and fast . but so far for 8 Years we have seen nothing but empty promises . the US and Nato forces should have taken advantage of the quiet years and rebuilt , and created jobs , and showed the people they really mean their welfare and not the caspian Sea Oil reserves . the violence only restarted for the last 2 years . so what have they done since 2001 ? nothing but more "collateral" damages on poor Villages and mud houses . now even the Average Afghani who despised the Taliban is now joining them and offering them accomodation and food .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 04/27/2008

Judging from Afghani history and the fact that nobody has been successful in ruling the country outside the major cities, the only strategy was to get in capture and destroy al Qaida and get out ASAP.

Colonialism is dead. It died in WW II, although it took some time for most westerners to realize that fact. No modern nation will subject itself to foreign occupation. Whether by the USA, NATO or the UN. Call it what you will, foreign occupation is foreign occupation.

But probably the WORST place on earth to try and occupy is Afghanistan. Well, maybe second worst nation. Viet Nam being the first.

Afghani's don't care to be ruled by a government composed by Afghanis. What makes anyone think that foreigners could accomplish it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 04/28/2008

What should be in the "news" is Pres. Karzai's call for the U.S. and its allies to stop military operations in Afghanistan without approval from the government.
Why does the corporate media ignore it when the Afghanis call for the U.S. to stop operations in their counry? (last Friday) And, why did most of the media ignore the call of the Iraq gov't for the U.S. to get out of Iraq? (May, 2007, reported in the NYT)

They don't want us there. We aren't even pretending to be going after Osama's Al Qaeda forces, but instead we go after the Taliban and Sadr's militia, or whichever sect we ally ourselves with this month. Why is it that under the Bush regime we can't get anything right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 04/27/2008

My guess is that Cheney didn't get his cut of this month's opium sales.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 04/27/2008

How sad, when a joke just might have some truthiness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/27/2008

LOL. Don't mess with El Heffe Ricardo Escobar Cheney's money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 04/27/2008

It's spelled Jefe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 04/27/2008

Good luck to Karzai. We've put him in an untenable position. He's "our guy", but without any real support. Some 22 year old guy is supplying them with 40 year old weapons. Then we have ammunition mistakenly being dropped to the Taliban. He has every right to complain as he did just before this attempt. He's fortunate to have survived this long.

Remember, Afghanistan was the first, yet forgotten, war target after 9/11. Iraq was suddenly named the source of all the trouble and the big war went there, leaving Afghanistan the poor stepchild.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 04/27/2008

Good thing the that Bush got rid of the Taliban instead of invading Iraq...oh wait, that didn't happen?
How can the current mis-administration still be allowed to breathe and waste oxygen, dollars & Lives?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 04/27/2008

Yeah, it's not like assassination attempts happen anywhere else in the world...oh wait.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 04/27/2008

Always have another rationalization ready, awcky?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 AM on 04/28/2008

Yesterday, Karzai was very critical of the AMERICAN conduct in this war of occupation in his home country. This is probably just a friendly reminder for him to shut up and behave. A friendly reminder from the Nazis who have occupied his country. Why does the world hate America?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 04/27/2008

USA had nothing to do with the Karzai assassination attempt. Your heroes the Taliban did.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2238428.stm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 04/27/2008

For your last question, perhaps you could ask your own country's troops if you see one on the street, why does everyone hate your country as well? After all, they went right along and did the same thing in both countries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 04/27/2008

Do you know where I am even from CC1?
My country has a bloody cruel history, that was recently turned up side down. Things are messy, but improving. The transition from tyranny to democracy was originally opposed by the USA, and was made more difficult by you as well. But how typical of a thin skinned easily offended American to change the subject. The subject is your cruelty in Afghanistan, your cruelty in Iraq, and your lust for more blood and profit in Iran. And though I doubt you are even capable of reading anything critical of your bloody nation, try this if you have any guts or curiosity. It explains how bad things are in your sick country.
http://www.alternet.org/story/83555/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 04/27/2008

Not changing the subject, merely pointing out another fact. Things are improving? Hmmm..... http://www.stopboergenocide.com/index2.html if my guess is correct. I was a teenager when the events you're probably referring to happened.

