Microsoft May Go Hostile In Bid For Yahoo, Says Report

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Microsoft May Go Hostile In Bid For Yahoo, Says Report stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL LIEDTKE | May 2, 2008 07:55 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft Corp. finally dangled a higher takeover bid in front of Yahoo Inc. Friday, hoping to reach a friendly deal after weeks of saber rattling.

The Redmond, Wash.-based software maker upped its offer beyond the original value of $44.6 billion, or $31 per share, according to a person familiar with the matter. The specifics of the new offer weren't known by this person, who didn't want to be identified because the negotiations are still confidential.

The New York Times, citing unnamed sources, reported Microsoft boosted the offer by "by several dollars" per share, lending weight to the assertion by many market analysts that Microsoft can afford to pay up to $35 a share.

Representatives from Microsoft and Yahoo declined to comment on the negotiations. The talks were expected to continue into the weekend.

In an intriguing twist, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates and Yahoo President Susan Decker were both expected to be in Omaha, Neb. this weekend to attend Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s annual meeting. Both Gates and Decker are on the board of the company led by famed investor Warren Buffett.

The prospect of a sweetened offer lifted Yahoo shares 80 cents in extended trading after surging $1.86, or nearly 7 percent, to finish the regular session at $28.67.

Sunnyvale-based Yahoo began pressing for a higher offer shortly after Microsoft made its unsolicited bid in February. That offer, which was made half in cash and half in stock, is currently valued at $42.3 billion, or $29.40 per share, reflecting the decline in Microsoft shares since it began its pursuit of the Internet pioneer.

Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer had held firm, insisting the original offer was fair in light of Yahoo's eroding profits during the past two years. He threatened an attempt to oust Yahoo's board if the 10 directors, including Chief Executive Jerry Yang, didn't accept the offer by April 26.

Story continues below

Now that Yahoo has forced the issue by letting the deadline pass, Ballmer appears ready to put more money on the table.

Microsoft's board reportedly met earlier this week to consider raising the bid as high as $33 per share, or about $47.5 billion.

Several of Yahoo's shareholders are reportedly holding out for at least $35 per share, a price that would value the deal at about $50 billion.

Microsoft offered to buy Yahoo for about $40 per share during confidential discussions held in early 2007, but Yahoo's struggles since then make it unlikely the revised bid will be that high.

In a comments to Microsoft employees Thursday, Ballmer said he has a price in mind but didn't reveal it.

"I know exactly what I think Yahoo is worth to me, exactly," Ballmer told the employees, according to a transcript filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "I won't go a dime above, and I will go to what I think it's worth if that gets the deal done."

Most analysts have predicted all along that Microsoft eventually would buy Yahoo for $32 to $35 per share, so the news of Friday's negotiations wasn't a major surprise.

"It's all going according to script," said Ken Marlin, a New York investment banker specializing in technology deals.

The outcome of the weekend talks will likely ripple across the Internet.

If Microsoft and Yahoo shake hands on a deal, it will mark a significant step toward uniting two high-tech powerhouses whose online services are used by more than 500 million people worldwide. An amicable transaction also would make it easier to meld the two companies' disparate technologies and cultures.

Should the two sides remain at loggerheads, Microsoft could still try to force a sale by trying to replace Yahoo's board with 10 directors more inclined to approve a deal.

But that risky maneuver, known as a proxy contest, would likely entail several months of mudslinging with no guarantee of success.

Even if Microsoft were to prevail in a hostile takeover, it could wind up with buyer's remorse because the hard feelings provoked by the battle would drive off many of the Yahoo employees needed to make the deal pay off, said Arthur Dudley, a New York lawyer specializing in mergers and acquisitions.

"The trick for Microsoft is to figure out where the tipping point is," Dudley said. "They probably don't want to do a hostile takeover and just wind up with some more computer software and a bunch of empty desks."

Ballmer also has said Microsoft might simply withdraw its offer and walk away from Yahoo. Most analysts doubt Microsoft will give up the chase because Yahoo's still-prized Internet franchise would give the software maker its best chance to chip away at Google Inc.'s dominance of the booming Internet search and advertising market.