Back to the other point - I'm not thin skinned or in denial, nor do I personally lust for blood/profit, I've repeatedly been in protests against both wars. Yes, I already know everything stated in that article. I hate my government, have since 2001. It's a tad unfair however to stereotype and hate us all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 04/27/2008

Perhaps you could ask your country's troops why they need American troops to save them from real nazis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 04/27/2008

Who are the real Nazis?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 AM on 04/28/2008

Forget it, you can't point out facts to this individual without being accused of changing the subject. This guy conveniently forgets that other countries have actually done wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 04/27/2008



5 years and trillions of dollars and where are we?

The problem with Afghanistan was that the Taliban tolerated foreigners like Bin Laden although much of the population did not. We should just cut a deal with the clan heads that they keep foreigners out and we will leave Afghanistan alone. I don't know if that can succeed but I think the effort to impose a Soviet style democracy on Afghanistan at the point of a gun is not succeeding either so maybe we should try.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 04/27/2008

okay i'll be the conspirator here. i wonder if it was one of the thousands of weapons that america has lost over there that was used to try and assasinate karzai. the longer this 'losing battle' goes on the more reason we have to stay over there. till one day you hear .... butta bing butta BOOM it's bomb bomb bomb ... bomb bomb iran. it's all been set up in advance people. stability is not the goal ... it's chaos and imperialism in the modern era.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 04/27/2008

I wonder how much of the violence blamed on the Taliban is in reality opium growers protecting their crops.

And how much is Afghani anarchy. After all the central government in Afghanistan has never projected it's power much beyond the major cities. How much of what is blamed on the Taliban is simply local landowners officials and religious types keeping the government at bay for their own local purposes.

And how likely is that an Afghani, any Afghani would take up their weapons and shoot at foreign troops? No matter the political or religious leanings of that person.

Also, how different are the Taliban from your average Afghani religious fundamentalists?

My point is: If we could capture Bin Ladin and the rest of the al Qaida criminals I wonder if we couldn't exit Afghanistan promptly. And if that was the case could Afghani's work thing out by themselves?

The Afghani people deserve better from the world. We used them as pawns in our Cold War. Then left hem to kill each other after our goals were met. Now we are occupying their country. for our own purposes. Something that cannot be popular.

How do we make it up to the people of Afghanistan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 04/27/2008

One rifleman or sniper with a suitable weapon would have made this a sure thing. Military rifle matches once used rifles with open sights, not scopes, at 500 yards. If you could see him you could kill him. With a scope you could pick your spot. Either the target was not Karzai or someone was just plain incompetent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 04/27/2008

Karzai, the Mayor of Kabul survived. Thank God

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 04/27/2008

Shots from a building hundreds of yards away? This is sniper stuff. I'd expect the target was one or both of the legislators killed. Exploring that assumption may shed some light into the emplacement of the sniper in the midst of a secured area.Will we have answered why the dead suspects had missiles and didn't use them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 04/27/2008

An AK 47 even with an open battle is pretty lethal at 300 yds, in the hands of someone somewhat proficient. If it was within 300 yds then it didn't need a sniper. The thing is, you would suppose that the security ring should have encompassed an area large enough to prevent an attack of any kind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/27/2008

The one general running for his life is my doorman on weekends.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 04/27/2008

Nice one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 04/27/2008

So much for the principle of advancing in the direction of an attack, judging from the number of Afghan troops with rifles running away. After all, Afghanistan is only a war zone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 04/27/2008

I bet all the Afghan troops running away with their rifles did not have ammo in the rifles, so as not to get a repeat of Sadat.
Only Karzai's security detail had the loaded guns, and the rest of the troops were chopped liver. That's my assumption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 04/27/2008

An attack by the Taliban on an important anniversary. Who could have foreseen or predicted this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 04/27/2008

"It's a clusterfuck, sir." - Gunnery Sergeant Highway (Clint Eastwood)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 04/27/2008

Karzai is the elected head of the Afghan people. The attackers are scum who would never get elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 04/27/2008

Who elected Karzai? He was probably unknown to most Afghans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 AM on 04/28/2008

Karzai is an American puppet who was on the board of directors of Unocal oil, but I wonder if he is deciding to get friendly with different thugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 04/27/2008