Google's specter may have prodded Microsoft's higher bid. Yahoo is reportedly nearing a long-term deal that would allow Google to sell ads on its Web site. Although the alliance might be blocked by antitrust obstacles, Microsoft likely wouldn't want to risk the chance of Google gaining access to Yahoo's vast audience.

Yahoo executives think the company is well positioned to bounce back from its recent malaise, but Dudley doubts the company's board will resist Microsoft if its new offer is sweet enough.

"Yahoo's board won't have a lot of choice if the price is right," Dudley said. "Now, everyone is just scratching their heads trying to figure out what the number is."

___

AP Technology Writer Jessica Mintz in Seattle contributed to this story.

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft Corp. finally dangled a higher takeover bid in front of Yahoo Inc. Friday, hoping to reach a friendly deal after weeks of saber rattling. The Redmond, Wash.-based soft...
SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft Corp. finally dangled a higher takeover bid in front of Yahoo Inc. Friday, hoping to reach a friendly deal after weeks of saber rattling. The Redmond, Wash.-based soft...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
36
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- wordvarc I'm a Fan of wordvarc 32 fans permalink

.

MS, like it's operating system Vista, is now belligerent, obtuse, and clumsy. I'll use Google the day MS locks it's death grip on yahoo's neck.

Time to try Leopard or Linux for elegance, stability, and reliability.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 05/02/2008

Microsoft would ruin Yahoo.

Balmer recently said "Vista is a work in progress." Imagine if some other company released a flawed product and then used its monopoly power to foist it on consumers, which is exactly what that comment says they are doing, considering the fact that MS will set out to ruin any PC manufacturer that demands the right to continue putting the far superior XP on its products.

This is the same guy that once said that the rise of open source software is evil, or something like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 05/02/2008

Yahoo and Microsoft are a lot more similar than most would realize. Both companies are one giant Kludge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 05/02/2008

Another great photo of Ballmer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 05/02/2008
- kawreader I'm a Fan of kawreader 2 fans permalink

Yikes. Do any of these people commenting actually work at large companies? Know anything about business and capitalism?

Read a bit about outsourcing and it's effect on countries, not just the businesses that initially benefit from it. "It is maxim of every prudent master of a family never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy...What is prudence in the conduct of every private family can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom. If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage.” -Adam Smith

You live in a market economy, that means you have to find a skill that is valuable and you need to keep up with the changes. So, if someone finds a way to do your job for less money you have to think through a new product you can offer. This is how the United States keeps up with other countries in regards to innovation, health care, and GDP...among other things. It's too easy to appeal to emotions and look at the short-run effects of outsourcing. In the long-run, living standards rise for countries engaged in international trade and outsourcing.

You live in a fantasy world if you think Microsoft is going anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 05/02/2008

Basketweaving? Is that a marketable skill?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/02/2008
photo

Had it not been for Microsoft the computer would still be a luxury item. All you Microsoft haters give respect to the Man.

He made it possible for a lot of small vendors to eat bread!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 05/02/2008

Meanwhile, in the real world... Windows is disappearing from my desktop. I have one Windows and three Linux boxes running in my office. The one Windows box will stay, just like the ancient DOS boxes in our facilities are still around. It's called "fossilization". You hang on to all the geological layers of your equipment until they all die while augmenting them with the better new stuff. In this case the better new stuff is Linux. I don't mind M$ sticking around as an online advertisement company. I never click on any of those links, anyway. If they can buy Yahoo and find enough suckers to pay for web ads that few people ever read, more power to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 05/02/2008

Microsoft wants to take over the world!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 05/02/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 668 fans permalink
photo

I always root for the little guy, go Micro !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 05/02/2008
- KOisGod I'm a Fan of KOisGod 349 fans permalink
photo

Micro$oft needs to get BIG into the portals since their's garners few users and their ad revenue is paultry compared to Google.

And they are not doing well with making inroads into the Corp world with Vista, very slow adaption. What a hog it is, people hate it and are NOT upgrading to it, they are staying with XP professional.

So M$ - FIX Vista, or continue to give back users to Apples OS 10X

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 05/02/2008

Hope they fix whatever is plaguing their OS with the next release. They really need to get rid of all the excess bloat on ther OS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/02/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

The market told Microsoft what they thought of this deal. Microsoft's value has decreased by the amount of the deal since it was announced. Everyone thinks it's stupid. Microsoft is very quick to forget what happened when they bought SoftImage. Microsoft is yet another crumbling, decrepit empire, ready to collapse under its own weight. They have become disfunctional, releasing new products with less functionality than the products they replace. The Windows operating system is a software development disaster of epic proportions. Previous fiascoes like OS360 and Multics pale in comparison. Even Microsoft has no clue on how to proceed with their mess. Their only legacy will be lessons in how to not design systems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 05/02/2008
- cynic I'm a Fan of cynic 7 fans permalink

Don't count on it. Microsoft has so much cash, and so much market clout that it really doesn't matter how much they screw up. It will take at least a decade for any internal rot to become evident in any reduction in their global influence.
If you haven't noticed they keep expanding into every possible software and systems niche in existence or even imagined. They have the money to do it, so they are. Deal with it. Microsoft is here to stay.

I even met someone who bought a Zune...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 05/02/2008

You saw a Zune? Was it alive??? I thought that was this mythological creature which looks like a 1950's piece of furniture and can sometimes play DRM'ed files.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 05/02/2008

"Microsoft has so much cash, and so much market clout that it really doesn't matter how much they screw up."

Fifteen years ago, people said the same thing about Novell. Twenty-five years ago, people said the same thing about US Steel. Thirty-five years ago, people said the same thing about Chevrolet. All of them are hollow shells today. Reality has a way of having its way with things, no matter how large a company is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 05/02/2008

What does this picture of Clinton have to do with Microsoft?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 05/02/2008

MiniMSFT is an interesting place to see what some Microsoft employees thing about the acquisition. It's run by an anonymous employee, and a lot of other current and ex-"Softies" post there too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/02/2008
photo

Obamamo above has said it... the press brief should read.... We are going Hi_Liary about Yahoo... Yahoo Media Portal and Election coverage is leaning on the right... loads of Fox videos and crazy female Rush Limbaugh...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 05/02/2008

Too bad...I really liked Yahoo and now Microsoft will probably destroy the essence of what made Yahoo a pretty decent product...Let's hope that as opposed to most hostile takeovers - Microsoft management does NOT come in as the arrogant "owners" of the Yahoo employees, dismantle the organization without taking the time to understand the core structure or culture under believing that as Microsoft we must "know" better because we were able to buy them. Because Mr. Ballmer, let's face it - If Microsoft really did have the expertise, skill and talent they would have already created a successful online presence/search that would have competitively beat Yahoo...but you didn’t. Hotmail/Windows Live is a usability mess/failure – so hopefully you allow the Yahoo Management/Creative team take the lead on that angle…(No, I don't work for Yahoo)

At some point when will those "yahoo's" (pun intended) on Wall Street, most who have never really worked in a large corporate that actually makes a tangible product, understand that hostile takeovers may temporarily benefit to the share holders - but are generally a long-term disaster for the companies involved as there’s a high rate of failure. Merging two successful organizations with unique cultures is tough, near impossible thing and most corporate leadership lack the necessary skills to successfully do this...However, as we all know, way before the point of failure the investors who architect the deal have already jumped with the $$ in their pocket...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 05/02/2008
- dora rice I'm a Fan of dora rice 13 fans permalink
photo

yahoo hasn't been a decent product for the last 3 years or more. A arrogant company who didn't care less about the consumer. We all are gaming at yahoo and it's awful how they support cheating and
never cared about fixing their games but took millions from their sponsors. Msn is not perfect, but
they are professional and it's time they ripp this stock that was once 435 dollars a share and is now down to 29.00. Good writtens yahoo. You had your time in the sun and didn't use it wisely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 05/02/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect